Intensive Care Units (ICUs)LATLUNGNCT07323472
Body Lateralization and Its Effects on Respiratory Drive, Ventilation, and Pulmonary Aeration in Critically Ill Patients
A study testing Automatic Lateralization Therapy and Supine Positioning in people with Intensive Care Units (ICUs), run by University of Pernambuco at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
The goal of this quasi-experimental study is to investigate how different body positions, performed through Automatic Lateralization Therapy, affect respiratory drive, ventilation, and pulmonary aeration in critically ill adult patients under mechanical ventilation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Intensive Care Units (ICUs)
- What is being tested?
- Automatic Lateralization Therapy and Supine Positioning
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2026to 30 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients of both sexes will be included;
- Aged ≥ 18 years;
- BMI 18-35 kg/m²;
- Under invasive mechanical ventilation via orotracheal tube for ≥ 24 hours and expected to remain on mechanical ventilatory support for at least 48 hours;
- Sedated (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale [RASS] -1 to -4);
- Well adapted to protective ventilation strategies in VCV or PSV modes;
Show all 12Show fewer
- Presenting neural respiratory drive evidenced by a drop in Delta Pocc and/or the presence of assisted cycles;
- Hemodynamically stable (mean arterial pressure between 60-120 mmHg, systolic arterial pressure between 90-180 mmHg, diastolic arterial pressure between 60-100 mmHg, and heart rate between 50-150 bpm) with or without vasoactive drugs at the time of data collection (> 0.1 to 0.3 mcg/kg/min);
- Respiratory stability, no use of accessory muscles and target SpO₂ achieved;
- No indication for nebulization or heated humidification at the time of collection;
- Positive tolerance test for lateral decubitus positioning;
- Chest circumference of 78-87.9 cm (XS), 88-99.9 cm (S), or 100-111.9 cm (M).
Who cannot join
- Patients presenting medical restrictions to body repositioning, or to the use of EIT or sEMG;
- Those in therapeutic failure;
- Individuals with spinal cord injury, brain injury, or stroke with a history of functional loss and respiratory impairment prior to hospitalization;
- Neurological diseases affecting respiratory myoelectric conduction;
- History of postural deformities, diaphragmatic abnormalities, or colostomy bag;
- Unstable fracture (lower or upper limbs in proximal regions or thorax);
Show all 26Show fewer
- Pleural effusion requiring drainage;
- Presence of drains in the thoracic and/or abdominal regions;
- Unstable intracranial pressure;
- Pregnant patients;
- Immediate postoperative period of orthopedic surgeries;
- Use of mucolytics;
- Open ventriculostomy for drainage;
- Uncontrolled agitation;
- Pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator;
- Pneumothorax;
- Use of neuromuscular blockers;
- Active tuberculosis;
- Traction devices;
- Active bleeding;
- Suspected or confirmed pulmonary embolism without prior treatment within 24 hours;
- Presence of a large mass in the right and/or left hemithorax;
- History of cardiopulmonary arrest within the past 24 hours under neuroprotection;
- In the total weaning phase from IMV and/or tracheostomy and/or enteral feeding tube and/or scheduled CT scan within the next 6 hours;
- Intolerance to the TLA test (SpO₂ drop <92% or ≥20% from baseline, need for FiO₂ increase >50% or ≥20% from baseline, need for PEEP increase, or hemodynamic instability within the first 5 minutes of lateralization testing);
- Those who refuse to provide consent, as determined by the legal representative.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Emanuel Fernandes Ferreira da Silva Júnior, MSc contact
Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Geral Otávio de Freitas - Secretaria de Saúde de Pernambuco
Recife, Pernamu, 50670-901
Rômulo de Aquino Coelho Lins Direção do Hospital Geral Otávio de Freitas, MSc, +55 81 9 9486498, romulo.aquino@ufpe.br
Elaine Araújo de Souza, Specialist
About this study
Official title: Analysis of Respiratory Drive Activation, Ventilation, and Pulmonary Aeration Resulting From Body Lateralization in Critically Ill Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation
The goal of this quasi-experimental study is to investigate how different body positions, performed through Automatic Lateralization Therapy, affect respiratory drive, ventilation, and pulmonary aeration in critically ill adult patients under mechanical ventilation. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Does Automatic Lateralization Therapy, modify respiratory drive, as measured by P0.1, estimated Pmus, and sEMG of the diaphragm and parasternal muscles?
- Is there an association between respiratory drive, ventilation, and pulmonary aeration measured by Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) in different body positions promoted by Automatic Lateralization Therapy ?
Read more
Does combining Automatic Lateralization Therapy, with Flow Bias improve physiological and functional outcomes compared to Automatic Lateralization Therapy, without Flow Bias?
Participants will:
- Be positioned in different lateralization strategies using Automatic Lateralization Therapy, while under mechanical ventilation;
- Have respiratory parameters and ventilation images assessed by EIT and sEMG;
Participate only during their ICU stay, with no need for additional visits after discharge.
Read the detailed description
Detailed Description:
Critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation frequently develop respiratory complications due to immobility and altered pulmonary mechanics. Automatic Lateralization Therapy has emerged as a promising physiologic intervention to optimize ventilation and reduce respiratory dysfunction in this population. However, its effects on respiratory drive activation remain poorly understood.
Objective:
To evaluate the effects of body lateralization on respiratory drive activation, ventilation, and pulmonary aeration in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
Methods and Design:
This is a quasi-experimental, non-randomized physiological intervention study conducted in a controlled ICU environment, following the TREND 2025 Statement Checklist for transparent reporting of non-randomized evaluations. Automatic Lateralization Therapy will be applied with and without Flow Bias, using progressive body tilt angles (0°, 15°, and 30°). Positioning strategies will be personalized based on Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) findings to ensure optimal lung recruitment and safety.
