Opioid-Refractory Chronic Cancer-Related PainEarly Phase 1NCT07408193
The Role of Coadministration of Lidocaine and Ketamine in Opioid-Refractory Chronic Cancer-Related Pain.
A Early Phase 1 study testing Lidocaine and Ketamine Infusion in people with Opioid-Refractory Chronic Cancer-Related Pain, run by National and Kapodistrian University of Athens at 1 site in Greece.
Trial summary
This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial examining the effect of a series of two weekly intravenous infusions of lidocaine 4 mg/kg and ketamine 0.2 mg/kg in patients with moderate to severe opioid-refractory chronic cancer-related pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Opioid-Refractory Chronic Cancer-Related Pain
- What is being tested?
- Lidocaine and Ketamine Infusion
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGreece
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2026to Aug 2027
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 years or more
- Capacity to provide informed consent, ability to complete study assessments and comply with the study procedures
- Meets the IASP definition for chronic cancer-related pain
- Moderate or severe pain, defined as average pain of 4 or greater on an 11-point (0-10) NRS in the past 24h
- Adequate trial of opioid medication, defined as a dose of at least 60 mg/day oral morphine equivalent or maximum tolerated dose, in the past 24h
- For patients with neuropathic component to pain: adequate trial of at least one adjuvant analgesic, defined as a daily dose of at least Amitriptyline 37.5mg, Duloxetine 30mg, Gabapentin 900mg, Pregabalin 150mg, Venlafaxine 60mg or equivalent (26), or maximum tolerated dose in the past 24h
Who cannot join
- Previous adverse reaction to ketamine, lidocaine or other amide-type local anesthetics, midazolam
- Severe liver disease (Child Class B or C)
- SGPT or SGOT >5 times the upper limit of normal
- End stage kidney disease
- Serious cardiac comorbidity (e.g. unstable angina, poorly controlled hypertension or tachycardia, high-risk coronary vascular disease, symptomatic heart failure with NYHA class III-IV, history of heart block, Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome, Adams-Stokes syndrome)
- Elevated intracranial or intraocular pressure
Show all 11Show fewer
- Pheochromocytoma or poorly controlled hyperthyroidism
- History of psychosis, schizophrenia or substance abuse
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Porphyria
- Life expectancy shorter than the duration of the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Konstantinos Kalimeris MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, Associate Professor contact
Greece1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University General Hospital of Athens "Attikon" - National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School
Athens, Attica, 12461
Konstantinos Kalimeris MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, +302105831997, kkalimeris@med.uoa.gr
Erond Zeneli, MD, +306982094129
About this study
Official title: The Role of Coadministration of Lidocaine and Ketamine in Opioid-Refractory Chronic Cancer-Related Pain: a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Trial.
This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial examining the effect of a series of two weekly intravenous infusions of lidocaine 4 mg/kg and ketamine 0.2 mg/kg in patients with moderate to severe opioid-refractory chronic cancer-related pain. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the lidocaine - ketamine (LK) regimen provides better analgesia that an active placebo of midazolam 0.02 mg/kg, in this population.
Read the detailed description
Background
Opioids are the mainstay of treatment for chronic cancer-related pain, but their use is associated with multiple adverse effects, tolerance requiring progressively higher doses, and, in rare cases, opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Standard adjuvant analgesics (antiepileptics and antidepressants) may provide modest benefit. However, despite maximally tolerated therapy, many patients continue to experience refractory pain.
Lidocaine and low-dose ketamine may be beneficial in these difficult-to-treat pain scenarios due to their favorable safety profile and mechanisms of action. The main limitation of these drugs is their short duration of action; however, mechanisms involving central plasticity and reversal of opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia may explain the longer analgesic effects observed in some studies.
Study Design
This is a randomized, double-blind, active placebo-controlled, cross-over trial evaluating the efficacy of two weekly lidocaine-ketamine (LK) infusions compared to active placebo in patients with opioid-refractory chronic cancer-related pain.
