Physical PerformanceNCT07440615
Lower-Limb Muscle Mass and Cardiovascular and Muscular Performance in Males and Females
A study testing Physical Performance Assessment in people with Physical Performance and Leg Muscle Mass, run by Uludag University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The aim of this study will be to examine the relationship between leg muscle mass and muscle strength, aerobic capacity, anaerobic power, and jumping performance in young adults. In addition, these physical performance measures will be compared between male and female participants. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 30 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Physical Performance, Leg Muscle Mass, Muscle Strength
- What is being tested?
- Physical Performance Assessment
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 235 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 20 Feb 2026to 15 Aug 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 30 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- absent of lower body injuries that could impact testing;
- were moderately physically active
- did not ingest ergogenic aids or stimulant drugs for at least 6 months prior to the start of the study.
Who cannot join
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Aeromedical Research and Training Center (ARTC)
Eskişehir, 26000
Tuncay ALPARSLAN, Assoc. Prof., +905058221661, tuncayalparslan@hotmail.com
About this study
Official title: The Relationship Between Lower-limb Muscle Mass and Cardiovascular and Muscular Performance in Males and Females.
The aim of this study will be to examine the relationship between leg muscle mass and muscle strength, aerobic capacity, anaerobic power, and jumping performance in young adults. In addition, these physical performance measures will be compared between male and female participants.
Recreationally active young adults will be recruited to participate in the study. Body weight and leg muscle mass will be assessed using a body composition analyzer. Participants will perform isokinetic and isometric leg strength tests, an aerobic fitness test (VO₂max), an anaerobic power test (Wingate), and a countermovement jump (CMJ) test.
This study aims to improve the understanding of the effects of leg muscle mass on physical performance and to identify possible differences between males and females. The findings are expected to contribute to exercise prescription, performance assessment, and future research in sports and health sciences.
- Conditions
- Physical Performance, Leg Muscle Mass, Muscle Strength, Aerobic Capacity, Anaerobic Power, Jumping Performance in Young Adults
- Being tested
- Physical Performance Assessment
- Keywords
- lean mass, isokinetic, isometric, aerobic capacity, force
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Physical Performance AssessmentOther
Muscle Isokinetic Strength Testing, Leg Muscle Mass, and Aerobic and Anaerobic Performance Testing, Contermovement Jump
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Young Adult Participants Healthy Recreationally Active Adults | Experimental | Male and Female Participant Receives: Other: Physical Performance Assessment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Leg Muscle Mass-Related Physical Performance Measures
Measurement tool: Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer (InBody 270, Biospace Co., South Korea) Description: Segmental lower-limb muscle mass (kg) measured using multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis.
Unit: kg Time Frame: Baseline (single assessment)
Measured: Baseline
Muscle Isokinetic Strength
Measurement tool: Isokinetic dynamometer (Humac Norm, Computer Sports Medicine Inc., USA) Description: Peak torque of dominant leg knee flexors and extensors measured at 60°·s-¹ and normalized to body weight.
Unit: Nm·kg-¹ Time Frame: Baseline
Measured: Baseline
Anaerobic Power
Measurement tool: Wingate Anaerobic Test performed on cycle ergometer (Wattbike WPM Model B, UK) Description: Relative peak anaerobic power calculated during 30-s Wingate test and normalized to body weight.
Unit: W·kg-¹ Time Frame: Baseline
Measured: Baseline
Countremovement Jump
Measurement tool: SmartJump contact mat system (Fusion Sport, Queensland, Australia) Description: Vertical jump height measured during the Countermovement Jump test. Jump height is calculated automatically from flight time using the SmartJump performance measurement system.
Scale description: Countermovement Jump Height (centimeters). Typical physiological range in healthy young adults is approximately 10-60 cm.
Interpretation: Higher values indicate better lower-body explosive performance. Unit: cm Time Frame: Baseline (up to 8 weeks)
Measured: Baseline
Aerobic Capacity
Measurement tool: Breath-by-breath metabolic gas analyzer (Cosmed Quark CPET) during Bruce treadmill protocol Description: Maximal oxygen consumption determined according to standard VO₂max criteria.
Unit: ml·kg-¹·min-¹ Time Frame: Baseline
Measured: Baseline
Muscle Isometric Strength
Measurement tool: Leg dynamometer (Takei T.K.K. 5402, Takei Scientific Instruments, Japan) Description: Maximal voluntary isometric force normalized to body weight. Highest value of three trials recorded.
