AzTrials
AzTrials

Hypotension After Spinal AnesthesiaNCT07363109

Comparison of the Efficacy of Continuous Metaraminol Infusion Versus Continuous Norepinephrine Infusion for the Prevention of Hypotension During Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anaesthesia. A Randomised Controlled Trial.

A study testing Metaraminol infusion and Norepinephrine infusion in people with Hypotension After Spinal Anesthesia and Hypotension During Cesarean Delivery, run by Aretaieion University Hospital.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this double-blind randomised study will be to compare a fixed-rate prophylactic metaraminol infusion to a fixed-rate prophylactic norepinephrine infusion during elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 48 years, women only
What is being tested?
Metaraminol infusion and Norepinephrine infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Feb 2026to Mar 2029
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 48 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • adult parturients, singleton gestation, elective cesarean section

Who cannot join

  • ASA >II, age <18 years, Body Mass Index (BMI) >40 kg/m2, body weight <50 kg, body weight>100 kg, height<150 cm, height>180 cm, multiple gestation, fetal abnormality, fetal distress, active labor, emergency CT, cardiovascular disease or cerebrovascular disease, pre-existing or pregnancy-induced hypertension, use of antihypertensive medication during pregnancy, preeclampsia, any contraindication for regional anesthesia, such as thrombocytopenia or coagulation disorder, communication or language barriers, lack of informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Kassiani Theodoraki contact

00306974634162

ktheodoraki@hotmail.com

About this study

Official title: Prevention of Hypotension During Elective Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anaesthesia With Fixed-rate Metaraminol Infusion Versus Fixed-rate Norepinephrine Infusion: A Double-blind Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial.

The aim of this double-blind randomised study will be to compare a fixed-rate prophylactic metaraminol infusion to a fixed-rate prophylactic norepinephrine infusion during elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia.

Read the detailed description

Spinal anaesthesia is the anaesthetic technique of choice for elective cesarean section.

Spinal anaesthesia can be complicated by hypotension, with incidence exceeding 80% occasionally. Hypotension can lead to nausea, emesis and a subjective feeling of discomfort due to cerebral hypoperfusion. If left untreated, severe or sustained hypotension can lead to decreased uteroplacental flow and fetal distress of premature or compromised fetuses while severe complications to the parturient might ensue, such as loss of consciousness, aspiration, apnea or cardiac arrest.

Prophylactic vasoconstrictor infusion is an effective strategy for preventing maternal hypotension during regional anaesthesia. Phenylephrine is widely used because it acts quickly and causes less neonatal acidosis than ephedrine, but high doses may reduce maternal cardiac output. Norepinephrine and metaraminol, a sympathomimetic amine that acts both directly and indirectly, mainly by stimulating alpha-1-adrenergic receptors, with a weak effect on beta-receptors, have emerged as potential alternatives. While the optimal norepinephrine infusion dose has been defined in several studies, research on metaraminol remains limited, with insufficient data on its ideal dosing and efficacy in obstetrics. Most comparative studies evaluate metaraminol against phenylephrine-some suggesting better fetal acid-base outcomes-but no studies directly compare metaraminol with norepinephrine. Further research is therefore needed before metaraminol can be routinely recommended in obstetric anaesthesia.

This study will include pregnant adults who are normotensive, without complications, with a single pregnancy, who are not in active labor, and who are scheduled to undergo an elective cesarean section at the Gynecology-Obstetrics Clinic of Aretaieion Hospital.The study will use randomized, concealed allocation to assign participants to receive either metaraminol or norepinephrine infusions. Study group allocation will take place according to a computer-generated sequence of random numbers. A non-involved healthcare professional will reveal each participant's assignment, and a nurse will prepare identical 50 mL syringes labeled "study infusion," containing the drug at concentrations that deliver either 100 µg/min (200 µg/mL at 30 mL/h) of metaraminol or 4 µg/min (8 µg/mL at 30 mL/h) of norepinephrine. The anaesthesiologist, patient, and data analyst will remain blinded to group allocation.

All parturients will receive standard pre-anesthetic evaluation and standard hemodynamic monitoring will be applied. Next, on the hand opposite the one with the cuff for measuring NIBP, a special finger cuff connected to the Edwards Lifesciences ClearSight system will be placed on the index, middle, or ring finger. The ClearSight system from Edwards Lifesciences is a non-invasive medical system that allows continuous monitoring of blood pressure (cBP), as well as a range of other hemodynamic parameters such as cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR).

Baseline systolic arterial pressure will be considered the average of three consecutive measurements that will not differ more than 10% among them.

All parturients will have a peripheral intravenous catheter placed in the upper extremity after baseline hemodynamic measurements are recorded. The peripheral venous catheter in the arm without the cuff will be connected via a three-way stopcock and a small-volume tube to an infusion syringe placed in an electronic infusion pump in standby mode. The syringe will contain the corresponding vasoactive drug "study infusion." At the same time, infusion of Ringer/Lactate solution at a dose of 3 mL/kg/h will begin through the study infusion line (pre-loading) before the regional procedure.

