HIV PreventionNCT07433985
California MEPS Hub
A study testing Mobile Enhanced Prevention Support (MEPS) in people with HIV Prevention and Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI), run by University of California, Los Angeles at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The California Hub for HIV/SUD Prevention Research with Reentry Populations addresses the question: "Can the evidence-based MEPS intervention be adapted and implemented at a range of organizations to effectively serve a wider range of clients?" The Mobile Enhanced Prevention Support (MEPS) intervention was originally… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 59 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Prevention, Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI), Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)
- What is being tested?
- Mobile Enhanced Prevention Support (MEPS)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 318 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2025to 31 Jul 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 59 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- RCT Participants
- Assigned male at birth
- Ages 18 - 59
- Was released from incarceration in the previous 12 months (incarceration is defined as a stay in jail, prison, or detention centers for over 24 hours)
- Reports an SUD diagnosis or seeking SUD services at any time in the 24 months prior to enrollment
- During the 24 months prior to enrollment, either:
Show all 15Show fewer
- Reports intercourse with a person assigned male at birth
- Reports injection drug use
- Has not received an HIV diagnosis (based on self-report)
- Possesses a smartphone or plans to obtain one
- Plans to reside within designated jurisdictions (counties) for the 9 months following enrollment
- CBO and agency staff participating in implementation surveys or interviews
- >=18 years of age
- Employed at a study site or otherwise involved with intervention implementation and/or maintenance OR works at an agency in the counties where the study is taking place (Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Alameda counties, California).
- Willing to provide informed consent for participation.
Who cannot join
- RCT Participants:
- Does not have a smart phone and is not willing to obtain one
- Is not able to speak and understand English
- Has insufficient reading skills to operate a mobile application on a cell phone
- CBO participating in implementation interviews
- n/a
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
CAL-PEP
Oakland, California, 94608
Lisa Ryan, 424-501-4829 ext. 102, camepshub@mednet.ucla.edu
- Recruiting
Kindful Restoration
Riverside, California, 92504
Ernesto Rodriguez, 424-501-4829, camepshub@mednet.ucla.edu
- Recruiting
Starting Over, Inc
Riverside, California, 92506
Ashley Williams, 424-501-4829, camepshub@mednet.ucla.edu
About this study
Official title: California Hub for HIV/STI/SUD Prevention Research With Reentry Populations
The California Hub for HIV/SUD Prevention Research with Reentry Populations addresses the question: "Can the evidence-based MEPS intervention be adapted and implemented at a range of organizations to effectively serve a wider range of clients?"
The Mobile Enhanced Prevention Support (MEPS) intervention was originally implemented in Los Angeles County and was proven successful in promoting biomedical HIV prevention (PrEP) uptake and preventative screenings in people who used drugs who recently left incarceration. MEPS is an evidence-based intervention for people with substance use disorders (SUD) that incorporates a client-centered planning session, including trained peer mentors, service utilization incentives, and a mobile application (GeoPass).
The study includes a randomized controlled trial (RCT) across three community partners located in Riverside and Alameda Counties. At least 300 people will be enrolled in these three counties; the first 200 will be randomized to either receive the intervention or usual care, with the final 100 all receiving the intervention. The primary implementation outcome for the study involves using an implementation science framework and assessment tools to examine MEPS's implementation. Key outcomes include how well the implementation strategies used support intervention enrollment and retention, integration with existing services in each partnering community agency, and perceived intervention acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, and maintenance at 6- and 12-months. The primary effectiveness outcome for the study is an increase in HIV testing, PrEP uptake and adherence, and SUD service utilization at 6 months and 12 months in the MEPS compared to the usual care group. Secondary effectiveness outcomes include frequency of service use for SUDs, hepatitis C virus testing, and linkage to care for those who test positive for HIV or hepatitis C.