The investigators will assess:
Pain intensity and physical functioning using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Emotional functioning using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Patient-reported overall improvement using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale Total opioid consumption expressed as oral morphine equivalents (MME) Neuropathic pain effects in patients with confirmed neuropathic components using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)
Adult patients presenting to the pain clinic of Attikon University General Hospital with a diagnosis of chronic cancer-related pain according to the International Association for the Study of Pain definition will be screened for eligibility. Participants will be adult patients with chronic cancer-related pain who continue to experience moderate to severe pain despite stable, optimized analgesic therapy. Eligible patients will be on a stable opioid regimen of at least 60 mg oral morphine equivalents per day for at least one week, with stable adjuvant analgesics in those with a neuropathic pain component. A minimum life expectancy of three months and the ability to provide informed consent will be required. Patients with significant hepatic or renal dysfunction, uncontrolled psychiatric or neurological illness, pregnancy, or contraindications to lidocaine, ketamine, or midazolam will be excluded. The presence of a neuropathic pain component will be assessed clinically and with validated instruments to allow exploratory subgroup analyses of treatment effects on neuropathic pain.
Randomization and Blinding Patients will be randomized using a computer-generated sequence in blocks of four.
Allocation will be concealed in sequentially numbered sealed envelopes. Infusions will be prepared by anesthesiology staff not involved in the trial, using identical, unmarked transparent syringes to maintain blinding.
Both patients and assessors (including companions or clinic staff assisting with questionnaires) will be blinded to treatment.
Intervention
Active intervention (LK infusion):
Lidocaine 4 mg/kg + ketamine 0.2 mg/kg, administered over 45 minutes using an electronic infusion pump Dosing based on actual body weight; for BMI >30, ideal body weight will be used
Active placebo: Midazolam 0.02 mg/kg IV over 45 minutes, selected to mimic sedative effects without analgesic activity
Procedure:
Pre-infusion: patients complete questionnaires and undergo brief clinical assessment IV cannula insertion and standard monitoring (pulse oximeter, ECG, non-invasive BP) Infusion over 45 minutes, followed by 1-hour post-infusion observation Two infusions will be administered 7 days apart After a 14-day washout, patients cross over to the alternate intervention
Rescue Analgesia
All patients will have access to rescue analgesics (e.g., oral oxycodone), converted to oral morphine equivalents for measurement and comparison.
Safety Monitoring Hepatic function: SGOT/SGPT monitored during the study Renal function: Creatinine and GFR monitored
Protocol adjustments:
If SGOT/SGPT above ULN => Extend infusion to 60 min; If SGOT/SGPT >3x ULN => Reduce lidocaine dose to 2 mg/kg; If. SGOT/SGPT >5x ULN, Child B/C liver disease, or GFR <30ml/min => Discontinue participation
Common side effects:
Lidocaine: lightheadedness, somnolence, peri-oral paresthesia, nausea, headache, dysarthria, dry mouth, metallic taste Ketamine: nausea, vomiting, psychotomimetic effects, headache, fatigue, sedation
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome:
Change in BPI question 3 (pain intensity) from baseline to end of treatment.
Secondary Outcomes:
Physical functioning (BPI) Emotional functioning (BDI) Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Opioid consumption (MME) Neuropathic pain (NPSI)
Statistical analysis will be performed using the SPSS software package (IBM SPSS Statistics, Chicago, IL, USA) and R Project. The Shapiro-Wilk test will be applied to assess the normality of data distribution, and the level of statistical significance will be set at 5% (p < 0.05). Continuous variables with a normal distribution will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD), whereas those not following the normal distribution will be presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables will be presented as absolute and relative frequencies (percentages).
Comparisons between the two treatment conditions in the crossover design will be performed using the paired Student's t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, depending on the normality of the data distribution. To explore potential correlations among study parameters, Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) or other appropriate correlation coefficients will be calculated. If required by the study findings, additional analyses-such as multivariable logistic regression to identify independent determinants of observed changes, or mixed-effects model analyses-will be conducted.
Sample size calculation was performed using the Hedwig tool provided online by Massachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center. A sample of 20 patients has 80% statistical power for a level of significance of a=0.05 to detect a clinically significant change of 2 points in question 3 of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form from baseline to end of treatment assessment, given an SD of 3 based on data from studies assessing this particular outcome. Based on that, at least 20 patients need to be enrolled. We aim to enroll 24 patients.
