Muscle StrengthNCT07362329
Use of Exercise Snacks to Improve Upper Body Fitness
A study testing Submaximal Repeated Exercise Snack and Maximal One-Time Exercise Snack in people with Muscle Strength and Muscle Power, run by New York Institute of Technology at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will examine the effects of an upper-body resistance "exercise snack" (ES) protocol on upper-body strength, endurance, and power. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: a submaximal effort repeated throughout the exercise day ES group, a maximal effort performed once per exercise day… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Muscle Strength, Muscle Power, Physical Endurance
- What is being tested?
- Submaximal Repeated Exercise Snack and Maximal One-Time Exercise Snack
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2026to 25 Apr 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 35 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy, as determined by self-reported health history
- Enrolled as a college or university student (full-time or part-time)
- Not currently participating in a structured upper-body resistance training program
- No participation in upper-body resistance training (e.g., weightlifting, calisthenics, CrossFit, bodyweight strength programs) for ≥ 3 months prior to study enrollment
- Willing and able to perform maximal and submaximal push-up and plank exercises
- Willing to refrain from initiating any new upper-body resistance training during the study period
- Able to provide written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Current participation in an upper-body resistance training program or engagement in upper-body strength training within the past 3 months
- History of upper extremity, shoulder, elbow, wrist, or trunk injury within the past 6 months that could limit exercise performance
- History of neurological, cardiovascular, metabolic, or musculoskeletal disorders that contraindicate resistance exercise
- Current pain or discomfort in the shoulders, elbows, wrists, hands, neck, or low back during pushing or plank activities
- Previous surgery to the upper extremities or spine within the past 12 months
- Use of medications that may significantly affect muscle performance, fatigue, or neuromuscular function
- Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy
- Any condition deemed by the investigators to pose an increased risk during maximal or repeated resistance exercise
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
New York Institute of Technology
Old Westbury, New York, 11568
About this study
Official title: Use of Resistive Exercise Snacks to Improve Upper Body Fitness in Graduate Students
This study will examine the effects of an upper-body resistance "exercise snack" (ES) protocol on upper-body strength, endurance, and power. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: a submaximal effort repeated throughout the exercise day ES group, a maximal effort performed once per exercise day ES group, and a control group that continues usual activity (Control: no resistance exercise). Both exercise groups will perform two exercises, push-ups and planks, three days per week. The submaximal repeated effort ES group (SMR_ES) will perform approximately 33% of the maximal number of push-ups and maintain a plank position for 33% of maximal time, three times per day. The maximal once-per-day effort ES group (MO_ES) will perform the maximal number of push-ups and maintain a plank position for maximal time, once per day. Therefore, both ES groups (SMR_ES and MO_ES) will perform the same weekly volume (repetitions and time) of both exercises across the six-week intervention period.
Before and after the six-week intervention period, all participants will undergo testing to assess upper-body performance. Outcome measures will include push-up endurance (maximum repetitions), plank endurance (maximum time), push-up power (assessed using force plates), and maximal push strength (assessed using hand-held dynamometry). Pre- and post-intervention changes in outcomes will be compared among all three groups. If significant changes are identified, additional comparisons will be conducted between the SMR_ES and Control groups, as well as between the SMR_ES and MO_ES groups.
The primary aim of this study is to determine whether repeated submaximal efforts performed three times per day, three days per week, increase upper-body endurance, power, and strength compared to a control group performing no resistance exercise. The secondary aim is to determine whether submaximal efforts performed three times per day, three days per week, produce changes in upper-body strength, endurance, and power that are not different from maximal efforts performed once per day, three days per week. These aims address whether exercise distribution influences strength and power adaptations beyond total weekly volume. The findings may help inform time-efficient, lower subjective-effort resistance training strategies that can be implemented in educational, athletic, or general fitness settings.
Read the detailed description
The academic demands imposed on graduate students present a barrier to performing regular resistive exercise and promote a sedentary lifestyle, which can lead to losses in upper-body strength, power, and endurance.
