Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesMADINCT07366619
Magic Angle Direction Imaging (MADI) ACL Study
An observational study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries and Meniscus Tear, run by Imperial College London at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This study will be conducted to see if a new Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanner could give additional information or help view the body in a different way. The new scanner may be useful to diagnose conditions affecting tissues such as ligaments, tendons and cartilage more accurately, potentially improving the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Meniscus Tear
- What is being tested?
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 29 Jan 2025to 30 Jun 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Before a patient can enter the study, they will have undergone a clinically indicated MRI for knee pathology which diagnosed an ACL injury requiring surgery.
Who may be able to join
- adults aged 18 - 65 years
- selected for ligament repair surgery
- ability to give informed consent, either written or e-consent
- no contraindications to MRI
- BMI ≤ 28 or thigh circumference less than 47 cm at approximately 7.5cm above the joint line
Who cannot join
- acutely unwell or frail patients in whom extension of scanning time may not be tolerated or may delay treatment
- contraindications to MRI
- participants who are too big to be able to fit in the prototype scanner
- recent surgery to the affected joint
- severe pain
- pregnant and/or breastfeeding participants
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United Kingdom2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Imperial College London
London, SW7 2AZ
Mihailo Ristic, PhD, 07768860451, m.ristic@imperial.ac.uk
Karyn E Chappell, PhD, 07961 144 537, k.chappell@imperial.ac.uk
- Recruiting
Imperial College NHS Trust, Department of Surgery and Cancer
London, W6 8RF
Chimnay Gupte, PhD, +44 20 8846 1234 ext. 15215, c.gupte00@imperial.ac.uk
Dimitri Amiras, PhD, 07760679587, d.amiras@imperial.ac.uk
About this study
Official title: Diagnostics of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Using Magic Angle Directional Imaging (MADI)
This study will be conducted to see if a new Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanner could give additional information or help view the body in a different way. The new scanner may be useful to diagnose conditions affecting tissues such as ligaments, tendons and cartilage more accurately, potentially improving the quality of care by the NHS. To develop such protocols and to test the clinical capabilities of the scanner, it is necessary to evaluate the scans of healthy volunteers before recruiting patient participants.
Conventional MRI scans are unable to detect the signal from tissues such as ligaments, tendons, cartilage and cortical bone, which contain highly aligned collagen fibres and the signal decays too quickly to be captured. These tissues appear black and are only seen because of the surrounding brighter tissues. If a bright region appears, it can be a sign of an injury or disease, but it can also appear due to the Magic Angle artefacts, when the collagen fibres are at a specific angle to the main magnetic field of the MR scanner. This anomaly can make assessment of these tissues difficult. Currently the diagnostic gold standard is arthroscopy, though it is mostly undertaken therapeutically.
Read more
The method harnesses this inherent tissue property to gain information about these collagen-rich tissues in joints. Using Magic Angle Direction Imaging (MADI) it is possible to obtain detailed information about the collagen fibre structures, and this is not available using conventional MRI. MADI could be important for planning surgery, developing new tissue implants, and monitoring outcome measures.
In both standard cylindrical scanner and the conventional open scanner, it is impossible to move the magnet, nor the patient, in the required manner. This motivated the development of a novel prototype MA scanner that can move around the patient.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the ability to routinely perform in-vivo Magic Angle-MRI of collagen structures in joints based on the magic angle principle, and to assess the ability to use qualitative and quantitative assessment of the Magic Angle-MR images to distinguish between the pathologies of the soft structures imaged.
Read the detailed description
STUDY DESIGN
- Type of Study This is a pilot study investigating the potential role of MA-MRI in visualising and assessing ACL tears in the knee using a non-CE marked medical device. The patient study follows on from a pilot study of healthy volunteers that enabled the research team to establish the best practice and sequences for qualitative/quantitative evaluation of the knee joint. The MRI study protocol has been developed using healthy volunteers initially and now will be tested in patients. Methods for positioning the healthy volunteers and their limbs will now be applied to a patient cohort. The scanner is based at the Mechanical Engineering department at Imperial College London, South Kensington campus.
- Duration It will last 36 months.
- Number and Type of Subjects As this is a novel technique there is no data available to perform a reliable power calculation. However, similar studies to examine the efficacy of the novel MRI technique image between 20 and 30 subjects. This study will therefore recruit 20 patients. 20 healthy volunteers have previously been recruited from staff and students at Imperial College London to fine tune the methods before the patient study commences. The patient group will be recruited from ICHT sports injury/orthopaedic clinic once a diagnosis of an ACL tear has been made with conventional MRI.