Common side effects associated with lidocaine infusion include lightheadedness, somnolence, peri-oral paresthesia, nausea, headache, dysarthria, dry mouth, metallic taste. Common side effects associated with ketamine infusion include nausea, vomiting, psychotomimetic effects, headache, fatigue, sedation. No serious adverse events have been reported with these drugs at the dosages used in this RCT. Any adverse events will be reported, along with any action taken.
- Being tested
- Lidocaine and Ketamine Infusion, Active Placebo (Midazolam) Infusion
- Keywords
- Cancer Pain, Treatment-Resistant Chronic Pain, Lidocaine, Ketamine, Analgesics, Adjuvant, Infusions, Intravenous, Cross-Over Studies, Double-Blind Method, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Opioid-Related Disorders, Neoplasms
- Medical subject headings
- Cancer Pain, Opioid-Related Disorders, Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lidocaine and Ketamine InfusionDrug
Participants receive two intravenous infusions, 7 days apart, containing lidocaine 4 mg/kg and ketamine 0.2 mg/kg (using actual body weight, or ideal body weight if BMI >30). The drugs are combined in a single, clear solution and administered via an electronic pump in an outpatient setting.
Active Placebo (Midazolam) InfusionDrug
Participants receive two intravenous infusions, 7 days apart, containing midazolam 0.02mg/kg (using actual body weight, or ideal body weight if BMI >30). The drugs are combined in a single, clear solution and administered via an electronic pump in an outpatient setting.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine and Ketamine Infusion | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Lidocaine and Ketamine Infusion |
| Active Placebo (Midazolam) Infusion | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Active Placebo (Midazolam) Infusion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from Baseline in the Worst Pain During the Last 24 Hours on an 11-Point, 0 to 10, Numerical Rating Scale
Question 3 of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form, where 0 is equivalent to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.
Measured: Baseline (immediately before the first LK or placebo infusion) and one week after the second infusion.
Secondary outcomes (7)
Changes in the Score of Pain Intensity of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form
Assesses changes in patient-reported pain severity, including worst, least, average pain over the past 24 hours, and current pain ("pain right now").
Measured: Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).
Change in the Proportion of Patients Achieving 2-Point Reduction on Worst and Least Pain of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form
Evaluates the proportion of patients achieving a clinically significant improvement, defined as a ≥2-point reduction in worst and least pain on the Brief Pain Inventory.
Measured: Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).
Change in the Score of the Interference Scale of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form
Measures changes in the degree to which pain interferes with daily functioning, mood, sleep, work, and social activities.
Measured: Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).
Change in total Oral Morphine Equivalents Consumption of the Previous Week
Assesses changes in total opioid use by calculating the weekly oral morphine equivalent dose consumed by each participant.
Measured: Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).
Immediate Analgesic Effect of the Infusion (LK or placebo)
Evaluated using question 6 of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (pain right now)
Measured: Before the infusion and one hour after infusion termination.
Change in the Score of the Beck Depression Inventory
Measures changes in depressive symptom severity associated with treatment over the course of the study. Beck Depression inventory is a 21-item, self-report rating inventory that measures characteristic attitudes and symptoms of depression. Scores range from 0 to 63, where higher score indicates more depressive symptoms.
Measured: Baseline (immediately before the first LK or placebo infusion) and one week after the second infusion.
Rating of Overall Improvement Using Patient Global Impression of Change Scale
Assesses the patient's overall perceived improvement in pain and function following the treatment. PGIC is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse."
Measured: one week after the second (LK or placebo) infusion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Feb 2026
- Study start1 Mar 2026
- Primary completionAug 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (24)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Opioid-Refractory Chronic Cancer-Related PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National and Kapodistrian University of AthensThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Attikon Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Konstantinos Kalimeris, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
- Investigators
- Konstantinos Kalimeris, Assoc Prof of Anesthesiology, Study chair, National and Kapodistrian University of AthensMaria Riga, Assis Prof of Anesthesiology, Study chair, National and Kapodistrian University of AthensIoannis Kotsantis, Assis Prof of Oncology, Study chair, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07408193
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 801/30-12-2025
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 7 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Bennett MI, Kaasa S, Barke A, Korwisi B, Rief W, Treede RD; IASP Taskforce for the Classification of Chronic Pain. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic cancer-related pain. Pain. 2019 Jan;160(1):38-44. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001363.