Read the detailed description
The Mobile Enhanced Prevention Support (MEPS) intervention combines three evidence-based components - peer support, a smartphone app (GeoPass), and contingency management in the form of small cash incentives for access services. The overarching goal of this study is to adapt the MEPS to ensure it can achieve its intended objectives for a diverse set of beneficiaries in wider settings and to establish both the tools and an audience for its dissemination. This will include a clinical trial and documentation and dissemination of tailoring and evaluation results. Our prior RCT of the MEPS intervention has shown it to be effective at increasing PrEP uptake and HIV testing among English-speaking participants in Los Angeles County. Now, the primary goal of our Type 3 Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness study is to examine the MEPS implementation in different settings with a greater reach into the population who could benefit, with assessing effectiveness being a secondary goal. It is essential to consider inter-agency differences and their impact in this study.
For the randomized controlled trial, the investigators aim for a sample size of 300 participants across our 3 different study sites. The first 200 individuals enrolled with be randomized to either receive the intervention or be control participants. The last 100 individuals will all receive the intervention as a single arm continuation. Additionally, investigators will recruit 15 CBO partner staff (5 per agency), plus 6 individuals who work at agencies located in the same jurisdictions as the CBO partner staff. Both the CBO partner staff and agency representatives will be asked to participate in surveys and interviews at different time points during the R33 phase.
Client-centered Planning Session/Control Arm All participants, regardless of study arm, will receive the usual care services at the partner agency plus a client-centered planning session following enrollment. This session will be conducted with the person providing clinical supervision to the Peer Mentors at each site and may be conducted by phone, video, or in person. Plans, listing participant goals and tailored referrals, will be offered to the participant in electronic and paper versions. (For MEPS intervention participants, it will also be incorporated into the GeoPass app.)
Follow-up Quantitative Survey UCLA research associates (RAs) will conduct follow-up interviews with RCT participants at 6 and 12 months-post-enrollment. Investigators will use a survey instrument largely consisting of questions developed by the Common Data Element (CDE) workgroup comprised of NIDA CONNECT Network members; this study is one of the funded projects in CONNECT. Some of the survey questions were also carried forward from the original MEPS survey. The survey has the dual purpose of collecting information for the study aims as well as for each participant's needs assessment. The survey includes a comprehensive set of domains using validated measures/scales. Surveys administered at 6 and 12 months will include a set of questions designed to assess perceptions of the intervention (RE-AIM domains: adoption, implementation, and maintenance).
PrEP Adherence Assessment Participants who initiate PrEP (using an estimate derived from the prior MEPS trial, where up to 40% of participants will initiate PrEP) will be asked to choose to provide urine samples at six and 12 months for confirmation of PrEP use and evaluation of PrEP adherence through detection of tenofovir- (TFV, RE-AIM domain: adoption). Collection will be undertaken by partner community-based organization (CBO) agency staff.
Client-centered Planning Session/Intervention Arm (MEPS Overview) Participants enrolling in the study following randomization to the intervention arm will receive the usual care services at the partner agency, the client-centered planning session, plus the MEPS intervention is a 6-month, evidence-based intervention to increase engagement in SUD treatment, harm reduction, and preventive behaviors (including PrEP and PEP uptake and screening for HIV, STIs and HCV). MEPS includes Peer Mentor support, in combination with incentives and the GeoPass application, to facilitate effective goal-setting and tracking of client-centered plans and utilization of services, especially those for HIV/STI/HCV prevention and treatment for SUDs.
The site's clinical supervisor will match a Peer Mentor to each intervention participant, who then works with participants over 14 sessions to address the personal priorities and preventive health needs outlined in the participant's goal planning session. The intervention will also employ the systematic use of incentives to motivate specifically desired behaviors, borrowing elements from a practice known as contingency management (CM) to incentivize a range of activities, including meeting with the peer mentor and screening for STIs and hepatitis C, engaging in activities that fall along the PrEP cascade, and accessing social services, to name some examples (see list of incentives under "financial considerations" section below). Finally, the MEPS intervention will include a smartphone app, called GeoPass, which enables participants to find providers near them, track calendar appointments for planned service utilization, take experience surveys once services are utilized, track progress toward their wellness goals, and view incentive earnings. This project expands the MEPS target population to include cisgender men with a history of injection drug use (IDU) regardless of sexual orientation.
