AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML)NCT07379528

Mesenchymal Stem Cells in NPM1 Mutated Low Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia: a Study of the Tumor Microenvironment and Its Contribution to the Outcome

An observational study of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML), run by Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) arises from the somatic acquisition of genetic alterations in hematopoietic progenitor or stem cells. One of the main hallmarks of AML is heterogeneity in terms of morphology, immunophenotype, cytogenetics, and molecular abnormalities, this heterogeneity leads to an important clinical… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML)
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
15 Mar 2023to 15 Mar 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult patients with new onset Acute Myeloid Leukemia diagnosed at Clinica Ematologica of the Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia.

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients with new onset Acute Myeloid Leukemia diagnosed.

Who cannot join

  • -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo

    Pavia, Pavia, 27100

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Low Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Nucleophosmin Gene Mutation: a Study of the Tumor Microenvironment and Its Contribution to the Outcome

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) arises from the somatic acquisition of genetic alterations in hematopoietic progenitor or stem cells.

One of the main hallmarks of AML is heterogeneity in terms of morphology, immunophenotype, cytogenetics, and molecular abnormalities, this heterogeneity leads to an important clinical heterogeneity in term of response to chemotherapy and prognosis. , The European Leukemia Net recognizes three different prognostic risk group (favorable, intermediate and high). Patients with favorable or intermediate risk AML, theoretically, should be cured with pharmacological treatment only (chemo and in some cases targeted therapies). However, more of the 50% of patients with favorable or intermediate risk AML experience relapse. This heterogeneity in outcome is not only explained by genetics and it's probably due to the persistence of chemo-resistant leukemic stem cell (LSC) clone, and to its interaction with the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment.

This research project is focused on the analysis of the mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) of the BM in order to deepen their connections with the LSC and their correlation with different genetic AML subgroups, and to evaluate their contribution to the outcome of favorable risk AML with Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) gene mutation.

Read the detailed description

Background Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous hematological malignancy characterized by clonal expansion and differentiation arrest of myeloid progenitor cells.

Although incomplete, current knowledge of AML pathogenesis has allowed patient stratification into different prognostic groups and has led to the emergence of personalized treatment strategies.

The European Leukemia Net (ELN) stratifies de novo AML into favorable, intermediate and adverse risk groups according to genetic mutations and chromosomal abnormalities. In particular, patients with a favorable-risk profile are characterized by either the presence of core-binding factor rearrangements (CBF), normal karyotype with nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) mutations and fms related receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) wild-type, NPM1 mutations and FLT3-internal tandem duplication with low allelic ratio, or biallelic mutations in CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α (CEBPα).

Despite the favorable-risk profile, patients in long-term follow-up after conventional chemotherapy have relapse rates of up to 50% in AML with NPM1 mutation, 40% in CBF AML, and 44% in AML with CEBPα biallelic mutation. These data highlight the need for further investigation among favorable-risk AML to gain more knowledge regarding the pathogenetic and resistance mechanisms, thus improving patient stratification. Moreover, these insights could lead to the discovery of new therapeutic targets.

NPM1 is the most frequent mutation in AML, accounting for approximately 50-60% of de novo cytogenetically normal AML. Murine and in vivo studies have demonstrated that NPM1 mutation promotes leukemogenesis and myeloproliferation but is not sufficient to induce leukemia. Pre-existing mutations of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) may be a possible mechanism that cooperates in leukemogenesis. These mutations mainly involve epigenetic modifiers in hematopoietic stem or progenitor cells, resulting in their clonal expansion in individuals without an overt hematologic disease. This condition, named clonal hematopoiesis, represents a pre-leukemic state that may promote the emergence of mutations able to drive leukemogenesis. Indeed, NPM1 mutations frequently cluster with co-occurring mutations involving genes of the signaling pathways, DNA methylation, RNA-splicing, cohesin complex, gene transcription, and tumor suppression.

Although few studies have shown that some co-occurring mutations negatively affect disease prognosis, controversies remain on their real impact. Therefore, the mutational landscape alone cannot fully explain the clinical courses of some patients in this group of low risk leukemias; other factors may play a role in the heterogeneity of this AML subgroup. Recently, major efforts have been made to gain insights into the leukemic hematopoietic niche, which is implicated in disease refractoriness and relapse.

Haematopoietic Stem Cells regulate their proliferation, differentiation and self-renewal processes in a specific bone marrow niche, through the interaction with the BM microenvironment. The microenvironment has a cellular compartment that consists mainly of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), but also osteoblasts, endothelial cells, macrophages. In particular, MSC subgroups have different roles in the regulation of HSCs activity.

