AzTrials
AzTrials

Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (INPH)Phase 4FLOURISHNCT07447479

Functional Outcomes After LumbOpenitoneal Shunt Placement UndeR Local Anesthesia for Patients With Idiopathic Normal preSsure Hydrocephalus (FLOURISH) Trial

A Phase 4 study testing ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery under general anesthesia and lumbar-peritoneal shunt procedure under local anesthesia in people with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (INPH), run by Institute for Clinical Effectiveness, Japan at 1 site in Japan.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a prospective observational registry study that enrolls all patients aged 60 years or older suspected of having idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus based on the Third Edition of the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and older
What is being tested?
ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery under general anesthesia and lumbar-peritoneal shunt procedure under local anesthesia
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteJapan
Study dates
1 Apr 2026to 31 Mar 2031
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Probable iNPH patients
  • Age 60 years or older at the time of the tap test
  • Patients capable of performing the Timed Up and Go test
  • Patients assignable within 2 weeks (14 days) of obtaining RCT consent
  • Patients capable of undergoing shunt surgery within 1 month (30 days) of assignment
  • Patients capable of follow-up at the assigned facility or referring facility for 12 months after assignment
  • Patients for whom informed consent was obtained

Who cannot join

  • Patients deemed unsuitable for lumbar-abdominal shunt surgery due to advanced degeneration of the lumbar spine and spinal canal, etc.
  • Patients deemed unsuitable for abdominal shunt surgery due to a history of multiple open abdominal surgeries, a history of severe intra-abdominal infection, etc.
  • Other patients deemed unsuitable by the attending physician

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Japan1 site
  • Nadogaya Hospital

    Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-0084

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: Functional Outcomes After Lumbopenitoneal Shunt Placement Under Local Anesthesia for Patients With Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Trial

This study is a prospective observational registry study that enrolls all patients aged 60 years or older suspected of having idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus based on the Third Edition of the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. From the cohort registered, patients judged to be candidates for surgery based on the 3rd Edition of the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. These patients will be randomized 1:1 to undergo either ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery under general anesthesia or lumbar peritoneal shunt surgery under local anesthesia. A randomized clinical trial would attest the non-inferiority of lumbar peritoneal shunt surgery under local anesthesia compared to ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery under general anesthesia regarding the improvement in timed up-and-go test scores at 3 months post-surgery relative to pre-surgery levels.

Being tested
ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery under general anesthesia, lumbar-peritoneal shunt procedure under local anesthesia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery under general anesthesiaProcedure or surgery

    ventriculoperitoneal shunt procedure was performed via right posterior horn puncture under general anesthesia

  • lumbar-peritoneal shunt procedure under local anesthesiaProcedure or surgery

    Pentazocine and midazolam are administered intravenously to induce conscious sedation, and a lumbar-peritoneal shunt procedure is performed using local infiltration anesthesia with 1% lidocaine.

Study groups in NCT07447479
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery under general anesthesia (GA-VPS group)Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery under general anesthesia
lumbar-peritoneal shunt surgery under local anesthesia (LA-LPS group)Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: lumbar-peritoneal shunt procedure under local anesthesia

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in timed up and go test score

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist score

    0-8 scale (0 best and 8 worst)

    Measured: 24 hours

  2. 10% or greater improvement in the timed up and go score

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Change in timed up and go score

    Measured: 1 month

  4. Change in timed up and go score

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Change in timed up and go score

    Measured: 12 months

  6. Change in average walking speed measured by the 10-meter walk test

    Measured: 3 months

  7. Change in Tinetti scale score

    Tinetti scale score is 0-28 scale (28 best and 0 worst)

    Measured: 3 months

  8. Change in modified Rankin Scale score

    modified Rankin Scale score 0-6 (0 completely independent and 6 death)

    Measured: 3 months

  9. Change in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire score

    Overactive Bladder Questionnaire score has two components of Symptom Bother Scale and HRQoL Scale.

    Symptom Bother Scale: The 8 items are scored from 1 ("Not at all") to 6 ("A very great deal"). The scores are then summed to produce a total score ranging from 8 to 48, where higher scores indicate greater symptom bother.

    HRQoL Scale: The 25 items are scored from 1 ("All of the time" / "Extremely") to 6 ("None of the time" / "Not at all"). Importantly, these items are reverse-scored before being summed. The total and subscale scores are then transformed to a 0-100 scale. On this scale, higher scores reflect a better health-related quality of life.

    Measured: 3 month

  10. Change in Mini-Mental State Exam scores

    Mini-Mental State Exam scores ranges 0-30 (30 best and 0 worst)

    Measured: 3 months

  11. Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment--Japanese Version scores

    Montreal Cognitive Assessment--Japanese Version scores ranges 0-30 (30 best and 0 worst)

    Measured: 3 months

  12. Change in 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L)

    0-1 (0 worst and 1 best quality of life)

    Measured: 3 months

  13. Change in 5-level EuroQoL 5D (VAS)

    0-100 (0 worst and 100 best quality of life)

    Measured: 3 months

  14. Days from surgery to discharge

    Measured: 3 months

  15. Days of ambulation after surgery

    Measured: 7 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Mar 2026
  2. Study start1 Apr 2026
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2031 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Before the enrolment of participants, the principal investigator was fired, and the study site did not allow the continuation of the study.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07447479
Sponsor's protocol ID
ICE_2026_01R
Other IDs
5246
Acronym
FLOURISH
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
22 Feb 2026
Last updated
21 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery under general anesthesia and lumbar-peritoneal shunt procedure under local anesthesia in people with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (INPH), run by Institute for Clinical Effectiveness, Japan at 1 site in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in timed up and go test score (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in