There are many causes of loss of lean body mass (LBM) in the general population. Decreases in strength and LBM typically begin between thirty and forty years of age and progress at a rate of 3-10% per decade. After the age of 70, the rate of LBM loss and strength decline accelerates to approximately 3% per year. These changes may be attributed to immobilization, loss of appetite, muscular dystrophies, chronic disease, aging, and sedentary behavior. By age 65, difficulty with dressing, transferring, walking, and toileting occurs at rates between 14% and 17%. By age 75, the incidence of difficulty increases to between 20% and 27%, and by age 85, difficulty with dressing, bathing, walking, toileting, and transferring increases to between 26% and 36%. Decreases in LBM and strength are strong indicators of negative health outcomes and represent one of the primary contributors to sarcopenia, alongside anorexia, dehydration, and cachexia. Loss of LBM combined with obesity further increases the risk of developing type II diabetes due to the role of skeletal muscle in glycemic control. Reductions in LBM also negatively affect bone density and metabolic rate.
Resistance training is one of the most effective interventions for improving physical performance and long-term health across the lifespan. Resistance training enhances muscular strength, endurance, and neuromuscular control, all of which are essential for optimal movement, joint stability, and performance of daily functional activities. Resistance exercise stimulates muscle hypertrophy, improves motor unit recruitment, increases LBM, and supports metabolic health through improved insulin sensitivity and elevated resting metabolic rate.
In older adults, resistance training increases muscle mass, strength, and power, while reducing difficulty performing daily activities and supporting independence with aging. Moderate-intensity, short-term resistance training significantly improves insulin sensitivity and HbA1c levels in older adults. In older women, resistance training reduces age-related declines in cortical bone health and bone mineral density of the hip and spine. Resistance training also reduces mild to severe depressive symptoms, thereby improving quality of life across age groups.
The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM), American Heart Association (AHA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and National Health Service (NHS) recommend performing resistance exercises at least twice per week for all major muscle groups, including the legs, hips, back, chest, abdomen, shoulders, and arms. These exercises are generally recommended at moderate intensity, characterized by muscular fatigue after completing 12-15 repetitions.
Despite the known benefits of resistance exercise, many individuals face barriers to consistent participation. Physical limitations associated with aging, chronic health conditions, psychological factors (e.g., lack of motivation, fear of injury, embarrassment), limited transportation, financial constraints, and environmental factors such as weather can all negatively affect adherence.
Among graduate students, time constraints related to academic workload are a primary barrier to regular resistance exercise and promote sedentary behavior. Previous studies have demonstrated declines in fitness and exercise participation during graduate training. Limited institutional support for physical activity and financial constraints further exacerbate barriers to consistent resistance training.
A potential solution to declining fitness among graduate students is the integration of resistive "exercise snacks" (ES). Exercise snacks are brief bouts of exercise lasting 1-5 minutes, separated by short rest periods, and performed multiple times per day. These sessions can be completed as little as three times per week.
Current literature strongly supports the viability of the ES approach. A 2024 systematic review by Yin et al. examining 11 randomized controlled trials found that ES protocols improved strength, flexibility, and balance in older adults without requiring equipment, while reducing common barriers such as time constraints and access limitations. Additional randomized trials have demonstrated improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength, power, and adherence using minimal-volume ES protocols across diverse populations.
Collectively, the literature supports ES as a time-efficient and effective training strategy for improving muscular and cardiovascular outcomes while enhancing adherence among populations facing barriers to traditional exercise. However, research examining upper-body resistance-based ES in young adult populations remains limited.
The objective of this study is to determine the effects of a six-week upper-body ES program performed at submaximal intensities on upper-body strength, power, endurance, participant retention, adherence, and satisfaction. The study aims to determine whether short-duration, repeated submaximal ES performed multiple times per day, three days per week, elicits positive adaptations in upper-body muscular performance among graduate students who do not regularly engage in resistance training.
It is hypothesized that the ES group will demonstrate greater improvements in upper-body strength and endurance compared to a control group maintaining usual physical activity. A secondary hypothesis is that outcomes in the ES group will not differ from those observed in a maximal-intensity, once-daily resistance exercise group performing the same exercises three days per week. A third hypothesis is that the ES group will demonstrate greater participant retention, adherence, and satisfaction compared to the maximal-intensity exercise group.
Investigating the effects of upper-body resistive ES on muscular performance in graduate students may identify an accessible, time-efficient, and lower-effort training strategy capable of improving strength, power, and adherence despite substantial academic demands.
