AzTrials
AzTrials

Alzheimer DiseasePYL-AIPNCT07361601

Implementation of AIP Services for Older Adults With AD

An observational study of Alzheimer Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will longitudinally follow a cohort of older adults to better understand how decisions about aging in place or transitioning to long-term care-and the implementation of those decisions-are influenced by age-related changes (e.g., cognition, health literacy, chronic conditions) and social supports (e.g.… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Alzheimer Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
2 Jul 2026to 31 Dec 2031
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population consists of a cohort of older adults who are currently enrolled in the longitudinal study, R01AG058777. Older adults as well as their caregivers, where appropriate, are being followed over time to assess decision-making and planning related to aging in place and potential transitions to long-term care. The cohort includes individuals with varying levels of cognitive function, health status, chronic conditions, and social support, as well as diverse living environments (e.g., rural and urban settings, different types of housing). Participants will continue to be followed prospectively.

Who may be able to join

  • Active participant in the 'Decision Making and Implementation of Aging-in-Place/Long Term Care Plans among Older Adults' [R01AG058777] study;
  • Age 65 years or older (older adult); age 18 years or older (caregiver)
  • Speak English; and
  • Pass UBACC (University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent) cognitive assessment
  • Age 18 years or older;
  • Speak English;
  • Currently assist enrolled, older adult study participant with activities such as managing their health, and/or household activities (i.e., taking them to the doctor, housekeeping, meal prep, medication reminders); and
  • Pass UBACC (University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent) cognitive assessment

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Northwestern University

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Implementation of Aging in Place Services for Older Adults With Alzheimer's Disease

This study will longitudinally follow a cohort of older adults to better understand how decisions about aging in place or transitioning to long-term care-and the implementation of those decisions-are influenced by age-related changes (e.g., cognition, health literacy, chronic conditions) and social supports (e.g., caregivers).

Read the detailed description

Participants currently enrolled in the National Institute on Aging (NIA)-funded study Decision Making and Implementation of Aging-in-Place/Long-Term Care Plans Among Older Adults (R01AG058777) will continue to be followed for an additional 42 months.

This study will examine how decision-making and planning related to aging in place change over time and how these processes are influenced by age-related changes (e.g., cognition, multiple chronic conditions), social influences (e.g., adult children, spouses, friends), and environmental factors (e.g., rural vs. urban residence, housing type). The study will also assess whether aging-in-place planning translates into timely implementation of services and whether implemented plans are concordant with the goals and preferences of older adults and their surrogate or caregiver decision makers.

In addition, the study will examine how age-related changes, social influences, and environmental factors interact to affect planning and implementation of aging-in-place and long-term care decisions over time.

Keywords
Aging in place, Long term care planning
Medical subject headings
Alzheimer Disease, Cognitive Dysfunction

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of participant long term care planning for Alzheimer's Dementia/Memory Loss

    Participants are asked "If you developed Alzheimer's or memory loss and could no longer live independently in your home, have you decided what your living preferences (e.g. stay in own home, retirement/long term care community) would be?" Decision-making is measured as a binary ('yes', 'no') outcome at each time-point. Will report % of participants who indicated "YES", that they have decided on their living preferences. Frequencies given for 108 month timepoint per primary outcome analysis.

    Measured: Assessed every 6 months, 108 months reported

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Rate of participant planning for in-home care in the event of Alzheimer's Disease/Memory Loss

    Participants are asked "Have you already decided what your preferences would be if you developed Alzheimer's Disease or memory loss and needed caregiver help in your home?". Responses recorded as binary. Will report % of participants who indicated "YES", that they have decided on their caregiver preferences. Frequencies given for 108 month timepoint per primary outcome analysis.

    Measured: Assessed every 6 months, 108 months reported

  2. Rate of participant planning for memory care in the event of Alzheimer's Disease/Memory Loss

    Participants are asked "Have you decided what your long-term care preferences (e.g. where you would prefer to go if you needed to be in a nursing home or memory care), would be if you ever developed Alzheimer's Disease or memory loss? " Here, participants were specifically asked about "memory care" vs other types of care options. Responses recorded as binary. Will report % of participants who indicated "YES", that they have a plan for that scenario. All statistical analyses for this outcome will reflect data at the 108 month assessment.

    Measured: Assessed every 6 months, 108 months reported

  3. Rate of participant planning for a hospitalization requiring rehabilitation outside the home

    Participants are asked "Have you already decided what your preferences would be if you were hospitalized and needed post-hospitalization rehabilitation outside of the home? " Responses recorded as binary. Will report % of participants who reported positively ("Yes") that they had a plan for the scenario. Frequencies given for 108 month timepoint per primary outcome analysis.

    Measured: Assessed every 6 months, 108 months reported

  4. Rate of participant planning for a hospitalization requiring in-home care

    Participants are asked "Have you already decided what your preferences would be if you were hospitalized and needed caregiver help in your home?" Responses recorded as binary. Will report % of participants who reported positively ("Yes") that they had a plan for the scenario. All statistical analyses for this outcome will reflect data at the 108 month assessment.

    Measured: Assessed every 6 months, 108 months reported

  5. Rate of participant decision-making contemplation: Alzheimer's Dementia/Memory Loss (ADML)

    Participants are asked a panel of statements about contemplation for decision-making in the event of Alzheimer's Dementia/Memory Loss (ADML). Participants are shown a statement and asked to gauge how frequently they contemplated the possibility of the given scenario, ranging from "Never" to "A Lot". Frequencies given for 108 month timepoint per primary outcome analysis. Each statement is prefixed by "How much have you thought about..."

    Measured: Assessed every 6 months, 108 months reported

  6. Rate of participant decision-making contemplation: Hospitalization

    Participants were asked a panel of statements about contemplation for decision-making in the event of Hospitalization. Participants are shown a statement and asked to gauge how frequently they contemplated the possibility of the given scenario, ranging from "Never" to "A lot". Frequencies given for 108 month timepoint per primary outcome analysis. Each statement is prefixed by "How much have you thought about..."

    Measured: Assessed every 6 months, 108 months reported

  7. Participant utilization of long-term care services (RUI)

    Participant utilization of long-term care services such as in-home caregivers as measured by the Resource Use Inventory (RUI). Frequencies provided for "yes" responses to individual items on the inventory. This outcome measure collected as part of the LitCog assessment battery. Frequencies reflect all available data at the 72 month assessment.

    Measured: 72-month timepoint

  8. Previous health experiences: Self and others

    Participants are asked a panel of non-validated questions about their previous health experiences and their experiences with others. Frequencies reflect all available data at the 72 month assessment.

    Measured: 72-month timepoint

  9. Event and Goal Concordance

    Participants report on any hospitalizations, recent memory loss, and changes in lifestyle due to hospitalization and memory loss. Responses are binary (yes/no), with a N/A and "unsure/don't know" option. Questions are non-validated. Frequencies given for 108 month timepoint per primary outcome analysis.

    Measured: Assessed every 6 months, 108 months reported

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jan 2026
  2. Study start2 Jul 2026
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2030 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2031 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Not a clinical trial so retiring ClinicalTrials.gov record

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07361601
Sponsor's protocol ID
R01AG091323-01
Acronym
PYL-AIP
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
21 Jan 2026
Last updated
14 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: There is no plan to make IPD and related data dictionaries available.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Alzheimer Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of participant long term care planning for Alzheimer's Dementia/Memory Loss (time frame: Assessed every 6 months, 108 months reported). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in