PubMed 30586069van den Beuken-van Everdingen MH, de Rijke JM, Kessels AG, Schouten HC, van Kleef M, Patijn J. Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the past 40 years. Ann Oncol. 2007 Sep;18(9):1437-49. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm056. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
PubMed 17355955WHO Guidelines for the Pharmacological and Radiotherapeutic Management of Cancer Pain in Adults and Adolescents. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537492/
PubMed 30776210Bennett MI. Effectiveness of antiepileptic or antidepressant drugs when added to opioids for cancer pain: systematic review. Palliat Med. 2011 Jul;25(5):553-9. doi: 10.1177/0269216310378546. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
PubMed 20671006Lee JT, Sanderson CR, Xuan W, Agar M. Lidocaine for Cancer Pain in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Palliat Med. 2019 Mar;22(3):326-334. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0257. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
PubMed 30614748Mestdagh F, Steyaert A, Lavand'homme P. Cancer Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Current Concepts, Strategies, and Techniques. Curr Oncol. 2023 Jul 18;30(7):6838-6858. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30070500.
PubMed 37504360Zhu B, Zhou X, Zhou Q, Wang H, Wang S, Luo K. Intra-Venous Lidocaine to Relieve Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol. 2019 Sep 18;10:954. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00954. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31620064Orhurhu V, Orhurhu MS, Bhatia A, Cohen SP. Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Anesth Analg. 2019 Jul;129(1):241-254. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004185.
PubMed 31082965Jonkman K, van de Donk T, Dahan A. Ketamine for cancer pain: what is the evidence? Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2017 Jun;11(2):88-92. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000262.
PubMed 28306568Kandil E, Melikman E, Adinoff B. Lidocaine Infusion: A Promising Therapeutic Approach for Chronic Pain. J Anesth Clin Res. 2017 Jan;8(1):697. doi: 10.4172/2155-6148.1000697. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
PubMed 28239510Iacob E, Hagn EE, Sindt J, Brogan S, Tadler SC, Kennington KS, Hare BD, Bokat CE, Donaldson GW, Okifuji A, Junkins SR. Tertiary Care Clinical Experience with Intravenous Lidocaine Infusions for the Treatment of Chronic Pain. Pain Med. 2018 Jun 1;19(6):1245-1253. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx167.
PubMed 29016948Cohen SP, Bhatia A, Buvanendran A, Schwenk ES, Wasan AD, Hurley RW, Viscusi ER, Narouze S, Davis FN, Ritchie EC, Lubenow TR, Hooten WM. Consensus Guidelines on the Use of Intravenous Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain From the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Jul;43(5):521-546. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000808.
PubMed 29870458Striebel J, Ruppen W, Schneider T. Simultaneous application of lidocaine and ketamine during ambulatory infusion therapy: a retrospective analysis. Pain Manag. 2023 Sep;13(9):539-553. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2023-0037. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
PubMed 37850330Sugimoto M, Uchida I, Mashimo T. Local anaesthetics have different mechanisms and sites of action at the recombinant N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 2003 Mar;138(5):876-82. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705107.
PubMed 12642389Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38.
PubMed 8080219
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Role of Coadministration of Lidocaine and Ketamine in Opioid-Refractory Chronic Cancer-Related Pain: a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07408193
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 801/30-12-2025
- Keywords
- Cancer Pain, Treatment-Resistant Chronic Pain, Lidocaine, Ketamine, Analgesics, Adjuvant, Infusions, Intravenous, Cross-Over Studies, Double-Blind Method
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National and Kapodistrian University of AthensUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Attikon Hospital
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial examining the effect of a series of two weekly intravenous infusions of lidocaine 4 mg/kg and ketamine 0.2 mg/kg in patients with moderate to severe opioid-refractory chronic cancer-related pain. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the lidocaine - ketamine (LK) regimen provides better analgesia that an active placebo of midazolam 0.02 mg/kg, in this population.