- Conditions
- Muscle Strength, Muscle Power, Physical Endurance
- Being tested
- Submaximal Repeated Exercise Snack, Maximal One-Time Exercise Snack
- Keywords
- Exercise snacks, resistance exercise, upper body fitness
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Submaximal Repeated Exercise SnackBehavioural
Participants perform frequent, low-dose submaximal upper-body exercise snacks spread throughout the day. The SMR_ES group will perform approximately 33% of their individual number of maximal push-up and maximal plank time, three times per day, three days per week.
Maximal One-Time Exercise SnackBehavioural
Participants perform a single daily maximal-effort upper-body exercise snack. The MO_ES group will perform the maximal number of push-ups and hold a plank position for their maximal time, once per day, three days per week.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A submaximal repeated effort exercise snack (SMR_ES) | Experimental | The SMR_ES group will perform approximately 33% of their individual number of maximal push-up and maximal plank time, three times per day, three days per week. Receives: Behavioral: Submaximal Repeated Exercise Snack |
| A maximal effort one-time exercise snack (MO_ES) | Experimental | The MO_ES group will perform the maximal number of push-ups and hold a plank position for their maximal time, once per day, three days per week. Receives: Behavioral: Maximal One-Time Exercise Snack |
| Control group | No intervention | Continues usual activity with no upper body resistive exercise. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Maximal Upper Body Push Strength
Upper-body muscular strength will be assessed using a hand-held dynamometer during a standardized pushing task. Participants will push a barbell upward against an immovable strap connected to a pull dynamometer. Peak force output (Newtons) will be recorded.
Measured: Change from baseline after 6 weeks
Push-Up Endurance (Repetitions)
Upper-body muscular endurance will be assessed by the maximum number of push-ups completed using standardized form criteria.
Measured: Change from baseline after 6 weeks.
Plank Endurance (Seconds)
Core and upper-body endurance will be assessed by the maximum duration (seconds) participants can maintain a standardized plank position.
Measured: Change from baseline after 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Upper-Body Power - Peak Force (Newtons)
Upper-body power will be assessed during maximal push-up efforts performed on force plates. Peak force output (Newtons) will be recorded.
Measured: Change from baseline after 6 weeks.
Upper-Body Power - Time to Task Completion (Seconds)
Time to completion (seconds) of maximal push-up efforts performed on force plates will be recorded as an additional indicator of power output.
Measured: Change from baseline after 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jan 2026
- Study start1 Feb 2026
- Primary completion24 Mar 2026
- Study completion25 Apr 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (42)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Muscle StrengthStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- New York Institute of Technology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alexander Rothstein, New York Institute of Technology
- Investigators
- Alexander Rothstein, Principal investigator, New York Institute of Technology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07362329
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NYIT IRB-2026-396 Title:
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 9 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: We will upload our shared anonymized data using DryAd.
Publications
Marijancic V, Grubic Kezele T, Peharec S, Dragas-Zubalj N, Pavicic Zezelj S, Starcevic-Klasan G. Relationship between Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior, Spinal Curvatures, Endurance and Balance of the Trunk Muscles-Extended Physical Health Analysis in Young Adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Oct 18;20(20):6938. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20206938.
PubMed 37887676Jett KM, Daniels BT, Brigance M, Passarelli JL, Howie EK. A Qualitative Description of Graduate Students' Perceived Decline in Physical Activity from Undergraduate School. Int J Exerc Sci. 2024 Aug 1;17(5):1038-1055. doi: 10.70252/ORGX1052. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 39257547Stork MJ, Marcotte-Chenard A, Jung ME, Little JP. Exercise in the workplace: examining the receptivity of practical and time-efficient stair-climbing "exercise snacks". Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2024 Jan 1;49(1):30-40. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2023-0128. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
PubMed 37748202DiFrancisco-Donoghue J, Werner W, Douris PC. Comparison of once-weekly and twice-weekly strength training in older adults. Br J Sports Med. 2007 Jan;41(1):19-22. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.029330. Epub 2006 Oct 24.
PubMed 17062657Brandt T, Schwandner CTL, Schmidt A. Resistance exercise snacks improve muscle mass in female university employees: a prospective, controlled, intervention pilot-study. Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 6;12:1347825. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1347825. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 38379679Perkin OJ, McGuigan PM, Stokes KA. Exercise Snacking to Improve Muscle Function in Healthy Older Adults: A Pilot Study. J Aging Res. 2019 Oct 3;2019:7516939. doi: 10.1155/2019/7516939. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31687210Yin M, Zheng H, Bai M, Huang G, Chen Z, Deng S, Lyu M, Deng J, Zhang B, Li H, Zhang X, Liu Q, Little JP, Li Y. Effects of Integrating Stair Climbing-Based Exercise Snacks Into the Campus on Feasibility, Perceived Efficacy, and Participation Perspectives in Inactive Young Adults: A Randomized Mixed-Methods Pilot Study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2024 Dec;34(12):e14771. doi: 10.1111/sms.14771.