Collected data will include:
Clinical and physiological parameters such as respiratory drive (P0.1, estimated Pmus),
Diaphragm and parasternal muscle activity via surface electromyography (sEMG),
Ventilatory mechanics and gas exchange,
Pulmonary aeration and regional ventilation distribution assessed by EIT,
Additional monitoring by lung ultrasound to confirm aeration patterns.
The investigator performing the physiological data analysis will be blinded to the intervention group to minimize bias. Cardiorespiratory safety (e.g., hemodynamic stability, oxygenation) and adverse events will be monitored throughout all procedures.
Expected Outcomes:
The study aims to provide insights into whether body lateralization through Automatic Lateralization Therapy, modulates respiratory drive and improves ventilation efficiency in critically ill patients. It is hypothesized that combining Automatic Lateralization Therapy, with Flow Bias will enhance pulmonary expansion, respiratory drive activation, and gas exchange efficiency compared to Automatic Lateralization Therapy, alone, while maintaining patient safety.
- Conditions
- Intensive Care Units (ICUs)
- Being tested
- Automatic Lateralization Therapy, Supine Positioning
- Keywords
- Automatic lateralization therapy, Critical illness, Continuous lateral rotation, Electrical impedance tomography, Surface electromyography, Respiratory muscles
- Medical subject headings
- Critical Illness
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Automatic Lateralization TherapyOther
Also called Continuous lateral positioning, Automatic patient positioning, Continuous lateral rotation therapy, Lateral rotation therapy
During this phase of analysis and intervention related to lateral positioning, patients will be maintained on a Multicare bed (LINET) and subjected to personalized lateral positioning based on the morphofunctional pattern detected by electrical impedance tomography. This positioning will be performed using automatic lateralization therapy, programmed for unilateral or bilateral application, continuously alternating between angles of 0°, 15°, and 30°, maintained for 20 minutes at each position. The procedure will be conducted in two sequences, with the second sequence combined with the Flow Bias intervention. At each angle, data will be collected on hemodynamic monitoring, respiratory drive, respiratory mechanics, regional distribution of ventilation and aeration, and gas exchange.
Supine PositioningOther
Also called Supine, Semi-recumbent position, Recumbent position, Dorsal decubitus
During this analysis phase, patients will be positioned on a Multicare bed (LINET) in the dorsal decubitus position with the head of the bed elevated to 30°. Data will be collected on hemodynamic monitoring, respiratory drive, respiratory mechanics, degree of lung involvement, regional distribution of ventilation and aeration, and gas exchange.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Supine Positioning | Active comparator | Participants will remain in supine position with 30° head elevation. No lateralization therapy is applied. Receives: Other: Supine Positioning |
| Automatic lateralization therapy | Active comparator | Participants will undergo continuous lateral positioning on an automated bed, with automatic angle and time adjustments. The second sequence will be combined with the Flow Bias intervention. Receives: Other: Automatic Lateralization Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Respiratory drive parameters: Surface electromyography (sEMG)
The respiratory drive parameter will be assessed using surface electromyographic (sEMG) activity of the respiratory muscles, including the diaphragm and parasternal intercostals, expressed in microvolts (µV) (Silva Junior et al., 2023).
Data are given in:
- µV: Microvolts Measurements will be performed during the first and last 5 minutes of each body angulation. Unilateral: 140 minutes | Bilateral: 370 minutes. Following the sequence: Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, 30°/20 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, and Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, totaling 70 minutes per sequence plus 60 minutes of washout between sequences. This results in 140 minutes for patients undergoing Unilateral Lateralization Therapy and 370 minutes for patients undergoing Bilateral Lateralization Therapy.
Measured: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hour 10 minutes)
Respiratory drive parameter: P0.1 (airway occlusion pressure during the first 100 ms of the inspiratory effort)
The respiratory drive parameter will be assessed by P0.1(airway occlusion pressure during the first 100ms of the inspiratory effort,cmH₂O).P0.1 is the drop in airway pressure within 100 ms after the onset of inspiration and is considered a reliable, fast, and feasible bedside marker.The following values are considered: Normal: 1.5-3.5 cmH₂O; Low: <1.0 cmH₂O(hypostimulated); High:>4.0 cmH₂O (hyperstimulated)(CHEN et al.,2023).
Data are given in: cmH₂O: centimeters of water Measurements will be performed during the first and last 5 minutes of each body angulation. Unilateral: 140 minutes | Bilateral: 370 minutes. Following the sequence: Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, 30°/20 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, and Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, totaling 70 minutes per sequence plus 60 minutes of washout between sequences. This results in 140 minutes for patients undergoing Unilateral Lateralization Therapy and 370 minutes Bilateral.
Measured: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 minutes(6 hour 10 minutes)
Respiratory drive parameters: Pmus (estimated inspiratory muscle pressure)
The respiratory drive will be assessed using Pmus (estimated inspiratory muscle pressure). Pmus is derived from the airway pressure drop during a brief inspiratory occlusion and reflects inspiratory effort. Reference ranges: Pmus < 5 cmH₂O indicates over-assistance/low drive; Pmus ≤ 10 cmH₂O represents the diaphragmatic protection zone; Pmus > 13-15 cmH₂O indicates excessive effort (Dianti, Bertoni ;Goligher, 2020).
Data are given in:
•cmH₂O: centimeters of water
Measurements will be performed during the first and last 5 minutes of each body angulation. Unilateral: 140 minutes | Bilateral: 370 minutes. Following the sequence: Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, 30°/20 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, and Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, totaling 70 minutes per sequence plus 60 minutes of washout between sequences. This results in 140 minutes for patients undergoing Unilateral Lateralization Therapy and 370 minutes for patients undergoing Bilateral
Measured: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hour 10 minutes)
Pulmonary ventilation: Ventilation Impedance Change (ΔZ)
ΔZ will be quantified using electrical impedance tomography (EIT). ΔZ represents the sum of impedance changes of all pixels within a predefined region of interest (ROI), corresponding to regional tidal ventilation. ROIs will include right anterior, left anterior, right posterior, and left posterior lung regions, and will also be categorized as dependent or non-dependent lung areas. Data will be expressed in arbitrary units (a.u.).
