Autism Spectrum DisorderSTARNCT07315685
Understanding and Treating Severe and Resistant Pathological Aggression: Using Deep Brain Stimulation to Treat Resistant Aggression
A study testing neurostimulator in people with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Schizophrenia Disorder, run by University Hospital, Rouen at 2 sites in France.
Trial summary
Physical aggression can be defined as the use of force with the intention of causing physical injury, psychological damage or death. Pathological aggression may be associated with various psychiatric disorders. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Schizophrenia Disorder
- What is being tested?
- neurostimulator
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 6 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 13 Jul 2026to 8 May 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged between 18 and 70 inclusive
- Patients who have been in isolation in a secure psychiatric unit for at least 50% of the time over a period of more than 6 months prior to inclusion
- A GAF score <21
- An ICAP score <40
- Other stable medical conditions
- No contraindications to brain imaging (MRI and CT)
Show all 19Show fewer
- No contraindications to taking medication for travel (loxapine and diazepam)
- No contraindications to surgery
- Adult who has read and understood the information letter and signed the consent form. A psychiatrist, independent of the study and treatment, will examine the patient and determine their ability to read and understand the consent form before signing. If this is not the case, authorisation may be given by the guardianship judge in accordance with Article L. 1111-6.
- An adult assisted by their guardian or by the judge who has read and understood the information letter and signed the consent form (if the patient is under guardianship). If the guardian does not wish to give an opinion or make a decision for the patient, the guardianship judge may be consulted in accordance with Article L1223-1.
- Patients covered by social health insurance (except AME)
- Women of childbearing age (a woman is considered to be of childbearing age, i.e. fertile, after menarche and until she reaches menopause, unless she is permanently infertile) using at least minimally effective contraception (i.e. at least: oral progestogen-only contraception, where inhibition of ovulation is not the primary mode of action, male or female condoms with or without spermicide, diaphragm, diaphragm or sponge with spermicide) for at least 1 month and throughout the study, as well as a negative urinary pregnancy test for β-HCG at inclusion.
- Surgically sterile women (hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral oophorectomy)
- Menopausal women: Post-menopausal status is defined as the absence of menstruation for 12 months without any other medical cause. Elevated follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels in the post-menopausal interval may be used to confirm post-menopausal status in women who are not using hormonal contraception or hormone replacement therapy. However, in the absence of 12 months of amenorrhoea, a single FSH measurement is insufficient.
- For schizophrenic patients
- All previous treatments have failed, including the combination of clozapine (for at least 6 months with clozapine levels > 350 ng/mL) + ECT (minimum 20 sessions)
- Have had at least two clozapine potentiations among the following: lithium, valproic acid, beta-blockers, other antipsychotics.
- For ASD patients with or without intellectual disability
- All recommended psychoeducational measures must have been attempted with failure of the following treatments: risperidone, aripiprazole, clozapine, naltrexone, beta-blockers given for at least three months at the maximum tolerated dose.
Who cannot join
- Minors
- Contraindications to surgery and anaesthesia
- Contraindications to the use of the Medical Device (diathermy, certain magnetic resonance imaging procedures, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), (see section 'Contraindications' in the 'Information for Prescribers' manual for the implanted neurostimulator)
- Contraindications to MRI and CT scans (cardiac or neural pacemakers, ferromagnetic surgical clips, implants and metallic objects, intraocular foreign bodies, pregnancy, claustrophobia, cardiac or neural pacemakers, ferromagnetic surgical clips, implants and metallic objects, intraocular foreign bodies, etc.)
- Other medical problems interfering with the protocol and surgery
- Pregnant women
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
France2 sites
Ap-Hp Pitie Salpetriere
Paris
Carine Karachi, Pr, 01 42 16 33 29, karine.martin@aphp.fr
Carine Karachi, Pr
CH du ROUVRAY
Rouvray, 76301
Olivier Guillin, Pr, 02 32 95 10 30, olivier.guillin@ch-lerouvray.fr
Olivier Guillin, Pr
About this study
Physical aggression can be defined as the use of force with the intention of causing physical injury, psychological damage or death. Pathological aggression may be associated with various psychiatric disorders. This symptom can often be improved by prescribing medication, implementing psychoeducational strategies or even electroconvulsive therapy. However, some patients exhibit such severe pathological aggression that they must be institutionalised because they pose a danger to themselves or others. These patients are then hospitalised in a unit for difficult patients (UMD) for enhanced therapeutic care. Despite this maximum level of care, the pathological aggression of a minority of patients persists, leading to a therapeutic impasse, confining the patient to the UMD for many years with social isolation, a collapsed quality of life, and major repercussions for the family. The aim of this project is to use deep brain stimulation, a controlled, reversible, adaptable and low-morbidity neurosurgical method, in six patients with pathological aggression suffering from either schizophrenia (n=3) or autism spectrum disorders (n=3). We hypothesise that the effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the Sano triangle will significantly control the pathological aggression of these six patients.