PubMed 39587826Yin M, Deng S, Chen Z, Zhang B, Zheng H, Bai M, Li H, Zhang X, Deng J, Liu Q, Little JP, Li Y. Exercise snacks are a time-efficient alternative to moderate-intensity continuous training for improving cardiorespiratory fitness but not maximal fat oxidation in inactive adults: a randomized controlled trial. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2024 Jul 1;49(7):920-932. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2023-0593. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
PubMed 38569204Jenkins EM, Nairn LN, Skelly LE, Little JP, Gibala MJ. Do stair climbing exercise "snacks" improve cardiorespiratory fitness? Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019 Jun;44(6):681-684. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0675. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
PubMed 30649897Wang T, Laher I, Li S. Exercise snacks and physical fitness in sedentary populations. Sports Med Health Sci. 2024 Feb 27;7(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.smhs.2024.02.006. eCollection 2025 Jan.
PubMed 39649791Western MJ, Welsh T, Keen K, Bishop V, Perkin OJ. Exercise snacking to improve physical function in pre-frail older adult memory clinic patients: a 28-day pilot study. BMC Geriatr. 2023 Aug 4;23(1):471. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04169-6.
PubMed 37542234Rodriguez MA, Quintana-Cepedal M, Cheval B, Thogersen-Ntoumani C, Crespo I, Olmedillas H. Effect of exercise snacks on fitness and cardiometabolic health in physically inactive individuals: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2026 Jan 19;60(2):133-141. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2025-110027.
PubMed 41057224Hanson, Melanie. "Student Loan Debt Statistics" EducationData.org, 2025-08-08,
Herazo-Beltran Y, Pinillos Y, Vidarte J, Crissien E, Suarez D, Garcia R. Predictors of perceived barriers to physical activity in the general adult population: a cross-sectional study. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017 Jan-Feb;21(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2016.04.003. Epub 2017 Jan 14.
PubMed 28442074Scroggs GJ, Battista RA, Kappus RM. Bridging the Gap: Promoting Physical Activity in College-Aged Students. Prev Chronic Dis. 2025 Jul 10;22:E36. doi: 10.5888/pcd22.250118. No abstract available.
PubMed 40638806
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Use of Resistive Exercise Snacks to Improve Upper Body Fitness in Graduate Students
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07362329
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NYIT IRB-2026-396 Title:
- Conditions
- Muscle Strength, Muscle Power, Physical Endurance
- Keywords
- Exercise snacks, resistance exercise, upper body fitness
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- New York Institute of TechnologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will examine the effects of an upper-body resistance "exercise snack" (ES) protocol on upper-body strength, endurance, and power. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: a submaximal effort repeated throughout the exercise day ES group, a maximal effort performed once per exercise day ES group, and a control group that continues usual activity (Control: no resistance exercise). Both exercise groups will perform two exercises, push-ups and planks, three days per week. The submaximal repeated effort ES group (SMR_ES) will perform approximately 33% of the maximal number of push-ups and maintain a plank position for 33% of maximal time, three times per day. The maximal once-per-day effort ES group (MO_ES) will perform the maximal number of push-ups and maintain a plank position for maximal time, once per day. Therefore, both ES groups (SMR_ES and MO_ES) will perform the same weekly volume (repetitions and time) of both exercises across the six-week intervention period.
Before and after the six-week intervention period, all participants will undergo testing to assess upper-body performance. Outcome measures will include push-up endurance (maximum repetitions), plank endurance (maximum time), push-up power (assessed using force plates), and maximal push strength (assessed using hand-held dynamometry). Pre- and post-intervention changes in outcomes will be compared among all three groups. If significant changes are identified, additional comparisons will be conducted between the SMR_ES and Control groups, as well as between the SMR_ES and MO_ES groups.