Detailed description
Background
Opioids are the mainstay of treatment for chronic cancer-related pain, but their use is associated with multiple adverse effects, tolerance requiring progressively higher doses, and, in rare cases, opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Standard adjuvant analgesics (antiepileptics and antidepressants) may provide modest benefit. However, despite maximally tolerated therapy, many patients continue to experience refractory pain.
Lidocaine and low-dose ketamine may be beneficial in these difficult-to-treat pain scenarios due to their favorable safety profile and mechanisms of action. The main limitation of these drugs is their short duration of action; however, mechanisms involving central plasticity and reversal of opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia may explain the longer analgesic effects observed in some studies.
Study Design
This is a randomized, double-blind, active placebo-controlled, cross-over trial evaluating the efficacy of two weekly lidocaine-ketamine (LK) infusions compared to active placebo in patients with opioid-refractory chronic cancer-related pain.
The investigators will assess:
Pain intensity and physical functioning using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Emotional functioning using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Patient-reported overall improvement using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale Total opioid consumption expressed as oral morphine equivalents (MME) Neuropathic pain effects in patients with confirmed neuropathic components using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)
Adult patients presenting to the pain clinic of Attikon University General Hospital with a diagnosis of chronic cancer-related pain according to the International Association for the Study of Pain definition will be screened for eligibility. Participants will be adult patients with chronic cancer-related pain who continue to experience moderate to severe pain despite stable, optimized analgesic therapy. Eligible patients will be on a stable opioid regimen of at least 60 mg oral morphine equivalents per day for at least one week, with stable adjuvant analgesics in those with a neuropathic pain component. A minimum life expectancy of three months and the ability to provide informed consent will be required. Patients with significant hepatic or renal dysfunction, uncontrolled psychiatric or neurological illness, pregnancy, or contraindications to lidocaine, ketamine, or midazolam will be excluded. The presence of a neuropathic pain component will be assessed clinically and with validated instruments to allow exploratory subgroup analyses of treatment effects on neuropathic pain.
Randomization and Blinding Patients will be randomized using a computer-generated sequence in blocks of four.
Allocation will be concealed in sequentially numbered sealed envelopes. Infusions will be prepared by anesthesiology staff not involved in the trial, using identical, unmarked transparent syringes to maintain blinding.
Both patients and assessors (including companions or clinic staff assisting with questionnaires) will be blinded to treatment.
Intervention
Active intervention (LK infusion):
Lidocaine 4 mg/kg + ketamine 0.2 mg/kg, administered over 45 minutes using an electronic infusion pump Dosing based on actual body weight; for BMI >30, ideal body weight will be used
Active placebo: Midazolam 0.02 mg/kg IV over 45 minutes, selected to mimic sedative effects without analgesic activity
Procedure:
Pre-infusion: patients complete questionnaires and undergo brief clinical assessment IV cannula insertion and standard monitoring (pulse oximeter, ECG, non-invasive BP) Infusion over 45 minutes, followed by 1-hour post-infusion observation Two infusions will be administered 7 days apart After a 14-day washout, patients cross over to the alternate intervention
Rescue Analgesia
All patients will have access to rescue analgesics (e.g., oral oxycodone), converted to oral morphine equivalents for measurement and comparison.
Safety Monitoring Hepatic function: SGOT/SGPT monitored during the study Renal function: Creatinine and GFR monitored
Protocol adjustments:
If SGOT/SGPT above ULN => Extend infusion to 60 min; If SGOT/SGPT >3x ULN => Reduce lidocaine dose to 2 mg/kg; If. SGOT/SGPT >5x ULN, Child B/C liver disease, or GFR <30ml/min => Discontinue participation
Common side effects:
Lidocaine: lightheadedness, somnolence, peri-oral paresthesia, nausea, headache, dysarthria, dry mouth, metallic taste Ketamine: nausea, vomiting, psychotomimetic effects, headache, fatigue, sedation
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome:
Change in BPI question 3 (pain intensity) from baseline to end of treatment.