Measurements will be performed during the first and last 5 minutes of each body angulation. Unilateral: 140 minutes | Bilateral: 370 minutes. Following the sequence: Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, 30°/20 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, and Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, totaling 70 minutes per sequence plus 60 minutes of washout between sequences. This results in 140 minutes for patients undergoing Unilateral Lateralization Therapy and 370 minutes for patients undergoing Bilateral Lateralization Therapy.
Measured: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hour 10 minutes)
Pulmonary aeration: End-Expiratory Lung Impedance Change (ΔEELZ)
ΔEELZ will be assessed using electrical impedance tomography (EIT). ΔEELZ corresponds to the aggregate end-expiratory impedance (sum of pixel values) within each ROI, representing changes in end-expiratory lung volume. ROIs will include right anterior, left anterior, right posterior, and left posterior lung regions, grouped as dependent or non-dependent areas. Data will be expressed in arbitrary units (a.u.).
Measurements will be performed during the first and last 5 minutes of each body angulation. Unilateral: 140 minutes | Bilateral: 370 minutes. Following the sequence: Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, 30°/20 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, and Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, totaling 70 minutes per sequence plus 60 minutes of washout between sequences. This results in 140 minutes for patients undergoing Unilateral Lateralization Therapy and 370 minutes for patients undergoing Bilateral Lateralization Therapy.
Measured: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hour 10 minutes)
Secondary outcomes (18)
Mechanical response associated with respiratory drive: Diaphragmatic excursion
Diaphragmatic excursion will be assessed by ultrasonography using a convex transducer placed along the right mid-clavicular line, using the liver as an acoustic window. The procedure follows established ICU protocols and can be performed without ventilator disconnection. In this study, ventilation will remain connected, and diaphragmatic excursion will be quantified in millimeters (mm) (Santana et al., 2020).
Data are given in: mm: Millimeters. Measurements will be performed during the first and last 5 minutes of each body angulation. Unilateral: 140 minutes | Bilateral: 370 minutes. Following the sequence: Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, 30°/20 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, and Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, totaling 70 minutes per sequence plus 60 minutes of washout between sequences. This results in 140 minutes for patients undergoing Unilateral Lateralization Therapy and 370 minutes for patients undergoing Bilateral.
Measured: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hour 10 minutes)
Mechanical response related to respiratory effort and lung stress: Dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure
Dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure (cmH₂O) will assess the mechanical response to respiratory effort and lung stress. It is derived from the same expiratory occlusion maneuver used for Pmus, applying a correction formula to isolate lung distension. This provides a non-invasive measure of dynamic lung stress during ventilation. Recent studies have targeted values between 15 and 20 cmH₂O (Dianti et al., 2022).
Data are given in: cmH₂O: centimeters of water
Measurements will be performed during the first and last 5 minutes of each body angulation. Unilateral: 140 minutes | Bilateral: 370 minutes. Following the sequence: Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, 30°/20 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, and Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, totaling 70 minutes per sequence plus 60 minutes of washout between sequences. This results in 140 minutes for patients undergoing Unilateral Lateralization Therapy and 370 minutes for patients undergoing Bilateral.
Measured: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hour 10 minutes)
Driving Pressure (cmH₂O)
Driving pressure will be assessed using ventilator-derived parameters during mechanical ventilation to estimate lung stress under different body angulations and lateralization strategies. Driving pressure will be calculated as the difference between plateau pressure (Pplat) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), according to the formula: Driving Pressure = Pplat - PEEP.
Data will be expressed in: cmH₂O (centimeters of water). Measurements will be performed during the first and last 5 minutes of each body angulation. Unilateral: 140 minutes | Bilateral: 370 minutes. Following the sequence: Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, 30°/20 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, and Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, totaling 70 minutes per sequence plus 60 minutes of washout between sequences. This results in 140 minutes for patients undergoing Unilateral Lateralization Therapy and 370 minutes for patients undergoing Bilateral Lateralization Therapy.
Measured: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hour 10 minutes)
Respiratory System Compliance (mL/cmH₂O)
Respiratory system compliance will be evaluated using ventilator-derived parameters to assess lung distensibility during different body angulations and lateralization strategies under mechanical ventilation.
Respiratory system compliance will be calculated as the ratio between tidal volume (VT) and driving pressure, according to the formula:
Compliance = VT/ (plateau press - PEEP).
Data will be expressed in: cmH₂O (centimeters of water). Measurements will be performed during the first and last 5 minutes of each body angulation. Unilateral: 140 minutes | Bilateral: 370 minutes. Following the sequence: Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, 30°/20 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, and Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, totaling 70 minutes per sequence plus 60 minutes of washout between sequences. This results in 140 minutes for patients undergoing Unilateral Lateralization Therapy and 370 minutes for patients undergoing Bilateral Lateralization Therapy.
Measured: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hours and 20 minutes) Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hours and 10 minutes)
Airway Resistance (cmH₂O/L/s)
Airway resistance will be measured using ventilator-derived parameters to evaluate airflow resistance during mechanical ventilation across different body angulations and lateralization strategies.