This is a pilot study with randomised, crossover, double-blind evaluation. It will also provide answers regarding the safety of using SCP for this indication.
- Conditions
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Schizophrenia Disorder
- Being tested
- neurostimulator
- Medical subject headings
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Schizophrenia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
neurostimulatorDevice
implantation of a neurostimulator and stimulation of the triangle of Sano by alternating ON and OFF phases
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| OFF (6-8) ON (8-10) | Experimental | Group 1: stimulation turned off for 2 months (OFF-DBS from M6 to M8) and will be turned back on for 2 months (ON-DBS from M8 to M10). Receives: Device: neurostimulator |
| ON (6-8) OFF (8-10) | Experimental | Group 2: stimulation switched on for 2 months (ON-DBS from M6 to M8) and switched off for 2 months (OFF-DBS from M8 to M10). Receives: Device: neurostimulator |
| ON (6-7) OFF (7-9) ON (9-10) | Experimental | Group 3: stimulation switched on for 1 month (ON-DBS from M6 to M7), switched off for 2 months (OFF-DBS from M7 to M9) then switched back on for 1 month (ON-DBS from M9 to M10). Receives: Device: neurostimulator |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To evaluate the effects of SCP of the Sano triangle on pathological aggression quantified by the MOAS scale after 1 month of SCP compared to the preoperative state.
Measured: 9 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
The tolerance and safety of Sano triangle SCP for treating pathological aggression in these six patients, with the collection of potential adverse events,
Measured: 10 months
The evaluation of the effects of Sano triangle SCP on pathological behaviours (ICAP scores up to M10),
Measured: 10 months
Assessment of the effects of Sano triangle SCP on the number of daily aggressive episodes up to M10 + 1 week,
Measured: 10 months
Assessment of the effects of Sano triangle SCP on quality of life (SF-36) up to M10,
Measured: 10 months
Assessment of the effects of Sano triangle SCP on socio-familial impact (GAF improved by 20% up to M10),
Measured: 10 months
Assessment of the effects of Sano triangle SCP on cognitive and mnemonic impact (TNI-93 up to M10),
Measured: 10 months
Study of changes in neuronal activity in local potential fields of the Sano triangle during aggressive episodes up to M10,
Measured: 10 months
Anatomical and diffusion MRI study for tractography analysis of fibre bundles in these patients, and study of the volume of activated tissue in relation to the effects observed.
Measured: 10 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jan 2026
- Study start13 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion8 Apr 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion8 May 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Autism Spectrum DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Rouen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centre Hospitalier du Rouvray, Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07315685
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023/0207/HP
- Other IDs
- 2025-A00335-44
- Acronym
- STAR
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 8 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Understanding and Treating Severe and Resistant Pathological Aggression: Using Deep Brain Stimulation to Treat Resistant Aggression
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07315685
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STAR / 2023/0207/HP
- Conditions
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Schizophrenia Disorder
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, RouenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centre Hospitalier du Rouvray, Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere
- Study start
- 13 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 8 Apr 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 8 May 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Physical aggression can be defined as the use of force with the intention of causing physical injury, psychological damage or death. Pathological aggression may be associated with various psychiatric disorders. This symptom can often be improved by prescribing medication, implementing psychoeducational strategies or even electroconvulsive therapy. However, some patients exhibit such severe pathological aggression that they must be institutionalised because they pose a danger to themselves or others. These patients are then hospitalised in a unit for difficult patients (UMD) for enhanced therapeutic care. Despite this maximum level of care, the pathological aggression of a minority of patients persists, leading to a therapeutic impasse, confining the patient to the UMD for many years with social isolation, a collapsed quality of life, and major repercussions for the family. The aim of this project is to use deep brain stimulation, a controlled, reversible, adaptable and low-morbidity neurosurgical method, in six patients with pathological aggression suffering from either schizophrenia (n=3) or autism spectrum disorders (n=3). We hypothesise that the effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the Sano triangle will significantly control the pathological aggression of these six patients.