- Recruitment 20 patients will be recruited from ICHT orthopaedic / sports medicine clinic who have suffered an ACL injury who have also undergone clinically indicated MRI. Patients will be recruited from Charing Cross Hospital and St Mary's Hospitals. They will be identified by members of the clinical team, who are also members of the research team at ICHT. NHS systems, MDT meetings and clinics will all be used to identify appropriate patients as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria (participant entry). A poster with a QR code to contact the study coordinator should patients wish to take part in the study will be placed in the orthopaedic and sport clinic waiting room. The clinical team at ICHT, some of whom are also part of the research team, will identify the patients, and will inform the research team at ICHT who the potential patients are once the patients have given verbal consent to be contacted by the research team. Patients will be given details of the study (in lay language), and any queries will be addressed by the members of the research team at ICHT. Written information will also be provided in the form of a patient information sheet that accompanies an invitation letter for the study. The invitation letter will be sent if a patient contacts the team after seeing a recruitment poster, after the patient's first appointment at clinic, or later based on the waiting list for ACL surgery. A video of the scanner and its movement will also be made available to interested patients. The research team will then call the patients, and ensure the patient is given the Patient Information Sheet and explain the study to them. A follow up call to the patients to check if they are interested in taking part will be made. If they are interested, then this call will also involve confirming the patient's eligibility, by going through the inclusion/exclusion checklist with them, as well as the MR safety checklist. This will include asking them their height and weight to get their BMI. If they are eligible then they will be invited to take part. Sufficient time will be given for full consideration of participation before informed consent is obtained. They will be assured their participation is entirely voluntary and their decision will have no impact on their clinical care. Either written or electronic informed consent must be obtained. Patients will be contacted for a telephone conversation by members of the research team at ICHT to ask questions about the study and any concerns before they consent. Patients will have the option to sign an informed consent form at ICHT sites or sign e-consent on the REDCAP database before any study procedures take place, and then the complete eligibility check will be completed, by going through the inclusion/exclusion checklist with patients, including measuring height, weight and thigh circumference. The research team will also complete the MR safety checklist with the patients. Reasonable travel expenses will be reimbursed for participants when required, up to £20 per participant for travel to the Magic Angle scanner based at Imperial College London.
- MRI Safety Participants will be asked to complete an MRI safety checklist to ensure that they are safe to go into an MRI scanner. Members of the study team will contact participants and confirm their eligibility according to the short MR safety check. Any red flags mean that the patient failed the eligibility criteria and cannot be included in the study. It is anticipated that they will have already been scanned on a hospital MRI system and completed the hospital MR safety form. However, before inclusion into this study the MR safety checklist will ensure there are no contraindications to MA-MRI. There is an adapted MR safety checklist which can be used to identify suitable patients at the recruitment stage. The research MR safety checklist is more restrictive due to the non-CE marked device and the magnetic field's ability to move around the patient. The MA-MRI scanner is low field so is unlikely to be less safe than conventional MRI, (10 times less strong). However, most safety data and recommendations are researched on horizontal field 1.5 T or 3T systems. No MR conditional active implants will be scanned on the MA-MRI system. Passive MR conditional implants may be scanned as it is unlikely that they will be inside the transmit coil (e.g., hip replacement). The medical physics team will review safety data for the device. An investigator meeting of the Trial Steering Group will be held after the first 10 patients have been scanned in order to review interim safety and efficacy of the trial.
