Postoperative CareNCT07344181
Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Scalp Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management After Supratentorial Craniotomy
A study testing Preoperative scalp nerve block in people with Postoperative Care, run by Beijing Tiantan Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial conducted at Beijing Tiantan Hospital to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liposomal bupivacaine for scalp nerve block in managing postoperative pain after elective supratentorial craniotomy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Postoperative Care
- What is being tested?
- Preoperative scalp nerve block
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 118 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2024to 1 May 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged 18-64 years.
- Scheduled for elective supratentorial craniotomy under general anesthesia.
- ASA physical status I-III.
- Preoperative GCS score of 15.
- Ability to provide informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Chronic pain syndromes, opioid tolerance, or psychiatric disorders.
- Coagulopathy or infection at the block site.
- Allergy to local anesthetics.
- BMI <15 or >35.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Scalp Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management After Supratentorial Craniotomy:a Randomized Controlled Trial
This is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial conducted at Beijing Tiantan Hospital to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liposomal bupivacaine for scalp nerve block in managing postoperative pain after elective supratentorial craniotomy.
A total of 118 eligible patients (aged 18-64, ASA I-III) will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups. The intervention group will receive a scalp nerve block using liposomal bupivacaine. The control group will receive a scalp nerve block using standard 0.5% bupivacaine. All patients will undergo standardized general anesthesia.
Read more
The primary outcome is postoperative pain intensity, measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at multiple time points: 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, patient satisfaction, cumulative opioid consumption, and the incidence of adverse events.
The study aims to determine if a single administration of liposomal bupivacaine provides superior and prolonged analgesia compared to conventional bupivacaine, potentially improving pain management and recovery for craniotomy patients. The study duration is from October 2024 to May 2027.
Read the detailed description
- Background and Rationale: Postoperative pain following supratentorial craniotomy is a significant clinical concern, often requiring opioid-based analgesia. However, opioid use in neurosurgical patients is limited by side effects such as sedation, respiratory depression, and nausea, which can obscure neurological assessment and delay recovery. Scalp nerve blocks (SNBs) with local anesthetics like bupivacaine are a well-established component of multimodal analgesia for craniotomy, targeting the primary sources of postoperative pain-the pericranial muscles and scalp tissues. While effective, conventional bupivacaine provides analgesia for only up to 6-8 hours, leaving patients with inadequate pain control during the critical 72-hour postoperative period. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is an extended-release formulation designed to provide sustained analgesia for up to 72 hours. Its efficacy has been demonstrated in various surgical settings, but its application in neurosurgery, particularly for scalp nerve blocks, remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate whether a single preoperative scalp nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine can provide superior and prolonged analgesia compared to standard bupivacaine, thereby reducing opioid consumption and improving patient outcomes following craniotomy.
- Objectives: Primary Objective: To compare the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine versus standard bupivacaine for scalp nerve blocks in controlling postoperative pain, as measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery. Secondary Objectives: To assess differences in cumulative opioid consumption postoperatively. To evaluate patient satisfaction using a standardized satisfaction scale. To monitor neurological status using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). To record the incidence of adverse events (e.g., infection, hematoma, neurological deficits).
- Study Design: Design: Prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial. Randomization: Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group (liposomal bupivacaine) or the control group (standard 0.5% bupivacaine). Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated sequence. Blinding: Outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to group assignments. Due to the nature of the intervention, treating clinicians will not be blinded.
- Participants: Inclusion Criteria: Adults aged 18-64 years. Scheduled for elective supratentorial craniotomy under general anesthesia. ASA physical status I-III. Preoperative GCS score of 15. Ability to provide informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Chronic pain syndromes, opioid tolerance, or psychiatric disorders. Coagulopathy or infection at the block site. Allergy to local anesthetics. BMI <15 or >35.
- Interventions: Intervention Group: Preoperative scalp nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine. Control Group: Preoperative scalp nerve block with 0.5% bupivacaine. Both groups will receive standardized general anesthesia and postoperative analgesia, including rescue opioids.