Calculated as the difference between peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak) and plateau pressure (Pplat) divided by inspiratory flow, according to the formula:
Airway Resistance = (Ppeak - Pplat) / Inspiratory Flow
Data will be expressed in: cmH₂O (centimeters of water). Measurements will be performed during the first and last 5 minutes of each body angulation. Unilateral: 140 minutes | Bilateral: 370 minutes. Following the sequence: Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, 30°/20 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, and Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, totaling 70 minutes per sequence plus 60 minutes of washout between sequences. This results in 140 minutes for patients undergoing Unilateral Lateralization Therapy and 370 minutes for patients undergoing Bilateral
Measured: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hours and 20 minutes) Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hours and 10 minutes)
Arterial pH
Arterial pH measured from arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis at predefined time points: baseline (prior to the first intervention), immediately after completion of Sequence 1, and immediately after completion of Sequence 2.
Unit: pH units.
Measured: Baseline; immediately after Sequence 1; immediately after Sequence 2. Unit: pH units.
Partial pressure of oxygen (PaO₂)
Arterial PaO₂ measured via arterial blood gas at baseline, immediately after Sequence 1, and immediately after Sequence 2. Values obtained from arterial blood samples analyzed by standard blood gas analyzer.
Unit: mmHg.
Measured: Baseline; immediately after Sequence 1; immediately after Sequence 2.
Partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO₂)
Arterial PaCO₂ measured via arterial blood gas at baseline, immediately after Sequence 1, and immediately after Sequence 2.
Unit: mmHg.
Measured: Baseline; immediately after Sequence 1; immediately after Sequence 2.
Bicarbonate (HCO₃-)
Arterial bicarbonate (HCO₃-) concentration obtained from arterial blood gas analysis at baseline, immediately after Sequence 1, and immediately after Sequence 2.
Unit: mEq/L.
Measured: Baseline; immediately after Sequence 1; immediately after Sequence 2.
Lactate
Arterial lactate concentration obtained from arterial blood gas or arterial blood sample at baseline, immediately after Sequence 1, and immediately after Sequence 2.
Unit: mmol/L.
Measured: Baseline; immediately after Sequence 1; immediately after Sequence 2.
Base Excess (BE)
Base excess determined from arterial blood gas analysis at baseline, immediately after Sequence 1, and immediately after Sequence 2.
Unit: mEq/L.
Measured: Baseline; immediately after Sequence 1; immediately after Sequence 2.
PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio
PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio calculated from arterial PaO₂ and the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) at baseline, immediately after Sequence 1, and immediately after Sequence 2. FiO₂ will be recorded at the time of each arterial blood gas sampling.
Ratio (unitless).
Measured: Baseline; immediately after Sequence 1; immediately after Sequence 2.
Pulmonary Severity - LUS Score (Lung Ultrasound Score)
Pulmonary severity will be assessed using lung ultrasound (LUS), quantified by the Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS Score). Assessments will occur at three predefined time points: baseline (prior to the first intervention), immediately after the completion of Sequence 1, and immediately after the completion of Sequence 2.
Pulmonary aeration will be classified according to standardized LUS Score criteria Mongodi, Silvia et al. Anesthesiology, 2021.
Score 0: Normal lung pattern; up to two isolated B-lines. Score 1: Up to four B-lines, indicating mild loss of aeration. Score 2: More than four B-lines or confluent B-lines, indicating moderate loss of aeration.
Score 3: Consolidations with coarse artifacts and pleural irregularities, indicating severe loss of aeration.
Outcome Units: Ordinal scale (0 to 3 per region) and total summed score.
Measured: Baseline, immediately after Sequence 1, and immediately after Sequence 2.
Hemodynamic Instability Events
Number of hemodynamic instability episodes defined by sustained Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) < 60 mmHg or > 120 mmHg, each lasting more than 10 minutes, recorded throughout the intervention period. Unit: Number of events
Measured: At any time during the intervention and immediately after completion.
Psychomotor Agitation - Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS Score)
Psychomotor agitation or sedation will be assessed using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) during each predefined body position and angulation throughout the therapy sequence.
The RASS score ranges from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (combative), with higher positive scores indicating greater agitation and more negative scores indicating deeper levels of sedation.
During each body position and angulation within the intervention sequence, assessed at the end of each positioning period, including:
Semi-seated 30° (20 minutes) Supine 0° (5 minutes) Lateralization 15° (20 minutes) Lateralization 30° (20 minutes) Lateralization 15° (20 minutes) Supine 0° (5 minutes) Semi-seated 30° (20 minutes), for a total of 70 minutes per sequence, with a 60-minute washout period between sequences.
Measured: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 min (6 hour 10 minutes)
Oxygenation and Hypoxemia Events (SpO₂ Monitoring + Hypoxemia Criteria)
Continuous monitoring of peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) during each therapy session.
Any episode meeting one or more of the following hypoxemia criteria will be recorded:
- SpO₂ < 92%, or > 20% decrease from baseline;
- Need to increase FiO₂ > 50% or > 20% above baseline;
- Need to increase PEEP;
- Associated hemodynamic instability (including changes in PAM according to predefined limits).
All events will be documented throughout the intervention. Unit: Number of events.
Measured: Continuous monitoring; events recorded at any time during the intervention.
Unplanned Removal of Devices
Occurrence of unplanned removal of tubes or catheters during therapy (e.g., endotracheal tube, feeding tube, urinary catheter). Unit: Number of events.
Measured: During the intervention.
Serious Adverse Events
Occurrence of pneumothorax, cardiopulmonary arrest, or any event requiring emergency interruption or modification of therapy. Unit: Number of events.
