Tendon Injury - HandNCT07320807
Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy After Flexor Tendon Injury
A study testing Ekstracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in people with Tendon Injury - Hand, run by Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
In this study aims to investigate the effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy, applied to the intervention group in addition to the rehabilitation program applied to the control and intervention groups, on range of motion, pain, grip strength, and dexterity after hand flexor tendon injury. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Tendon Injury - Hand
- What is being tested?
- Ekstracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2026to 30 May 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- • . Volunteering
- . Being 8-12 weeks post-operatively after flexor tendon repair
- . Having undergone flexor tendon zone II-IV surgical repair
Who cannot join
- . Infection
- • . Open wound
- . Pregnancy
- . History of finger or wrist fracture
- . Inflammatory rheumatic disease
- . Malignant tumor mass
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Ankara Bilkent City Hospital
Ankara, 06800
Merve KAPAN, PhD, +905057603658, fzt.kapan@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Range of Motion, Pain, Dexterity, and Function After Hand Flexor Tendon Injury.
In this study aims to investigate the effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy, applied to the intervention group in addition to the rehabilitation program applied to the control and intervention groups, on range of motion, pain, grip strength, and dexterity after hand flexor tendon injury.
Read the detailed description
The hand is a fundamental element in daily living activities, occupation, and social independence. Although different studies report varying figures for hand injuries, they constitute approximately 20% of injuries presenting to emergency departments. Soft tissue traumas account for a significant portion of these injuries. Due to the proximity of flexor tendons to the skin, the hand is frequently affected in hand injuries.
One of the agents used to accelerate healing and function in hand tendons after injury or surgery, and to reduce adhesion and contracture formation, is Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT). ESWT treatment modalities have been tested in experimental animal studies. The idea behind the use of shock waves in the treatment of orthopedic diseases is to stimulate healing in tendons, surrounding tissues, and bones. The importance of shock wave therapy on soft tissues has increased over time.
It has been reported that ESWT significantly reduces deformity in Dupuytren's disease treatment. Brunelli et al. found that radial ESWT (3 bars, 12 Hz, 1400 pulses) applied in 4 sessions to a patient with pain, weakness in the middle and ring fingers, and flexion deformity due to Dupuytren's disease resulted in a significant reduction in hand deformities and improvement in daily living performance. Positive results of the use of ESWT in hand flexor tendon pathologies have been published. In their cadaver study examining the applicability of radial ESWT to the flexor tendon, Lutter et al. stated that ESWT application at different intensities can penetrate soft tissues and is a treatment option in different finger pathologies. Malliaropoulos et al. have found that radial ESWT is effective in reducing pain and improving functional recovery in trigger finger treatment. This study aims to investigate the effect of ESWT on range of motion, pain, grip strength, and dexterity after hand flexor tendon injury. 56 patients who presented with flexor tendon injury and consented to participate will be included in this study and divided into two groups. All patients will be enrolled in a hand rehabilitation program including early passive mobilization according to the Modified Duran Protocol. In addition, the intervention group will receive 2000 pulses of radial ESWT at 2 bar pressure and 10 Hz frequency, applied to the flexor tendon scar tissue in 4 sessions, using a sweeping method with gel applied between the patient's skin and the probe.
- Conditions
- Tendon Injury - Hand
- Being tested
- Ekstracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy
- Keywords
- rehabilitation, ekstrakorporeal shock wave therapy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ekstracorporeal Shock Wave TherapyDevice
Radial ESWT with 2 bar pressure, 10 Hz frequency, and 2000 pulses will be applied to the flexor tendon scar tissue in a total of 4 sessions, once a week, using a sweeping method with gel applied between the patient's skin and the probe.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| control | No intervention | In accordance with the Modified Duran Protocol, a hand rehabilitation program, including early passive mobilization, will be implemented for 4 weeks. |
| intervention | Experimental | In addition to a hand rehabilitation program that includes early passive mobilization in accordance with the Modified Duran Protocol, ESWT will be applied. Receives: Device: Ekstracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual Analog Scale
For VAS assessment, patients are informed about the meaning of the numbers placed on a 10 cm line from 0 to 10. It is explained that no pain is worth 0 points, moderate pain is worth 5 points, and the most severe pain felt is worth 10 points. Based on these explanations, the patient is asked to mark the pain on the 10 cm line. The distance between the marked point and the starting point is measured with a ruler to determine the pain intensity.