- Outcome Measures: Primary Outcome: NRS pain scores at 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. Secondary Outcomes: Opioid consumption (morphine equivalents). Patient satisfaction scores (5-point Likert scale). GCS scores. Adverse events related to the block or study drugs.
- Sample Size: A total of 118 participants (59 per group) will be enrolled, accounting for a 20% dropout rate. This provides 90% power to detect a 25% difference in analgesia duration at a 5% significance level.
- Statistical Analysis:
Data will be analyzed using SPSS v25.0. Continuous variables will be compared using t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests; categorical variables will be analyzed with chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Repeated-measures ANOVA will assess pain scores over time. A p-value <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Postoperative Care
- Being tested
- Preoperative scalp nerve block
- Keywords
- Scalp nerve blocks,acute postoperative pain,Liposomal bupivacaine
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Preoperative scalp nerve blockProcedure or surgery
Block of the supraorbital nerve, supratrochlear nerve, auriculotemporal nerve, zygomaticotemporal nerve, greater occipital nerve, and lesser occipital nerve.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| intervention group | Experimental | Preoperative scalp nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine. Receives: Procedure: Preoperative scalp nerve block |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Preoperative scalp nerve block with 0.5% bupivacaine. Receives: Procedure: Preoperative scalp nerve block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
NRS pain scores
NRS pain scores at 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively.
Measured: 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively
Secondary outcomes (1)
Opioid consumption
Opioid consumption (morphine equivalents)
Measured: 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jan 2026
- Study start1 Dec 2024
- Primary completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 May 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Postoperative CareStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Beijing Tiantan HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 118 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Beijing Tiantan Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Fang Luo, Beijing Tiantan Hospital
- Investigators
- Fang Luo, Study chair, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University,Beijing, China
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07344181
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KY2025-005-02
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 7 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 15 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article will be shared following publication. The data will be available with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for use in achieving the goals of the approved proposal. Proposals should be directed to the corresponding author. Data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement to gain access.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Scalp Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management After Supratentorial Craniotomy:a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07344181
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KY2025-005-02
- Conditions
- Postoperative Care
- Keywords
- Scalp nerve blocks,acute postoperative pain,Liposomal bupivacaine
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 118 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Beijing Tiantan HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial conducted at Beijing Tiantan Hospital to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liposomal bupivacaine for scalp nerve block in managing postoperative pain after elective supratentorial craniotomy.
A total of 118 eligible patients (aged 18-64, ASA I-III) will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups. The intervention group will receive a scalp nerve block using liposomal bupivacaine. The control group will receive a scalp nerve block using standard 0.5% bupivacaine. All patients will undergo standardized general anesthesia.
The primary outcome is postoperative pain intensity, measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at multiple time points: 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, patient satisfaction, cumulative opioid consumption, and the incidence of adverse events.
The study aims to determine if a single administration of liposomal bupivacaine provides superior and prolonged analgesia compared to conventional bupivacaine, potentially improving pain management and recovery for craniotomy patients. The study duration is from October 2024 to May 2027.
Detailed description
- Background and Rationale: Postoperative pain following supratentorial craniotomy is a significant clinical concern, often requiring opioid-based analgesia. However, opioid use in neurosurgical patients is limited by side effects such as sedation, respiratory depression, and nausea, which can obscure neurological assessment and delay recovery. Scalp nerve blocks (SNBs) with local anesthetics like bupivacaine are a well-established component of multimodal analgesia for craniotomy, targeting the primary sources of postoperative pain-the pericranial muscles and scalp tissues. While effective, conventional bupivacaine provides analgesia for only up to 6-8 hours, leaving patients with inadequate pain control during the critical 72-hour postoperative period. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is an extended-release formulation designed to provide sustained analgesia for up to 72 hours. Its efficacy has been demonstrated in various surgical settings, but its application in neurosurgery, particularly for scalp nerve blocks, remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate whether a single preoperative scalp nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine can provide superior and prolonged analgesia compared to standard bupivacaine, thereby reducing opioid consumption and improving patient outcomes following craniotomy.
