AzTrials
AzTrials

Physical InactivityNCT07365020

Feasibility RCT of Culturally Appropriate Physical Activity Strategies for Older Chinese Adults in the UK

A study testing The culturally appropriate PA promotion strategies in people with Physical Inactivity and Ethnic Minority Group, run by University of Manchester at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study was to explore the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a feasibility randomised controlled trial of culturally appropriate physical activity (PA) promotion strategies among older Chinese adults living in the UK. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Physical Inactivity, Ethnic Minority Group
What is being tested?
The culturally appropriate PA promotion strategies
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
1 Sep 2024to 1 Sep 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults aged 60 years or above;
  • Self-identified as Chinese ethnicity;
  • Speaking either Cantonese, Mandarin and/or English;
  • Able to read and write Chinese or English;
  • No time requirement for their stay in the UK, but they should have settled in the UK as residents and not as tourists.
  • Self-report not meeting the PA guidelines for older adults (engaging in less than 150 minutes of moderate-level PA each week and performing balance, strength, and flexibility exercises less than twice a week);
  • Self-report being able to walk around at home independently;
  • Can provide informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Those who self-report that they already meet the PA guidelines (engaging in more than 150 minutes of moderate-level PA each week and performing balance, strength, and flexibility exercises more than twice a week), as this study focuses on older Chinese adults with insufficient PA.
  • Those who plan to be away from Manchester for more than 2 months during the intervention period.
  • Participants with diseases where exercise is contraindicated will be excluded to ensure the safety of the participants. A self-reported approach will be used to identify these conditions, including cognitive impairment, as it is considered more acceptable by PCIE participants than formal assessments such as the MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination), which were viewed as burdensome. To mitigate potential bias, the research team will monitor participants throughout the study. Participants who show signs of impairment after giving consent, such as difficulty completing data collection or following instructions, will be excluded.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • The university of Manchester

    Manchester, Great Manchester, M13 9PL

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial of Culturally Appropriate Physical Activity Promotion Strategies Among Older Chinese Adults in the UK

The goal of this study was to explore the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a feasibility randomised controlled trial of culturally appropriate physical activity (PA) promotion strategies among older Chinese adults living in the UK.

The main questions the study aimed to answer were:

Read more

Whether older Chinese adults in the UK were willing to take part in the study and to be randomly assigned to a group

Whether participants were willing to remain in the study for its full duration

Whether participants were willing to engage with the PA promotion strategies, including attending workshops, using a logbook, wearing a pedometer, and joining a social media support group

Whether participants found the PA promotion strategies and outcome measures acceptable

Whether physical activity, physical function, and quality of life showed changes in the intervention and control groups

Researchers compared the culturally appropriate PA promotion strategies with a World Health Organization (WHO) PA recommendation leaflet. The study lasted 18 weeks, including a 12-week intervention and a 6-week follow-up.

Participants in the intervention group received culturally appropriate PA promotion materials, including booklets, workshops, a social media support group, a resistance band for strength and balance exercises, and a pedometer.

Participants in the control group received a WHO PA information leaflet and a pedometer.

Participants in both groups completed data collection at three time points. At each time point, participants were asked to wear a pedometer for 7 days.

Being tested
The culturally appropriate PA promotion strategies, WHO leaflet group (control)
Keywords
physical activity, ethnic minority group, intervention, randomised control trial, older Chinese adults, UK, Feasibility
Medical subject headings
Sedentary Behavior, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • The culturally appropriate PA promotion strategiesBehavioural

    The intervention was developed based on the Behaviour Change Wheel, aiming to increase participants' capability, opportunity, and motivation to engage in physical activity. It consisted of three components: printed materials, group workshops, and an online social media support group.

    • The printed materials included three parts: a culturally appropriate core booklet; the Chinese version of the Otago home exercise booklet, and a physical activity logbook.
    • Participants were invited to attend three workshops over a 12-week period, scheduled every four weeks. The workshops were designed to reinforce the content of the booklets and included presentations, group exercises, and group discussions.
    • Participants were also invited to join a study-specific social media support group via WeChat or WhatsApp, depending on their preference. These groups provided peer support, opportunities to share physical activity goals and progress, and motivational messages and reminders from the researcher.
  • WHO leaflet group (control)Behavioural

    In the control group, participants received a printed leaflet outlining World Health Organization (WHO) physical activity recommendations for older adults. Participants were encouraged to follow these guidelines, including 150-300 minutes of moderate-intensity or 75-150 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic activity per week, along with strength and balance exercises twice weekly, at a time and place convenient to them. No additional support was provided.

Study groups in NCT07365020
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
The culturally appropriate physical activity promotion strategiesExperimentalThe culturally appropriate physical activity promotion strategies were developed based on 27 BCTs and will be delivered through three parts: a series of booklets, three workshops and a virtual social media support group
Receives: Behavioral: The culturally appropriate PA promotion strategies
WHO physical activity guideline groupActive comparatorThe printed leaflet of recommendations from the WHO physical activity guideline for older adults
Receives: Behavioral: WHO leaflet group (control)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recruitment rate

    We aimed to recruit at least 30 participants within eight weeks. Detailed records were kept of the total number of potential participants approached by the researcher, the number of participants who attend the screening, and the number of participants who are ultimately included in the study.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Compliance rate and follow-up rate.

    Participants were not fully withdrawn from the study solely due to discontinuation of or noncompliance with the intervention. For example, participants could choose to stop attending workshops or participating in the social media group while still remaining willing to complete data collection activities. Alternatively, participation could be discontinued based on clinical judgment. Every effort was made to collect as much data as possible to maintain the integrity of the study. Reasons for participants' exit from the trial were recorded separately.

    Measured: 18 weeks

  3. Adherence

    In this study, adherence was mainly assessed by the number of workshops attended by the participants.

    Measured: 12 week

  4. Acceptability

    Qualitative interviews. At the end of the study, about 50% of participants (including those who withdraw from the trial) was invited for follow-up interviews.

    Measured: 12 to 18 week

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Subjective measures of physical activity

    Subjective measurement was conducted using the Chinese version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE).

    Measured: Baseline, 12-week and 18-week

  2. Objective measures of physical activity

    A pedometer (Realalt 3DTriSport 3D Pedometer; 3DTriSport Pedometer for Walking with Clip and Lanyard - Realalt) was used to monitor participants' PA level (i.e., step counts).

    Measured: baseline, 12-week and 18-week

  3. COM-B questionnaires

    Brief COM-B questionnaires was used to assess the perceived capability, opportunity and motivation for PA behaviour among older Chinese adults in the UK.

    Measured: Baseline, 12-week and 18-week

  4. Physical Function

    The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) will be used to assess the potential change of physical function

    Measured: Baseline, 12-week and 18-week

  5. Health-related quality of life

    The CASP-12 (Control, Autonomy, Self-realisation, and Pleasure-12) questionnaire was used to measure older adults' health-related quality of life

    Measured: Baseline, 12-week and 18-week

  6. Adverse events

    A safety reporting protocol was followed for managing related and unexpected serious adverse events (SAEs) and directly attributable adverse events (AEs).

    Measured: Whole study period-18 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jan 2026
  2. Study start1 Sep 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2025
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants are randomly assigned to either a culturally appropriate physical activity promotion strategies group or a control group receiving standard WHO physical activity information and are followed in parallel.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07365020
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024-19749-37005
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
15 Jan 2026
Last updated
23 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing The culturally appropriate PA promotion strategies in people with Physical Inactivity and Ethnic Minority Group, run by University of Manchester at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recruitment rate (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in