Measured: Evaluation will be performed before treatment, on the day treatment ends, and one month after treatment.
Range of Motion
Range of motion (ROM) is one of the most frequently used outcome variables after tendon injuries in the hand. ROM measurement in the hand is performed using a finger goniometer. In active ROM assessment for the fingers, the patient is asked to make a fist for flexion and extend the finger straight; that is, the measurement is performed in a compound manner. In this study, the Modified Strickland calculation will be used for fingers 2-5. Active distal interphalangeal (DIF) and proximal interphalangeal (PIF) joint flexion are added together, and the active extension loss is subtracted. 175° is considered ideal and compared to 175°. The results are; 75°-100° is considered excellent, 50°-74° good, 25°-49° average, and 0°-24° poor.
Measured: Evaluation will be performed before treatment, on the day treatment ends, and one month after treatment.
Secondary outcomes (3)
Nine-hole peg test
Due to its low cost, ease of application, and speed, it is widely used in assessing dexterity. It consists of a square wooden board with nine holes and nine wooden pegs designed to fit these holes. During the test, the container with the square board and pegs is placed on the side of the extremity being evaluated. Then, the patient is asked to take the pegs one by one and place them in the holes. The order of placement is not important. As soon as the placement is complete, the pegs are removed one by one and returned to the container. The order of removal is not important. The process is timed. The timer starts when the hand first touches a peg at the beginning of placement and ends when the last peg is removed and touches the container.
Measured: Evaluation will be performed before treatment, on the day treatment ends, and one month after treatment.
Duruoz Hand Index
The Duruoz Hand Index was first developed in 1996 to assess hand-related activity limitations in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. It consists of 18 self-assessed items regarding hand abilities in the kitchen, dressing, personal hygiene, work, and other general movements. Scores range from 0-40 for kitchen tasks, 0-10 for dressing, hygiene, and office tasks, and 0-20 for the "other" category. Individuals rate their abilities on a scale of 0 (no difficulty) to 5 (impossible to perform). The questionnaire results in a total score of 0-90. A higher score represents a greater activity limitation and greater difficulty. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the questionnaire have been demonstrated in patients with traumatic hand injuries.
Measured: Evaluation will be performed before treatment, on the day treatment ends, and one month after treatment.
Short Form-36 Questionnaire
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire is a 36-item scale consisting of subscales of physical function, physical role, emotional role, pain, vitality, general health, and mental health. Each subscale is scored from "0" to "100", indicating the lowest and highest quality of life levels, respectively.
Measured: Evaluation will be performed before treatment, on the day treatment ends, and one month after treatment.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jan 2026
- Study start15 Jan 2026
- Primary completion30 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 May 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Tendon Injury - HandStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Kirsehir Ahi Evran UniversitesiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nazife Kapan, Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07320807
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AYBU-ESWT-MK-01
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 11 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Range of Motion, Pain, Dexterity, and Function After Hand Flexor Tendon Injury.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07320807
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AYBU-ESWT-MK-01
- Conditions
- Tendon Injury - Hand
- Keywords
- rehabilitation, ekstrakorporeal shock wave therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Kirsehir Ahi Evran UniversitesiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this study aims to investigate the effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy, applied to the intervention group in addition to the rehabilitation program applied to the control and intervention groups, on range of motion, pain, grip strength, and dexterity after hand flexor tendon injury.
Detailed description
The hand is a fundamental element in daily living activities, occupation, and social independence. Although different studies report varying figures for hand injuries, they constitute approximately 20% of injuries presenting to emergency departments. Soft tissue traumas account for a significant portion of these injuries. Due to the proximity of flexor tendons to the skin, the hand is frequently affected in hand injuries.
One of the agents used to accelerate healing and function in hand tendons after injury or surgery, and to reduce adhesion and contracture formation, is Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT). ESWT treatment modalities have been tested in experimental animal studies. The idea behind the use of shock waves in the treatment of orthopedic diseases is to stimulate healing in tendons, surrounding tissues, and bones. The importance of shock wave therapy on soft tissues has increased over time.
