Cataract SenileNCT07297719
Evaluation of Glistening, Visual Outcomes and General Safety 24 Months Post-IOL Implantation
An observational study of Cataract Senile, run by Carl Zeiss Meditec AG at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Main evaluation of glistening at least 24 Months post-IOL implantation Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cataract Senile
- How many people
- 33 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 25 Dec 2025to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Observational
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients currently implanted with the CT LUCIA 621P IOL from the Aier Eye Hospital of BoAo Hope City
Who may be able to join
- Patients currently implanted with the CT LUCIA 621P IOL into the capsular bag in at least one eye and who participated in previous study "CT LUCIA 621P-BER-401-21";
- A minimum follow-up period of 24 months after the IOL implantation of the study eye (selected as the study eye in the previous study);
- Patients willing and capable of providing informed consent;
- Patients willing and capable of complying with visits and procedures as defined by this protocol.
Who cannot join
- Complications during cataract surgery with clinically significant impact;
- Postoperative clinically significant corneal or retinal pathology as well as postoperative acute or chronic inflammatory ocular conditions (e.g. uveitis, iritis etc.);
- Presence of clinically significant PCO with potential to limit the glistening evaluation;
- IOL dislocation (the complete IOL is not stable fixated in the capsular bag);
- Patients unable to meet the limitations of the protocol or likely of non-cooperation during the clinical investigation;
- Patients whose freedom is impaired by administrative or legal order.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Non-interventional, Single-visit Study Focusing on the Evaluation of Glistening as Well as General Safety and Visual Outcomes With at Least 24 Months Follow-up in Patients Implanted With CT LUCIA 621P Intraocular Lenses
Main evaluation of glistening at least 24 Months post-IOL implantation
Read the detailed description
Evaluation of glistening, visual outcomes and general safety after at least 24 Months post-IOL implantation
- Conditions
- Cataract Senile
- Keywords
- IOL, Glistening
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Glistening Count
Glistening count: Number of glistenings (=microvacuoles) in the illuminated field were counted by slit lamp examination at the study visit 24 months post IOL implantation of the study eye. Lower glistening counts indicate a better outcome (=fewer glistenings).
Measured: single study visit conducted 24 months after IOL implantation of the study eye
Glistening Density Evaluation
Glistening density evaluation: Number of glistenings in the illuminated field were counted by slit lamp examination at the study visit 24 months post IOL implantation of the study eye. The number of glistenings were recorded and the density of microvacuoles per square millimeter (MV/mm²) was calculated. Lower glistening density values indicate better outcome (=fewer glistenings).
Measured: single study visit conducted 24 months after IOL implantation of the study eye
Glistening Grading (Miyata Classification)
Glistening grading (Miyata classification): At the 24-month post-IOL implantation visit, the number of glistenings/microvacuoles (MV) in the illuminated field of the study eye was counted by slit-lamp examination. Glistening density was expressed as microvacuoles per square millimeter (MV/mm²) and graded using the Miyata Glistening Density Grading Scale (grades 0-3), where the minimum glistening level corresponds to grade 0 (<25 MV/mm²) and the maximum to grade 3 (101-200 MV/mm²).0 corresponds to <25 MV/mm² and grade 3 to 101-200 MV/mm². Lower Miyata grades indicate a better outcome (=fewer glistenings).
Measured: single study visit conducted 24 months after IOL implantation of the study eye
Monocular Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA)
Monocular Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) was assessed for each study eye using a standardized visual acuity chart under photopic conditions with the subject's best refractive correction in place. CDVA was recorded in logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), with typical values ranging from about -0.3 (approximately 20/10 Snellen acuity) to 1.0 (approximately 20/200 Snellen acuity), where lower logMAR scores indicate better vision.
Measured: single study visit conducted 24 months after IOL implantation of the study eye
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Dec 2025
- Study start25 Dec 2025
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025
- Study completion31 Dec 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Cataract SenileStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Carl Zeiss Meditec AG
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07297719
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CT LUCIA 621P-BER-401-25
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 9 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 19 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No