- Methods The MA-MRI scanner will be used for all research scans. The scanner is in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Imperial College London, South Kensington campus. Once participants have given either written or electronic informed consent to take part in the study, they will undergo the MA-MRI scan. Transportation will be organised for the patient to bring them to the South Kensington campus of Imperial College London where they will be met by the postdoctoral research radiographer and their consent from will be checked to verify consent. If a paper consent form was signed, a copy of the signed ICF will be taken with the patient to the Imperial College London site, for the ICL team to confirm the patient is fully consented before undergoing the MADI scan. The visit to the MA-MRI scanner will take about 1 ½ hours and the imaging itself will be performed over a period of about an hour. The patient will be asked to remove and lock away any jewellery or loose metal items from around the body. If needed change into MR safe clothing (scrubs) without zips or metal fastening near the joint being scanned. The patient will be comfortably sitting outside the MRI magnet (as opposed to conventional MRI where they will lie in a tunnel with their head at the opening). Whichever knee is being imaged either right and/or left will be positioned in the receiver coil, which is then placed between the magnetic poles on the holder to reduce any movement and ensure it is in the centre of the magnet. Padding will be applied around the thigh and calf to keep the patient comfortable. The chair will be adjusted, and leg support used to ensure the patient's comfort. If patients prefer (their choice) they can be given earplugs or headphones as the MRI scans can be noisy, however we have measured the scan noise to be at a similar level to speaking (60-65dB). The patient will also be provided with a panic alarm to stop scanning if they are no longer happy to continue with the study or wish to stop the scanner rotating. All the images will be looked over by the research team. The MA-MRI scans are not intended as a diagnostic scan, however if additional pathology is detected on the MA-MR images that were not apparent on the conventional MRI scan the Radiologist reviewing will add an addendum to the patient's record on the Imperial College Healthcare Trust's PACs record. The participants lead clinician will also be informed. One year (+/- one month) after the Magic Angle scan, participants will be contacted either by phone or email to identify any further pathologies that have been identified through their clinical investigations, and collection of any relevant imaging and information from their clinical notes will be collected.
- Data Processing The raw data from the scan will be post-processed using the algorithms developed by the research team. These identify voxels in the multiple image positions that have exhibited a significant change in signal intensity which suggests they are made up from orientated collagen structures exhibiting a magic angle effect. The net collagen fibre direction of those voxels is computed then co-registered onto the initial anatomical MRI scan to aid visualisation. Images will be presented to and discussed with the steering group of radiologist surgeons and sports physicians for their feedback. Improvements to the imaging can be made if necessary. Quantitative measurements of width and length of tendons and ligaments and meniscus can be performed in the images.
- Statistics and Data Analysis Radiologists will perform the visual, qualitative analysis of the MR images, and these will be assessed using descriptive purposes. These will be recorded in a record sheet. Clinical correlation with conventional MRI and operative findings (where available) will be performed.
Reviewers will be blinded to the findings of the clinical MRI studies prior to reviewing the images. Two suitably qualified reviewers within ICL and/or ICHT will review the patient images on both the conventional and the MA-MRI in different sittings, randomised order, and blinded to clinical findings.
Visual grading of the anterior cruciate ligament fibres will be assessed as per the table below. If articular cartilage and meniscus can be visualised, then a similar grading system will be used to assess the collagen fibre directions.
ACL Ligament
- = not seen Individual 'bands' not well seen
- = probably seen Bands seen mild-to-moderate signal with indistinct margins
- = seen Bands well seen with mild-to-moderate signal with definitive margins
- = readily seen Bands well seen with indistinct individual fibres
- = well seen Circumscribed, strong signal with individual fibres seen
Visual grading of the ACL structure will be assessed as per the table below. Visual grading of patients MA-MRI to cMRI compared by statistical testing (depending on distribution) with p <0.05 indicating significant difference and the null hypothesis (no difference in grading between the MRI techniques).
Patients with ligament tear
- = no tear 0% Individual 'bands' appear intact
- = partial tear - low grade up to 49% PL and AM band seen with incomplete tear to one or a complete tear of one bundle
- = partial tear - high grade over 50% Less than one bundle seen remaining
- = complete tear 100% Complete destruction of all fibres
Arthroscopic grading Grade 1 Mild injury to the ACL such as stretching that has led to laxity and reduction of tension in the ligament.
Grade 2 Partially torn ACL Grade 3 Fully torn ACL Tibial Spine Avulsion ACL injury The ACL itself is not torn but the bony attachment of the ligament to the tibia is pulled off.
It is beyond the scope of this patient study to confirm the accuracy as no biopsy or tissue samples will be acquired for corroboration. Animal model studies alongside polarised light microscopy study will inform accuracy of the collagen fibre directions.
The recruitment target will be 20 patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury.
Data and all appropriate documentation will be stored for a minimum of 10 years after the completion of the study, including the follow-up period, as per Imperial College policies.
- Conditions
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Meniscus Tear
- Being tested
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Keywords
- magic angle, musculoskeletal, low field, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), knee, ACL, degenerative meniscus, patellar tendon, magic angle directional imaging (MADI), short T2, collagen fibre orientation
- Medical subject headings
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiagnostic test
Also called Magic Angle Directional Imaging (MADI)
Patients will be scanned in a prototype MRI scanner at several orientations of the MRI magnet relative to the body.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients undergoing clinically indicated MRI for investigation for ACL injury | Patients will be recruited from ICHT orthopaedic / sports medicine clinic who have suffered an ACL injury who have also undergone clinically indicated MRI Receives: Diagnostic Test: Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Reproducibility with Magic Angle MRI
The primary outcome measures will be the reproducibility with MA-MRI in a group of patients with known ACL tears. We will use a grading system for the radiologists to assess the MA-MRI images through a) qualitative assessment to grade ACL fibres and b) quantitative assessments to distinguish between the ACL tears with a grading system for the radiologists.