Follow-up In-depth Interview (IDI) Study staff will conduct IDIs with 60 intervention arm participants at the 6- and 12-month timepoint, a subset of participants who complete the quantitative survey at those time points. The investigators will purposely select individuals assigned to the MEPS intervention arm to ensure diversity and representation according to demographics, time, and study site. Those purposefully sampled for the in-depth interview will be approached by a study research assistant at a routine visit to the partner agency and/or will be send a private message through email or text describing the opportunity to participate in an in-depth interview. Those who are interested will be scheduled for the in-depth interview via a phone or video conference using a secure Zoom platform. In-depth interviews will follow a semi-structured interview guide based on the RE-AIM domains. All interviews will be audio recorded (unless declined by the participant). Guided by REAIM domains of adoption, implementation, and maintenance, they will ask about the MEPS experience, whether it motivated engagement in services, preferred aspects of the intervention, challenges with the intervention, and continued utilization of services or other changes after the intervention ended (interviews at 12 months). Inclusion in this activity will be based upon a purposive sample and the participant's willingness and availability and whether the study has achieved the target sample size for IDIs. The interviews will be audio recorded and transcribed for analysis.
Surveys with Clinic Staff and Leadership Surveys will be completed by CBO staff and leadership employed at the study sites at 12 months after intervention launch (n=60). Using the organizational-level measures from the JCOIN core measures (organizational readiness, organizational climate, staff attitudes, implementation outcomes), study investigators will purposefully select and survey five staff members/agency who were involved with MEPS implementation and assess RE-AIM domains related to adoption, implementation, and maintenance, as well as Proctor's IS outcomes (e.g., acceptability). They will ask leadership to recommend other staff at their agency, at which point the investigator will send them personalized links as well.
In-depth Interviews Staff, Leadership, and Other Stakeholders Community partner staff and leadership employed at the study sites, as well as other county agency stakeholders will be interviewed. Study investigators will conduct IDIs with 21 people at 12 months post intervention start to discuss the setting and environment and the intervention's implementation, acceptability, and practicality for routine use (e.g., enhanced/disrupted operations). The investigators will purposefully select staff from a variety of job titles, demographics, and level of involvement with implementation, as well as Peer Mentors. IDIs will be conducted by trained staff using established procedures, with interview guides designed using the primary domains of the RE-AIM framework. The procedures for administering the interviews to CBO partner staff and outside agency staff will be similar.
- Conditions
- HIV Prevention, Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI), Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), Incarceration, Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Substance Use Disorder (SUD)
- Being tested
- Mobile Enhanced Prevention Support (MEPS), Control
- Keywords
- implementation science, contingency management, mobile health technology (mHealth), community based participatory research, type 3 hybrid implementation effectiveness trial, randomized controlled trial
- Medical subject headings
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Hepatitis C, Substance-Related Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mobile Enhanced Prevention Support (MEPS)Behavioural
The 6 month MEPS intervention consists of 14 sessions with a peer mentor over a period of 6 months; up to $600 cash incentives for accessing medical and non-medical services while working the the peer mentor; and a smartphone app to keep track of goals, incentive earnings and provider appointments, a provider search feature, and fill out surveys based on participant experiences with services.
ControlOther
Client-centered goal planning session plus usual care
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MEPS Arm | Experimental | Intervention arm participants receive a client-centered goal planning session following enrollment; 14 sessions with a peer mentor over a period of 6 months; cash incentives for accessing medical and non-medical services; and a smartphone app to keep track of goals, incentive earnings and provider appointments, a provider search feature, and fill-out surveys based on participant experiences with accessing services. Receives: Behavioral: Mobile Enhanced Prevention Support (MEPS) |
| Control Arm | Active comparator | Control arm participants receive a client-centered goal planning session (like the intervention arm), and usual care. Receives: Other: Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Initiate PrEP regimen
Defined as the participant obtaining a prescription for PrEP and self-reporting taking the medication
Measured: 6 and 12 months
Demonstrate adherence to PrEP
Defined as the participant self-reporting taking prescribed PrEP in the previous 3 days. Assessed with a urine test kit that detects the presence of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
Measured: 6 and 12 months
Remain on PrEP for at least 3 months
Defined by self-reported PrEP use for 3 or more months
Measured: 6 and 12 months
Report an HIV test within 6 months of a follow-up interview
Defined as the participant self-reporting having obtained HIV testing within 3 months of the follow-up
Measured: 6 and 12 months
Report a test for HCV
Defined as the participant self-reporting having obtained HIV testing within 3 months of the follow-up
Measured: 6 and 12 months
Engage in substance use treatment in the community
Defined by the participant self-reporting remaining engaged in treatment (i.e., continuing to attend meetings, counseling or other treatment activities) in the 3 months prior to follow-up interviews.
