Diabetic PolyneuropathyNCT07369297
PULP SENSIBILITY AND MASSETER INHIBITORY REFLEX IN DIABETIC POLYNEUROPATHY
An observational study of Diabetic Polyneuropathy and Healthy Individuals (Controls), run by Bezmialem Vakif University.
Trial summary
Accurate evaluation of dental pulp health is essential to avoid unnecessary endodontic treatments. In routine dental practice, pulp sensibility is commonly assessed using electric pulp testing and thermal (cold) testing. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Polyneuropathy, Healthy Individuals (Controls)
- How many people
- 108 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 15 Apr 2026to 15 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Study participants will be selected from adult patients attending the Departments of Neurology and Endodontics at Bezmialem Vakif University. The study population will include individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus with mild and severe diabetic neuropathy who have been evaluated in the Neurology Department, as well as systemically healthy control subjects. Participants will be recruited from patients referred from the Neurology Department and from individuals presenting for routine dental examination at the university dental clinic.
Who may be able to join
- Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent.
- For diabetic polyneuropathy groups:
- Diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy confirmed by a neurologist
- Neuropathy severity (mild or severe) determined by nerve conduction studies
- For healthy control group:
- No history of diabetes mellitus
Show all 12Show fewer
- No history of peripheral neuropathy or neurological disease
- Presence of at least one maxillary central incisor suitable for testing, defined as:
- No previous root canal treatment
- No extensive caries
- No clinical or radiographic signs of periapical pathology
- No periodontal disease affecting the selected tooth
Who cannot join
- History of chemotherapy, head and neck radiotherapy, or systemic conditions known to affect peripheral nerve function (other than diabetic polyneuropathy in the patient groups)
- Presence of acute or chronic orofacial pain disorders
- Use of medications within the last 24 hours that may affect sensory perception or nerve conduction (e.g., analgesics, sedatives, neuroactive drugs)
- History of trauma to the maxillary central incisor or surrounding tissues
- Extensive restorations, fractures, caries, or periodontal pathology involving the selected tooth
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Inability to tolerate study procedures or refusal to continue participation at any point
About this study
Official title: EVALUATION OF ELECTRICAL AND THERMAL PULP SENSORY THRESHOLDS AND MASSETER INHIBITORY REFLEX RESPONSES IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC POLYNEUROPATHY
Accurate evaluation of dental pulp health is essential to avoid unnecessary endodontic treatments. In routine dental practice, pulp sensibility is commonly assessed using electric pulp testing and thermal (cold) testing. However, these tests depend on patient perception and may be influenced by various factors such as systemic diseases, nerve damage, anxiety, trauma, or medication use.
Diabetic polyneuropathy is a common complication of diabetes mellitus and may alter peripheral nerve function, potentially affecting dental pulp sensibility test responses. This clinical study aims to evaluate how the severity of diabetic polyneuropathy influences dental pulp sensibility responses and masseter inhibitory reflex (MIR) parameters. The MIR is an objective neurophysiological reflex that allows quantitative assessment of trigeminal nerve function.
Read more
In this study, individuals with mild diabetic polyneuropathy, severe diabetic polyneuropathy, and healthy controls will be evaluated. All participants will undergo electric pulp testing, cold testing, and MIR measurements using standardized protocols.
The primary hypothesis of this study is that increasing severity of diabetic polyneuropathy leads to reduced dental pulp sensibility responses and altered MIR parameters compared to healthy individuals. It is further hypothesized that conventional pulp sensibility tests may produce false-negative results in patients with advanced neuropathy.
The findings of this study are expected to contribute to more accurate endodontic diagnosis and improved understanding of orofacial neurophysiological changes in diabetic patients.
Read the detailed description
Accurate assessment of dental pulp health is fundamental for correct endodontic diagnosis and for preventing unnecessary or inappropriate treatment decisions. In routine dental practice, pulp sensibility is commonly evaluated using electric pulp testing (EPT) and thermal (cold) testing. These methods primarily assess neural response rather than true pulp vitality and rely on patient perception, which makes them inherently subjective.
