AzTrials
AzTrials

Pelvic Floor Muscle ExerciseAGDNCT07363174

The Clinical Role of Anogenital Distance

A study testing Anogenital Distance Measurements and pelvic floor muscle strengthening exercises in people with Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercise, run by Cigdem Cinar at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Aims: To evaluate the predictive value of anogenital distance (AGD) measurements, including the anus-to-clitoris distance (AGDAC) and genital hiatus (GH), on the success of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercise
What is being tested?
Anogenital Distance Measurements and pelvic floor muscle strengthening exercises
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
23 Dec 2023to 23 Jun 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged 18 years and older with confirmed SUI diagnosis who agreed to participate in a 12 weeks pelvic floor rehabilitation program were included in the study

Who cannot join

  • (1) Current pregnancy, (2) history of urinary tract or kidney infection within the last four weeks, (3) diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, (4) previous surgical intervention due to urinary incontinence, (5) known psychiatric disorders, (6) neuromuscular disease, (7) presence of genitourinary fistula, (8) active urogenital malignancy, (9) permanent urinary catheter use, (10) failure to comply with the prescribed exercise program or (11) Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) Stage 2 (including asymptomatic cases) and above.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Biruni University Hospital

    Istanbul, 34295

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Clinical Role of Anogenital Distance in Predicting Pelvic Floor Training Outcomes for Stress Urinary Incontinence

Aims:

To evaluate the predictive value of anogenital distance (AGD) measurements, including the anus-to-clitoris distance (AGDAC) and genital hiatus (GH), on the success of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Read more

Methods:

This cross-sectional, case-control study included 150 adult women with clinically confirmed stress urinary incontinence who completed a three-month PFMT program. All patients' demographic data were recorded, and the anogenital distance (AGDAC, AGDAF) and genital hiatus (GH) were measured using a digital caliper in the lithotomy position. All participants performed supervised Kegel exercises three times daily with monthly follow-up to ensure proper technique and compliance. Patients were then classified as responders or non-responders based on clinical improvement. Associations between PFMT outcomes and AGD parameters, BMI, parity, and other demographic factors were analyzed. All patients will be assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) before and after treatment.

Read the detailed description

Clinical and demographic data, including age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), and number of births, were recorded for all patients at baseline.

All anogenital distance (AGD) parameters were measured with participants in the lithotomy position, with the legs positioned at approximately 45°, during the Valsalva maneuver. Measurements were conducted in accordance with standardized protocols to ensure accuracy and reproducibility (6). A stainless-steel digital caliper (VWR® International, LLC, West Chester, PA, USA) was used for all assessments. After each use, the caliper was cleaned with soapy water and disinfected with a 2% alcohol-based chlorhexidine solution.

Two AGD parameters were recorded: the distance from the anus to the clitoris (AGDAC) and the distance from the anus to the posterior fourchette (AGDAF). In addition, the genital hiatus (GH) was measured from the center of the urethral meatus to the posterior hymenal rim or the perineal midline. To minimize measurement error, all evaluations were performed by the same experienced gynecologist on three separate occasions, and the mean value was used as the final estimate. All patients will be assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) before and after treatment.

Being tested
Anogenital Distance Measurements, pelvic floor muscle strengthening exercises

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Anogenital Distance MeasurementsOther

    All anogenital distance (AGD) parameters were measured with participants in the lithotomy position, with the legs positioned at approximately 45°, during the Valsalva maneuver. Measurements were conducted in accordance with standardized protocols to ensure accuracy and reproducibility (6). A stainless-steel digital caliper (VWR® International, LLC, West Chester, PA, USA) was used for all assessments. After each use, the caliper was cleaned with soapy water and disinfected with a 2% alcohol-based chlorhexidine solution.

    Two AGD parameters were recorded: the distance from the anus to the clitoris (AGDAC) and the distance from the anus to the posterior fourchette (AGDAF). In addition, the genital hiatus (GH) was measured from the center of the urethral meatus to the posterior hymenal rim or the perineal midline. To minimize measurement error, all evaluations were performed by the same experienced gynecologist on three separate occasions, and the mean value was used as the final estimate.

  • pelvic floor muscle strengthening exercisesOther

    Following AGD assessment, all patients underwent a standardized pelvic floor muscle training program. Kegel exercises were instructed and supervised by physiatrists with more than ten years of clinical experience in pelvic rehabilitation.

    Before initiating the exercise program, it was essential to confirm that patients could correctly identify and contract their pelvic floor muscles. To achieve this, patients were instructed in Kegel exercises over five consecutive days, performing three sets per day, each set consisting of 8-12 contractions with each contraction lasting 8-10 seconds. Following this initial training, patients were advised to perform the exercises three times daily for a period of three months.

    During monthly outpatient follow-up visits, adherence to the exercise regimen was assessed, and the correctness of the performed exercises was verified. Patients who were unable to perform the exercises correctly received additional instruction.

    Pelvic floor strengthening exercis

Study groups in NCT07363174
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pelvic Floor Training Outcomes for Stress Urinary IncontinenceOtherAll participants will be given pelvic floor muscle strengthening exercises. After 3 months, they will be divided into two groups: those who benefited from the exercises and those who did not.
Receives: Other: Anogenital Distance Measurements; Other: pelvic floor muscle strengthening exercises

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. anogenital distance (AGD) parameters

    Two AGD parameters were recorded: the distance from the anus to the clitoris (AGDAC) and the distance from the anus to the posterior fourchette (AGDAF). In addition, the genital hiatus (GH) was measured from the center of the urethral meatus to the posterior hymenal rim or the perineal midline. To minimize measurement error, all evaluations were performed by the same experienced gynecologist on three separate occasions, and the mean value was used as the final estimate.

    Measured: 15 minutes

  2. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF)

    The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure used to assess the severity and impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life. It consists of four items evaluating the frequency of urinary leakage, the amount of urine lost, and the extent to which incontinence affects daily activities, with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 derived from the first three items, while the fourth item identifies situations in which leakage occurs and aids in incontinence subtype classification but is not included in the total score. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity, and the questionnaire is sensitive to clinical change, with a reduction of 3-4 points considered clinically meaningful and a score of 0 often defined as complete cure. The ICIQ-UI SF is recommended by the International Continence Society, has been translated and validated in multiple languages including Turkish, and is w

    Measured: 1-2 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jan 2026
  2. Study start23 Dec 2023
  3. Primary completion23 Mar 2024
  4. Study completion23 Jun 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
150 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07363174
Sponsor's protocol ID
2015-KAEK-80-23-51
Acronym
AGD
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
15 Jan 2026
Last updated
23 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Anogenital Distance Measurements and pelvic floor muscle strengthening exercises in people with Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercise, run by Cigdem Cinar at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

anogenital distance (AGD) parameters (time frame: 15 minutes). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in