Measured: During the intervention.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jan 2026
- Study start1 Jan 2026
- Primary completion30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (25)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Intensive Care Units (ICUs)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Quasi-experimental study with a non-randomized physiological interventional design in a single group of critically ill adult patients under mechanical ventilation. Each participant will undergo all intervention conditions, including different body lateralization angles (0°, 15°, 30°) with Automatic Lateralization Therapy with and without Flow Bias. Repeated measures will include respiratory drive, ventilation, and pulmonary aeration assessed by P0.1, estimated Pmus, sEMG, EIT, and ultrasound, allowing each participant to serve as their own control.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pernambuco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Shirley Lima Campos, University of Pernambuco
- Investigators
- Emanuel Fernandes Ferreira da Silva Júnior, MSc, Principal investigator, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE) - Health-Applied Biology Graduate Program, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, BrazilShirley Lima Campos Lima Campos, PhD, Study director, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07323472
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LATLUNG
- Other IDs
- 92079725.0.0000.5208
- Acronym
- LATLUNG
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Participant characteristics Medical history Clinical measurements Functional results Images (USG) Adverse events
Publications
Salluh JI, Soares M. ICU severity of illness scores: APACHE, SAPS and MPM. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014 Oct;20(5):557-65. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000135.
PubMed 25137401Dianti J, Bertoni M, Goligher EC. Monitoring patient-ventilator interaction by an end-expiratory occlusion maneuver. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2338-2341. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06167-3. Epub 2020 Jul 4. No abstract available.
PubMed 32623476Chen H, Liang M, He Y, Teboul JL, Sun Q, Xie J, Yang Y, Qiu H, Liu L. Inspiratory effort impacts the accuracy of pulse pressure variations for fluid responsiveness prediction in mechanically ventilated patients with spontaneous breathing activity: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intensive Care. 2023 Aug 17;13(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01167-0.
PubMed 37592166Silva Junior EFFD, Campos SL, Leite WS, Melo PVS, Lins RAC, Araujo MDGR, Guerino MR. Surface electromyography signal processing and evaluation on respiratory muscles of critically ill patients: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2023 Apr 27;18(4):e0284911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284911. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 37104255Costa LSP, Reinaux CMA, Junior EFFS, Leite WS, Brandao DC, de Andrade AD, Roldan R, Morais CCA, Campos SL. Physiology of body lateralization on regional lung ventilation and lung volumes in healthy subjects: Within-subjects design. PLoS One. 2025 Oct 30;20(10):e0335622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335622. eCollection 2025.
PubMed 41166369Zack MB. Pectoriloquy, a retrospective analysis. Chest. 2009 Jan;135(1):8-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2261. No abstract available.
PubMed 19136401Vedrenne-Cloquet M, Ito Y, Hotz J, Klein MJ, Herrera M, Chang D, Bhalla AK, Newth CJL, Khemani RG. Phenotypes based on respiratory drive and effort to identify the risk factors when P0.1 fails to estimate ∆PES in ventilated children. Crit Care. 2024 Oct 4;28(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05103-x.
PubMed 39367452Umbrello M, Formenti P, Longhi D, Galimberti A, Piva I, Pezzi A, Mistraletti G, Marini JJ, Iapichino G. Diaphragm ultrasound as indicator of respiratory effort in critically ill patients undergoing assisted mechanical ventilation: a pilot clinical study. Crit Care. 2015 Apr 13;19(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0894-9.
PubMed 25886857Suttapanit K, Wongkrasunt S, Savatmongkorngul S, Supatanakij P. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the diaphragm in critically ill patients to predict invasive mechanical ventilation. J Intensive Care. 2023 Sep 19;11(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00690-3.
PubMed 37726832Schifino G, Vega ML, Pisani L, Prediletto I, Catalanotti V, Comellini V, Bassi I, Zompatori M, Ranieri MV, Nava S. Effects of non-invasive respiratory supports on inspiratory effort in moderate-severe COVID-19 patients. A randomized physiological study. Eur J Intern Med. 2022 Jun;100:110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.04.012. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
PubMed 35483993ROSA, Jéssica dos Santos Pereira et al. Impacts in the Respiratory Mechanics of the Ventilator Hyperinsuflation in the Flow Bias Concept: a Narrative Review. Journal of Health Sciences, v. 21, n. 3, p. 250-254, 2019.
Roesthuis LH, van der Hoeven JG, van Hees HWH, Schellekens WM, Doorduin J, Heunks LMA. Recruitment pattern of the diaphragm and extradiaphragmatic inspiratory muscles in response to different levels of pressure support. Ann Intensive Care. 2020 May 29;10(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00684-6.
PubMed 32472272Dos Santos Rocha A, Diaper J, Balogh AL, Marti C, Grosgurin O, Habre W, Petak F, Sudy R. Effect of body position on the redistribution of regional lung aeration during invasive and non-invasive ventilation of COVID-19 patients. Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 30;12(1):11085. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15122-9.
PubMed 35773299Pearce AK, McGuire WC, Elliott AR, Goligher EC, Prisk GK, Butler JP, Malhotra A. Impact of Supine Versus Semirecumbent Body Posture on the Distribution of Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Crit Care Explor. 2023 Dec 1;5(12):e1014. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001014. eCollection 2023 Dec.
PubMed 38053751Kubota S, Hashimoto H, Yoshikawa Y, Hiwatashi K, Ono T, Mochizuki M, Naraba H, Nakano H, Takahashi Y, Sonoo T, Nakamura K. Effects of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation on ventilator-free days in intensive care unit subjects with sputum retention; a randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. 2024 May 2;19(5):e0302239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302239. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 38696429
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Analysis of Respiratory Drive Activation, Ventilation, and Pulmonary Aeration Resulting From Body Lateralization in Critically Ill Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07323472
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LATLUNG / LATLUNG
- Conditions
- Intensive Care Units (ICUs)
- Keywords
- Automatic lateralization therapy, Critical illness, Continuous lateral rotation, Electrical impedance tomography, Surface electromyography, Respiratory muscles
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PernambucoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this quasi-experimental study is to investigate how different body positions, performed through Automatic Lateralization Therapy, affect respiratory drive, ventilation, and pulmonary aeration in critically ill adult patients under mechanical ventilation. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Does Automatic Lateralization Therapy, modify respiratory drive, as measured by P0.1, estimated Pmus, and sEMG of the diaphragm and parasternal muscles?