Several factors may influence pulp sensibility test outcomes, including systemic diseases affecting peripheral nerves, such as diabetic polyneuropathy, as well as trauma, anxiety levels, medication use, and metabolic disease duration. Diabetic polyneuropathy is a frequent complication of diabetes mellitus and is characterized by progressive sensory nerve dysfunction. This condition may alter trigeminal nerve conduction and pain perception, potentially leading to altered or reduced responses in conventional pulp sensibility tests and increasing the risk of false-negative results.
The masseter inhibitory reflex (MIR) is a well-established neurophysiological reflex mediated by trigeminal afferent and efferent pathways and can be objectively recorded using electromyography. Unlike conventional pulp tests, MIR provides quantitative and objective information about orofacial sensory and motor nerve function. However, the relationship between diabetic polyneuropathy severity, dental pulp sensibility responses, and MIR parameters has not been sufficiently investigated.
The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the effect of diabetic polyneuropathy severity on dental pulp sensibility responses and masseter inhibitory reflex parameters. Individuals diagnosed with diabetic polyneuropathy who presented to the Department of Neurology at Bezmialem Vakıf University will be included and categorized into mild and severe neuropathy groups based on neurological evaluation. A healthy control group without systemic or neurological disease will also be included for comparison.
A total of 108 participants aged between 25 and 65 years will be enrolled. Demographic and clinical data including age, sex, duration of diabetes, presence of comorbid systemic diseases other than diabetes, and medication use within the last 24 hours will be recorded for all participants.
Dental pulp sensibility tests will be performed on the maxillary central incisor. The selected tooth must be free of caries or present only with small, non-extensive restorations, must not have undergone root canal treatment, and must show no clinical or radiographic signs of periapical pathology or periodontal disease. Teeth with extensive caries, restorations, periodontal pathology, or previous endodontic treatment will be excluded.
Thermal sensibility will be assessed using a cold test, and both the time to initial sensation and the duration of sensation decay will be recorded.
Electric pulp testing will be performed using a standardized protocol, and the response threshold will be recorded as a numerical value on a scale ranging from 0 to 64. All pulp sensibility tests will be conducted under standardized conditions, and patient responses will be documented.
Masseter inhibitory reflex recordings will be obtained using electromyography. Electrical stimulation will be applied to the maxillary central incisor using a sterile needle electrode. Surface electrodes will be placed according to standardized neurophysiological protocols to record MIR responses. Participants may experience brief and mild transient sensations during stimulation. All procedures will be explained in detail prior to testing, and participants will be informed that they may request termination of the procedure at any time. If a participant expresses discomfort or wishes to stop, all procedures will be immediately discontinued.
The primary hypothesis of this study is that increasing severity of diabetic polyneuropathy is associated with decreased dental pulp sensibility responses and altered MIR parameters compared to healthy controls. It is further hypothesized that conventional pulp sensibility tests may yield false-negative responses in individuals with advanced neuropathy, whereas MIR measurements will provide objective evidence of altered orofacial nerve function.
Statistical analysis will be performed using appropriate statistical software. Descriptive statistics will be calculated for all variables. Normality of data distribution will be assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Group comparisons will be conducted using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal-Wallis test, depending on data distribution. Post hoc analyses will be performed where appropriate. Associations between neuropathy severity, pulp sensibility parameters, and MIR measurements will be evaluated using correlation and regression analyses. A p-value of <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
The results of this clinical study are expected to improve understanding of the impact of diabetic polyneuropathy on dental pulp sensibility testing and to support the use of neurophysiological assessment methods as complementary tools in endodontic diagnosis. By identifying limitations of conventional pulp tests in diabetic patients, this study aims to contribute to more accurate diagnostic decision-making and improved patient care.
