AzTrials
AzTrials

Digital TechnologyNCT07387887

A Vision-Based Characterization of Human Movement Scaling in Large-Amplitude Tasks

A study testing Large-Amplitude Exercise Observation and Video Recording in people with Digital Technology and Healthy, run by Biruni University.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This pilot study investigates the feasibility of objectively quantifying movement amplitude and amplitude decay during large-amplitude exercises using RGB camera-based video analysis in healthy volunteers. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Digital Technology, Healthy
What is being tested?
Large-Amplitude Exercise Observation and Video Recording
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
26 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
30 Jan 2026to 30 May 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Ability to stand, walk, reach, step, and perform sit-to-stand movements independently without assistance.
  • No self-reported or clinically diagnosed neurological, musculoskeletal, or vestibular disorders.
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision sufficient to follow visual instructions.

Who cannot join

  • History of neurological disorders (e.g., Parkinson's disease, stroke, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury).
  • History of major musculoskeletal injury or surgery affecting upper or lower extremities that limits movement.
  • Presence of balance disorders or vestibular dysfunction.
  • Cardiovascular, respiratory, or metabolic conditions that may limit safe participation in physical exercise.
  • Current pain, dizziness, or excessive fatigue during movement or exercise.
  • Pregnancy or any condition for which moderate-intensity physical activity is contraindicated.
  • Use of assistive devices for walking or balance.
  • Refusal or inability to provide consent for RGB video recording.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Güzin Kaya Aytutuldu contact

05366265884

guzinkaya14@gmail.com

About this study

This pilot study investigates the feasibility of objectively quantifying movement amplitude and amplitude decay during large-amplitude exercises using RGB camera-based video analysis in healthy volunteers. Six large-amplitude exercises are recorded across repeated trials, with the first repetition clinically confirmed as the individual's maximum reference. Movement amplitude is quantified using pose-based kinematic measures and complemented by an exploratory self-supervised visual transformer approach to characterize repetition-wise changes relative to the reference execution. The study aims to determine whether camera-based methods can detect amplitude decay patterns and identify moments requiring clinical verbal cues, thereby supporting future objective monitoring and feedback in large-amplitude exercise training.

Read the detailed description

Parkinson's disease is characterized by bradykinesia and impaired motor scaling, leading to reduced movement amplitude and diminished functional performance. Large-amplitude exercise approaches are widely used to counteract these deficits by promoting exaggerated movement execution and recalibration of internal movement perception. However, during repetitive exercise sets, individuals often demonstrate a gradual reduction in movement amplitude, a phenomenon known as amplitude decay, which typically requires verbal correction by a clinician.

Despite its clinical relevance, amplitude decay has not been objectively quantified, and movement quality is commonly assessed through visual observation alone. Marker-based motion capture systems, while accurate, are impractical for routine or remote use. RGB camera-based markerless analysis offers a low-cost and accessible alternative for objective movement assessment, particularly in telerehabilitation contexts where direct visual supervision is limited.

Participants and Study Design

A total of 22-26 healthy volunteers aged 18-45 years will be recruited. All participants will be capable of independent functional movement and will provide written informed consent prior to participation. The study follows a single-session, observational design.

Exercise Protocol

Participants will perform six standardized large-amplitude exercises:

Floor-to-Ceiling Reach

Forward Step

Side Step

Sit-to-Stand

Forward Reach to Grasp and Release an Object

Big Walking

Each exercise will be recorded for eight repetitions using a single RGB camera capturing full-body movement. No wearable sensors or reflective markers will be used.

For each exercise, the first repetition will be performed without prior instruction regarding maximal effort. Immediately after completion, a clinician expert will verbally confirm whether this execution represents the participant's maximum movement amplitude. Upon confirmation, this repetition will be designated as the individual reference trial for that exercise.