Unit: kg·kg-¹ Time Frame: Baseline
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Feb 2026
- Study start20 Feb 2026
- Primary completion5 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Aug 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Physical PerformanceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 235 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Uludag University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ramiz ARABACI, Uludag University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07440615
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E-87914409-050.04-87583
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 9 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Amaral JF, Alvim FC, Castro EA, Doimo LA, Silva MV, Novo Junior JM. Influence of aging on isometric muscle strength, fat-free mass and electromyographic signal power of the upper and lower limbs in women. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014 Mar-Apr;18(2):183-90. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552012005000145. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
PubMed 24676705Boraczynski M, Boraczynski T, Podstawski R, Wojcik Z, Gronek P. Relationships Between Measures of Functional and Isometric Lower Body Strength, Aerobic Capacity, Anaerobic Power, Sprint and Countermovement Jump Performance in Professional Soccer Players. J Hum Kinet. 2020 Oct 31;75:161-175. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2020-0045. eCollection 2020 Oct.
PubMed 33312304Bullo V, Roma E, Gobbo S, Duregon F, Bergamo M, Bianchini G, Doria E, Cugusi L, Blasio AD, Bocalini DS, Ermolao A, Bergamin M. Lower Limb Strength Profile in Elderly with Different Pathologies: Comparisons with Healthy Subjects. Geriatrics (Basel). 2020 Oct 22;5(4):83. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics5040083.
PubMed 33105620Comfort P, McMahon JJ, Lake JP, Ripley NJ, Triplett NT, Haff GG. Relative strength explains the differences in multi-joint rapid force production between sexes. PLoS One. 2024 Feb 15;19(2):e0296877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296877. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 38359039Cuesta-Vargas A, Gonzalez-Sanchez M. Correlation between architectural variables and torque in the erector spinae muscle during maximal isometric contraction. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(19):1797-804. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.924054. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
PubMed 24903060Driller MW, Argus CK, Shing CM. The reliability of a 30-s sprint test on the Wattbike cycle ergometer. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013 Jul;8(4):379-83. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.8.4.379.
PubMed 23863304Farinatti P, Castinheiras Neto AG, Amorim PR. Oxygen Consumption and Substrate Utilization During and After Resistance Exercises Performed with Different Muscle Mass. Int J Exerc Sci. 2016 Jan 15;9(1):77-88. doi: 10.70252/AKBM3973. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27293507Harris-Love MO, Benson K, Leasure E, Adams B, McIntosh V. The Influence of Upper and Lower Extremity Strength on Performance-Based Sarcopenia Assessment Tests. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2018 Dec;3(4):53. doi: 10.3390/jfmk3040053. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
PubMed 30533549Laffaye G, Wagner PP, Tombleson TI. Countermovement jump height: gender and sport-specific differences in the force-time variables. J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Apr;28(4):1096-105. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a1db03.
PubMed 23838969
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Relationship Between Lower-limb Muscle Mass and Cardiovascular and Muscular Performance in Males and Females.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07440615
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E-87914409-050.04-87583
- Conditions
- Physical Performance, Leg Muscle Mass, Muscle Strength, Aerobic Capacity, Anaerobic Power, Jumping Performance in Young Adults
- Keywords
- lean mass, isokinetic, isometric, aerobic capacity, force
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 235 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Uludag UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study will be to examine the relationship between leg muscle mass and muscle strength, aerobic capacity, anaerobic power, and jumping performance in young adults. In addition, these physical performance measures will be compared between male and female participants.
Recreationally active young adults will be recruited to participate in the study. Body weight and leg muscle mass will be assessed using a body composition analyzer. Participants will perform isokinetic and isometric leg strength tests, an aerobic fitness test (VO₂max), an anaerobic power test (Wingate), and a countermovement jump (CMJ) test.
This study aims to improve the understanding of the effects of leg muscle mass on physical performance and to identify possible differences between males and females. The findings are expected to contribute to exercise prescription, performance assessment, and future research in sports and health sciences.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Young Adult Participants Healthy Recreationally Active Adults | Experimental | Other: Physical Performance AssessmentMale and Female Participant |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 30 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- absent of lower body injuries that could impact testing;
- were moderately physically active
- did not ingest ergogenic aids or stimulant drugs for at least 6 months prior to the start of the study.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Performance AssessmentMuscle Isokinetic Strength Testing, Leg Muscle Mass, and Aerobic and Anaerobic Performance Testing, Contermovement Jump | Other | Young Adult Participants Healthy Recreationally Active Adults |
Primary outcome
Leg Muscle Mass-Related Physical Performance Measures
Time frame: Baseline