The primary aim of this study is to determine whether repeated submaximal efforts performed three times per day, three days per week, increase upper-body endurance, power, and strength compared to a control group performing no resistance exercise. The secondary aim is to determine whether submaximal efforts performed three times per day, three days per week, produce changes in upper-body strength, endurance, and power that are not different from maximal efforts performed once per day, three days per week. These aims address whether exercise distribution influences strength and power adaptations beyond total weekly volume. The findings may help inform time-efficient, lower subjective-effort resistance training strategies that can be implemented in educational, athletic, or general fitness settings.
Detailed description
The academic demands imposed on graduate students present a barrier to performing regular resistive exercise and promote a sedentary lifestyle, which can lead to losses in upper-body strength, power, and endurance.
There are many causes of loss of lean body mass (LBM) in the general population. Decreases in strength and LBM typically begin between thirty and forty years of age and progress at a rate of 3-10% per decade. After the age of 70, the rate of LBM loss and strength decline accelerates to approximately 3% per year. These changes may be attributed to immobilization, loss of appetite, muscular dystrophies, chronic disease, aging, and sedentary behavior. By age 65, difficulty with dressing, transferring, walking, and toileting occurs at rates between 14% and 17%. By age 75, the incidence of difficulty increases to between 20% and 27%, and by age 85, difficulty with dressing, bathing, walking, toileting, and transferring increases to between 26% and 36%. Decreases in LBM and strength are strong indicators of negative health outcomes and represent one of the primary contributors to sarcopenia, alongside anorexia, dehydration, and cachexia. Loss of LBM combined with obesity further increases the risk of developing type II diabetes due to the role of skeletal muscle in glycemic control. Reductions in LBM also negatively affect bone density and metabolic rate.
Resistance training is one of the most effective interventions for improving physical performance and long-term health across the lifespan. Resistance training enhances muscular strength, endurance, and neuromuscular control, all of which are essential for optimal movement, joint stability, and performance of daily functional activities. Resistance exercise stimulates muscle hypertrophy, improves motor unit recruitment, increases LBM, and supports metabolic health through improved insulin sensitivity and elevated resting metabolic rate.
In older adults, resistance training increases muscle mass, strength, and power, while reducing difficulty performing daily activities and supporting independence with aging. Moderate-intensity, short-term resistance training significantly improves insulin sensitivity and HbA1c levels in older adults. In older women, resistance training reduces age-related declines in cortical bone health and bone mineral density of the hip and spine. Resistance training also reduces mild to severe depressive symptoms, thereby improving quality of life across age groups.
The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM), American Heart Association (AHA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and National Health Service (NHS) recommend performing resistance exercises at least twice per week for all major muscle groups, including the legs, hips, back, chest, abdomen, shoulders, and arms. These exercises are generally recommended at moderate intensity, characterized by muscular fatigue after completing 12-15 repetitions.
Despite the known benefits of resistance exercise, many individuals face barriers to consistent participation. Physical limitations associated with aging, chronic health conditions, psychological factors (e.g., lack of motivation, fear of injury, embarrassment), limited transportation, financial constraints, and environmental factors such as weather can all negatively affect adherence.
Among graduate students, time constraints related to academic workload are a primary barrier to regular resistance exercise and promote sedentary behavior. Previous studies have demonstrated declines in fitness and exercise participation during graduate training. Limited institutional support for physical activity and financial constraints further exacerbate barriers to consistent resistance training.
A potential solution to declining fitness among graduate students is the integration of resistive "exercise snacks" (ES). Exercise snacks are brief bouts of exercise lasting 1-5 minutes, separated by short rest periods, and performed multiple times per day. These sessions can be completed as little as three times per week.
Current literature strongly supports the viability of the ES approach. A 2024 systematic review by Yin et al. examining 11 randomized controlled trials found that ES protocols improved strength, flexibility, and balance in older adults without requiring equipment, while reducing common barriers such as time constraints and access limitations. Additional randomized trials have demonstrated improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength, power, and adherence using minimal-volume ES protocols across diverse populations.
Collectively, the literature supports ES as a time-efficient and effective training strategy for improving muscular and cardiovascular outcomes while enhancing adherence among populations facing barriers to traditional exercise. However, research examining upper-body resistance-based ES in young adult populations remains limited.
The objective of this study is to determine the effects of a six-week upper-body ES program performed at submaximal intensities on upper-body strength, power, endurance, participant retention, adherence, and satisfaction. The study aims to determine whether short-duration, repeated submaximal ES performed multiple times per day, three days per week, elicits positive adaptations in upper-body muscular performance among graduate students who do not regularly engage in resistance training.