- Objectives: Primary Objective: To compare the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine versus standard bupivacaine for scalp nerve blocks in controlling postoperative pain, as measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery. Secondary Objectives: To assess differences in cumulative opioid consumption postoperatively. To evaluate patient satisfaction using a standardized satisfaction scale. To monitor neurological status using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). To record the incidence of adverse events (e.g., infection, hematoma, neurological deficits).
- Study Design: Design: Prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial. Randomization: Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group (liposomal bupivacaine) or the control group (standard 0.5% bupivacaine). Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated sequence. Blinding: Outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to group assignments. Due to the nature of the intervention, treating clinicians will not be blinded.
- Participants: Inclusion Criteria: Adults aged 18-64 years. Scheduled for elective supratentorial craniotomy under general anesthesia. ASA physical status I-III. Preoperative GCS score of 15. Ability to provide informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Chronic pain syndromes, opioid tolerance, or psychiatric disorders. Coagulopathy or infection at the block site. Allergy to local anesthetics. BMI <15 or >35.
- Interventions: Intervention Group: Preoperative scalp nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine. Control Group: Preoperative scalp nerve block with 0.5% bupivacaine. Both groups will receive standardized general anesthesia and postoperative analgesia, including rescue opioids.
- Outcome Measures: Primary Outcome: NRS pain scores at 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. Secondary Outcomes: Opioid consumption (morphine equivalents). Patient satisfaction scores (5-point Likert scale). GCS scores. Adverse events related to the block or study drugs.
- Sample Size: A total of 118 participants (59 per group) will be enrolled, accounting for a 20% dropout rate. This provides 90% power to detect a 25% difference in analgesia duration at a 5% significance level.
- Statistical Analysis:
Data will be analyzed using SPSS v25.0. Continuous variables will be compared using t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests; categorical variables will be analyzed with chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Repeated-measures ANOVA will assess pain scores over time. A p-value <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| intervention group | Experimental | Procedure: Preoperative scalp nerve blockPreoperative scalp nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine. |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Procedure: Preoperative scalp nerve blockPreoperative scalp nerve block with 0.5% bupivacaine. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Adults aged 18-64 years.
- Scheduled for elective supratentorial craniotomy under general anesthesia.
- ASA physical status I-III.
- Preoperative GCS score of 15.
- Ability to provide informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Chronic pain syndromes, opioid tolerance, or psychiatric disorders.
- Coagulopathy or infection at the block site.
- Allergy to local anesthetics.
- BMI <15 or >35.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Preoperative scalp nerve blockBlock of the supraorbital nerve, supratrochlear nerve, auriculotemporal nerve, zygomaticotemporal nerve, greater occipital nerve, and lesser occipital nerve. | Procedure or surgery | Control Group, intervention group |
Primary outcome
NRS pain scores
Time frame: 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively
NRS pain scores at 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively.
1 secondary outcome
Opioid consumption
Time frame: 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article will be shared following publication. The data will be available with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for use in achieving the goals of the approved proposal. Proposals should be directed to the corresponding author. Data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement to gain access.
Related trials for Postoperative Care
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Discontinuation or Continuation of SGLT-2 Inhibitors Before Cardiac Surgery
Heart Failure, Cardiac Surgery
Active, not recruiting
VentilO Prospective Study
Mechanical Ventilation Complication, Respiratory Acidosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of IV Dexmedetomidine Versus Clonidine Versus no Alpha 2 Agonist on Emergency Delirium, PACU Length of Stay and Time to Hospital Discharge in Children Undergoing (Adeno)Tonsillectomy: a Prospective Observational Study
Emergency Delirium, Postoperative Delirium (POD)
RecruitingObservational study
Vascular Events In Patients Undergoing Same-day Noncardiac Surgery (VALIANCE) Study
Preoperative Care, Surgery--Complications
Recruiting
Pharyngeal Mucosal Conditioning to Prevent Postoperative Sore Throat in Septoplasty Patients With Severe Nasal Obstruction
Postoperative Sore Throat, Nasal Obstruction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fang Luo study chair
Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University,Beijing, China
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Preoperative scalp nerve block in people with Postoperative Care, run by Beijing Tiantan Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
NRS pain scores (time frame: 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jan 2026.