AzTrials
AzTrials

HysterectomyVNOTES-TLHNCT07306507

vNOTES vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Randomized Trial on Pain and Recovery"

A study testing vNOTES Hysterectomy and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in people with Hysterectomy, run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing two different minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques: vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Hysterectomy
What is being tested?
vNOTES Hysterectomy and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
8 Jan 2026to 10 Apr 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Female patients aged 18 to 75 years
  • ASA physical status I-II
  • Scheduled for elective laparoscopic hysterectomy (benign indications such as myoma uteri, adenomyosis, endometrial hyperplasia)
  • Able to understand study procedures and provide written informed consent
  • Able to complete postoperative questionnaires (QoR-15 and Fatigue Assessment Scale)

Who cannot join

  • ASA III-IV status
  • Severe cardiopulmonary disease or contraindication to general anesthesia
  • Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders
  • Active pelvic infection
  • History of extensive pelvic or abdominal surgery complicating minimally invasive access
  • Cognitive impairment or inability to complete questionnaires
  • Conversion to laparotomy
  • Known allergy or intolerance to study medications (paracetamol, tramadol)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital

    Diyarbakır, Turkey, 21070

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Comparison of vNOTES and Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study of Pain, Opioid Use, and Quality of Recovery

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing two different minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques: vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). The aim is to evaluate whether vNOTES provides better postoperative comfort and recovery by reducing pain, lowering opioid analgesic requirements, and improving early recovery outcomes.

Approximately 80 women undergoing elective hysterectomy will be randomly assigned to either vNOTES or TLH. All surgeries will be performed under standardized general anesthesia by the same experienced surgical team. Postoperative pain management will follow an identical protocol for all patients.

Primary outcomes include postoperative pain scores (at 12 and 24 hours) and total opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes include Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores, fatigue scores, time to first mobilization, time to first flatus, and length of hospital stay. The results of this study may help identify which hysterectomy technique offers better patient-centered recovery and postoperative comfort.

Read the detailed description

This study is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial designed to compare two minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques: vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). The aim is to determine whether vNOTES offers advantages in postoperative pain control, opioid requirements, and early recovery outcomes by eliminating abdominal wall incisions and reducing pneumoperitoneum-related physiological effects.

Eligible ASA I-II female patients aged 18-75 scheduled for elective hysterectomy are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the vNOTES or TLH group using a computer-generated sequence with sealed opaque envelopes for allocation concealment. All procedures are performed by the same experienced surgical and anesthesia team using a standardized general anesthesia protocol. Postoperative analgesia and recovery care are identical for both groups to ensure uniformity of perioperative management.

In the vNOTES group, hysterectomy is performed via transvaginal access using a self-retaining vaginal port, with pneumoperitoneum pressure kept at or below 15 mmHg. In the TLH group, a standard laparoscopic approach using a 10 mm umbilical port and two 5 mm accessory trocars is applied, with pneumoperitoneum maintained between 12-15 mmHg. Trendelenburg positioning is used in both techniques but is expected to be less steep and shorter in duration in the vNOTES group.

Outcome assessment is conducted by nurses and clinicians blinded to group allocation. Primary endpoints include postoperative pain scores at 12 and 24 hours (measured using a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale) and total opioid consumption within the first 24 hours. Secondary endpoints include Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores, Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) scores, time to first mobilization, time to first flatus, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications such as nausea/vomiting, shoulder pain, and respiratory discomfort. The study is powered based on a one-tailed hypothesis expecting lower postoperative discomfort in the vNOTES group.

The findings of this trial may help clarify whether vNOTES provides superior postoperative comfort and enhanced recovery compared to standard laparoscopic hysterectomy, contributing evidence to guide technique selection in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

Conditions
Hysterectomy
Being tested
vNOTES Hysterectomy, Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Keywords
vNOTES, Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy, Postoperative Pain, Enhanced Recovery
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • vNOTES HysterectomyProcedure or surgery

    Transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy is performed through a vaginal natural opening via transvaginal access using a self-adhering vaginal port.

  • Total Laparoscopic HysterectomyProcedure or surgery

    It is a conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy performed using an umbilical cord port and two accessory trocars.