- Keywords
- Diabetic Polyneuropathy, Electrical Pulp Test, Cold Test, Masseter Inhibitory Reflex
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Neuropathies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mild Diabetic Polyneuropathy | The severity of diabetic polyneuropathy will be determined based on nerve conduction studies performed by the Department of Neurology. Participants will be classified into mild or severe diabetic polyneuropathy groups according to standardized nerve conduction parameters, including sensory and motor nerve conduction velocities, amplitudes, and latencies. These classifications will be made by an experienced neurologist, and group allocation will be based on objective electrophysiological findings rather than subjective symptoms. Interventions will be performed in the following order: thermal (cold test), electric pulp test, and masseter inhibitory reflex recording. | |
| Severe Diabetic Polyneuropathy | The severity of diabetic polyneuropathy will be determined based on nerve conduction studies performed by the Department of Neurology. Participants will be classified into mild or severe diabetic polyneuropathy groups according to standardized nerve conduction parameters, including sensory and motor nerve conduction velocities, amplitudes, and latencies. These classifications will be made by an experienced neurologist, and group allocation will be based on objective electrophysiological findings rather than subjective symptoms. Interventions will be performed in the following order: thermal (cold test), electric pulp test, and masseter inhibitory reflex recording. | |
| Healthy Controls Group | The healthy control group will consist of individuals with no history of diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy, or any other systemic or neurological disease. Control participants will have no history of chemotherapy, chronic pain disorders, or conditions known to affect peripheral nerve function. Individuals using medications that may influence sensory perception or nerve conduction within the last 24 hours will be excluded. Healthy controls will undergo the same standardized examination protocol as the diabetic polyneuropathy groups, including thermal (cold) testing, electric pulp testing, and masseter inhibitory reflex (MIR) recording, performed in the same fixed order. The same tooth selection criteria will be applied, and all procedures will be conducted under identical conditions to allow reliable comparison between groups. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Electrical Pulp Testing Threshold
Electric pulp sensibility will be evaluated using a standardized electric pulp test (EPT) performed on the maxillary central incisor. The tooth will be isolated and dried, and a conductive medium will be applied to ensure proper electrical contact. The EPT probe will be placed on the mid-facial surface of the tooth, and electrical stimulus intensity will be gradually increased according to the manufacturer's instructions. Participants will be instructed to indicate the first sensation perceived during stimulation. The stimulus will be stopped immediately upon participant response. The response threshold will be recorded as a numerical value on a standardized scale ranging from 0 to 64. The test will be repeated after a short recovery period if necessary to confirm reproducibility.
Measured: The total duration of the EPT procedure is expected to be approximately 2-3 minutes per participant, including tooth isolation, probe placement, gradual increase of electrical stimulus intensity, and recording of the response threshold.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Time to First Sensation During Thermal (cold) Pulp Sensibility Test
Thermal (cold) pulp sensibility will be assessed using a standardized cold test performed on the maxillary central incisor. The tooth will be isolated and dried, and a cold stimulus will be applied to the mid-facial surface using a cotton pellet sprayed with refrigerant (e.g., 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane). The stimulus will be maintained until the participant reports the first sensation. The test will be repeated after an appropriate recovery period to avoid sensitization. The time to first sensation will be recorded in seconds (s).
Measured: The thermal (cold) pulp sensibility test will require approximately 2-3 minutes, including tooth isolation, application of the cold stimulus, and recording of response times.
Time to Disappearance of Sensation After Thermal (cold) Stimulus Removal
Using the same standardized cold test protocol, thermal (cold) pulp sensibility will be assessed on the maxillary central incisor. The tooth will be isolated and dried, and a cold stimulus will be applied to the mid-facial surface using a cotton pellet sprayed with refrigerant (e.g., 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane). After the stimulus is removed, the time from removal of the cold stimulus to complete disappearance of the sensation will be recorded in seconds (s) to assess pulp sensibility recovery characteristics.
Measured: The thermal (cold) pulp sensibility test will require approximately 2-3 minutes, including tooth isolation, application of the cold stimulus, and recording of response times.
Masseter Inhibitory Reflex Latency
The masseter inhibitory reflex (MIR) will be recorded using electromyography to objectively assess trigeminal nerve function. Participants will be seated in a comfortable position, and electromyographic electrodes will be placed according to standardized neurophysiological protocols. Electrical stimulation will be delivered to the maxillary central incisor using a sterile needle electrode.
The stimulation intensity will be set at 120% of the individual electric pulp test (EPT) sensory threshold. During stimulation, electromyographic activity of the masseter muscle will be recorded, and the latency of the silent periods (SP1 and SP2) will be measured in milliseconds (ms).
Measured: The total duration of MIR recording, including electrode placement, calibration, and electromyographic data acquisition, is expected to be approximately 10-15 minutes per participant.