Measured: 6 and 12 months
Reduce substance use
Defined as a reduction in problematic use based Texas Christian University (TCU) Drug Screen 5 for any substance identified at as a problem based on their baseline TCU 5 score
Measured: 6 and 12 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Receive care for newly diagnosed HCV or HIV
Defined as self-report of receiving follow-up care and treatment for any HIV or hepatitis C infections diagnosed during study follow-up
Measured: 6 and 12 months
Access services for overdose prevention and infectious disease control
Defined as self report of having obtained any harm reduction supplies such as naloxone, clean needles, test strips, or smoking supplies in the prior 6 months
Measured: 6 and 12 months
Recidivism
Measure the comparative effectiveness of the intervention on the proportion of participants who report any arrests in the prior 6 months
Measured: 6 and 12 months
Frequency of arrests among those who recividate
Measure the comparative effectiveness of the intervention in reducing recidivism, quantified as total number of arrests over the study period among those who are arrested at least once
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Feb 2026
- Study start1 Dec 2025
- Primary completion31 Jul 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HIV PreventionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, Los AngelesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study is a randomized-controlled trial with parallel assignment. There's also a single-arm continuation: the final 100 enrolled participants (201-300) will all receive the intervention.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 318 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), University of California, Berkeley, Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science, Starting Over, Inc, Kindful Restoration, CAL-PEP
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nina T. Harawa, MPH, PhD, University of California, Los Angeles
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07433985
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 24-0665
- Other IDs
- 4R33DA060626-02
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 19 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 3 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Scientific data expected from RCT participants: 1. Screener data 2. Extensive quantitative surveys with a few, short open-ended response questions will be administered via phone or video conference at baseline and six- and 12-month follow-ups. The survey data will include sociodemographics; healthcare access; incarceration history; needs; knowledge and attitudes toward HIV, STIs, HCV, and PrEP; social support; sexual and substance use history; use of services related to SUDs, use of PrEP and PEP, symptoms of mental distress, and HIV/STI/HCV screening and diagnoses. 3. Peer session notes All data elements will be shared, after removal of all personal identifiers, except for notes from the peer sessions. Because of the highly narrative and sensitive nature of the content and the very specific population in the study, these data have a high risk of unintentional identification. The level of redaction needed to remove the potentially identifying/sensitive information would be prohibitive.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- California Hub for HIV/STI/SUD Prevention Research With Reentry Populations
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07433985
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 24-0665
- Conditions
- HIV Prevention, Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI), Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), Incarceration, Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Substance Use Disorder (SUD)
- Keywords
- implementation science, contingency management, mobile health technology (mHealth), community based participatory research, type 3 hybrid implementation effectiveness trial, randomized controlled trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 318 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los AngelesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), University of California, Berkeley, Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science, Starting Over, Inc, Kindful Restoration, CAL-PEP
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The California Hub for HIV/SUD Prevention Research with Reentry Populations addresses the question: "Can the evidence-based MEPS intervention be adapted and implemented at a range of organizations to effectively serve a wider range of clients?"
The Mobile Enhanced Prevention Support (MEPS) intervention was originally implemented in Los Angeles County and was proven successful in promoting biomedical HIV prevention (PrEP) uptake and preventative screenings in people who used drugs who recently left incarceration. MEPS is an evidence-based intervention for people with substance use disorders (SUD) that incorporates a client-centered planning session, including trained peer mentors, service utilization incentives, and a mobile application (GeoPass).
