Bone Augmentation Associated With Immediate LoadingILHANCT07374757
Immediately Loaded Implants With or Without Horizontal Augmentation
A study testing guided bone regeneration technique in people with Bone Augmentation Associated With Immediate Loading, run by Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Trial summary
This study aims to compare the clinical success and patient-reported outcomes of immediately loaded dental implants placed in sites with buccal dehiscence treated by horizontal augmentation versus immediately loaded implants placed without regeneration techniques. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 18 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Bone Augmentation Associated With Immediate Loading
- What is being tested?
- guided bone regeneration technique
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 8 Jan 2026to 11 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 18 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients requiring dental implant placement Presence of buccal dehiscence at the implant site Indication for immediate loading Ability to provide written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Uncontrolled systemic diseases Active periodontal disease Heavy smoking exceeding predefined limits Conditions contraindicating oral surgery
About this study
Official title: Clinical Outcomes of Immediately Loaded Implants With Buccal Dehiscence Treated by Horizontal Augmentation Compared With Immediately Loaded Implants Without Regeneration Techniques
This study aims to compare the clinical success and patient-reported outcomes of immediately loaded dental implants placed in sites with buccal dehiscence treated by horizontal augmentation versus immediately loaded implants placed without regeneration techniques.
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective, interventional, non-randomized, comparative clinical trial designed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of immediately loaded dental implants using two different surgical approaches. One group will receive implants placed in sites with buccal dehiscence treated by horizontal bone augmentation, while the comparison group will receive immediately loaded implants placed without the use of any bone regeneration techniques.
The primary outcome of the study is implant success at 12 months after implant placement. Secondary outcomes include marginal bone level changes, complication rates, and oral health-related quality of life assessed using a validated questionnaire. The study is conducted with a parallel assignment model and an open-label design due to the nature of the surgical interventions.
- Being tested
- guided bone regeneration technique, No intervention
- Keywords
- Inmediate loading, horizontal bone regeneration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
guided bone regeneration techniqueProcedure or surgery
Immediately loaded dental implants placed in sites presenting buccal dehiscence treated by horizontal bone augmentation using a guided bone regeneration technique according to a standardized surgical protocol.
No interventionProcedure or surgery
Immediately loaded dental implants placed without the use of any bone regeneration or augmentation techniques.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Horizontal bone augmentation associate with immediate loading | Experimental | Horizontal bone augmentation associate with immediate loading Receives: Procedure: guided bone regeneration technique |
| Inmediate Loading without bone regeneration technique | Other | Immediately loaded dental implants placed without the use of any bone regeneration or augmentation techniques. Receives: Procedure: No intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Implant Success Rate
Implant success is defined as implant survival at 12 months, absence of clinical mobility, absence of persistent pain or infection, absence of peri-implant radiolucency, and no need for implant removal or surgical re-intervention.
Measured: 12 months after implant placement
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jan 2026
- Study start8 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion11 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Bone Augmentation Associated With Immediate LoadingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07374757
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UCM2026
- Acronym
- ILHA
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 29 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Outcomes of Immediately Loaded Implants With Buccal Dehiscence Treated by Horizontal Augmentation Compared With Immediately Loaded Implants Without Regeneration Techniques
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07374757
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ILHA / UCM2026
- Keywords
- Inmediate loading, horizontal bone regeneration
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Complutense de MadridUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 11 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to compare the clinical success and patient-reported outcomes of immediately loaded dental implants placed in sites with buccal dehiscence treated by horizontal augmentation versus immediately loaded implants placed without regeneration techniques.
Detailed description
This is a prospective, interventional, non-randomized, comparative clinical trial designed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of immediately loaded dental implants using two different surgical approaches. One group will receive implants placed in sites with buccal dehiscence treated by horizontal bone augmentation, while the comparison group will receive immediately loaded implants placed without the use of any bone regeneration techniques.
The primary outcome of the study is implant success at 12 months after implant placement. Secondary outcomes include marginal bone level changes, complication rates, and oral health-related quality of life assessed using a validated questionnaire. The study is conducted with a parallel assignment model and an open-label design due to the nature of the surgical interventions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Horizontal bone augmentation associate with immediate loading | Experimental | Procedure: guided bone regeneration techniqueHorizontal bone augmentation associate with immediate loading |
| Inmediate Loading without bone regeneration technique | Other | Procedure: No interventionImmediately loaded dental implants placed without the use of any bone regeneration or augmentation techniques. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult patients requiring dental implant placement Presence of buccal dehiscence at the implant site Indication for immediate loading Ability to provide written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Uncontrolled systemic diseases Active periodontal disease Heavy smoking exceeding predefined limits Conditions contraindicating oral surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| guided bone regeneration techniqueImmediately loaded dental implants placed in sites presenting buccal dehiscence treated by horizontal bone augmentation using a guided bone regeneration technique according to a standardized surgical protocol. | Procedure or surgery | Horizontal bone augmentation associate with immediate loading |
| No interventionImmediately loaded dental implants placed without the use of any bone regeneration or augmentation techniques. | Procedure or surgery | Inmediate Loading without bone regeneration technique |
Primary outcome
Implant Success Rate
Time frame: 12 months after implant placement
Implant success is defined as implant survival at 12 months, absence of clinical mobility, absence of persistent pain or infection, absence of peri-implant radiolucency, and no need for implant removal or surgical re-intervention.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing guided bone regeneration technique in people with Bone Augmentation Associated With Immediate Loading, run by Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Implant Success Rate (time frame: 12 months after implant placement). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jan 2026.