- Visual grading of the anterior cruciate ligament fibres will be assessed (range 1-5) as follows:
- 1 = not seen
- 2 = probably seen
- 3 = seen
- 4 = readily seen
- 5 = well seen
- Visual grading of the ACL structure for patients with ligament tear will be assessed as per the table below.
- 1 = no tear 0%
- 2 = partial tear - low grade up to 49%
- 3 = partial tear - high grade over 50%
- 4 = complete tear 100%
Measured: Before surgery and 12 months after surgery.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Comparison of the ACLs imaged with MA-MRI against best practice
The secondary outcome measure will be a comparison of the ACLs (Anterior Cruciate Ligament) imaged with MA-MRI against best practice:
- cMR images (conventional MRI) performed pre-operatively to diagnose ACL injury taken from the imaging report and qualitative and quantitative assessment by 2 radiologists using the same scale as for MA-MR images (as defined for the Primary Outcome Measures);
- Arthroscopic assessment of the ACL during repair taken from surgical notes, evaluating the potential suitability of MA-MRI as a diagnostic tool for ACL injury.
Arthroscopic grading will be as follows:
- Grade 1 (Mild injury to the ACL such as stretching that has led to laxity and reduction of tension in the ligament)
- Grade 2 (Partially torn ACL)
- Grade 3 (Fully torn ACL)
- Tibial Spine Avulsion ACL injury (The ACL itself is not torn but the bony attachment of the ligament to the tibia is pulled off)
Measured: 12 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jan 2026
- Study start29 Jan 2025
- Primary completion30 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Imperial College LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Chinmay Gupte, PhD, Principal investigator, Imperial College NHS Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07366619
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 23CX8305
- Other IDs
- IRAS 301889
- Acronym
- MADI
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 26 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Data will be fully anonymised for any publication
Publications
Valente G, Pitto L, Testi D, Seth A, Delp SL, Stagni R, Viceconti M, Taddei F. Are subject-specific musculoskeletal models robust to the uncertainties in parameter identification? PLoS One. 2014 Nov 12;9(11):e112625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112625. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25390896Amin NH, Hussain W, Ryan J, Morrison S, Miniaci A, Jones MH. Changes Within Clinical Practice After a Randomized Controlled Trial of Knee Arthroscopy for Osteoarthritis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Apr 10;5(4):2325967117698439. doi: 10.1177/2325967117698439. eCollection 2017 Apr.
PubMed 28451610Fullerton GD, Cameron IL, Ord VA. Orientation of tendons in the magnetic field and its effect on T2 relaxation times. Radiology. 1985 May;155(2):433-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.155.2.3983395.
PubMed 3983395Fullerton GD, Rahal A. Collagen structure: the molecular source of the tendon magic angle effect. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Feb;25(2):345-61. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20808.
PubMed 17260393Bydder M, Rahal A, Fullerton GD, Bydder GM. The magic angle effect: a source of artifact, determinant of image contrast, and technique for imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Feb;25(2):290-300. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20850.
PubMed 17260400Du J, Pak BC, Znamirowski R, Statum S, Takahashi A, Chung CB, Bydder GM. Magic angle effect in magnetic resonance imaging of the Achilles tendon and enthesis. Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 May;27(4):557-64. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.09.003. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
PubMed 19022600Szeverenyi NM, Bydder GM. Dipolar anisotropy fiber imaging in a goat knee meniscus. Magn Reson Med. 2011 Feb;65(2):463-70. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22645. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
PubMed 20939091Bydder GM. Review. The Agfa Mayneord lecture: MRI of short and ultrashort T(2) and T(2)* components of tissues, fluids and materials using clinical systems. Br J Radiol. 2011 Dec;84(1008):1067-82. doi: 10.1259/bjr/74368403.
