AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornNCT07442669

Utilization of Lung Ultrasound Score in Decision for Minimally Invasive Surfactant Administration

A study testing Lung ultrasound in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn and Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant, run by Hackensack Meridian Health at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This prospective randomized controlled study aims to determine if using a lung ultrasound score can lead to a faster diagnosis of severe respiratory distress syndrome and quicker administration of surfactant in moderately and late-preterm infants. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 27 to 34 weeks
What is being tested?
Lung ultrasound
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
18 Aug 2026to 17 Aug 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 27 to 34 weeks
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Inborn at 27 0/7 to 34 6/7 weeks of gestational age
  • Spontaneously breathing at birth but requiring non-invasive respiratory support
  • RDS diagnosed on chest x-ray (diffuse, bilateral, fine granular opacities in lungs, air bronchograms) or were at risk of developing RDS

Who cannot join

  • Outborn
  • Endotracheal intubation in the delivery room or within 2 hours of life
  • Surfactant in the delivery room as part of advanced resuscitation
  • Presence of major congenital malformations or chromosomal anomalies
  • Hydrops fetalis
  • Inherited disorders of metabolism
  • Air leak syndrome (pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum) prior to surfactant administration, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, congenital pneumonia, meconium aspiration syndrome
  • Infants in extremis not expected to survive

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Jeanette Buljevich Haugh contact

5519963457

jeanette.haugh@hmhn.org

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hackensack Univeristy Medical Center

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Utilization of Lung Ultrasound Score in Decision for Minimally Invasive Surfactant Administration: A Pilot Study

This prospective randomized controlled study aims to determine if using a lung ultrasound score can lead to a faster diagnosis of severe respiratory distress syndrome and quicker administration of surfactant in moderately and late-preterm infants. The research will involve 100 infants, with 67 in the prospective group and 33 serving as controls.

The primary goal is to shorten the time to treatment for these vulnerable newborns. The study will also assess whether this ultrasound-guided approach improves short-term respiratory outcomes. These secondary objectives include measuring any decrease in the need for and duration of mechanical ventilation, the length of non-invasive respiratory support, and the overall need for oxygen.

The study population includes infants born between 27 and 34 6/7 weeks of gestation who are admitted to the NICU. Each participant will be monitored from birth until they are discharged or transferred. This research aligns with a growing body of evidence suggesting that lung ultrasound can be a valuable tool in neonatal care, potentially leading to earlier and more precise treatment for respiratory distress syndrome.

Read the detailed description

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a frequently diagnosed disorder in premature infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). It is caused by pulmonary immaturity and surfactant deficiency that result in increased alveolar collapse, mismatched ventilation-perfusion and ultimately hypoxia in neonates. Historically, early administration of exogenous surfactant via endotracheal tube has become the mainstay treatment and management of RDS. However, studies have shown neonates receiving invasive mechanical ventilation have higher incidence of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), causing a recent shift to increased use of non-invasive respiratory support for management of RDS. The use of early nasal ventilation and increasing mean airway pressure to improve alveolar stability and functional residual capacity (FRC) helps to improve fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) requirements even in the surfactant-deficient infant. This creates a dilemma for neonatologists. It is challenging to determine the severity of RDS in the first hours of life. Current standard is to use a combination of supplemental FiO2 requirement, work of breathing and chest x-ray to assess the need for surfactant replacement therapy (SRT) because there is a subset of infants who will fail non-invasive support and require intubation. Even with improvement in non-invasive RDS management, predicting surfactant deficiency before the deterioration of neonate would allow for earlier SRT and likely improve respiratory outcomes.

Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is a common modality used in emergency medicine and is a rapidly emerging area of clinical research in neonatal medicine. Lung ultrasound has been shown to provide quick, reliable information via a noninvasive bedside technique in dynamically changing lungs. POCUS in neonatology has been shown to diagnose RDS earlier than waiting for chest x-ray and clinical changes. Studies have shown ultrasound can identify surfactant deficiency before clinical deterioration and decrease need for mechanical ventilation.

With this study, it is proposed to use lung ultrasound with a calculated lung ultrasound score (LUS) to assess severity of RDS and identify surfactant deficiency earlier than current practice of using supplemental FiO2 requirement and clinical status. This will allow earlier SRT, potentially improving short term respiratory outcomes and possibly longer term such as BPD. Similarly, it is proposed to investigate the potential synergy of early SRT using lung ultrasound and non-invasive administration of surfactant in positively impacting respiratory outcomes in moderately preterm and late preterm infants.