Masseter Inhibitory Reflex Silent Period Duration
Using a standardized electromyographic recording protocol, the masseter inhibitory reflex will be recorded to assess trigeminal nerve function. Participants will be seated in a comfortable position, and surface electromyographic electrodes will be placed over the masseter muscle according to established neurophysiological guidelines. Electrical stimulation will be delivered to the maxillary central incisor using a sterile needle electrode.
The stimulation intensity will be set at 120% of the individual electric pulp test (EPT) sensory threshold. Following stimulation, the duration of the silent periods (SP1 and SP2) will be measured in milliseconds (ms) to assess inhibitory trigeminal reflex function.
Measured: The total duration of MIR recording, including electrode placement, calibration, and electromyographic data acquisition, is expected to be approximately 10-15 minutes per participant.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2026
- Study start15 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion15 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetic PolyneuropathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bezmialem Vakif UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 108 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bezmialem Vakif University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07369297
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E.224974
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 3 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- EVALUATION OF ELECTRICAL AND THERMAL PULP SENSORY THRESHOLDS AND MASSETER INHIBITORY REFLEX RESPONSES IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC POLYNEUROPATHY
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07369297
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E.224974
- Keywords
- Diabetic Polyneuropathy, Electrical Pulp Test, Cold Test, Masseter Inhibitory Reflex
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 108 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Bezmialem Vakif UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 15 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Accurate evaluation of dental pulp health is essential to avoid unnecessary endodontic treatments. In routine dental practice, pulp sensibility is commonly assessed using electric pulp testing and thermal (cold) testing. However, these tests depend on patient perception and may be influenced by various factors such as systemic diseases, nerve damage, anxiety, trauma, or medication use.
Diabetic polyneuropathy is a common complication of diabetes mellitus and may alter peripheral nerve function, potentially affecting dental pulp sensibility test responses. This clinical study aims to evaluate how the severity of diabetic polyneuropathy influences dental pulp sensibility responses and masseter inhibitory reflex (MIR) parameters. The MIR is an objective neurophysiological reflex that allows quantitative assessment of trigeminal nerve function.
In this study, individuals with mild diabetic polyneuropathy, severe diabetic polyneuropathy, and healthy controls will be evaluated. All participants will undergo electric pulp testing, cold testing, and MIR measurements using standardized protocols.
The primary hypothesis of this study is that increasing severity of diabetic polyneuropathy leads to reduced dental pulp sensibility responses and altered MIR parameters compared to healthy individuals. It is further hypothesized that conventional pulp sensibility tests may produce false-negative results in patients with advanced neuropathy.
The findings of this study are expected to contribute to more accurate endodontic diagnosis and improved understanding of orofacial neurophysiological changes in diabetic patients.
Detailed description
Accurate assessment of dental pulp health is fundamental for correct endodontic diagnosis and for preventing unnecessary or inappropriate treatment decisions. In routine dental practice, pulp sensibility is commonly evaluated using electric pulp testing (EPT) and thermal (cold) testing. These methods primarily assess neural response rather than true pulp vitality and rely on patient perception, which makes them inherently subjective.
Several factors may influence pulp sensibility test outcomes, including systemic diseases affecting peripheral nerves, such as diabetic polyneuropathy, as well as trauma, anxiety levels, medication use, and metabolic disease duration. Diabetic polyneuropathy is a frequent complication of diabetes mellitus and is characterized by progressive sensory nerve dysfunction. This condition may alter trigeminal nerve conduction and pain perception, potentially leading to altered or reduced responses in conventional pulp sensibility tests and increasing the risk of false-negative results.
The masseter inhibitory reflex (MIR) is a well-established neurophysiological reflex mediated by trigeminal afferent and efferent pathways and can be objectively recorded using electromyography. Unlike conventional pulp tests, MIR provides quantitative and objective information about orofacial sensory and motor nerve function. However, the relationship between diabetic polyneuropathy severity, dental pulp sensibility responses, and MIR parameters has not been sufficiently investigated.
The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the effect of diabetic polyneuropathy severity on dental pulp sensibility responses and masseter inhibitory reflex parameters. Individuals diagnosed with diabetic polyneuropathy who presented to the Department of Neurology at Bezmialem Vakıf University will be included and categorized into mild and severe neuropathy groups based on neurological evaluation. A healthy control group without systemic or neurological disease will also be included for comparison.
