AzTrials
AzTrials

High Anal FistulaTROCO-HAFNCT07334678

TROPIS Versus Coring Out Fistulectomy in High Anal Fistula

A study testing Transanal opening of intersphincteric space (TROPIS) and Coring Out Fistulectomy in people with High Anal Fistula, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

High anal fistulas represent a surgical challenge due to high recurrence rates and risk of postoperative fecal incontinence. Several sphincter-preserving techniques have been developed to address these issues. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
High Anal Fistula
What is being tested?
Transanal opening of intersphincteric space (TROPIS) and Coring Out Fistulectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
64 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
8 Jul 2025to 1 Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with high anal fistula ( involving more than 1/3 of the sphincter complex), whether de novo or recurrent

Who cannot join

  • Patients with fistula secondary to malignancy, inflammatory bowel disease, trauma or radiation
  • Patients with Low anal fistula
  • Patient with preoperative fecal incontinence
  • Previous levator ani muscle injury

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Ahmed Mohamed Abdelaal, Lecturer contact

+201118732767

drabdelaal90@gmail.com

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Faculty of medicine Cairo University

    Cairo, Al-Manial Cairo, 11451

    Ahmed Mohamed Abdelaal, Lecturer, +201118732767, drabdelaal90@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Early Results of Transanal Opening of the Intersphincteric Space (TROPIS) Versus Coring Out Fistulectomy in Management of High Anal Fistulas: A Randomized Clinical Trial

High anal fistulas represent a surgical challenge due to high recurrence rates and risk of postoperative fecal incontinence. Several sphincter-preserving techniques have been developed to address these issues. Coring Out fistulectomy is a traditional sphincter-saving approach, while Transanal Opening of the Intersphincteric Space (TROPIS) is a recently introduced technique with promising outcomes. This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and patient outcomes of TROPIS versus coring out fistulectomy in the management of high complex anal fistulas.

Read the detailed description

Fistula-in-ano is an abnormal epithelialized tract connecting the anal canal to the perianal skin, most commonly caused by cryptoglandular infection. High anal fistulas, involving more than one-third of the sphincter complex, carry a significant risk of postoperative incontinence when treated with fistulotomy. As a result, sphincter-preserving techniques have introduced.

Coring out fistulectomy allows excision of the fistulous tract while preserving sphincter integrity but has variable recurrence rates. TROPIS involves transanal opening of the intersphincteric space with complete preservation of the external anal sphincter and has shown high success rates in recent studies.

This prospective randomized clinical trial compares TROPIS and coring out fistulectomy regarding Failure rate (defined as failure of healing or recurrence of anal fistula), operative time, time for wound healing and postoperative complications including fecal incontinence.

Being tested
Transanal opening of intersphincteric space (TROPIS), Coring Out Fistulectomy
Keywords
TROPIS, Intersphincteric Space, Coring Out Fistulectomy, High anal fistulas, Sphincter-Preserving Surgery

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Transanal opening of intersphincteric space (TROPIS)Procedure or surgery

    The fistula tracts on both sides of the External anal sphincter (EAS) are separately dealt with. A curved artery forceps is inserted in the fistula tract in the intersphincteric space through the internal opening.The mucosa and the internal sphincter overlying the artery forceps are then incised with electrocautery. The edges of the resulting wound are trimmed and A gutter is made inferiorly from the opened-up intersphincteric space to the anal verge to facilitate drainage from the intersphincteric space wound in the postoperative period.The fistula tract lateral to (outside) the EAS will be excised till the external anal sphincter.

  • Coring Out FistulectomyProcedure or surgery

    Incision was made around external opening.Coring out the fistulous track using a combination of cutting and coagulation diathermy from external opening to internal opening with closure of internal opening

Study groups in NCT07334678
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Transanal Opening of the Intersphincteric Space (TROPIS)Experimentalpatient with high anal fistula will be treated with Transanal Opening of the Intersphincteric Space (TROPIS)
Receives: Procedure: Transanal opening of intersphincteric space (TROPIS)
Coring Out FistulectomyActive comparatorpatient with high anal fistula will be treated with Coring Out Fistulectomy
Receives: Procedure: Coring Out Fistulectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Compares Failure rate of TROPIS versus Coring Out fistulectomy in high fistula

    Compares Failure rate of TROPIS versus Coring Out fistulectomy in high fistula (failure of healing or recurrence of anal fistula), Early results

    Measured: Up to 4 months postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Operative time

    compare time of operation between both procedure

    Measured: During surgery

  2. Hospitalization period

    compare how many days patients stay in hospital postoperatively in both groups

    Measured: From surgery until discharge

  3. surgical site infection

    compare surgical site infection in both groups

    Measured: Up to 4 months postoperatively

  4. Time for wound Healing

    Time for wound Healing in both groups

    Measured: Up to 4 months postoperatively

  5. Postoperative bleeding

    compare Postoperative bleeding in both groups

    Measured: Up to 4 months postoperatively

  6. postoperative fecal incontinence

    compare post postoperative fecal incontinence in both groups

    Measured: Up to 4 months postoperatively

  7. Time to return to normal activity

    Compare Time to return to normal activity in both groups

    Measured: Up to 4 months postoperatively

  8. Postoperative urine retention

    compare postoperative urine retention in both groups

    Measured: Within 48 hours postoperatively

  9. Pain intensity

    Compare Pain intensity measured using Visual Analogue Scale between both groups (Visual Analogue Scale for Pain: ranges from 0 to 10 . Higher scores indicate a worse outcome {greater pain intensity}).

    Measured: At day 1 and day 7 postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jan 2026
  2. Study start8 Jul 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
64 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07334678
Sponsor's protocol ID
MS-311-2025
Acronym
TROCO-HAF
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
31 Dec 2025
Last updated
27 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because this is a small surgical trial with a limited number of participants, and sharing raw data could lead to identification of participants

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Transanal opening of intersphincteric space (TROPIS) and Coring Out Fistulectomy in people with High Anal Fistula, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ahmed Mohamed Abdelaal, Lecturer (+201118732767, drabdelaal90@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Compares Failure rate of TROPIS versus Coring Out fistulectomy in high fistula (time frame: Up to 4 months postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in