This is a pilot study with randomised, crossover, double-blind evaluation. It will also provide answers regarding the safety of using SCP for this indication.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| OFF (6-8) ON (8-10) | Experimental | Device: neurostimulatorGroup 1: stimulation turned off for 2 months (OFF-DBS from M6 to M8) and will be turned back on for 2 months (ON-DBS from M8 to M10). |
| ON (6-8) OFF (8-10) | Experimental | Device: neurostimulatorGroup 2: stimulation switched on for 2 months (ON-DBS from M6 to M8) and switched off for 2 months (OFF-DBS from M8 to M10). |
| ON (6-7) OFF (7-9) ON (9-10) | Experimental | Device: neurostimulatorGroup 3: stimulation switched on for 1 month (ON-DBS from M6 to M7), switched off for 2 months (OFF-DBS from M7 to M9) then switched back on for 1 month (ON-DBS from M9 to M10). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Aged between 18 and 70 inclusive
- Patients who have been in isolation in a secure psychiatric unit for at least 50% of the time over a period of more than 6 months prior to inclusion
- A GAF score <21
- An ICAP score <40
- Other stable medical conditions
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Minors
- Contraindications to surgery and anaesthesia
- Contraindications to the use of the Medical Device (diathermy, certain magnetic resonance imaging procedures, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), (see section 'Contraindications' in the 'Information for Prescribers' manual for the implanted neurostimulator)
- Contraindications to MRI and CT scans (cardiac or neural pacemakers, ferromagnetic surgical clips, implants and metallic objects, intraocular foreign bodies, pregnancy, claustrophobia, cardiac or neural pacemakers, ferromagnetic surgical clips, implants and metallic objects, intraocular foreign bodies, etc.)
- Other medical problems interfering with the protocol and surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| neurostimulatorimplantation of a neurostimulator and stimulation of the triangle of Sano by alternating ON and OFF phases | Device | OFF (6-8) ON (8-10), ON (6-7) OFF (7-9) ON (9-10), ON (6-8) OFF (8-10) |
Primary outcome
To evaluate the effects of SCP of the Sano triangle on pathological aggression quantified by the MOAS scale after 1 month of SCP compared to the preoperative state.
Time frame: 9 months
8 secondary outcomes
The tolerance and safety of Sano triangle SCP for treating pathological aggression in these six patients, with the collection of potential adverse events,
Time frame: 10 months
The evaluation of the effects of Sano triangle SCP on pathological behaviours (ICAP scores up to M10),
Time frame: 10 months
Assessment of the effects of Sano triangle SCP on the number of daily aggressive episodes up to M10 + 1 week,
Time frame: 10 months
Assessment of the effects of Sano triangle SCP on quality of life (SF-36) up to M10,
Time frame: 10 months
Assessment of the effects of Sano triangle SCP on socio-familial impact (GAF improved by 20% up to M10),
Time frame: 10 months
Assessment of the effects of Sano triangle SCP on cognitive and mnemonic impact (TNI-93 up to M10),
Time frame: 10 months
Study of changes in neuronal activity in local potential fields of the Sano triangle during aggressive episodes up to M10,
Time frame: 10 months
Anatomical and diffusion MRI study for tractography analysis of fibre bundles in these patients, and study of the volume of activated tissue in relation to the effects observed.
Time frame: 10 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jun 2026.
Related trials for Autism Spectrum Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Single Session Support for Parents of Children With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities Struggling With Anxious Avoidance
Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of a Novel Quantum-Inspired Intervention (QII) for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Global Confirmatory Study
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD
Recruiting
Smith Magenis Syndrome and Autism Spectrum Disorders
Smith-Magenis Syndrome, Autism Spectrum Disorder
Recruiting
Strategies for Toddler ASD With Remote-therapy (STAR) Model for ASD
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Therapy
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Psilocybin for Treatment-Resistant Depression in Autism
Treatment Resistant Depression, Autism Spectrum Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing neurostimulator in people with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Schizophrenia Disorder, run by University Hospital, Rouen at 2 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 19 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Carine Karachi, Pr (01 42 16 33 29, karine.martin@aphp.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To evaluate the effects of SCP of the Sano triangle on pathological aggression quantified by the MOAS scale after 1 month of SCP compared to the preoperative state. (time frame: 9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.