Leukemia stem cells are a small subgroup of leukemic cells capable of self-renewal and with stemness properties. By definition, these cells can re-initiate leukemia if engrafted in a recipient host.

The BM microenvironment interacts, as well, with leukemic stem cells (LSCs), altering their proliferation, adhesion properties, quiescence and clonal expansion.

At the same time, studies have shown that LSCs can reprogram the MSCs and receive trophic support, protection from oxidative stress and preservation from toxic chemotherapeutic agents, promoting the formation of a "leukemic niche". On the other hand, the BM MSCs interact with LSCs, directly or indirectly, and alter LSCs' proliferation, adhesion properties, quiescence and clonal expansion. As a result, the MSCs contribute to the LSC maintenance. MSC remodeling is a leukemogenesis selfr-enewal strategy that could explain the clinical heterogeneity and thus could be a potential prognostic factor.

Several studies have revealed the presence of functional alterations at the BM-MSCs level in patients with AML, such as decreased proliferation, increased apoptotic rate, and a pro-inflammatory state.

Although the BM microenvironment seems to play a key role in promoting chemoresistance in AML, whether these alterations or others are related to leukemia pathogenesis still remains unclear.

Patients with AML have altered MSCs characteristics; in particular, there is a reduced amount of primitive MSCs, defined as CD146+/nestin+, compared to healthy donors (HD). Nestin+ BM-MSCs enhance leukemic cell survival and chemoresistance by stimulating oxidative phosphorylation and thus increasing energy production. This subpopulation seems to be associated with the disease course: patients who relapse have an increased percentage of CD146+/nestin+ MSCs with respect to subjects in remission.

Moreover, modified MSCs interact differently with HSC and LSC, selectively inhibiting normal hematopoiesis and promoting leukemogenesis and chemoresistance, respectively. The mechanism of stroma-mediated protection of leukemic cells is complex and involves a network of cytokines, chemokines, soluble factors and microvesicles (MVs) that promote LSCs proliferation. A probable mechanism of action is the interaction between BM stromal cells and LSCs through the release of CXCL12 by MSCs and its binding to the CXCR4 receptor on the surface of LSCs. More in detail, leukemic cells exploit the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis for homing in a protective BM niche, which is usually restricted to normal HSC. As a result, LSCs dwell in an environment that promotes their survival and protects them from chemotherapy. For this reason CXCL12/CXCR4 axis could be targeted by future therapies to prevent relapses.

To our knowledge, there is no data regarding the characterization of the BM microenvironment, in NPM1mutated AML. The characterization of MSCs, as the most representative components of the BM microenvironment, could be useful for the identification of specific cellular mechanisms that might explain the high relapse rate observed in these patients.

Objectives of the study

General objective:

To characterize the BM-MSCs of subjects affected by AML NPM1mut as possible novel indicators of patient clinical outcome.

In detail, it will be studied the AML-MSCs' phenotype, genetic profile and function, and evaluate their paracrine activity in order to understand the mechanisms that promote resistance to therapy and relapse occurrence in AML NPM1mut at the level of the bone marrow microenvironment. The paracrine activity of MSCs' will be assessed through the study and characterization of the microvesicles released by MSCs after deprivation.

Primary Objective:

The primary objective of this study is the detection of CD146+ MSCs percentage at diagnosis, as this subpopulation seems to be involved in the LSC niche creation and chemo-resistance. It has been described that BM of relapsed patients shows higher percentage of this MSC subpopulation compared to patients undergoing clinical remission. The aim is the demonstration that in AML NPM1mut patients there is a statistically significant difference in CD146+ MSC percentage (at diagnosis) compared to HD-MSCs and DC-MSCs (disease control MSCs: AML patients NPM1 wt).

Co-primary objective:

Comparison of the percentage of CD146+ cells at diagnosis and at different time points (diagnosis, post induction, end of treatment, follow up, pre-transplant, relapse) between relapsed patients and patients who do not relapse in the whole population (AML NPM1mut and AML-NPM1wt)

Secondary objectives:

  1. Compare the MSCs CD146+ subpopulation in AML NPM1mut and AML NPM1wt patients at each predefined time-point.
  2. Characterize AML-MSCs in patients with AML NPM1mut vs AML NPM1wt. Following the international guidelines for the definition of MSCs (Dominici et al., 2006), will be evaluated the morphology, the ability to adhere to plastic, the clonogenic efficiency, the proliferative capacity and the transition to senescence. The expression of surface markers CD105, CD73 and CD90 and the lack of CD45, CD34, CD14, CD19 and HLA-DR will be evaluated through labeling with monoclonal antibodies and assessment by means of multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) (FacsCanto II, Becton Dickinson). CD146 and nestin expression will be assessed on the samples obtained at specific time points. The AML-MSCs' ability to differentiate into adipocytes and osteocytes will be determined after "in vitro" stimulation with the appropriate differentiation factors.
  3. Functional characterization of MSCs from AML NPM1mut vs AML NPM1wt patients. MSCs' functional properties will be evaluated through the development of a co-culture of AML-MSCs in the autologous setting (patient's peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)/patient's MSCs) and allogeneic one (healthy donor's PBMCs/patient's MSCs). Then it will assessed the immunomodulating potential, the ability to generate T, B and NK subpopulations and the regulation of the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis. Moreover, the pro-inflammatory and regulatory cytokines in the culture's supernatant will be quantified.
  4. Genomic characterization of the MSCs in patients with AML NPM1mut vs AML-NPM1wt By using next generaton sequencing (NGS) with the aid of a panel of genes recurrently mutated in myeloid neoplasms.

Tertiary explorative objective

  • Sorting of the CD146+/nestin+ MSCs subpopulation for future co-culture in vitro studies
  • Isolation and characterization of the MVs released by AML-MSCs after deprivation.
  • Development of cultures of PBMCs from HD with MVs in order to evaluate their paracrine activity.

Study design This is a pilot single center prospective observational, longitudinal, in vitro study

Subjects and inclusion criteria Adult patients with new onset Acute Myeloid Leukemia diagnosed at Clinica Ematologica of the Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia.

The controls are healthy donors of haematopoietic stem cells for bone marrow transplant enrolled by Oncoematologia Pediatrica, upon signing the informed consent

Collection of Samples Expansion and analysis of the bone marrow MSCs at selected time points (diagnosis, end of induction, end of consolidation, follow-up, before hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (HSCT), relapse).

At the same time-points, a peripheral blood sample will be collected. Each planned time points represents an ordinary clinical practice bone marrow aspirate and blood collection.

Methods

Primary and co-primary objectives:

Sixty patients with new onset Acute Myeloid Leukemia diagnosed at Clinica Ematologica of the Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo of Pavia will be enrolled in three years;

Primary and co-primary objective:

As standard procedure, the bone marrow aspirate of enrolled patients will be collected at diagnosis end of induction, end of consolidation, follow-up, before and after HSCT, relapse.

The MSCs will be isolated from the bone marrow of AML NPM1mut and AML-NPM1wt subjects, and than cultured "in vitro'' with 5% lysed DMEM+ culture medium until senescence.

The expression of the surface markers CD146 and nestin will be evaluated through intracytoplasmic labeling and subsequent analysis through MFC FacsCanto II (BD). The percentage of CD146+/nestin+ MSCs at disease onset in patients with AML NPM1mut with the percentage of HD and disease controls will be compared.

Secondary objectives:

The characterization of patients' BM-MSCs by evaluating the clonogenic efficiency (colony forming units, CFU-f). Meanwhile, the proliferative capacity will be assessed in terms of cumulative population doubling (cPD). Senescence of AML-MSCs will be defined as the time when the number of cells recovered is less or equal than the number of cells cultured. Senescent cells will be detected by using β-galactosidase.

The ability of AML-MSCs to differentiate into adipocytes and osteocytes, driven by the addition of specific factors in vitro: the Alizarin red dye specifically colors lipid droplets, whereas the alkaline phosphatase dye will highlight the presence of calcium deposits, typical of osteocytes.

At the same time-points, peripheral blood sample will be collected, a residue of the standard diagnostic analyses performed during clinical activity. From the sample PBMCs will be extracted and used in the subsequent immunomodulation experiments.

AML-MSCs' functional properties will be evaluated after co-culture with PBMCs. After three days of incubation, MSCs' ability to modulate PBMCs' proliferation will be analysed through incorporation of Titrated Thymidine. The results will be compared with those obtained from HD-MSC and disease controls.

After ten days of incubation in the same culture, the capacity of AML-MSCs of regulating the percentage of the lymphocyte subpopulations (T and B lymphocytes and NK cells) through MFC will be evaluated, along with the percentage of T regulatory cells through the measurement of intracytoplasmic Foxp3, and the expression of CXCR4 on the surface of patients' lymphocytes. The culture's supernatants will be stored and used to dose CXCL12, IL-6, IFN-γ, IL-10, PGE-2 by means of ELISA.