Secondary Outcomes:
Physical functioning (BPI) Emotional functioning (BDI) Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Opioid consumption (MME) Neuropathic pain (NPSI)
Statistical analysis will be performed using the SPSS software package (IBM SPSS Statistics, Chicago, IL, USA) and R Project. The Shapiro-Wilk test will be applied to assess the normality of data distribution, and the level of statistical significance will be set at 5% (p < 0.05). Continuous variables with a normal distribution will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD), whereas those not following the normal distribution will be presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables will be presented as absolute and relative frequencies (percentages).
Comparisons between the two treatment conditions in the crossover design will be performed using the paired Student's t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, depending on the normality of the data distribution. To explore potential correlations among study parameters, Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) or other appropriate correlation coefficients will be calculated. If required by the study findings, additional analyses-such as multivariable logistic regression to identify independent determinants of observed changes, or mixed-effects model analyses-will be conducted.
Sample size calculation was performed using the Hedwig tool provided online by Massachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center. A sample of 20 patients has 80% statistical power for a level of significance of a=0.05 to detect a clinically significant change of 2 points in question 3 of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form from baseline to end of treatment assessment, given an SD of 3 based on data from studies assessing this particular outcome. Based on that, at least 20 patients need to be enrolled. We aim to enroll 24 patients.
Common side effects associated with lidocaine infusion include lightheadedness, somnolence, peri-oral paresthesia, nausea, headache, dysarthria, dry mouth, metallic taste. Common side effects associated with ketamine infusion include nausea, vomiting, psychotomimetic effects, headache, fatigue, sedation. No serious adverse events have been reported with these drugs at the dosages used in this RCT. Any adverse events will be reported, along with any action taken.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine and Ketamine Infusion | Active comparator | Drug: Lidocaine and Ketamine Infusion |
| Active Placebo (Midazolam) Infusion | Placebo comparator | Drug: Active Placebo (Midazolam) Infusion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age 18 years or more
- Capacity to provide informed consent, ability to complete study assessments and comply with the study procedures
- Meets the IASP definition for chronic cancer-related pain
- Moderate or severe pain, defined as average pain of 4 or greater on an 11-point (0-10) NRS in the past 24h
- Adequate trial of opioid medication, defined as a dose of at least 60 mg/day oral morphine equivalent or maximum tolerated dose, in the past 24h
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Previous adverse reaction to ketamine, lidocaine or other amide-type local anesthetics, midazolam
- Severe liver disease (Child Class B or C)
- SGPT or SGOT >5 times the upper limit of normal
- End stage kidney disease
- Serious cardiac comorbidity (e.g. unstable angina, poorly controlled hypertension or tachycardia, high-risk coronary vascular disease, symptomatic heart failure with NYHA class III-IV, history of heart block, Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome, Adams-Stokes syndrome)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine and Ketamine InfusionParticipants receive two intravenous infusions, 7 days apart, containing lidocaine 4 mg/kg and ketamine 0.2 mg/kg (using actual body weight, or ideal body weight if BMI >30). The drugs are combined in a single, clear solution and administered via an electronic pump in an outpatient setting. | Drug | Lidocaine and Ketamine Infusion |
| Active Placebo (Midazolam) InfusionParticipants receive two intravenous infusions, 7 days apart, containing midazolam 0.02mg/kg (using actual body weight, or ideal body weight if BMI >30). The drugs are combined in a single, clear solution and administered via an electronic pump in an outpatient setting. | Drug | Active Placebo (Midazolam) Infusion |
Primary outcome
Change from Baseline in the Worst Pain During the Last 24 Hours on an 11-Point, 0 to 10, Numerical Rating Scale
Time frame: Baseline (immediately before the first LK or placebo infusion) and one week after the second infusion.
Question 3 of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form, where 0 is equivalent to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.
7 secondary outcomes
Changes in the Score of Pain Intensity of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form
Time frame: Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).
Change in the Proportion of Patients Achieving 2-Point Reduction on Worst and Least Pain of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form
Time frame: Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).
Change in the Score of the Interference Scale of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form
Time frame: Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).
Change in total Oral Morphine Equivalents Consumption of the Previous Week
Time frame: Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).
Immediate Analgesic Effect of the Infusion (LK or placebo)
Time frame: Before the infusion and one hour after infusion termination.