It is hypothesized that the ES group will demonstrate greater improvements in upper-body strength and endurance compared to a control group maintaining usual physical activity. A secondary hypothesis is that outcomes in the ES group will not differ from those observed in a maximal-intensity, once-daily resistance exercise group performing the same exercises three days per week. A third hypothesis is that the ES group will demonstrate greater participant retention, adherence, and satisfaction compared to the maximal-intensity exercise group.
Investigating the effects of upper-body resistive ES on muscular performance in graduate students may identify an accessible, time-efficient, and lower-effort training strategy capable of improving strength, power, and adherence despite substantial academic demands.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A submaximal repeated effort exercise snack (SMR_ES) | Experimental | Behavioral: Submaximal Repeated Exercise SnackThe SMR_ES group will perform approximately 33% of their individual number of maximal push-up and maximal plank time, three times per day, three days per week. |
| A maximal effort one-time exercise snack (MO_ES) | Experimental | Behavioral: Maximal One-Time Exercise SnackThe MO_ES group will perform the maximal number of push-ups and hold a plank position for their maximal time, once per day, three days per week. |
| Control group | No intervention | –Continues usual activity with no upper body resistive exercise. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Healthy, as determined by self-reported health history
- Enrolled as a college or university student (full-time or part-time)
- Not currently participating in a structured upper-body resistance training program
- No participation in upper-body resistance training (e.g., weightlifting, calisthenics, CrossFit, bodyweight strength programs) for ≥ 3 months prior to study enrollment
- Willing and able to perform maximal and submaximal push-up and plank exercises
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Current participation in an upper-body resistance training program or engagement in upper-body strength training within the past 3 months
- History of upper extremity, shoulder, elbow, wrist, or trunk injury within the past 6 months that could limit exercise performance
- History of neurological, cardiovascular, metabolic, or musculoskeletal disorders that contraindicate resistance exercise
- Current pain or discomfort in the shoulders, elbows, wrists, hands, neck, or low back during pushing or plank activities
- Previous surgery to the upper extremities or spine within the past 12 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Submaximal Repeated Exercise SnackParticipants perform frequent, low-dose submaximal upper-body exercise snacks spread throughout the day. The SMR_ES group will perform approximately 33% of their individual number of maximal push-up and maximal plank time, three times per day, three days per week. | Behavioural | A submaximal repeated effort exercise snack (SMR_ES) |
| Maximal One-Time Exercise SnackParticipants perform a single daily maximal-effort upper-body exercise snack. The MO_ES group will perform the maximal number of push-ups and hold a plank position for their maximal time, once per day, three days per week. | Behavioural | A maximal effort one-time exercise snack (MO_ES) |
Primary outcome
Maximal Upper Body Push Strength
Time frame: Change from baseline after 6 weeks
Upper-body muscular strength will be assessed using a hand-held dynamometer during a standardized pushing task. Participants will push a barbell upward against an immovable strap connected to a pull dynamometer. Peak force output (Newtons) will be recorded.
Push-Up Endurance (Repetitions)
Time frame: Change from baseline after 6 weeks.
Upper-body muscular endurance will be assessed by the maximum number of push-ups completed using standardized form criteria.
Plank Endurance (Seconds)
Time frame: Change from baseline after 6 weeks
Core and upper-body endurance will be assessed by the maximum duration (seconds) participants can maintain a standardized plank position.
2 secondary outcomes
Upper-Body Power - Peak Force (Newtons)
Time frame: Change from baseline after 6 weeks.
Upper-Body Power - Time to Task Completion (Seconds)
Time frame: Change from baseline after 6 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 37887676Marijancic V, Grubic Kezele T, Peharec S, Dragas-Zubalj N, Pavicic Zezelj S, Starcevic-Klasan G. Relationship between Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior, Spinal Curvatures, Endurance and Balance of the Trunk Muscles-Extended Physical Health Analysis in Young Adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Oct 18;20(20):6938. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20206938.
- Background: PubMed 39257547Jett KM, Daniels BT, Brigance M, Passarelli JL, Howie EK. A Qualitative Description of Graduate Students' Perceived Decline in Physical Activity from Undergraduate School. Int J Exerc Sci. 2024 Aug 1;17(5):1038-1055. doi: 10.70252/ORGX1052. eCollection 2024.
