AzTrials
AzTrials

Fixation of Lateral Malleolus in Ankle Fracture Type A&B by Plate Versus Intramedullary ScrewNCT07447336

Plate Versus Intramedullary Screw for Lateral Malleolus Fracture in Ankle Fracture Type A&B

A study testing Fixation of lateral malleolar fracture in Danis_Weber_A&B fracture ankle by plate versus intramedullary screw fixation in people with Fixation of Lateral Malleolus in Ankle Fracture Type A&B by Plate Versus Intramedullary Screw, run by Sohag University at 1 site in Egypt.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to compare the short term : Clinical, radiographic and functional outcome, and healing time and rate of complications between fixation of lateral malleolar fracture in Danis_Weber_A\&B fracture ankle by plate versus intramedullary screw fixation Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
What is being tested?
Fixation of lateral malleolar fracture in Danis_Weber_A&B fracture ankle by plate versus intramedullary screw fixation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
52 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
5 Mar 2026to 5 Feb 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Displaced , unstable lateral malleolar fractures Weber type A or B,
  • either isolated or associated with medial or posterior malleolar fractures .
  • Age group : [18_60 years old Patients]
  • Male or female patient

Who cannot join

  • 1. Associated syndesmotic injury
  • 2open fractures 3. neuropathic disorders 4. paralytic disorders
  • 5 Osteoporotic fractures 6. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes
  • 7 Comminuted fractures

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Ahmed Mohamed Hemdan, Principal investigator contact

+201140113008

ahmadmohdelrashedy@gmail.com

Egypt1 site
  • Faculty of Medecine ,Sohag University

    Sohag

    Ahmed Mohamed Hemdan, Principal investigator, +201140113008, ahmadmohdelrashedy@gmail.com

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Fixation of Lateral Malleolus in Danis_Weber A&B Ankle Fracture by Plate Versus Intramedullary Screw: A Comparative Study

The aim of this study is to compare the short term :

Clinical, radiographic and functional outcome, and healing time and rate of complications between fixation of lateral malleolar fracture in Danis_Weber_A\&B fracture ankle by plate versus intramedullary screw fixation

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to compare the short term :

Clinical, radiographic and functional outcome, and healing time and rate of complications between fixation of lateral malleolar fracture in Danis_Weber_A\&B fracture ankle by plate versus intramedullary screw fixation Study will occur at Orthopaedics and Traumatology department Sohag University Hospitals .Study will be done on about 52 participants selected randomly

Being tested
Fixation of lateral malleolar fracture in Danis_Weber_A&B fracture ankle by plate versus intramedullary screw fixation
Keywords
Lateral malleolus,type A&B ,plate,intramedullary screw

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fixation of lateral malleolar fracture in Danis_Weber_A&B fracture ankle by plate versus intramedullary screw fixationProcedure or surgery

    under spinal anaesthesia. A suitable broad_spectrum antibiotic will be given with induction of anaesthesia. Patients will be positioned supine on a standard radiolucent operation table, under image intensifier guidance. A pneumatic tourniquet will be placed on the thigh and inflated .

    Plate fixation group:

    A straight incision made over the lateral malleolus . Then, blunt dissection through subcutaneous fat made to avoid injury to the superficial peroneal nerve. The periosteum dissected away to allow clean inspection of the fracture fragments. After the fracture reduced, plate applied to the lateral side of the lateral malleolus and held to the bone by a plate holder. The plate secured to the bone by screws above the fracture site and below it . Wounds then closed in layers before adding a sterile gauze dressing.

    Intramedullary Screw group:

    Under image intensifier guidance, closed reduction achieved by inverting and internally rotating the foot

Study groups in NCT07447336
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group (A) : plate fixation for lateral malleolus fractureActive comparatorfixation of lateral malleolar fracture in Danis_Weber_A\&B fracture ankle by plate(Group A) versus intramedullary screw fixation (Group B)
Receives: Procedure: Fixation of lateral malleolar fracture in Danis_Weber_A&B fracture ankle by plate versus intramedullary screw fixation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. compare the short term : Clinical, radiographic and functional outcome, and healing time and rate of complications between fixation of lateral malleolar fracture in Danis_Weber_A&B fracture ankle by plate versus intramedullary screw fixation

    compare the short term : Clinical, radiographic and functional outcome, and healing time and rate of complications between fixation of lateral malleolar fracture in Danis_Weber_A\&B fracture ankle by ORIF and plate fixation versus intramedullary screw fixation .Study will occur at Orthopaedics and Traumatology department Sohag University Hospitals .Study will be done on about 52 participants Functional outcome evaluated by Manchester_Oxford Foot Questionnaire(MOXFQ) scoring system: comprises three dimensions (pain, standing/walking, social interaction ) and also by VAS(Visual Analogue score)is a 10-cm (

    ) straight line used to measure subjective intensity of pain, fatigue, or mood, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 or 100 representing "worst imaginable pain" American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score is a 100-point clinical rating system (0-100, with higher being better) designed to evaluate pain (40 pts), function (50 pts), and alignment (10 pts) for foot and ankle

    Measured: 4months,6months,9months,1year after treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Mar 2026
  2. Study start5 Mar 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion5 Nov 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion5 Feb 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
The aim of this study is to compare the short term : Clinical, radiographic and functional outcome, and healing time and rate of complications between fixation of lateral malleolar fracture in Danis\_Weber\_A\&B fracture ankle by plate(Group A) and another group intramedullary screw fixation (Group B) Study will occur at Orthopaedics and Traumatology department Sohag University Hospitals .Study will be done on about 52 participants selected randomly
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
52 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07447336
Sponsor's protocol ID
Soh_Med_26_2_2MS
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
20 Feb 2026
Last updated
11 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Fixation of lateral malleolar fracture in Danis_Weber_A&B fracture ankle by plate versus intramedullary screw fixation in people with Fixation of Lateral Malleolus in Ankle Fracture Type A&B by Plate Versus Intramedullary Screw, run by Sohag University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ahmed Mohamed Hemdan, Principal investigator (+201140113008, ahmadmohdelrashedy@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

compare the short term : Clinical, radiographic and functional outcome, and healing time and rate of complications between fixation of lateral malleolar fracture in Danis_Weber_A&B fracture ankle by plate versus intramedullary screw fixation (time frame: 4months,6months,9months,1year after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in