A standard spinal anaesthetic consisting of ropivacaine 0.75% 1.8 mL plus fentanyl 10 μg will be administered in the left lateraL position at the L3-4 or L4-5 vertebral interspace. The study infusion medication (either metaraminol or norepinephrine, depending on group allocation) will be started at the same time cerebrospinal fluid is obtained, immediately before injection of spinal medications. After the intrathecal injection, patients will placed in the supine position with a left lateral tilt to provide left uterine displacement and to prevent aortocaval compression. The spinal sensory level will be tested bilaterally to ensure a T4 dermatomal level before surgical incision.

Hemodynamic parameters [systolic blood pressure (SAP), diastolic blood pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR)] will be recorded by a specially trained, experienced anaesthesiologist at specific time points during the procedure: baseline (T0), initiation of the study drug infusion (T1), placement in the supine position after subarachnoid administration (T2), sympathetic blockade at the T4 level (T3), start of surgery (T4), delivery of the newborn (T5), 5 minutes after administration of the oxytocin bolus (T6), end of surgery (T7).

Requirements for additional vasoactive agents and any adverse effects and complications in the mother's health will also be recorded.

Hypotension will be defined as SAP < 80% of baseline, hypertension as SAP > 120% of baseline, and bradycardia as HR < 60 bpm. In case of hypotension combined with HR > 80/min, a dose of 50 μg of phenylephrine will be administered, while when hypotension is combined with HR < 80/min, a dose of 5 mg of ephedrine will be administered. Episodes of hypertension (SAP > 120% of baseline) will be treated by reducing the infusion of the "study drug" by half (15 ml/h) while if blood pressure rises to levels >130% of the baseline value, administration of the vasoconstrictor solution will be discontinued. In case of bradycardia (HR < 60 bpm) in combination with SAP within 80%-120% of baseline or hypertension, the infusion of the "study drug" will be discontinued without the administration of atropine. When HR < 55 bpm in combination with hypotension (SAP value < 80% of baseline) or in case of HR < 50 bpm regardless of the degree of hypotension, 0.6 mg of atropine will be administered.

Neonatal pH values in the first blood gas sample immediately after birth will be recorded, as well as the Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes after birth.

The clinical interest of the study lies in determining whether the use of metaraminol is superior to the administration of norepinephrine as a vasoconstrictor during cesarean section and to what extent it ensures hemodynamic stability of the mother and a more favorable metabolic profile of the newborn.

Being tested
Metaraminol infusion, Norepinephrine infusion
Keywords
metaraminol, norepinephrine, prevention of hypotension, cesarean section, maternal hemodynamics

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Metaraminol infusionProcedure or surgery

    In parturients allocated to the metaraminol group, a metaraminol infusion (30 mL/h corresponding to 100 μg/min) will be initiated as soon as spinal anaesthesia is established.

  • Norepinephrine infusionProcedure or surgery

    In parturients allocated to the norepinephrine group, a norepinephrine infusion (30 mL/h corresponding to 4 μg/min) will be initiated as soon as spinal anaesthesia is established.

Study groups in NCT07363109
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Metaraminol groupActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Metaraminol infusion
Norepinephrine groupActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Norepinephrine infusion

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. incidence of hypotension

    any occurrence of hypotension throughout the operation will be recorded (SAP < 80% of baseline)

    Measured: intraoperative

  2. number of hypotensive episodes in the pregnant woman

    the number of hypotensive episodes (SAP < 80% of baseline)throughout the operation will be recorded

    Measured: intraoperativre

  3. incidence of bradycardia

    any incidence of HR < 60/min will be recorded

    Measured: intraoperative

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. need for vasoconstrictor

    parturient needed or not vasoconstrictor during the operation

    Measured: intraoperative

  2. type of bolus vasopressor administered

    phenylephrine verus ephedrine

    Measured: intraoperative

  3. number of bolus doses of vasoconstrictor administered

    number of provided interventions to maintain systolic blood pressure within the set limits will be recorded

    Measured: intraoperative

  4. total dose of vasoconstrictor administered

    total dose in mg for ephedrine or μg for phenylephrine

    Measured: intraoperative

  5. need for administration of atropine

    parturient needed or not atropine during the operation

    Measured: intraoperative

  6. incidence of hypertension

    any incidence of systolic blood pressure >120% of baseline will be recorded

    Measured: intraoperative

  7. need for differentiation in the basic infusion rate of the vasopressor solution

    due to the occurrence of bradycardia or reactive hypertension

    Measured: intraoperative

  8. incidence of nausea/vomiting

    incidence of nausea and vomiting throughout the operation

    Measured: intraoperative

  9. Incidence of dizziness, discomfort, and shivering

    Incidence of dizziness, discomfort, and shivering through the operation

    Measured: intraoperative

  10. neonatal Apgar score

    Neonatal Apgar score will be recorded at 1 min and at 5 min after delivery. The Apgar score is determined by evaluating the newborn baby on five simple criteria on a scale from zero to two, then summing up the five values thus obtained. The resulting Apgar score ranges from zero to 10. Scores 7 and above are generally normal; 4 to 6, fairly low; and 3 and below are generally regarded as critically low and cause for immediate resuscitative efforts.