- Is there an association between respiratory drive, ventilation, and pulmonary aeration measured by Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) in different body positions promoted by Automatic Lateralization Therapy ?
Does combining Automatic Lateralization Therapy, with Flow Bias improve physiological and functional outcomes compared to Automatic Lateralization Therapy, without Flow Bias?
Participants will:
- Be positioned in different lateralization strategies using Automatic Lateralization Therapy, while under mechanical ventilation;
- Have respiratory parameters and ventilation images assessed by EIT and sEMG;
Participate only during their ICU stay, with no need for additional visits after discharge.
Detailed description
Detailed Description:
Critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation frequently develop respiratory complications due to immobility and altered pulmonary mechanics. Automatic Lateralization Therapy has emerged as a promising physiologic intervention to optimize ventilation and reduce respiratory dysfunction in this population. However, its effects on respiratory drive activation remain poorly understood.
Objective:
To evaluate the effects of body lateralization on respiratory drive activation, ventilation, and pulmonary aeration in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
Methods and Design:
This is a quasi-experimental, non-randomized physiological intervention study conducted in a controlled ICU environment, following the TREND 2025 Statement Checklist for transparent reporting of non-randomized evaluations. Automatic Lateralization Therapy will be applied with and without Flow Bias, using progressive body tilt angles (0°, 15°, and 30°). Positioning strategies will be personalized based on Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) findings to ensure optimal lung recruitment and safety.
Collected data will include:
Clinical and physiological parameters such as respiratory drive (P0.1, estimated Pmus),
Diaphragm and parasternal muscle activity via surface electromyography (sEMG),
Ventilatory mechanics and gas exchange,
Pulmonary aeration and regional ventilation distribution assessed by EIT,
Additional monitoring by lung ultrasound to confirm aeration patterns.
The investigator performing the physiological data analysis will be blinded to the intervention group to minimize bias. Cardiorespiratory safety (e.g., hemodynamic stability, oxygenation) and adverse events will be monitored throughout all procedures.
Expected Outcomes:
The study aims to provide insights into whether body lateralization through Automatic Lateralization Therapy, modulates respiratory drive and improves ventilation efficiency in critically ill patients. It is hypothesized that combining Automatic Lateralization Therapy, with Flow Bias will enhance pulmonary expansion, respiratory drive activation, and gas exchange efficiency compared to Automatic Lateralization Therapy, alone, while maintaining patient safety.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Quasi-experimental study with a non-randomized physiological interventional design in a single group of critically ill adult patients under mechanical ventilation. Each participant will undergo all intervention conditions, including different body lateralization angles (0°, 15°, 30°) with Automatic Lateralization Therapy with and without Flow Bias. Repeated measures will include respiratory drive, ventilation, and pulmonary aeration assessed by P0.1, estimated Pmus, sEMG, EIT, and ultrasound, allowing each participant to serve as their own control.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Supine Positioning | Active comparator | Other: Supine PositioningParticipants will remain in supine position with 30° head elevation. No lateralization therapy is applied. |
| Automatic lateralization therapy | Active comparator | Other: Automatic Lateralization TherapyParticipants will undergo continuous lateral positioning on an automated bed, with automatic angle and time adjustments. The second sequence will be combined with the Flow Bias intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patients of both sexes will be included;
- Aged ≥ 18 years;
- BMI 18-35 kg/m²;
- Under invasive mechanical ventilation via orotracheal tube for ≥ 24 hours and expected to remain on mechanical ventilatory support for at least 48 hours;
- Sedated (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale [RASS] -1 to -4);
Key exclusion criteria (26 listed)
- Patients presenting medical restrictions to body repositioning, or to the use of EIT or sEMG;
- Those in therapeutic failure;
- Individuals with spinal cord injury, brain injury, or stroke with a history of functional loss and respiratory impairment prior to hospitalization;
- Neurological diseases affecting respiratory myoelectric conduction;
- History of postural deformities, diaphragmatic abnormalities, or colostomy bag;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Lateralization TherapyAlso: Continuous lateral positioning, Automatic patient positioning, Continuous lateral rotation therapy, Lateral rotation therapyDuring this phase of analysis and intervention related to lateral positioning, patients will be maintained on a Multicare bed (LINET) and subjected to personalized lateral positioning based on the morphofunctional pattern detected by electrical impedance tomography. This positioning will be performed using automatic lateralization therapy, programmed for unilateral or bilateral application, continuously alternating between angles of 0°, 15°, and 30°, maintained for 20 minutes at each position. The procedure will be conducted in two sequences, with the second sequence combined with the Flow Bias intervention. At each angle, data will be collected on hemodynamic monitoring, respiratory drive, respiratory mechanics, regional distribution of ventilation and aeration, and gas exchange. | Other | Automatic lateralization therapy |
| Supine PositioningAlso: Supine, Semi-recumbent position, Recumbent position, Dorsal decubitusDuring this analysis phase, patients will be positioned on a Multicare bed (LINET) in the dorsal decubitus position with the head of the bed elevated to 30°. Data will be collected on hemodynamic monitoring, respiratory drive, respiratory mechanics, degree of lung involvement, regional distribution of ventilation and aeration, and gas exchange. | Other | Supine Positioning |
Primary outcome
Respiratory drive parameters: Surface electromyography (sEMG)
Time frame: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hour 10 minutes)
The respiratory drive parameter will be assessed using surface electromyographic (sEMG) activity of the respiratory muscles, including the diaphragm and parasternal intercostals, expressed in microvolts (µV) (Silva Junior et al., 2023). Data are given in: • µV: Microvolts Measurements will be performed during the first and last 5 minutes of each body angulation. Unilateral: 140 minutes | Bilateral: 370 minutes. Following the sequence: Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, 30°/20 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, and Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, totaling 70 minutes per sequence plus 60 minutes of washout between sequences. This results in 140 minutes for patients undergoing Unilateral Lateralization Therapy and 370 minutes for patients undergoing Bilateral Lateralization Therapy.