PubMed 22101579McGinley JV, Ristic M, Young IR. A permanent MRI magnet for magic angle imaging having its field parallel to the poles. J Magn Reson. 2016 Oct;271:60-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
PubMed 27552556Jones GMC, Pitsillides AA, Meeson RL. Moving Beyond the Limits of Detection: The Past, the Present, and the Future of Diagnostic Imaging in Canine Osteoarthritis. Front Vet Sci. 2022 Mar 15;9:789898. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.789898. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 35372534Brujic D, Chappell KE, Ristic M. Accuracy of collagen fibre estimation under noise using directional MR imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2020 Dec;86:101796. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101796. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
PubMed 33069034Chappell KE, Brujic D, Van Der Straeten C, Meeson R, Gedroyc W, McRobbie D, Ristic M. Detection of maturity and ligament injury using magic angle directional imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2019 Sep;82(3):1041-1054. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27794. Epub 2019 May 12.
PubMed 31081201
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Diagnostics of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Using Magic Angle Directional Imaging (MADI)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07366619
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MADI / 23CX8305
- Conditions
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Meniscus Tear
- Keywords
- magic angle, musculoskeletal, low field, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), knee, ACL, degenerative meniscus, patellar tendon
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
- Study start
- 29 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will be conducted to see if a new Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanner could give additional information or help view the body in a different way. The new scanner may be useful to diagnose conditions affecting tissues such as ligaments, tendons and cartilage more accurately, potentially improving the quality of care by the NHS. To develop such protocols and to test the clinical capabilities of the scanner, it is necessary to evaluate the scans of healthy volunteers before recruiting patient participants.
Conventional MRI scans are unable to detect the signal from tissues such as ligaments, tendons, cartilage and cortical bone, which contain highly aligned collagen fibres and the signal decays too quickly to be captured. These tissues appear black and are only seen because of the surrounding brighter tissues. If a bright region appears, it can be a sign of an injury or disease, but it can also appear due to the Magic Angle artefacts, when the collagen fibres are at a specific angle to the main magnetic field of the MR scanner. This anomaly can make assessment of these tissues difficult. Currently the diagnostic gold standard is arthroscopy, though it is mostly undertaken therapeutically.
The method harnesses this inherent tissue property to gain information about these collagen-rich tissues in joints. Using Magic Angle Direction Imaging (MADI) it is possible to obtain detailed information about the collagen fibre structures, and this is not available using conventional MRI. MADI could be important for planning surgery, developing new tissue implants, and monitoring outcome measures.
In both standard cylindrical scanner and the conventional open scanner, it is impossible to move the magnet, nor the patient, in the required manner. This motivated the development of a novel prototype MA scanner that can move around the patient.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the ability to routinely perform in-vivo Magic Angle-MRI of collagen structures in joints based on the magic angle principle, and to assess the ability to use qualitative and quantitative assessment of the Magic Angle-MR images to distinguish between the pathologies of the soft structures imaged.
Detailed description
STUDY DESIGN
- Type of Study This is a pilot study investigating the potential role of MA-MRI in visualising and assessing ACL tears in the knee using a non-CE marked medical device. The patient study follows on from a pilot study of healthy volunteers that enabled the research team to establish the best practice and sequences for qualitative/quantitative evaluation of the knee joint. The MRI study protocol has been developed using healthy volunteers initially and now will be tested in patients. Methods for positioning the healthy volunteers and their limbs will now be applied to a patient cohort. The scanner is based at the Mechanical Engineering department at Imperial College London, South Kensington campus.
- Duration It will last 36 months.
- Number and Type of Subjects As this is a novel technique there is no data available to perform a reliable power calculation. However, similar studies to examine the efficacy of the novel MRI technique image between 20 and 30 subjects. This study will therefore recruit 20 patients. 20 healthy volunteers have previously been recruited from staff and students at Imperial College London to fine tune the methods before the patient study commences. The patient group will be recruited from ICHT sports injury/orthopaedic clinic once a diagnosis of an ACL tear has been made with conventional MRI.