Change in the Score of the Beck Depression Inventory
Time frame: Baseline (immediately before the first LK or placebo infusion) and one week after the second infusion.
Rating of Overall Improvement Using Patient Global Impression of Change Scale
Time frame: one week after the second (LK or placebo) infusion
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jul 2026.
- Background: PubMed 30586069Bennett MI, Kaasa S, Barke A, Korwisi B, Rief W, Treede RD; IASP Taskforce for the Classification of Chronic Pain. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic cancer-related pain. Pain. 2019 Jan;160(1):38-44. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001363.
- Background: PubMed 17355955van den Beuken-van Everdingen MH, de Rijke JM, Kessels AG, Schouten HC, van Kleef M, Patijn J. Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the past 40 years. Ann Oncol. 2007 Sep;18(9):1437-49. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm056. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
- Background: PubMed 30776210WHO Guidelines for the Pharmacological and Radiotherapeutic Management of Cancer Pain in Adults and Adolescents. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537492/
- Background: PubMed 20671006Bennett MI. Effectiveness of antiepileptic or antidepressant drugs when added to opioids for cancer pain: systematic review. Palliat Med. 2011 Jul;25(5):553-9. doi: 10.1177/0269216310378546. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
- Background: PubMed 30614748Lee JT, Sanderson CR, Xuan W, Agar M. Lidocaine for Cancer Pain in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Palliat Med. 2019 Mar;22(3):326-334. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0257. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
- Background: PubMed 37504360Mestdagh F, Steyaert A, Lavand'homme P. Cancer Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Current Concepts, Strategies, and Techniques. Curr Oncol. 2023 Jul 18;30(7):6838-6858. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30070500.
- Background: PubMed 31620064Zhu B, Zhou X, Zhou Q, Wang H, Wang S, Luo K. Intra-Venous Lidocaine to Relieve Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol. 2019 Sep 18;10:954. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00954. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 31082965Orhurhu V, Orhurhu MS, Bhatia A, Cohen SP. Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Anesth Analg. 2019 Jul;129(1):241-254. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004185.
- Background: PubMed 28306568Jonkman K, van de Donk T, Dahan A. Ketamine for cancer pain: what is the evidence? Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2017 Jun;11(2):88-92. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000262.
- Background: PubMed 28239510Kandil E, Melikman E, Adinoff B. Lidocaine Infusion: A Promising Therapeutic Approach for Chronic Pain. J Anesth Clin Res. 2017 Jan;8(1):697. doi: 10.4172/2155-6148.1000697. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
- Background: PubMed 29016948Iacob E, Hagn EE, Sindt J, Brogan S, Tadler SC, Kennington KS, Hare BD, Bokat CE, Donaldson GW, Okifuji A, Junkins SR. Tertiary Care Clinical Experience with Intravenous Lidocaine Infusions for the Treatment of Chronic Pain. Pain Med. 2018 Jun 1;19(6):1245-1253. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx167.
- Background: PubMed 29870458Cohen SP, Bhatia A, Buvanendran A, Schwenk ES, Wasan AD, Hurley RW, Viscusi ER, Narouze S, Davis FN, Ritchie EC, Lubenow TR, Hooten WM. Consensus Guidelines on the Use of Intravenous Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain From the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Jul;43(5):521-546. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000808.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Konstantinos Kalimeris MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, Associate Professor contact
Konstantinos Kalimeris, Assoc Prof of Anesthesiology study chair
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Maria Riga, Assis Prof of Anesthesiology study chair
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Ioannis Kotsantis, Assis Prof of Oncology study chair
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Lidocaine and Ketamine Infusion in people with Opioid-Refractory Chronic Cancer-Related Pain, run by National and Kapodistrian University of Athens at 1 site in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Konstantinos Kalimeris MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, Associate Professor (+302105831997, kkalimeris@med.uoa.gr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from Baseline in the Worst Pain During the Last 24 Hours on an 11-Point, 0 to 10, Numerical Rating Scale (time frame: Baseline (immediately before the first LK or placebo infusion) and one week after the second infusion.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07408193, which also lists 24 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2026.