Respiratory drive parameter: P0.1 (airway occlusion pressure during the first 100 ms of the inspiratory effort)
Time frame: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 minutes(6 hour 10 minutes)
The respiratory drive parameter will be assessed by P0.1(airway occlusion pressure during the first 100ms of the inspiratory effort,cmH₂O).P0.1 is the drop in airway pressure within 100 ms after the onset of inspiration and is considered a reliable, fast, and feasible bedside marker.The following values are considered: Normal: 1.5-3.5 cmH₂O; Low: <1.0 cmH₂O(hypostimulated); High:>4.0 cmH₂O (hyperstimulated)(CHEN et al.,2023). Data are given in: cmH₂O: centimeters of water Measurements will be performed during the first and last 5 minutes of each body angulation. Unilateral: 140 minutes | Bilateral: 370 minutes. Following the sequence: Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, 30°/20 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, and Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, totaling 70 minutes per sequence plus 60 minutes of washout between sequences. This results in 140 minutes for patients undergoing Unilateral Lateralization Therapy and 370 minutes Bilateral.
Respiratory drive parameters: Pmus (estimated inspiratory muscle pressure)
Time frame: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hour 10 minutes)
The respiratory drive will be assessed using Pmus (estimated inspiratory muscle pressure). Pmus is derived from the airway pressure drop during a brief inspiratory occlusion and reflects inspiratory effort. Reference ranges: Pmus < 5 cmH₂O indicates over-assistance/low drive; Pmus ≤ 10 cmH₂O represents the diaphragmatic protection zone; Pmus > 13-15 cmH₂O indicates excessive effort (Dianti, Bertoni ;Goligher, 2020). Data are given in: •cmH₂O: centimeters of water Measurements will be performed during the first and last 5 minutes of each body angulation. Unilateral: 140 minutes | Bilateral: 370 minutes. Following the sequence: Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, 30°/20 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, and Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, totaling 70 minutes per sequence plus 60 minutes of washout between sequences. This results in 140 minutes for patients undergoing Unilateral Lateralization Therapy and 370 minutes for patients undergoing Bilateral
Pulmonary ventilation: Ventilation Impedance Change (ΔZ)
Time frame: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hour 10 minutes)
ΔZ will be quantified using electrical impedance tomography (EIT). ΔZ represents the sum of impedance changes of all pixels within a predefined region of interest (ROI), corresponding to regional tidal ventilation. ROIs will include right anterior, left anterior, right posterior, and left posterior lung regions, and will also be categorized as dependent or non-dependent lung areas. Data will be expressed in arbitrary units (a.u.). Measurements will be performed during the first and last 5 minutes of each body angulation. Unilateral: 140 minutes | Bilateral: 370 minutes. Following the sequence: Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, 30°/20 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, and Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, totaling 70 minutes per sequence plus 60 minutes of washout between sequences. This results in 140 minutes for patients undergoing Unilateral Lateralization Therapy and 370 minutes for patients undergoing Bilateral Lateralization Therapy.
Pulmonary aeration: End-Expiratory Lung Impedance Change (ΔEELZ)
Time frame: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hour 10 minutes)
ΔEELZ will be assessed using electrical impedance tomography (EIT). ΔEELZ corresponds to the aggregate end-expiratory impedance (sum of pixel values) within each ROI, representing changes in end-expiratory lung volume. ROIs will include right anterior, left anterior, right posterior, and left posterior lung regions, grouped as dependent or non-dependent areas. Data will be expressed in arbitrary units (a.u.). Measurements will be performed during the first and last 5 minutes of each body angulation. Unilateral: 140 minutes | Bilateral: 370 minutes. Following the sequence: Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, 30°/20 minutes, 15°/20 minutes, Supine 0°/5 minutes, and Semi-seated 30°/20 minutes, totaling 70 minutes per sequence plus 60 minutes of washout between sequences. This results in 140 minutes for patients undergoing Unilateral Lateralization Therapy and 370 minutes for patients undergoing Bilateral Lateralization Therapy.
18 secondary outcomes
Mechanical response associated with respiratory drive: Diaphragmatic excursion
Time frame: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hour 10 minutes)
Mechanical response related to respiratory effort and lung stress: Dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure
Time frame: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hour 10 minutes)
Driving Pressure (cmH₂O)
Time frame: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hour 10 minutes)
Respiratory System Compliance (mL/cmH₂O)
Time frame: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hours and 20 minutes) Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hours and 10 minutes)
Airway Resistance (cmH₂O/L/s)
Time frame: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hours and 20 minutes) Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hours and 10 minutes)
Arterial pH
Time frame: Baseline; immediately after Sequence 1; immediately after Sequence 2. Unit: pH units.
Partial pressure of oxygen (PaO₂)
Time frame: Baseline; immediately after Sequence 1; immediately after Sequence 2.
Partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO₂)
Time frame: Baseline; immediately after Sequence 1; immediately after Sequence 2.
Bicarbonate (HCO₃-)
Time frame: Baseline; immediately after Sequence 1; immediately after Sequence 2.
Lactate
Time frame: Baseline; immediately after Sequence 1; immediately after Sequence 2.
Base Excess (BE)
Time frame: Baseline; immediately after Sequence 1; immediately after Sequence 2.
PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio
Time frame: Baseline; immediately after Sequence 1; immediately after Sequence 2.
Pulmonary Severity - LUS Score (Lung Ultrasound Score)
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after Sequence 1, and immediately after Sequence 2.
Hemodynamic Instability Events
Time frame: At any time during the intervention and immediately after completion.