- Recruitment 20 patients will be recruited from ICHT orthopaedic / sports medicine clinic who have suffered an ACL injury who have also undergone clinically indicated MRI. Patients will be recruited from Charing Cross Hospital and St Mary's Hospitals. They will be identified by members of the clinical team, who are also members of the research team at ICHT. NHS systems, MDT meetings and clinics will all be used to identify appropriate patients as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria (participant entry). A poster with a QR code to contact the study coordinator should patients wish to take part in the study will be placed in the orthopaedic and sport clinic waiting room. The clinical team at ICHT, some of whom are also part of the research team, will identify the patients, and will inform the research team at ICHT who the potential patients are once the patients have given verbal consent to be contacted by the research team. Patients will be given details of the study (in lay language), and any queries will be addressed by the members of the research team at ICHT. Written information will also be provided in the form of a patient information sheet that accompanies an invitation letter for the study. The invitation letter will be sent if a patient contacts the team after seeing a recruitment poster, after the patient's first appointment at clinic, or later based on the waiting list for ACL surgery. A video of the scanner and its movement will also be made available to interested patients. The research team will then call the patients, and ensure the patient is given the Patient Information Sheet and explain the study to them. A follow up call to the patients to check if they are interested in taking part will be made. If they are interested, then this call will also involve confirming the patient's eligibility, by going through the inclusion/exclusion checklist with them, as well as the MR safety checklist. This will include asking them their height and weight to get their BMI. If they are eligible then they will be invited to take part. Sufficient time will be given for full consideration of participation before informed consent is obtained. They will be assured their participation is entirely voluntary and their decision will have no impact on their clinical care. Either written or electronic informed consent must be obtained. Patients will be contacted for a telephone conversation by members of the research team at ICHT to ask questions about the study and any concerns before they consent. Patients will have the option to sign an informed consent form at ICHT sites or sign e-consent on the REDCAP database before any study procedures take place, and then the complete eligibility check will be completed, by going through the inclusion/exclusion checklist with patients, including measuring height, weight and thigh circumference. The research team will also complete the MR safety checklist with the patients. Reasonable travel expenses will be reimbursed for participants when required, up to £20 per participant for travel to the Magic Angle scanner based at Imperial College London.
- MRI Safety Participants will be asked to complete an MRI safety checklist to ensure that they are safe to go into an MRI scanner. Members of the study team will contact participants and confirm their eligibility according to the short MR safety check. Any red flags mean that the patient failed the eligibility criteria and cannot be included in the study. It is anticipated that they will have already been scanned on a hospital MRI system and completed the hospital MR safety form. However, before inclusion into this study the MR safety checklist will ensure there are no contraindications to MA-MRI. There is an adapted MR safety checklist which can be used to identify suitable patients at the recruitment stage. The research MR safety checklist is more restrictive due to the non-CE marked device and the magnetic field's ability to move around the patient. The MA-MRI scanner is low field so is unlikely to be less safe than conventional MRI, (10 times less strong). However, most safety data and recommendations are researched on horizontal field 1.5 T or 3T systems. No MR conditional active implants will be scanned on the MA-MRI system. Passive MR conditional implants may be scanned as it is unlikely that they will be inside the transmit coil (e.g., hip replacement). The medical physics team will review safety data for the device. An investigator meeting of the Trial Steering Group will be held after the first 10 patients have been scanned in order to review interim safety and efficacy of the trial.
- Methods The MA-MRI scanner will be used for all research scans. The scanner is in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Imperial College London, South Kensington campus. Once participants have given either written or electronic informed consent to take part in the study, they will undergo the MA-MRI scan. Transportation will be organised for the patient to bring them to the South Kensington campus of Imperial College London where they will be met by the postdoctoral research radiographer and their consent from will be checked to verify consent. If a paper consent form was signed, a copy of the signed ICF will be taken with the patient to the Imperial College London site, for the ICL team to confirm the patient is fully consented before undergoing the MADI scan. The visit to the MA-MRI scanner will take about 1 ½ hours and the imaging itself will be performed over a period of about an hour. The patient will be asked to remove and lock away any jewellery or loose metal items from around the body. If needed change into MR safe clothing (scrubs) without zips or metal fastening near the joint being scanned. The patient will be comfortably sitting outside the MRI magnet (as opposed to conventional MRI where they will lie in a tunnel with their head at the opening). Whichever knee is being imaged either right and/or left will be positioned in the receiver coil, which is then placed between the magnetic poles on the holder to reduce any movement and ensure it is in the centre of the magnet. Padding will be applied around the thigh and calf to keep the patient comfortable. The chair will be adjusted, and leg support used to ensure the patient's comfort. If patients prefer (their choice) they can be given earplugs or headphones as the MRI scans can be noisy, however we have measured the scan noise to be at a similar level to speaking (60-65dB). The patient will also be provided with a panic alarm to stop scanning if they are no longer happy to continue with the study or wish to stop the scanner rotating. All the images will be looked over by the research team. The MA-MRI scans are not intended as a diagnostic scan, however if additional pathology is detected on the MA-MR images that were not apparent on the conventional MRI scan the Radiologist reviewing will add an addendum to the patient's record on the Imperial College Healthcare Trust's PACs record. The participants lead clinician will also be informed. One year (+/- one month) after the Magic Angle scan, participants will be contacted either by phone or email to identify any further pathologies that have been identified through their clinical investigations, and collection of any relevant imaging and information from their clinical notes will be collected.