The study includes a randomized controlled trial (RCT) across three community partners located in Riverside and Alameda Counties. At least 300 people will be enrolled in these three counties; the first 200 will be randomized to either receive the intervention or usual care, with the final 100 all receiving the intervention. The primary implementation outcome for the study involves using an implementation science framework and assessment tools to examine MEPS's implementation. Key outcomes include how well the implementation strategies used support intervention enrollment and retention, integration with existing services in each partnering community agency, and perceived intervention acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, and maintenance at 6- and 12-months. The primary effectiveness outcome for the study is an increase in HIV testing, PrEP uptake and adherence, and SUD service utilization at 6 months and 12 months in the MEPS compared to the usual care group. Secondary effectiveness outcomes include frequency of service use for SUDs, hepatitis C virus testing, and linkage to care for those who test positive for HIV or hepatitis C.
Detailed description
The Mobile Enhanced Prevention Support (MEPS) intervention combines three evidence-based components - peer support, a smartphone app (GeoPass), and contingency management in the form of small cash incentives for access services. The overarching goal of this study is to adapt the MEPS to ensure it can achieve its intended objectives for a diverse set of beneficiaries in wider settings and to establish both the tools and an audience for its dissemination. This will include a clinical trial and documentation and dissemination of tailoring and evaluation results. Our prior RCT of the MEPS intervention has shown it to be effective at increasing PrEP uptake and HIV testing among English-speaking participants in Los Angeles County. Now, the primary goal of our Type 3 Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness study is to examine the MEPS implementation in different settings with a greater reach into the population who could benefit, with assessing effectiveness being a secondary goal. It is essential to consider inter-agency differences and their impact in this study.
For the randomized controlled trial, the investigators aim for a sample size of 300 participants across our 3 different study sites. The first 200 individuals enrolled with be randomized to either receive the intervention or be control participants. The last 100 individuals will all receive the intervention as a single arm continuation. Additionally, investigators will recruit 15 CBO partner staff (5 per agency), plus 6 individuals who work at agencies located in the same jurisdictions as the CBO partner staff. Both the CBO partner staff and agency representatives will be asked to participate in surveys and interviews at different time points during the R33 phase.
Client-centered Planning Session/Control Arm All participants, regardless of study arm, will receive the usual care services at the partner agency plus a client-centered planning session following enrollment. This session will be conducted with the person providing clinical supervision to the Peer Mentors at each site and may be conducted by phone, video, or in person. Plans, listing participant goals and tailored referrals, will be offered to the participant in electronic and paper versions. (For MEPS intervention participants, it will also be incorporated into the GeoPass app.)
Follow-up Quantitative Survey UCLA research associates (RAs) will conduct follow-up interviews with RCT participants at 6 and 12 months-post-enrollment. Investigators will use a survey instrument largely consisting of questions developed by the Common Data Element (CDE) workgroup comprised of NIDA CONNECT Network members; this study is one of the funded projects in CONNECT. Some of the survey questions were also carried forward from the original MEPS survey. The survey has the dual purpose of collecting information for the study aims as well as for each participant's needs assessment. The survey includes a comprehensive set of domains using validated measures/scales. Surveys administered at 6 and 12 months will include a set of questions designed to assess perceptions of the intervention (RE-AIM domains: adoption, implementation, and maintenance).
PrEP Adherence Assessment Participants who initiate PrEP (using an estimate derived from the prior MEPS trial, where up to 40% of participants will initiate PrEP) will be asked to choose to provide urine samples at six and 12 months for confirmation of PrEP use and evaluation of PrEP adherence through detection of tenofovir- (TFV, RE-AIM domain: adoption). Collection will be undertaken by partner community-based organization (CBO) agency staff.
Client-centered Planning Session/Intervention Arm (MEPS Overview) Participants enrolling in the study following randomization to the intervention arm will receive the usual care services at the partner agency, the client-centered planning session, plus the MEPS intervention is a 6-month, evidence-based intervention to increase engagement in SUD treatment, harm reduction, and preventive behaviors (including PrEP and PEP uptake and screening for HIV, STIs and HCV). MEPS includes Peer Mentor support, in combination with incentives and the GeoPass application, to facilitate effective goal-setting and tracking of client-centered plans and utilization of services, especially those for HIV/STI/HCV prevention and treatment for SUDs.