A total of 108 participants aged between 25 and 65 years will be enrolled. Demographic and clinical data including age, sex, duration of diabetes, presence of comorbid systemic diseases other than diabetes, and medication use within the last 24 hours will be recorded for all participants.
Dental pulp sensibility tests will be performed on the maxillary central incisor. The selected tooth must be free of caries or present only with small, non-extensive restorations, must not have undergone root canal treatment, and must show no clinical or radiographic signs of periapical pathology or periodontal disease. Teeth with extensive caries, restorations, periodontal pathology, or previous endodontic treatment will be excluded.
Thermal sensibility will be assessed using a cold test, and both the time to initial sensation and the duration of sensation decay will be recorded.
Electric pulp testing will be performed using a standardized protocol, and the response threshold will be recorded as a numerical value on a scale ranging from 0 to 64. All pulp sensibility tests will be conducted under standardized conditions, and patient responses will be documented.
Masseter inhibitory reflex recordings will be obtained using electromyography. Electrical stimulation will be applied to the maxillary central incisor using a sterile needle electrode. Surface electrodes will be placed according to standardized neurophysiological protocols to record MIR responses. Participants may experience brief and mild transient sensations during stimulation. All procedures will be explained in detail prior to testing, and participants will be informed that they may request termination of the procedure at any time. If a participant expresses discomfort or wishes to stop, all procedures will be immediately discontinued.
The primary hypothesis of this study is that increasing severity of diabetic polyneuropathy is associated with decreased dental pulp sensibility responses and altered MIR parameters compared to healthy controls. It is further hypothesized that conventional pulp sensibility tests may yield false-negative responses in individuals with advanced neuropathy, whereas MIR measurements will provide objective evidence of altered orofacial nerve function.
Statistical analysis will be performed using appropriate statistical software. Descriptive statistics will be calculated for all variables. Normality of data distribution will be assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Group comparisons will be conducted using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal-Wallis test, depending on data distribution. Post hoc analyses will be performed where appropriate. Associations between neuropathy severity, pulp sensibility parameters, and MIR measurements will be evaluated using correlation and regression analyses. A p-value of <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
The results of this clinical study are expected to improve understanding of the impact of diabetic polyneuropathy on dental pulp sensibility testing and to support the use of neurophysiological assessment methods as complementary tools in endodontic diagnosis. By identifying limitations of conventional pulp tests in diabetic patients, this study aims to contribute to more accurate diagnostic decision-making and improved patient care.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mild Diabetic Polyneuropathy | – | –The severity of diabetic polyneuropathy will be determined based on nerve conduction studies performed by the Department of Neurology. Participants will be classified into mild or severe diabetic polyneuropathy groups according to standardized nerve conduction parameters, including sensory and motor nerve conduction velocities, amplitudes, and latencies. These classifications will be made by an experienced neurologist, and group allocation will be based on objective electrophysiological findings rather than subjective symptoms. Interventions will be performed in the following order: thermal (cold test), electric pulp test, and masseter inhibitory reflex recording. |
| Severe Diabetic Polyneuropathy | – | –The severity of diabetic polyneuropathy will be determined based on nerve conduction studies performed by the Department of Neurology. Participants will be classified into mild or severe diabetic polyneuropathy groups according to standardized nerve conduction parameters, including sensory and motor nerve conduction velocities, amplitudes, and latencies. These classifications will be made by an experienced neurologist, and group allocation will be based on objective electrophysiological findings rather than subjective symptoms. Interventions will be performed in the following order: thermal (cold test), electric pulp test, and masseter inhibitory reflex recording. |
| Healthy Controls Group | – | –The healthy control group will consist of individuals with no history of diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy, or any other systemic or neurological disease. Control participants will have no history of chemotherapy, chronic pain disorders, or conditions known to affect peripheral nerve function. Individuals using medications that may influence sensory perception or nerve conduction within the last 24 hours will be excluded. Healthy controls will undergo the same standardized examination protocol as the diabetic polyneuropathy groups, including thermal (cold) testing, electric pulp testing, and masseter inhibitory reflex (MIR) recording, performed in the same fixed order. The same tooth selection criteria will be applied, and all procedures will be conducted under identical conditions to allow reliable comparison between groups. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Study participants will be selected from adult patients attending the Departments of Neurology and Endodontics at Bezmialem Vakif University. The study population will include individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus with mild and severe diabetic neuropathy who have been evaluated in the Neurology Department, as well as systemically healthy control subjects. Participants will be recruited from patients referred from the Neurology Department and from individuals presenting for routine dental examination at the university dental clinic.