The DNA extracted from the MSCs of subjects with AML NPM1mut and AML NPM1wt will be analyzed through a custom TruSight Myeloid Sequencing Panel of 54 genes sequenced by Illumina MiSeq, together with DNA extracted from leukemic blasts of the same patients.

Tertiary explorative objective If the percentage CD146+/nestin+ MSCs will be suitable, this subpopulation will be sorted and the above-mentioned analysis on it will be performed.

The MVs will be isolated through ultracentrifugation and quantified (NanoSight). The expression of MVs surface markers will be assessed through MACSPlex Exosomes Kit (Miltenyi) and MacsQuant Flow Cytometer (Miltenyi).

The protein content of the MVs will be evaluated through HPLC and mass spectrometry.

Co-culture experiments in the presence of MVs will be developed.

Data Collection Data will be recorded in an electronic database. Patients will receive an identification code that ensures their privacy. The PI will keep separately a list with patient's identification data and the corresponding code.

Sample size calculation Ninenty subjects will be enrolled (60 patinents: 30 AML NPM1mut, 30 AML NPM1wt and 30 HD-MSCs). With this sample size it will be possible to detect a significant 2x2 post-hoc comparison (two-sided type I error alpha=0.017) in nestin+/CD146+ MSCs levels after one-way analysis of variance if the difference between means is 85% of the common standard deviation. A power of 80% has been considered.

Statistical analysis Qualitative variables will be described as absolute and relative frequencies of each category. Quantitative variables will be summarized as mean±standard deviation, or by median and interquartile range. If necessary, log-transformations of data will be adopted.

Statistical analyses will be performed using Stata 17 (StataCorp. 2021. Stata Statistical Software: Release 17. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.)

Statistical analysis for the primary endpoint Nestin+/CD146+ MSCs levels at baseline will be compared between three groups with one-way analysis of variance, followed by Bonferroni's 2x2 post-hoc comparisons.

Statistical analysis for the co-primary endpoint The association between nestin+/CD146+ MSCs levels at different time points and relapse will be evaluated by a joint model of longitudinal and survival data.

Statistical analysis for the secondary endpoints

  1. The comparison according to NPM1 mutational status will be carried out fitting multilevel mixed (with patients treated as random effect) linear or logistic models.
  2. The interactions between MSCs and leukemic cells will be analyzed by fitting multilevel mixed (with patients treated as random effect) linear or logistic models.
  3. Fisher's exact test will be performed in order to compare patients with AML NPM1mut vs AML-NPM1wt.

Statistical analysis for tertiary explorative endpoints For tertiary explorative endpoints, descriptive statistics will be employed.

Informed consent Each patient will receive the study informative material and signed informed consent form will be obtained.

An information leaflet and informed consent will clarify that the patient will not be subjected to additional blood withdrawals and bone marrow aspirates.

Keywords
Acute myeloid leukemia, Mesenchimal cells, NPM1
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07379528
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
pazients with diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemiaNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To characterize the BM-MSCs of subjects affected by AML NPM1mut as possible novel indicators of patient clinical outcome

    detection of CD146+ MSCs percentage at baseline

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Characterize AML-MSCs in patients with AML NPM1mut vs AML NPM1wt

    proliferative capacity evaluation

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Characterize AML-MSCs in patients with AML NPM1mut vs AML NPM1wt

    transition to senescence evaluation

    Measured: baseline

  3. Characterize AML-MSCs in patients with AML NPM1mut vs AML NPM1wt

    The expression of surface marker CD105 will be evaluated by multiparametric flow cytometry.

    Measured: baseline

  4. Characterize AML-MSCs in patients with AML NPM1mut vs AML NPM1wt

    The expression of surface marker CD73 will be evaluated through multiparametric flow cytometry.

    Measured: baseline

  5. Characterize AML-MSCs in patients with AML NPM1mut vs AML NPM1wt

    The expression of surface marker CD90 will be evaluated through multiparametric flow cytometry.

    Measured: baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jan 2026
  2. Study start15 Mar 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2025
  4. Study completion15 Mar 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
70 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07379528
Sponsor's protocol ID
AML-MSC
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
27 Nov 2025
Last updated
30 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The individual participant data will be made available after the publication of the study results in a peer-reviewed journal. Interested researchers can submit a formal request to access the data. The data will be shared exclusively for scientific research purposes. Commercial use or use outside of the agreed-upon research scope will not be permitted. All personal identifiers will be removed from the dataset to protect participant confidentiality in accordance with applicable data protection regulations

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML), run by Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To characterize the BM-MSCs of subjects affected by AML NPM1mut as possible novel indicators of patient clinical outcome (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in