- Background: PubMed 37748202Stork MJ, Marcotte-Chenard A, Jung ME, Little JP. Exercise in the workplace: examining the receptivity of practical and time-efficient stair-climbing "exercise snacks". Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2024 Jan 1;49(1):30-40. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2023-0128. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
- Background: PubMed 17062657DiFrancisco-Donoghue J, Werner W, Douris PC. Comparison of once-weekly and twice-weekly strength training in older adults. Br J Sports Med. 2007 Jan;41(1):19-22. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.029330. Epub 2006 Oct 24.
- Background: PubMed 38379679Brandt T, Schwandner CTL, Schmidt A. Resistance exercise snacks improve muscle mass in female university employees: a prospective, controlled, intervention pilot-study. Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 6;12:1347825. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1347825. eCollection 2024.
- Background: PubMed 31687210Perkin OJ, McGuigan PM, Stokes KA. Exercise Snacking to Improve Muscle Function in Healthy Older Adults: A Pilot Study. J Aging Res. 2019 Oct 3;2019:7516939. doi: 10.1155/2019/7516939. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 39587826Yin M, Zheng H, Bai M, Huang G, Chen Z, Deng S, Lyu M, Deng J, Zhang B, Li H, Zhang X, Liu Q, Little JP, Li Y. Effects of Integrating Stair Climbing-Based Exercise Snacks Into the Campus on Feasibility, Perceived Efficacy, and Participation Perspectives in Inactive Young Adults: A Randomized Mixed-Methods Pilot Study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2024 Dec;34(12):e14771. doi: 10.1111/sms.14771.
- Background: PubMed 38569204Yin M, Deng S, Chen Z, Zhang B, Zheng H, Bai M, Li H, Zhang X, Deng J, Liu Q, Little JP, Li Y. Exercise snacks are a time-efficient alternative to moderate-intensity continuous training for improving cardiorespiratory fitness but not maximal fat oxidation in inactive adults: a randomized controlled trial. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2024 Jul 1;49(7):920-932. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2023-0593. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
- Background: PubMed 30649897Jenkins EM, Nairn LN, Skelly LE, Little JP, Gibala MJ. Do stair climbing exercise "snacks" improve cardiorespiratory fitness? Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019 Jun;44(6):681-684. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0675. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
- Background: PubMed 39649791Wang T, Laher I, Li S. Exercise snacks and physical fitness in sedentary populations. Sports Med Health Sci. 2024 Feb 27;7(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.smhs.2024.02.006. eCollection 2025 Jan.
- Background: PubMed 37542234Western MJ, Welsh T, Keen K, Bishop V, Perkin OJ. Exercise snacking to improve physical function in pre-frail older adult memory clinic patients: a 28-day pilot study. BMC Geriatr. 2023 Aug 4;23(1):471. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04169-6.
- Background: PubMed 41057224Rodriguez MA, Quintana-Cepedal M, Cheval B, Thogersen-Ntoumani C, Crespo I, Olmedillas H. Effect of exercise snacks on fitness and cardiometabolic health in physically inactive individuals: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2026 Jan 19;60(2):133-141. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2025-110027.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. We will upload our shared anonymized data using DryAd.
Related trials for Muscle Strength
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Isokinetic Knee Strength, Bilateral Muscle Balance, and Anaerobic Performance in Adolescent Athletes
Isokinetic Knee Strength, Hamstring-to-Quadriceps Strength Ratio
Recruiting
Effects of Urolithin A Supplementation on Glucose Metabolism in Healthy Adults 55 >= Years Old: A Randomized Triple-Masked Controlled Clinical Trial
Healthy Volunteer
Recruiting
Recovery After Fatigue in Young Athletes: Comparison Between TECAR Therapy and Cycle Ergometer"
Muscle Fatigue, Healthy Adult
RecruitingObservational study
Physical Impairments in Premature Ventricular Complex
Premature Ventricular Complexes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alexander Rothstein principal investigator
New York Institute of Technology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Submaximal Repeated Exercise Snack and Maximal One-Time Exercise Snack in people with Muscle Strength and Muscle Power, run by New York Institute of Technology at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Maximal Upper Body Push Strength (time frame: Change from baseline after 6 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07362329, which also lists 42 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Apr 2026.