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent.
- Diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy confirmed by a neurologist
- Neuropathy severity (mild or severe) determined by nerve conduction studies
- No history of diabetes mellitus
- No history of peripheral neuropathy or neurological disease
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- History of chemotherapy, head and neck radiotherapy, or systemic conditions known to affect peripheral nerve function (other than diabetic polyneuropathy in the patient groups)
- Presence of acute or chronic orofacial pain disorders
- Use of medications within the last 24 hours that may affect sensory perception or nerve conduction (e.g., analgesics, sedatives, neuroactive drugs)
- History of trauma to the maxillary central incisor or surrounding tissues
- Extensive restorations, fractures, caries, or periodontal pathology involving the selected tooth
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Electrical Pulp Testing Threshold
Time frame: The total duration of the EPT procedure is expected to be approximately 2-3 minutes per participant, including tooth isolation, probe placement, gradual increase of electrical stimulus intensity, and recording of the response threshold.
Electric pulp sensibility will be evaluated using a standardized electric pulp test (EPT) performed on the maxillary central incisor. The tooth will be isolated and dried, and a conductive medium will be applied to ensure proper electrical contact. The EPT probe will be placed on the mid-facial surface of the tooth, and electrical stimulus intensity will be gradually increased according to the manufacturer's instructions. Participants will be instructed to indicate the first sensation perceived during stimulation. The stimulus will be stopped immediately upon participant response. The response threshold will be recorded as a numerical value on a standardized scale ranging from 0 to 64. The test will be repeated after a short recovery period if necessary to confirm reproducibility.
4 secondary outcomes
Time to First Sensation During Thermal (cold) Pulp Sensibility Test
Time frame: The thermal (cold) pulp sensibility test will require approximately 2-3 minutes, including tooth isolation, application of the cold stimulus, and recording of response times.
Time to Disappearance of Sensation After Thermal (cold) Stimulus Removal
Time frame: The thermal (cold) pulp sensibility test will require approximately 2-3 minutes, including tooth isolation, application of the cold stimulus, and recording of response times.
Masseter Inhibitory Reflex Latency
Time frame: The total duration of MIR recording, including electrode placement, calibration, and electromyographic data acquisition, is expected to be approximately 10-15 minutes per participant.
Masseter Inhibitory Reflex Silent Period Duration
Time frame: The total duration of MIR recording, including electrode placement, calibration, and electromyographic data acquisition, is expected to be approximately 10-15 minutes per participant.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Apr 2026.
Related trials for Diabetic Polyneuropathy
Recruiting
Comparative Study of Combination Treatment of Bionerv E+ Versus Vitamin B Complex in Treatment of Diabetic Polyneuropathy in Type 2 Diabetic Patients and Its Effect on Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Diabetic Symmetrical Polyneuropathy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Polyneuropathy, Impairments and Physical Activity - The PolyImPAct Study
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP), Vasculitic Neuropathy
RecruitingPhase 2
Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation With Balance Training to Decrease Fall Risks in Diabetic Polyneuropathy
Diabetic Polyneuropathy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Is Serum Irisin Level a Biomarker in Diabetic Polyneuropathy?
Polyneuropathies, Diabetic Complications Neurological
Recruiting
Normast3 for Adults With Diabetic Polyneuropathy
Diabete Type 2
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diabetic Polyneuropathy and Healthy Individuals (Controls), run by Bezmialem Vakif University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Electrical Pulp Testing Threshold (time frame: The total duration of the EPT procedure is expected to be approximately 2-3 minutes per participant, including tooth isolation, probe placement, gradual increase of electrical stimulus intensity, and recording of the response threshold.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2026.