It has been reported that ESWT significantly reduces deformity in Dupuytren's disease treatment. Brunelli et al. found that radial ESWT (3 bars, 12 Hz, 1400 pulses) applied in 4 sessions to a patient with pain, weakness in the middle and ring fingers, and flexion deformity due to Dupuytren's disease resulted in a significant reduction in hand deformities and improvement in daily living performance. Positive results of the use of ESWT in hand flexor tendon pathologies have been published. In their cadaver study examining the applicability of radial ESWT to the flexor tendon, Lutter et al. stated that ESWT application at different intensities can penetrate soft tissues and is a treatment option in different finger pathologies. Malliaropoulos et al. have found that radial ESWT is effective in reducing pain and improving functional recovery in trigger finger treatment. This study aims to investigate the effect of ESWT on range of motion, pain, grip strength, and dexterity after hand flexor tendon injury. 56 patients who presented with flexor tendon injury and consented to participate will be included in this study and divided into two groups. All patients will be enrolled in a hand rehabilitation program including early passive mobilization according to the Modified Duran Protocol. In addition, the intervention group will receive 2000 pulses of radial ESWT at 2 bar pressure and 10 Hz frequency, applied to the flexor tendon scar tissue in 4 sessions, using a sweeping method with gel applied between the patient's skin and the probe.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| control | No intervention | –In accordance with the Modified Duran Protocol, a hand rehabilitation program, including early passive mobilization, will be implemented for 4 weeks. |
| intervention | Experimental | Device: Ekstracorporeal Shock Wave TherapyIn addition to a hand rehabilitation program that includes early passive mobilization in accordance with the Modified Duran Protocol, ESWT will be applied. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- • . Volunteering
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- . Infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ekstracorporeal Shock Wave TherapyRadial ESWT with 2 bar pressure, 10 Hz frequency, and 2000 pulses will be applied to the flexor tendon scar tissue in a total of 4 sessions, once a week, using a sweeping method with gel applied between the patient's skin and the probe. | Device | intervention |
Primary outcome
Visual Analog Scale
Time frame: Evaluation will be performed before treatment, on the day treatment ends, and one month after treatment.
For VAS assessment, patients are informed about the meaning of the numbers placed on a 10 cm line from 0 to 10. It is explained that no pain is worth 0 points, moderate pain is worth 5 points, and the most severe pain felt is worth 10 points. Based on these explanations, the patient is asked to mark the pain on the 10 cm line. The distance between the marked point and the starting point is measured with a ruler to determine the pain intensity.
Range of Motion
Time frame: Evaluation will be performed before treatment, on the day treatment ends, and one month after treatment.
Range of motion (ROM) is one of the most frequently used outcome variables after tendon injuries in the hand. ROM measurement in the hand is performed using a finger goniometer. In active ROM assessment for the fingers, the patient is asked to make a fist for flexion and extend the finger straight; that is, the measurement is performed in a compound manner. In this study, the Modified Strickland calculation will be used for fingers 2-5. Active distal interphalangeal (DIF) and proximal interphalangeal (PIF) joint flexion are added together, and the active extension loss is subtracted. 175° is considered ideal and compared to 175°. The results are; 75°-100° is considered excellent, 50°-74° good, 25°-49° average, and 0°-24° poor.
3 secondary outcomes
Nine-hole peg test
Time frame: Evaluation will be performed before treatment, on the day treatment ends, and one month after treatment.
Duruoz Hand Index
Time frame: Evaluation will be performed before treatment, on the day treatment ends, and one month after treatment.
Short Form-36 Questionnaire
Time frame: Evaluation will be performed before treatment, on the day treatment ends, and one month after treatment.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Tendon Injury - Hand
Recruiting
Conservative Treatment With Relative Motion Flexion Orthosis for Boutonniere Injuries in Fingers
Finger Joint Deformities, Tendon Injuries
Recruiting
Vibratory Anesthesia on Pain Following Corticosteroid Injections
Bilateral Arthritis of Wrist, Tendinopathy
Recruiting
Ultrasound-Guided Repeated Saline Injections to Prevent and Treat Tendon Adhesions After Hand Tendon Repair
Tendon Adhesion, Zone II Flexor Tendon Injury
Recruiting
3D Hand Orthosis Trial
Hand Injuries and Disorders, Neurological Conditions
Recruiting
Effects of Different Wrist Positions in Dorsal Blocking Orthoses After Flexor Tendon Repair
Flexor Tendon Injury, Tendon Injury - Hand
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ekstracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in people with Tendon Injury - Hand, run by Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Merve KAPAN, PhD (+905057603658, fzt.kapan@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual Analog Scale (time frame: Evaluation will be performed before treatment, on the day treatment ends, and one month after treatment.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2026.