    Measured: 1 min and 5 min post delivery

  11. neonatal blood gases

    fetal cord blood analysis will be performed immediately post-delivery

    Measured: 1 min post delivery

  12. glucose in neonatal blood

    glucose will be measured in the cord blood gas sample taken immediately post-delivery

    Measured: 1 min post delivery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jan 2026
  2. Study startFeb 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionFeb 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07363109
Sponsor's protocol ID
719/28-11-2025
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
15 Jan 2026
Last updated
23 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • McDonnell NJ, Paech MJ, Muchatuta NA, Hillyard S, Nathan EA. A randomised double-blind trial of phenylephrine and metaraminol infusions for prevention of hypotension during spinal and combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 2017 May;72(5):609-617. doi: 10.1111/anae.13836. Epub 2017 Mar 3.

    PubMed 28255987
  • Chao E, Sun HL, Huang SW, Liao JH, Ma PL, Chen HC. Metaraminol use during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 Aug;39:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Jan 25.

    PubMed 30772119
  • Lyu W, Zhang Z, Li C, Wei P, Feng H, Zhou H, Zheng Q, Zhou J, Li J. Intravenous initial bolus during prophylactic norepinephrine infusion to prevent spinal hypotension for cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled, dose-finding trial. J Clin Anesth. 2024 Oct;97:111562. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111562. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

    PubMed 39047530
  • Xiao F, Xu WP, Yao HQ, Fan JM, Chen XZ. A Randomized Double-Blinded Dose-dependent Study of Metaraminol for Preventing Spinal-Induced Hypotension in Caesarean Delivery. Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 12;12:608198. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.608198. eCollection 2021.

    PubMed 34054513
  • Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF. Comparison of phenylephrine infusion regimens for maintaining maternal blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2004 Apr;92(4):469-74. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh088. Epub 2004 Feb 20.

    PubMed 14977792
  • Ngan Kee WD. Prevention of maternal hypotension after regional anaesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jun;23(3):304-9. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328337ffc6.

    PubMed 20173633
  • Fitzgerald JP, Fedoruk KA, Jadin SM, Carvalho B, Halpern SH. Prevention of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Anaesthesia. 2020 Jan;75(1):109-121. doi: 10.1111/anae.14841. Epub 2019 Sep 18.

    PubMed 31531852
  • Bower JR, Kinsella SM. Preventing and treating hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. BJA Educ. 2020 Nov;20(11):360-361. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Sep 9. No abstract available.

    PubMed 33456918
  • Gizzo S, Di Gangi S, Noventa M, Bacile V, Zambon A, Nardelli GB. Women's choice of positions during labour: return to the past or a modern way to give birth? A cohort study in Italy. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:638093. doi: 10.1155/2014/638093. Epub 2014 May 15.

    PubMed 24955365
  • Nguyen-Lu N, Carvalho JC, Kingdom J, Windrim R, Allen L, Balki M. Mode of anesthesia and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing Cesarean delivery for invasive placentation: a retrospective cohort study of 50 consecutive cases. Can J Anaesth. 2016 Nov;63(11):1233-44. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0695-x. Epub 2016 Jul 21.

    PubMed 27443374
  • Kim WH, Hur M, Park SK, Yoo S, Lim T, Yoon HK, Kim JT, Bahk JH. Comparison between general, spinal, epidural, and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a network meta-analysis. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 Feb;37:5-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Sep 27.

    PubMed 30415797
  • Theodoraki K, Hadzilia S, Valsamidis D, Stamatakis E. Prevention of hypotension during elective cesarean section with a fixed-rate norepinephrine infusion versus a fixed-rate phenylephrine infusion. Alpha double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2020 Dec;84:41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.10.006. Epub 2020 Oct 17.

    PubMed 33080415
  • Sumikura H, Niwa H, Sato M, Nakamoto T, Asai T, Hagihira S. Rethinking general anesthesia for cesarean section. J Anesth. 2016 Apr;30(2):268-73. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2099-4. Epub 2015 Nov 19.

    PubMed 26585767
  • Iddrisu, M., Khan, Z.H. Anesthesia for cesarean delivery: general or regional anesthesia-a systematic review. Ain-Shams J Anesthesiol 13, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42077-020-00121-7

  • Angolile CM, Max BL, Mushemba J, Mashauri HL. Global increased cesarean section rates and public health implications: A call to action. Health Sci Rep. 2023 May 18;6(5):e1274. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1274. eCollection 2023 May.

    PubMed 37216058

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Metaraminol infusion and Norepinephrine infusion in people with Hypotension After Spinal Anesthesia and Hypotension During Cesarean Delivery, run by Aretaieion University Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Adamantia Gkaniou (00306930386842, adamantiagkaniou@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

incidence of hypotension (time frame: intraoperative). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07363109, which also lists 16 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in