AzTrials
AzTrials

Cultural CompetencyCULSENNCT07427147

CULTURAL SENSITIVITY TRAINING

A study testing Cultural Sensitivity Training Program in people with Cultural Competency and Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, run by Giresun University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized controlled experimental study aims to determine the effect of a cultural sensitivity training program on nursing students' cultural sensitivity, cultural awareness, and ethnocentrism levels. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Cultural Sensitivity Training Program
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
67 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Apr 2025to 30 Jun 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Being a fourth-year student enrolled in the Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Giresun University during the 2024-2025 academic year
  • Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study

Who cannot join

  • Being a foreign national student
  • Not volunteering to participate in the study
  • Withdrawal Criteria:
  • Failing to attend at least two training sessions during the study period
  • Incomplete or incorrect completion of data collection instruments

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Giresun University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing

    Giresun, Central, 28200

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Determining the Effect of Cultural Sensitivity Training on Nursing Students' Cultural Sensitivity, Cultural Awareness and Ethnocentrism Levels

This randomized controlled experimental study aims to determine the effect of a cultural sensitivity training program on nursing students' cultural sensitivity, cultural awareness, and ethnocentrism levels. Fourth-year nursing students at Giresun University Faculty of Health Sciences are randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group using simple randomization. The experimental group receives a 4-week cultural sensitivity training program (2 hours per week) including interactive lectures, discussions, case studies, video demonstrations, and role-playing activities. The control group continues with the standard nursing curriculum. Data are collected using the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale, Intercultural Awareness Scale, and Ethnocentrism Scale at baseline (pre-test) and after the intervention (post-test). The primary hypothesis is that participants receiving the training will show significant improvements in cultural sensitivity and awareness and a significant decrease in ethnocentrism compared to the control group.

Read the detailed description

Background: Cultural sensitivity and awareness are essential competencies for nursing professionals providing care to diverse patient populations. Ethnocentrism, the tendency to view one's own culture as superior, can negatively affect patient care quality. Structured educational interventions during undergraduate nursing education may enhance culturally competent care delivery.

Study Design: This is a randomized controlled experimental study conducted at Giresun University Faculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, during April-May 2025. Fourth-year nursing students were selected because they have accumulated both theoretical knowledge and clinical experience and have interacted with individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds.

Sample Size: Power analysis was performed using G*Power 3.1. Based on the effect size of 0.685 reported by Topcu (2019), with 95% power and 5% significance level, a minimum of 60 participants (30 per group) was required. To account for potential attrition, 71 students were enrolled (35 experimental, 36 control). Three students in the experimental group were excluded due to non-attendance, resulting in a final sample of 67 participants (32 experimental, 35 control).

Randomization: Participants were assigned to groups using simple random randomization. An independent biostatistician generated the randomization table using an online calculator (calculatorsoup.com). Groups had only one common class day per week, minimizing cross-contamination risk. Participants were verbally instructed not to share intervention content.

Intervention: The experimental group received a 4-week Cultural Sensitivity Training Program delivered in classroom settings every Monday (11:00-13:00) in two 50-minute sessions. The program content included: Week 1 - Culture concepts, cultural elements, and the relationship between society and culture; Week 2 - Health, illness, and culture relationships including cultural factors in health behaviors and nutrition; Week 3 - Cultural sensitivity, cultural awareness, and ethnocentrism concepts with strategies for reducing ethnocentrism; Week 4 - Transcultural nursing and cultural care models including Leininger's Sunrise Model, Giger and Davidhizar's Transcultural Assessment Model, and Purnell's Cultural Competence Model. Teaching methods included interactive lectures with PowerPoint presentations, group discussions, question-and-answer sessions, case studies, video demonstrations, and role-playing scenarios. The training content was validated by field experts using the DISCERN quality assessment tool.

Control Group: The control group received no cultural sensitivity intervention during the study period. After post-test data collection, the control group also received the Cultural Sensitivity Training Program for ethical considerations.

Outcome Measures: Three validated instruments were used - (1) Intercultural Sensitivity Scale (Chen and Starosta, 2000; Turkish adaptation by Bulduk, Tosun and Ardic, 2010): 24-item, 5-point Likert scale measuring five emotional dimensions of intercultural sensitivity (Cronbach alpha=0.90); (2) Ethnocentrism Scale (Neuliep and McCroskey, 2001; Turkish adaptation by Ustun, 2011): 20-item, 5-point Likert scale (Cronbach alpha=0.92); (3) Intercultural Awareness Scale (Rozaimie et al.; Turkish adaptation by Yakar Karabuga and Alpar, 2017): 9-item, 5-point Likert scale with three sub-dimensions (Cronbach alpha=0.73). A 17-item Descriptive Characteristics Form was also administered.

Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0. Normality was assessed using skewness and kurtosis coefficients (within ±1.5 range). Parametric tests were used including paired samples t-test for within-group comparisons, independent samples t-test for between-group comparisons, and chi-square test (with Fisher's Exact Test when necessary) for demographic homogeneity. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Instrument reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficients.

Ethics: The study was approved by Karadeniz Technical University Health Sciences Scientific Research Ethics Committee (Decision No: 158, Date: December 12, 2024). Institutional permission was obtained from Giresun University Rectorate (Decision No: E-13301833-100-55965, Date: December 13, 2024). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Being tested
Cultural Sensitivity Training Program
Keywords
Cultural Sensitivity, Cultural Awareness, Nursing Education, Nursing Students, Cultural Sensitivity Training
Medical subject headings
Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cultural Sensitivity Training ProgramBehavioural

    A structured 4-week educational program delivered in classroom settings (Mondays 11:00-13:00). Week 1: Culture concepts and society-culture relationship. Week 2: Health, illness and culture relationship. Week 3: Cultural sensitivity, cultural awareness and ethnocentrism. Week 4: Transcultural nursing and cultural care models (Leininger's Sunrise Model, Giger-Davidhizar's Transcultural Assessment Model, Purnell's Cultural Competence Model). Teaching methods include PowerPoint presentations, group discussions, Q\&A sessions, case studies, video demonstrations, and role-playing scenarios.

Study groups in NCT07427147
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental: Cultural Sensitivity TrainingExperimentalFourth-year nursing students receiving a 4-week cultural sensitivity training program consisting of two 50-minute interactive sessions per week, including lectures, discussions, case studies, video demonstrations, and role-playing activities.
Receives: Behavioral: Cultural Sensitivity Training Program
No Intervention: Standard CurriculumNo interventionFourth-year nursing students continuing with the standard nursing curriculum without any additional cultural sensitivity training during the study period. The training program was provided to this group after post-test data collection.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Intercultural Sensitivity Scale Score

    Measured using the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale (Chen and Starosta, 2000; Turkish adaptation by Bulduk, Tosun and Ardic, 2010). A 24-item, 5-point Likert scale measuring five emotional dimensions: interaction engagement, respect for cultural differences, interaction confidence, interaction enjoyment, and interaction attentiveness. Items 2, 4, 7, 9, 12, 15, 18, 20, and 22 are reverse scored. Higher scores indicate greater intercultural sensitivity. Cronbach's alpha = 0.90.

    Measured: Baseline (pre-test, before intervention) and 4 weeks (post-test, immediately after completion of the training program)

  2. Change in Ethnocentrism Scale Score

    Measured using the Ethnocentrism Scale (Neuliep and McCroskey, 2001; Turkish adaptation by Ustun, 2011). A 20-item, 5-point Likert scale with a score range of 20-100. Items 4, 7, 9, 12, 15, and 19 are reverse scored. Higher scores indicate higher levels of ethnocentrism. Cronbach's alpha = 0.92.

    Measured: Baseline (pre-test, before intervention) and 4 weeks (post-test, immediately after completion of the training program)

  3. Change in Intercultural Awareness Scale Score

    Measured using the Intercultural Awareness Scale (Rozaimie et al.; Turkish adaptation by Yakar Karabuga and Alpar, 2017). A 9-item, 5-point Likert scale with three sub-dimensions: existing cultural awareness (items 1, 6, 8, 9), felt cultural awareness (items 3, 5), and cultural communication awareness (items 2, 4, 7). Score range is 9-45. Lower scores indicate greater intercultural awareness. Cronbach's alpha = 0.73.

    Measured: Baseline (pre-test, before intervention) and 4 weeks (post-test, immediately after completion of the training program)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Feb 2026
  2. Study start1 Apr 2025
  3. Primary completion20 Apr 2025
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants were randomly assigned to either an experimental group receiving a 4-week cultural sensitivity training program or a control group continuing standard nursing curriculum. Both groups were assessed simultaneously at baseline and post-intervention.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
67 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07427147
Sponsor's protocol ID
E-13562490-050.01.04-595443
Acronym
CULSEN
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
16 Feb 2026
Last updated
23 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cultural Sensitivity Training Program in people with Cultural Competency and Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, run by Giresun University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Intercultural Sensitivity Scale Score (time frame: Baseline (pre-test, before intervention) and 4 weeks (post-test, immediately after completion of the training program)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in