- Data Processing The raw data from the scan will be post-processed using the algorithms developed by the research team. These identify voxels in the multiple image positions that have exhibited a significant change in signal intensity which suggests they are made up from orientated collagen structures exhibiting a magic angle effect. The net collagen fibre direction of those voxels is computed then co-registered onto the initial anatomical MRI scan to aid visualisation. Images will be presented to and discussed with the steering group of radiologist surgeons and sports physicians for their feedback. Improvements to the imaging can be made if necessary. Quantitative measurements of width and length of tendons and ligaments and meniscus can be performed in the images.
- Statistics and Data Analysis Radiologists will perform the visual, qualitative analysis of the MR images, and these will be assessed using descriptive purposes. These will be recorded in a record sheet. Clinical correlation with conventional MRI and operative findings (where available) will be performed.
Reviewers will be blinded to the findings of the clinical MRI studies prior to reviewing the images. Two suitably qualified reviewers within ICL and/or ICHT will review the patient images on both the conventional and the MA-MRI in different sittings, randomised order, and blinded to clinical findings.
Visual grading of the anterior cruciate ligament fibres will be assessed as per the table below. If articular cartilage and meniscus can be visualised, then a similar grading system will be used to assess the collagen fibre directions.
ACL Ligament
- = not seen Individual 'bands' not well seen
- = probably seen Bands seen mild-to-moderate signal with indistinct margins
- = seen Bands well seen with mild-to-moderate signal with definitive margins
- = readily seen Bands well seen with indistinct individual fibres
- = well seen Circumscribed, strong signal with individual fibres seen
Visual grading of the ACL structure will be assessed as per the table below. Visual grading of patients MA-MRI to cMRI compared by statistical testing (depending on distribution) with p <0.05 indicating significant difference and the null hypothesis (no difference in grading between the MRI techniques).
Patients with ligament tear
- = no tear 0% Individual 'bands' appear intact
- = partial tear - low grade up to 49% PL and AM band seen with incomplete tear to one or a complete tear of one bundle
- = partial tear - high grade over 50% Less than one bundle seen remaining
- = complete tear 100% Complete destruction of all fibres
Arthroscopic grading Grade 1 Mild injury to the ACL such as stretching that has led to laxity and reduction of tension in the ligament.
Grade 2 Partially torn ACL Grade 3 Fully torn ACL Tibial Spine Avulsion ACL injury The ACL itself is not torn but the bony attachment of the ligament to the tibia is pulled off.
It is beyond the scope of this patient study to confirm the accuracy as no biopsy or tissue samples will be acquired for corroboration. Animal model studies alongside polarised light microscopy study will inform accuracy of the collagen fibre directions.
The recruitment target will be 20 patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury.
Data and all appropriate documentation will be stored for a minimum of 10 years after the completion of the study, including the follow-up period, as per Imperial College policies.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients undergoing clinically indicated MRI for investigation for ACL injury | – | Diagnostic Test: Magnetic Resonance ImagingPatients will be recruited from ICHT orthopaedic / sports medicine clinic who have suffered an ACL injury who have also undergone clinically indicated MRI |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Before a patient can enter the study, they will have undergone a clinically indicated MRI for knee pathology which diagnosed an ACL injury requiring surgery.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- adults aged 18 - 65 years
- selected for ligament repair surgery
- ability to give informed consent, either written or e-consent
- no contraindications to MRI
- BMI ≤ 28 or thigh circumference less than 47 cm at approximately 7.5cm above the joint line
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- acutely unwell or frail patients in whom extension of scanning time may not be tolerated or may delay treatment
- contraindications to MRI
- participants who are too big to be able to fit in the prototype scanner
- recent surgery to the affected joint
- severe pain
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Magnetic Resonance ImagingAlso: Magic Angle Directional Imaging (MADI)Patients will be scanned in a prototype MRI scanner at several orientations of the MRI magnet relative to the body. | Diagnostic test | Patients undergoing clinically indicated MRI for investigation for ACL injury |
Primary outcome
Reproducibility with Magic Angle MRI
Time frame: Before surgery and 12 months after surgery.