Being tested
Lung ultrasound
Keywords
Respiratory Distress, Lung ultrasound, Surfactant Administration
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Dyspnea

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lung ultrasoundDiagnostic test

    Lung ultrasounds informing the decision-making on the Surfactant Administration

Study groups in NCT07442669
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lung Ultrasound (LUS)ExperimentalThe lung ultrasound will be performed within 2 hours of life scanning 6 anatomic lung zones. The lung ultrasound (LUS) score will be calculated in a longitudinal and transverse scan by dividing each lung into 3 different areas: upper-anterior, lower-anterior, and lateral. Every lung section will be scored 0-3 points. The total LUS score will range from 0 to 18 points according to the severity of the lung pattern. Examinations will be performed in the supine position. Lung ultrasound scores will be performed by neonatologist-researchers. A LUS score of 6 in < 28 week gestation and 8 in > 28 week gestation is the cut-off for initiating surfactant treatment. If the LUS score is > 6 in neonates < 28 weeks gestation, or > 8 in those > 28 weeks gestation, surfactant treatment will be administered. If a neonate in the LUS group does not meet criteria for SRT based on the lung ultrasound score, SRT may be administered per the clinician's discretion at any time.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Lung ultrasound
Standard of care (SOC)No interventionThe standard of care group may have surfactant administered per clinician discretion. Standard diagnostic testing including CXR and blood gas will be performed per SOC. Current accepted practice in the NICU is to utilize a composite of chest x-ray interpretation, assessment of work of breathing, degree of respiratory support and FiO2 requirement (typically Fi02 35%) to guide SRT.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to Lung Ultrasound

    To assess the feasibility of the lung ultrasound, this metric measures the elapsed time from birth to the administration of the lung ultrasound.

    Measured: From date of birth to until the date/time of the lung ultrasound or date of death from any cause, assessed up to 1 week of life

  2. Time to surfactant administration via LISA method

    Neonates who underwent evaluation with lung ultrasound and received a LUS of 6 or greater in < 28 week gestation and total LUS of 8 or greater in > 28 week gestation will receive exogenous surfactant via the LISA method. The time to surfactant administration will be calculated from time of birth to time receiving therapy in hours.

    Measured: From date of birth to until the date/time of first documented progression (surfactant administration) or date of death from any cause, assessed up to 1 week of life

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Need for mechanical ventilation during first 5 days

    Neonates will be followed during NICU stay and evaluate if neonates require intubation for mechanical ventilation during the first 5 days of life. This metric will be a binary outcome with "Yes" for neonates that required mechanical ventilation during the first 5 days of life and "No" for neonates that did not require mechanical ventilation or received mechanical ventilation after the 5 day period. The first 5 days of life will be defined as ≤ 120 hours.

    Measured: First 5 days of life

  2. Duration of respiratory support during NICU hospitalization

    Neonates will be followed during NICU stay and duration of respiratory support (invasive and non-invasive defined as greater than 1L flow) will be calculated by the start of respiratory support until discontinuation of all respiratory support for a 24-hour period.

    Measured: Duration of respiratory support during NICU stay, up to 100 days

  3. Duration of supplemental oxygen administration

    The preterm neonates admitted to NICU with confirmed diagnosis of RDS and received surfactant administration will be followed during the remainder of NICU stay. The duration of supplemental oxygen administration will be calculated from the start of receiving supplemental oxygen to until discontinuation supplemental oxygen administration for a 24-hour period.

    Measured: Duration of receiving supplemental oxygen during NICU stay, up to 100 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Mar 2026
  2. Study start18 Aug 2026
  3. Primary completion17 Aug 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion17 Aug 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07442669
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro2025-0038
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
11 Feb 2026
Last updated
19 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Lung ultrasound in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn and Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant, run by Hackensack Meridian Health at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jeanette Buljevich Haugh (5519963457, jeanette.haugh@hmhn.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to Lung Ultrasound (time frame: From date of birth to until the date/time of the lung ultrasound or date of death from any cause, assessed up to 1 week of life). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in