The site's clinical supervisor will match a Peer Mentor to each intervention participant, who then works with participants over 14 sessions to address the personal priorities and preventive health needs outlined in the participant's goal planning session. The intervention will also employ the systematic use of incentives to motivate specifically desired behaviors, borrowing elements from a practice known as contingency management (CM) to incentivize a range of activities, including meeting with the peer mentor and screening for STIs and hepatitis C, engaging in activities that fall along the PrEP cascade, and accessing social services, to name some examples (see list of incentives under "financial considerations" section below). Finally, the MEPS intervention will include a smartphone app, called GeoPass, which enables participants to find providers near them, track calendar appointments for planned service utilization, take experience surveys once services are utilized, track progress toward their wellness goals, and view incentive earnings. This project expands the MEPS target population to include cisgender men with a history of injection drug use (IDU) regardless of sexual orientation.
Follow-up In-depth Interview (IDI) Study staff will conduct IDIs with 60 intervention arm participants at the 6- and 12-month timepoint, a subset of participants who complete the quantitative survey at those time points. The investigators will purposely select individuals assigned to the MEPS intervention arm to ensure diversity and representation according to demographics, time, and study site. Those purposefully sampled for the in-depth interview will be approached by a study research assistant at a routine visit to the partner agency and/or will be send a private message through email or text describing the opportunity to participate in an in-depth interview. Those who are interested will be scheduled for the in-depth interview via a phone or video conference using a secure Zoom platform. In-depth interviews will follow a semi-structured interview guide based on the RE-AIM domains. All interviews will be audio recorded (unless declined by the participant). Guided by REAIM domains of adoption, implementation, and maintenance, they will ask about the MEPS experience, whether it motivated engagement in services, preferred aspects of the intervention, challenges with the intervention, and continued utilization of services or other changes after the intervention ended (interviews at 12 months). Inclusion in this activity will be based upon a purposive sample and the participant's willingness and availability and whether the study has achieved the target sample size for IDIs. The interviews will be audio recorded and transcribed for analysis.
Surveys with Clinic Staff and Leadership Surveys will be completed by CBO staff and leadership employed at the study sites at 12 months after intervention launch (n=60). Using the organizational-level measures from the JCOIN core measures (organizational readiness, organizational climate, staff attitudes, implementation outcomes), study investigators will purposefully select and survey five staff members/agency who were involved with MEPS implementation and assess RE-AIM domains related to adoption, implementation, and maintenance, as well as Proctor's IS outcomes (e.g., acceptability). They will ask leadership to recommend other staff at their agency, at which point the investigator will send them personalized links as well.