The primary outcome measures will be the reproducibility with MA-MRI in a group of patients with known ACL tears. We will use a grading system for the radiologists to assess the MA-MRI images through a) qualitative assessment to grade ACL fibres and b) quantitative assessments to distinguish between the ACL tears with a grading system for the radiologists. 1. Visual grading of the anterior cruciate ligament fibres will be assessed (range 1-5) as follows: * 1 = not seen * 2 = probably seen * 3 = seen * 4 = readily seen * 5 = well seen 2. Visual grading of the ACL structure for patients with ligament tear will be assessed as per the table below. * 1 = no tear 0% * 2 = partial tear - low grade up to 49% * 3 = partial tear - high grade over 50% * 4 = complete tear 100%
1 secondary outcome
Comparison of the ACLs imaged with MA-MRI against best practice
Time frame: 12 months after surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jan 2026.
- Background: PubMed 25390896Valente G, Pitto L, Testi D, Seth A, Delp SL, Stagni R, Viceconti M, Taddei F. Are subject-specific musculoskeletal models robust to the uncertainties in parameter identification? PLoS One. 2014 Nov 12;9(11):e112625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112625. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 28451610Amin NH, Hussain W, Ryan J, Morrison S, Miniaci A, Jones MH. Changes Within Clinical Practice After a Randomized Controlled Trial of Knee Arthroscopy for Osteoarthritis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Apr 10;5(4):2325967117698439. doi: 10.1177/2325967117698439. eCollection 2017 Apr.
- Background: PubMed 3983395Fullerton GD, Cameron IL, Ord VA. Orientation of tendons in the magnetic field and its effect on T2 relaxation times. Radiology. 1985 May;155(2):433-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.155.2.3983395.
- Background: PubMed 17260393Fullerton GD, Rahal A. Collagen structure: the molecular source of the tendon magic angle effect. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Feb;25(2):345-61. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20808.
- Background: PubMed 17260400Bydder M, Rahal A, Fullerton GD, Bydder GM. The magic angle effect: a source of artifact, determinant of image contrast, and technique for imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Feb;25(2):290-300. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20850.
- Background: PubMed 19022600Du J, Pak BC, Znamirowski R, Statum S, Takahashi A, Chung CB, Bydder GM. Magic angle effect in magnetic resonance imaging of the Achilles tendon and enthesis. Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 May;27(4):557-64. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.09.003. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
- Background: PubMed 20939091Szeverenyi NM, Bydder GM. Dipolar anisotropy fiber imaging in a goat knee meniscus. Magn Reson Med. 2011 Feb;65(2):463-70. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22645. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
- Background: PubMed 22101579Bydder GM. Review. The Agfa Mayneord lecture: MRI of short and ultrashort T(2) and T(2)* components of tissues, fluids and materials using clinical systems. Br J Radiol. 2011 Dec;84(1008):1067-82. doi: 10.1259/bjr/74368403.
- Background: PubMed 27552556McGinley JV, Ristic M, Young IR. A permanent MRI magnet for magic angle imaging having its field parallel to the poles. J Magn Reson. 2016 Oct;271:60-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
- Background: PubMed 35372534Jones GMC, Pitsillides AA, Meeson RL. Moving Beyond the Limits of Detection: The Past, the Present, and the Future of Diagnostic Imaging in Canine Osteoarthritis. Front Vet Sci. 2022 Mar 15;9:789898. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.789898. eCollection 2022.
- Background: PubMed 33069034Brujic D, Chappell KE, Ristic M. Accuracy of collagen fibre estimation under noise using directional MR imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2020 Dec;86:101796. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101796. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
- Background: PubMed 31081201Chappell KE, Brujic D, Van Der Straeten C, Meeson R, Gedroyc W, McRobbie D, Ristic M. Detection of maturity and ligament injury using magic angle directional imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2019 Sep;82(3):1041-1054. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27794. Epub 2019 May 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Data will be fully anonymised for any publication
Related trials for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Extended Post-Operative Oral Tranexamic Acid Dosing After ACL Reconstruction
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
RecruitingObservational study
BioBrace® Augmentation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedures
ACL Tears
Recruiting
Quadriceps Strengthening ACL Reconstruction
ACL Tear
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of the Correlation Between Bone Tunnel Projection Placement and Clinical Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury, Tunneling Technique
Not yet recruiting
Supporting Athletes' Return to Sports After ACL Reconstruction: A Study of a Psychological Readiness Program
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Chinmay Gupte, PhD principal investigator
Imperial College NHS Trust
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries and Meniscus Tear, run by Imperial College London at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Chinmay Gupte, PhD (+44 (0) 20 331 21715, chinmay.gupte@nhs.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Reproducibility with Magic Angle MRI (time frame: Before surgery and 12 months after surgery.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07366619, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2026.