Study groups in NCT07306507
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
vNOTES GroupExperimentalPatients undergo vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy (vNOTES) using a transvaginal access port with a maximum pneumoperitoneum pressure not exceeding 15 mmHg.
Receives: Procedure: vNOTES Hysterectomy
TLH GroupActive comparatorPatients undergo conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy using a camera port and accessory trocars from the umbilicus, and pneumoperitoneum is maintained at a pressure not exceeding 15 mmHg.
Receives: Procedure: Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postoperative Pain Intensity (NRS)

    Postoperative pain intensity will be assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.

    Measured: At 12 and 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Need for Rescue Analgesia Within 24 Hours

    The proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesia (intravenous tramadol 100 mg) after the standard regimen (paracetamol intravenously every 8 hours) will be recorded along with the number of rescue doses per patient.

    Measured: First 24 postoperative hours

  2. Time to First Mobilization

    Time from the end of surgery to the first ambulation out of bed will be recorded in hours.

    Measured: From the end of surgery until the first ambulation out of bed, assessed up to 48 hours postoperatively.

  3. Time to First Flatus

    Time from the end of surgery to the first passage of flatus will be recorded in hours as an indicator of return of bowel function.

    Measured: Time Frame: From the end of surgery until the first passage of flatus, assessed during the postoperative hospital stay, up to 7 days postoperatively or until hospital discharge, whichever comes first.

  4. Length of Postoperative Hospital Stay

    Length of stay will be calculated as the number of days from the day of surgery to the day of hospital discharge.

    Measured: Time Frame: From the day of surgery until hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days postoperatively or until discharge, whichever comes first.

  5. Change in QoR-15 Score from Baseline to 24 Hours

    The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire (total score 0-150; higher scores indicate better recovery) will be administered preoperatively and at 24 hours postoperatively. The primary analysis will focus on the change in total score from baseline to 24 hours.

    Measured: Time Frame: Preoperative (within 24 hours before surgery) and 24 hours postoperatively

  6. Change in Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) Score from Baseline to 24 Hours

    Fatigue will be evaluated using the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS; total score 10-50, higher scores indicate greater fatigue). The change in total score from baseline to 24 hours will be analyzed.

    Measured: Preoperative (within 24 hours before surgery) and 24 hours postoperatively

  7. Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)

    Postoperative nausea and vomiting will be recorded. Nausea severity will be assessed using a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no nausea and 10 indicates the worst imaginable nausea. Rescue antiemetic therapy will be administered if nausea severity is ≥4 or if vomiting occurs, and the need for rescue antiemetic treatment will be documented.

    Measured: During the first 24 hours postoperatively

  8. Postoperative Hemoglobin Decrease

    Hemoglobin decrease will be calculated as the difference between preoperative hemoglobin level and postoperative hemoglobin level measured at 24 hours after surgery.

    Measured: From preoperative baseline to 24 hours postoperatively

  9. Postoperative Delirium and Acute Cognitive Dysfunction

    Postoperative delirium and acute cognitive dysfunction will be assessed using the 4AT (4 'A's Test) screening tool within the first 24 hours after surgery. The 4AT evaluates four domains:

    1. Alertness (level of arousal),
    2. AMT4 (abbreviated mental test: age, date of birth, place, and current year),
    3. Attention (months of the year backwards),
    4. Acute change or fluctuating course.

    Scores range from 0 to 12, with 0 indicating normal cognition, 1-3 suggesting possible cognitive impairment, and ≥4 indicating probable delirium. The incidence of postoperative delirium (4AT ≥4) and acute cognitive dysfunction (4AT ≥1) will be recorded and compared between the vNOTES and TLH groups.

    Measured: Within the first 24 hours postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Dec 2025
  2. Study start8 Jan 2026
  3. Primary completion9 Apr 2026
  4. Study completion10 Apr 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either vNOTES hysterectomy or conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Each participant receives only one of the two surgical interventions, and both groups are followed in parallel for outcome assessment.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
90 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07306507
Sponsor's protocol ID
11/7/2025-705
Acronym
VNOTES-TLH
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
2 Dec 2025
Last updated
15 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Fang S, Xia Y, Jin J, Zhang J, Lu L. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Vaginally Assisted NOTES Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Primary Hospitals: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Invest Surg. 2025 Dec;38(1):2515054. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2025.2515054. Epub 2025 Jun 10.

    PubMed 40492370

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing vNOTES Hysterectomy and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in people with Hysterectomy, run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Postoperative Pain Intensity (NRS) (time frame: At 12 and 24 hours postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07306507, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in