Measurement tool: Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer (InBody 270, Biospace Co., South Korea) Description: Segmental lower-limb muscle mass (kg) measured using multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. Unit: kg Time Frame: Baseline (single assessment)
Muscle Isokinetic Strength
Time frame: Baseline
Measurement tool: Isokinetic dynamometer (Humac Norm, Computer Sports Medicine Inc., USA) Description: Peak torque of dominant leg knee flexors and extensors measured at 60°·s-¹ and normalized to body weight. Unit: Nm·kg-¹ Time Frame: Baseline
Anaerobic Power
Time frame: Baseline
Measurement tool: Wingate Anaerobic Test performed on cycle ergometer (Wattbike WPM Model B, UK) Description: Relative peak anaerobic power calculated during 30-s Wingate test and normalized to body weight. Unit: W·kg-¹ Time Frame: Baseline
Countremovement Jump
Time frame: Baseline
Measurement tool: SmartJump contact mat system (Fusion Sport, Queensland, Australia) Description: Vertical jump height measured during the Countermovement Jump test. Jump height is calculated automatically from flight time using the SmartJump performance measurement system. Scale description: Countermovement Jump Height (centimeters). Typical physiological range in healthy young adults is approximately 10-60 cm. Interpretation: Higher values indicate better lower-body explosive performance. Unit: cm Time Frame: Baseline (up to 8 weeks)
Aerobic Capacity
Time frame: Baseline
Measurement tool: Breath-by-breath metabolic gas analyzer (Cosmed Quark CPET) during Bruce treadmill protocol Description: Maximal oxygen consumption determined according to standard VO₂max criteria. Unit: ml·kg-¹·min-¹ Time Frame: Baseline
Muscle Isometric Strength
Time frame: Baseline
Measurement tool: Leg dynamometer (Takei T.K.K. 5402, Takei Scientific Instruments, Japan) Description: Maximal voluntary isometric force normalized to body weight. Highest value of three trials recorded. Unit: kg·kg-¹ Time Frame: Baseline
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 24676705Amaral JF, Alvim FC, Castro EA, Doimo LA, Silva MV, Novo Junior JM. Influence of aging on isometric muscle strength, fat-free mass and electromyographic signal power of the upper and lower limbs in women. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014 Mar-Apr;18(2):183-90. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552012005000145. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
- Background: PubMed 33312304Boraczynski M, Boraczynski T, Podstawski R, Wojcik Z, Gronek P. Relationships Between Measures of Functional and Isometric Lower Body Strength, Aerobic Capacity, Anaerobic Power, Sprint and Countermovement Jump Performance in Professional Soccer Players. J Hum Kinet. 2020 Oct 31;75:161-175. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2020-0045. eCollection 2020 Oct.
- Background: PubMed 33105620Bullo V, Roma E, Gobbo S, Duregon F, Bergamo M, Bianchini G, Doria E, Cugusi L, Blasio AD, Bocalini DS, Ermolao A, Bergamin M. Lower Limb Strength Profile in Elderly with Different Pathologies: Comparisons with Healthy Subjects. Geriatrics (Basel). 2020 Oct 22;5(4):83. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics5040083.
- Background: PubMed 38359039Comfort P, McMahon JJ, Lake JP, Ripley NJ, Triplett NT, Haff GG. Relative strength explains the differences in multi-joint rapid force production between sexes. PLoS One. 2024 Feb 15;19(2):e0296877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296877. eCollection 2024.
- Background: PubMed 24903060Cuesta-Vargas A, Gonzalez-Sanchez M. Correlation between architectural variables and torque in the erector spinae muscle during maximal isometric contraction. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(19):1797-804. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.924054. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
- Background: PubMed 23863304Driller MW, Argus CK, Shing CM. The reliability of a 30-s sprint test on the Wattbike cycle ergometer. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013 Jul;8(4):379-83. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.8.4.379.
- Background: PubMed 27293507Farinatti P, Castinheiras Neto AG, Amorim PR. Oxygen Consumption and Substrate Utilization During and After Resistance Exercises Performed with Different Muscle Mass. Int J Exerc Sci. 2016 Jan 15;9(1):77-88. doi: 10.70252/AKBM3973. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 30533549Harris-Love MO, Benson K, Leasure E, Adams B, McIntosh V. The Influence of Upper and Lower Extremity Strength on Performance-Based Sarcopenia Assessment Tests. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2018 Dec;3(4):53. doi: 10.3390/jfmk3040053. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
- Background: PubMed 23838969Laffaye G, Wagner PP, Tombleson TI. Countermovement jump height: gender and sport-specific differences in the force-time variables. J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Apr;28(4):1096-105. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a1db03.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Physical Performance
RecruitingObservational study
Effects of Obesity on Physical Abilities and Daily Living Activities in Elderly Adults
Obesity, Sarcopenic Obesity
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Postural Control and Balance Performance in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Postural Assessment
RecruitingObservational study
A Post-Market Assessment of the Safety and Performance of the TriClip™ System
Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR)
Not yet recruiting
Motor Imagery and Turning Practice to Improve Mobility: Pilot Trial
Mobility Impairment, Community Dwelling Older Adults
Recruiting
Acute Effects of Post-Exercise Hyperoxia on Recovery in Cycling
Athletic Performance, Hyperbaric Oxygenation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Physical Performance Assessment in people with Physical Performance and Leg Muscle Mass, run by Uludag University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Tuncay ALPARSLAN, Assoc.Prof. (Türkiye ext. 5058221661, tuncayalparslan@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Leg Muscle Mass-Related Physical Performance Measures (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07440615, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jun 2026.