Psychomotor Agitation - Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS Score)
Time frame: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 min (6 hour 10 minutes)
Oxygenation and Hypoxemia Events (SpO₂ Monitoring + Hypoxemia Criteria)
Time frame: Continuous monitoring; events recorded at any time during the intervention.
Unplanned Removal of Devices
Time frame: During the intervention.
Serious Adverse Events
Time frame: During the intervention.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2026.
- Background: PubMed 25137401Salluh JI, Soares M. ICU severity of illness scores: APACHE, SAPS and MPM. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014 Oct;20(5):557-65. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000135.
- Background: PubMed 32623476Dianti J, Bertoni M, Goligher EC. Monitoring patient-ventilator interaction by an end-expiratory occlusion maneuver. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2338-2341. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06167-3. Epub 2020 Jul 4. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 37592166Chen H, Liang M, He Y, Teboul JL, Sun Q, Xie J, Yang Y, Qiu H, Liu L. Inspiratory effort impacts the accuracy of pulse pressure variations for fluid responsiveness prediction in mechanically ventilated patients with spontaneous breathing activity: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intensive Care. 2023 Aug 17;13(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01167-0.
- Background: PubMed 37104255Silva Junior EFFD, Campos SL, Leite WS, Melo PVS, Lins RAC, Araujo MDGR, Guerino MR. Surface electromyography signal processing and evaluation on respiratory muscles of critically ill patients: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2023 Apr 27;18(4):e0284911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284911. eCollection 2023.
- Background: PubMed 41166369Costa LSP, Reinaux CMA, Junior EFFS, Leite WS, Brandao DC, de Andrade AD, Roldan R, Morais CCA, Campos SL. Physiology of body lateralization on regional lung ventilation and lung volumes in healthy subjects: Within-subjects design. PLoS One. 2025 Oct 30;20(10):e0335622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335622. eCollection 2025.
- Background: PubMed 19136401Zack MB. Pectoriloquy, a retrospective analysis. Chest. 2009 Jan;135(1):8-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2261. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 39367452Vedrenne-Cloquet M, Ito Y, Hotz J, Klein MJ, Herrera M, Chang D, Bhalla AK, Newth CJL, Khemani RG. Phenotypes based on respiratory drive and effort to identify the risk factors when P0.1 fails to estimate ∆PES in ventilated children. Crit Care. 2024 Oct 4;28(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05103-x.
- Background: PubMed 25886857Umbrello M, Formenti P, Longhi D, Galimberti A, Piva I, Pezzi A, Mistraletti G, Marini JJ, Iapichino G. Diaphragm ultrasound as indicator of respiratory effort in critically ill patients undergoing assisted mechanical ventilation: a pilot clinical study. Crit Care. 2015 Apr 13;19(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0894-9.
- Background: PubMed 37726832Suttapanit K, Wongkrasunt S, Savatmongkorngul S, Supatanakij P. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the diaphragm in critically ill patients to predict invasive mechanical ventilation. J Intensive Care. 2023 Sep 19;11(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00690-3.
- Background: PubMed 35483993Schifino G, Vega ML, Pisani L, Prediletto I, Catalanotti V, Comellini V, Bassi I, Zompatori M, Ranieri MV, Nava S. Effects of non-invasive respiratory supports on inspiratory effort in moderate-severe COVID-19 patients. A randomized physiological study. Eur J Intern Med. 2022 Jun;100:110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.04.012. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
- BackgroundROSA, Jéssica dos Santos Pereira et al. Impacts in the Respiratory Mechanics of the Ventilator Hyperinsuflation in the Flow Bias Concept: a Narrative Review. Journal of Health Sciences, v. 21, n. 3, p. 250-254, 2019.
- Background: PubMed 32472272Roesthuis LH, van der Hoeven JG, van Hees HWH, Schellekens WM, Doorduin J, Heunks LMA. Recruitment pattern of the diaphragm and extradiaphragmatic inspiratory muscles in response to different levels of pressure support. Ann Intensive Care. 2020 May 29;10(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00684-6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Participant characteristics Medical history Clinical measurements Functional results Images (USG) Adverse events
Related trials for Intensive Care Units (ICUs)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Continuous Connected Patient Care (CCPC), a Pilot Testing a Novel Device for Continuous Vitals Monitoring - Department of Anesthesia at PHC
Surgical Procedure, Unspecified, Intensive Care Units (ICUs)
RecruitingObservational study
Rehabilitation Practices in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in the Intensive Care Unit.
Mechanical Ventilation, Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Safety and Efficacy of Esketamine - Dexmedetomidine Combination Versus Dexmedetomidine Monotherapy for Hyperactive Delirium in ICU Patients on Non-Invasive Respiratory Support (SEED-NIRS Trial): Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine
Recruiting
Assessment of the PEEP Responsiveness to Titrate End-expiratory Pressure and of the Need for Muscle Relaxation During Prone Positioning in Moderate-to-severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Master Protocol
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Intensive Care Units (ICUs)
Recruiting
ICU Delirium Playbook Training Study for ICU Nurses
Nursing Education, Delirium Confusional State
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Emanuel Fernandes Ferreira da Silva Júnior, MSc contact
Emanuel Fernandes Ferreira da Silva Júnior, MSc principal investigator
Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE) - Health-Applied Biology Graduate Program, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
Shirley Lima Campos Lima Campos, PhD study director
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Automatic Lateralization Therapy and Supine Positioning in people with Intensive Care Units (ICUs), run by University of Pernambuco at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 26 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Shirley Lima Campos, PhD (+5581999413087, shirley.campos@ufpe.br), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Respiratory drive parameters: Surface electromyography (sEMG) (time frame: Unilateral: 140 minutes (2 hour 20 minutes) | Bilateral: 370 minutes (6 hour 10 minutes)). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07323472, which also lists 25 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2026.