Data Processing and Outcome Measures

Movement data will be analyzed using two complementary approaches:

Pose-Based Analysis:

Joint keypoints will be extracted from video using a pose estimation algorithm. Movement amplitude will be computed using joint displacement-based metrics and normalized according to individual anthropometric characteristics. Amplitude decay will be quantified by comparing early and late repetitions and by calculating repetition-wise trends.

Visual Representation Analysis:

As an exploratory component, a self-supervised vision transformer will be used to extract visual feature representations from exercise videos. Each repetition will be compared to the clinician-confirmed reference repetition using feature similarity measures. Repetition-wise similarity scores will be used to characterize within-exercise changes and identify patterns consistent with amplitude decay.

Statistical Analysis

Data distribution will be assessed for normality. Changes in movement amplitude and repetition-wise trends will be analyzed using paired statistical methods. Associations between camera-based measures and clinician observations will be explored using correlation analysis, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

Ethical Considerations and Expected Impact

The study involves no invasive procedures or therapeutic interventions. Video data will be anonymized and securely stored, and participants may withdraw at any time. Ethical approval has been obtained from the Biruni University Non-Interventional Ethics Committee.

This study is expected to demonstrate the feasibility of camera-based methods for objective assessment of movement amplitude and amplitude decay, providing a methodological foundation for future studies involving patient populations, automated feedback systems, and telerehabilitation applications

Being tested
Large-Amplitude Exercise Observation and Video Recording
Keywords
Exercise, Motion Analysis, Video-recording, artificial intelligence
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Large-Amplitude Exercise Observation and Video RecordingOther

    Participants perform six standardized large-amplitude exercises (Floor-to-Ceiling Reach, Forward Step, Side Step, Sit-to-Stand, Forward Reach to Grasp and Release an Object, and Big Walking). Each exercise is repeated eight times while full-body movement is recorded using an RGB camera. The first repetition of each exercise is clinically confirmed as the participant's maximum movement amplitude and used as a reference for subsequent observational analysis. No therapeutic manipulation or feedback is provided beyond standard verbal confirmation.

Study groups in NCT07387887
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Healthy Volunteers - Observational ArmExperimentalNo Intervention / Observational: All participants are healthy adult volunteers who perform standardized large-amplitude exercises while being video recorded. No therapeutic intervention, randomization, or group allocation is applied. All participants undergo the same exercise protocol and data collection procedures.
Receives: Other: Large-Amplitude Exercise Observation and Video Recording

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Movement Amplitude Across Repetitions

    Movement amplitude will be quantified for each repetition of six large-amplitude exercises using normalized, RGB camera-based pose estimation. Amplitude decay will be defined as the change in movement amplitude across repeated executions within each exercise, reflecting repetition-related reduction in movement scali

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Reference-Based Visual Similarity Score

    A repetition-wise visual similarity score will be computed by comparing each repetition to the clinician-confirmed maximum reference repetition using data-driven video feature representations. Lower similarity indicates greater deviation from the maximum-amplitude execution.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Repetition-Wise Amplitude Decay Trend

    Within-exercise repetition trends will be quantified using early-late repetition comparisons and slope-based measures to characterize the progression of amplitude decay across repetitions.

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Association Between Kinematic Amplitude and Visual Representation Measures

    Correlation between pose-based movement amplitude metrics and reference-based visual similarity scores will be evaluated to examine agreement between kinematic and visual measures of movement scaling.

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Feb 2026
  2. Study start30 Jan 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 May 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
The proposed model is designed to characterize movement scaling during large-amplitude exercises using RGB video recordings. It combines markerless pose-based kinematic analysis with an exploratory data-driven visual representation approach to quantify repetition-wise changes in movement execution relative to an individualized reference.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
26 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07387887
Sponsor's protocol ID
Gebze Technical Uni
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
23 Jan 2026
Last updated
4 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Large-Amplitude Exercise Observation and Video Recording in people with Digital Technology and Healthy, run by Biruni University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Güzin Kaya Aytutuldu (05366265884, guzinkaya14@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Movement Amplitude Across Repetitions (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in