In-depth Interviews Staff, Leadership, and Other Stakeholders Community partner staff and leadership employed at the study sites, as well as other county agency stakeholders will be interviewed. Study investigators will conduct IDIs with 21 people at 12 months post intervention start to discuss the setting and environment and the intervention's implementation, acceptability, and practicality for routine use (e.g., enhanced/disrupted operations). The investigators will purposefully select staff from a variety of job titles, demographics, and level of involvement with implementation, as well as Peer Mentors. IDIs will be conducted by trained staff using established procedures, with interview guides designed using the primary domains of the RE-AIM framework. The procedures for administering the interviews to CBO partner staff and outside agency staff will be similar.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study is a randomized-controlled trial with parallel assignment. There's also a single-arm continuation: the final 100 enrolled participants (201-300) will all receive the intervention.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MEPS Arm | Experimental | Behavioral: Mobile Enhanced Prevention Support (MEPS)Intervention arm participants receive a client-centered goal planning session following enrollment; 14 sessions with a peer mentor over a period of 6 months; cash incentives for accessing medical and non-medical services; and a smartphone app to keep track of goals, incentive earnings and provider appointments, a provider search feature, and fill-out surveys based on participant experiences with accessing services. |
| Control Arm | Active comparator | Other: ControlControl arm participants receive a client-centered goal planning session (like the intervention arm), and usual care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 59 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- RCT Participants
- Assigned male at birth
- Ages 18 - 59
- Was released from incarceration in the previous 12 months (incarceration is defined as a stay in jail, prison, or detention centers for over 24 hours)
- Reports an SUD diagnosis or seeking SUD services at any time in the 24 months prior to enrollment
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Does not have a smart phone and is not willing to obtain one
- Is not able to speak and understand English
- Has insufficient reading skills to operate a mobile application on a cell phone
- CBO participating in implementation interviews
- n/a
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile Enhanced Prevention Support (MEPS)The 6 month MEPS intervention consists of 14 sessions with a peer mentor over a period of 6 months; up to $600 cash incentives for accessing medical and non-medical services while working the the peer mentor; and a smartphone app to keep track of goals, incentive earnings and provider appointments, a provider search feature, and fill out surveys based on participant experiences with services. | Behavioural | MEPS Arm |
| ControlClient-centered goal planning session plus usual care | Other | Control Arm |
Primary outcome
Initiate PrEP regimen
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Defined as the participant obtaining a prescription for PrEP and self-reporting taking the medication
Demonstrate adherence to PrEP
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Defined as the participant self-reporting taking prescribed PrEP in the previous 3 days. Assessed with a urine test kit that detects the presence of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
Remain on PrEP for at least 3 months
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Defined by self-reported PrEP use for 3 or more months
Report an HIV test within 6 months of a follow-up interview
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Defined as the participant self-reporting having obtained HIV testing within 3 months of the follow-up
Report a test for HCV
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Defined as the participant self-reporting having obtained HIV testing within 3 months of the follow-up
Engage in substance use treatment in the community
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Defined by the participant self-reporting remaining engaged in treatment (i.e., continuing to attend meetings, counseling or other treatment activities) in the 3 months prior to follow-up interviews.
Reduce substance use
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Defined as a reduction in problematic use based Texas Christian University (TCU) Drug Screen 5 for any substance identified at as a problem based on their baseline TCU 5 score
4 secondary outcomes
Receive care for newly diagnosed HCV or HIV
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Access services for overdose prevention and infectious disease control
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Recidivism
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Frequency of arrests among those who recividate
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Apr 2026.
- Main study website. Information on data access to be added at a later date.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Scientific data expected from RCT participants: 1. Screener data 2. Extensive quantitative surveys with a few, short open-ended response questions will be administered via phone or video conference at baseline and six- and 12-month follow-ups. The survey data will include sociodemographics; healthcare access; incarceration history; needs; knowledge and attitudes toward HIV, STIs, HCV, and PrEP; social support; sexual and substance use history; use of services related to SUDs, use of PrEP and PEP, symptoms of mental distress, and HIV/STI/HCV screening and diagnoses. 3. Peer session notes All data elements will be shared, after removal of all personal identifiers, except for notes from the peer sessions. Because of the highly narrative and sensitive nature of the content and the very specific population in the study, these data have a high risk of unintentional identification. The level of redaction needed to remove the potentially identifying/sensitive information would be prohibitive.
Related trials for HIV Prevention
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Healthy Families PrEP Program for Women at Risk for HIV
HIV, Pregnancy
Recruiting
Screen Smart: Using Digital Health to Improve HIV Screening and Prevention
HIV Infections
Active, not recruiting
IGHID 12230 - An Implementation Trial of an Experiential Brief Alcohol Intervention for HIV Prevention
HIV-1-infection, Unhealthy Alcohol Use
RecruitingObservational study
Implementation Study of Lenacapavir Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention
HIV Infections
Active, not recruiting
Implementing PrEP for Women Who Inject Drugs
HIV, Intravenous Substance Abuse
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mobile Enhanced Prevention Support (MEPS) in people with HIV Prevention and Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI), run by University of California, Los Angeles at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Study Director (424-501-4829, camepshub@mednet.ucla.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Initiate PrEP regimen (time frame: 6 and 12 months). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2026.