AzTrials
AzTrials

Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery (MINS)NCT07335042

Prediction Model for MINS After Major Hepatobiliary Surgery

An observational study of Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery (MINS) and Postoperative Complications, run by Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital at 6 sites in China.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This multi-center, prospective observational study aims to develop and validate an interpretable prediction model for Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery (MINS) in patients undergoing major hepatobiliary surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
What is being tested?
Major Hepatobiliary Surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
1,800 participants
Where
6 sitesChina
Study dates
14 Jan 2026to 30 Jun 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: 1800

Who may be able to join

  • Adults (18-85 yr, ASA physical status II-III) undergoing major hepatobiliary surgery were enrolled. Major surgery was defined as duration ≥ 3 h involving hepatectomy (≥ 3 segments) or biliary reconstruction necessitating ICU admission. Eligibility required paired perioperative high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) data and comprehensive documentation of surgical covariates, including surgical approach (laparoscopic vs. open), resection nature (anatomic vs. non-anatomic), number of resected segments, tumor characteristics (size and location), and presence of cirrhosis.

Who cannot join

  • preoperative acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/ (min · 1.73 m2); (2) undocumented inflow occlusion strategy; or (3) non-imputable missing covariates.

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

6 sites in 1 country

China6 sites, 6 recruiting
  • Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua Medicine,Tsinghua University

    Beijing

    Zhifeng Gao, MD, +86-15801249466, gzfa02461@btch.edu.cn

    Recruiting
  • Peking University International Hospital

    Beijing

    Lin Ding, MD, +86-13269092835, 13269092835@163.com

    Recruiting
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University

    Chongqing

    Zhiyu Chen, MD, +86-13983881219, chenzhiyu_umn@163.com

    Zhifeng Gao, MD, gzfa02461@btch.edu.cn

    Recruiting
  • Qingdao West Coast New Area People's Hospital

    Qingdao

    peng Zhang, MD, +86-16678658917, zhangpeng27309@126.com

    Recruiting
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University

    Shandong

    Ming Hou, MD, +86-13869183831, 13869183831@126.com

    Recruiting
  • Zhuhai People's Hospital

    Zhuhai

    Wenpeng Li, MD, +86-13431577611, liwenpeng324324@163.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Development of an Interpretable Prediction Model for Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery in Patients Undergoing Major Hepatobiliary Surgery

This multi-center, prospective observational study aims to develop and validate an interpretable prediction model for Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery (MINS) in patients undergoing major hepatobiliary surgery. The study adopts a nested modeling strategy, starting with baseline risk factors (e.g., RCRI) and stepwise incorporating hepatic inflow occlusion strategies (specifically comparing SPVO vs. Pringle maneuver) and routine intraoperative biomarkers. The model's performance will be evaluated using AUC, Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI), and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), followed by interpretability analysis using SHAP values and external validation in an independent cohort.

Read the detailed description

Study Design and Methodology: The study consists of four consecutive phases aimed at constructing a robust and interpretable prediction model for MINS.

  1. Multi-center Cohort Standardization: Based on clinical data from multiple participating centers, the investigators will establish a standardized structural dataset. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria will be applied. The process involves rigorous data cleaning and normalization to harmonize demographics, surgical operation details, and perioperative hemodynamic parameters across different centers, laying the foundation for model construction.
  2. Nested Modeling and Performance Evaluation: A nested modeling strategy will be employed to assess the incremental predictive value of specific surgical and biological variables: Model A (Baseline): Constructed using standard baseline variables such as the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI). Model B (+Surgical Technique): Incorporates hepatic inflow occlusion strategies, specifically comparing SPVO (Selective Pringle Vascular Occlusion) vs. Pringle maneuver, along with occlusion duration and frequency. Model C (Full Model): Further incorporates MINS-related biomarkers. Model performance will be comprehensively evaluated using: Discrimination: Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC). Calibration: Calibration plots. Clinical Utility: Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) to assess the improvement in risk stratification and clinical net benefit after adding new variables.
  3. Model Interpretability Analysis: To enhance the transparency of the model ("White-box" approach), SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values or similar methods will be utilized. This will quantify and visualize the specific contribution (weight) of key variables, such as SPVO usage, to the individual risk prediction, aligning the statistical results with clinical medical reasoning.
  4. External Validation: The final model will undergo validation using an independent external clinical cohort. This step aims to test the stability and generalizability of the model across different center data, defining its applicable scope in real-world clinical scenarios.
Being tested
Major Hepatobiliary Surgery
Keywords
MINS, Major Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hepatectomy, Hepatic Inflow Occlusion, Pringle Maneuver, Prediction Model, High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin
Medical subject headings
Postoperative Complications, Liver Neoplasms, Digestive System Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Major Hepatobiliary SurgeryProcedure or surgery

    Patients undergo standard major hepatobiliary surgery (e.g., hepatectomy). The specific surgical strategy, including the method of hepatic inflow occlusion (e.g., Pringle maneuver or SPVO), is determined by the attending surgeon based on routine clinical practice and patient condition, not by the study protocol.

Study groups in NCT07335042
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Training setCases in this subset are used for model training, testing and internal validation
Receives: Procedure: Major Hepatobiliary Surgery
External validation setThis part is for external validation of predictive models.
Receives: Procedure: Major Hepatobiliary Surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of predictive model

    The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) in patients undergoing major hepatobiliary surgery

    Measured: Within 3 days after surgery

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Model calibration

    assessed by calibration curve / Hosmer-Lemeshow test

    Measured: Within 3 days after surgery

  2. Decision curve analysis (DCA)-derived clinical net benefit

    Measured: Within 3 days after surgery

  3. Model stability and generalizability in the external validation cohort

    Measured: Within 3 days after surgeries

  4. Contribution weight of key variables (SPVO, biomarkers) analyzed via SHAP

    Measured: Within 3 days after surgeires

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jan 2026
  2. Study start14 Jan 2026
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,800 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07335042
Sponsor's protocol ID
26082-4-01
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
4 Jan 2026
Last updated
15 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery (MINS) and Postoperative Complications, run by Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital at 6 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Zhifeng Gao, MD (+86-15801249466, gzfa02461@btch.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of predictive model (time frame: Within 3 days after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in