AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative Pain After Thoracic SurgeryNCT07287761

Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block in Postoperative Pain Management After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

An observational study of Postoperative Pain After Thoracic Surgery and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG), run by Ankara Education and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) is a common surgical procedure for ischemic heart disease, but it often leads to severe acute and chronic postoperative pain, which can delay recovery and reduce patient comfort. Effective pain management is crucial to prevent pulmonary complications and long hospital stays. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
How many people
55 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Jun 2025to 1 Feb 2026
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population consists of adult patients (18 to 80 years) classified as ASA Physical Status Class II or III, who are scheduled to undergo elective Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) requiring median sternotomy at the University of Health Sciences Ankara Training and Research Hospital.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients scheduled for elective Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) via median sternotomy.
  • Age between 18 and 80 years.
  • Classification of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Class II or III.
  • Patients who provide written and verbal informed consent to participate in the study.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who do not provide consent.
  • Age older than 80 years or ASA Physical Status Class > III.
  • Patients who do not understand the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) or have communication difficulties.
  • Patients with a known history of coagulation disorders or bleeding disorders.
  • Patients with skin infection at the site of peripheral nerve block application.
  • Patients with Morbid Obesity (Body Mass Index BMI>35 kg/m2).
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Patients with chronic pain, opioid or substance dependence, or who use chronic analgesics.
  • Patients with known allergy to local anesthetics.
  • Patients with liver or kidney function disorders.
  • Patients with a history of previous median sternotomy operation.
  • Patients undergoing emergency surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Ankara Training and Research Hospital

    Ankara, Altındag, 06230

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block in Postoperative Pain Management After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Prospective, Observational Study

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) is a common surgical procedure for ischemic heart disease, but it often leads to severe acute and chronic postoperative pain, which can delay recovery and reduce patient comfort. Effective pain management is crucial to prevent pulmonary complications and long hospital stays. Peripheral nerve blocks are increasingly used to reduce opioid consumption and improve patient satisfaction after major surgery.

This prospective, observational study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of two different regional anesthesia techniques, the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and the Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB), in managing postoperative pain in patients undergoing CABG via median sternotomy.

Read more

Patients aged 18-80 years, classified as ASA II-III, who are scheduled for elective CABG will be included. The choice of block technique (ESPB or SPSIPB) will be determined by the operating anesthesiologist based on the visibility of anatomical structures (transverse processes) under ultrasound guidance. All patients will receive the same general anesthesia and be managed postoperatively with Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA).

The main goal is to determine which block provides optimal pain control, measured by the time to first rescue analgesia and pain scores (NRS) at various time points after extubation. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative opioid consumption, total PCA usage, extubation time, and the incidence of opioid-related side effects. The findings will help optimize pain protocols for cardiac surgery patients.

Read the detailed description

This is a single-center, prospective, observational study conducted at the University of Health Sciences Ankara Training and Research Hospital. The primary clinical challenge addressed is the intense postoperative pain following median sternotomy for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG), which requires multimodal analgesia. The use of ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks has gained popularity due to their ease of application and lower complication rates compared to traditional methods.

Rationale for Comparison:

The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) has proven efficacy in thoracic and abdominal procedures. The Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB) is being investigated as a potential alternative, targeting a broader area to manage pain in cardiac surgery. The study aims to provide clinical evidence regarding which of these two specific regional techniques offers superior postoperative pain control in this patient population.

Procedure Detail (Specific to Observation):

The selection of the block type (ESPB or SPSIPB) for the patient is determined intraoperatively by the experienced anesthesiologist based on the quality of the ultrasound image (visibility of the transverse processes) to ensure the most anatomically suitable block is performed.

Anesthesia Protocol (Standardized):

All enrolled patients (ASA II-III) will receive the same general anesthesia protocol (Thiopental, Fentanyl, Rocuronium for induction; Sevoflurane for maintenance). The regional block will be administered by a single experienced anesthesiologist under the supervision of the responsible investigator, using a bilateral injection of 30 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine for both techniques. Postoperative analgesia will be managed using a standardized Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) device, set at a 3mg/ml concentration, with a 24mg bolus dose and a 20-minute lockout interval.

Keywords
Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB), Regional Anesthesia, Post-CABG Pain, Postoperative pain, Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery, Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB)
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07287761
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ESPB GroupErector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) with Bupivacaine
SPSIPB GroupSerratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB) with Bupivacaine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total Opioid Consumption in the Perioperative Period

    The cumulative dose of all opioids administered (Intraoperative Fentanyl and Post-Extubation Tramadol via PCA and rescue doses of Morphine) will be calculated in Morphine Equivalent Dose (mg).

    Measured: Up to 24 hours post-extubation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Dec 2025
  2. Study start1 Jun 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2026
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
55 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07287761
Sponsor's protocol ID
496
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
25 Nov 2025
Last updated
30 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in this article (such as anonymized patient-level data, study protocol, statistical analysis plan) will be shared. Data will be made available to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for research and sign a data access agreement. Access will be provided after the article is published and for a period of 5 years following publication

Publications

  • Tulgar S, Ciftci B, Ahiskalioglu A, Bilal B, Sakul BU, Korkmaz AO, Bozkurt NN, De Cassai A, Torres AJ, Elsharkawy H, Alici HA. Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block: A Technical Report on the Description of a Novel Periparavertebral Block for Thoracic Pain. Cureus. 2023 Feb 3;15(2):e34582. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34582. eCollection 2023 Feb.

    PubMed 36883093
  • Rothaug J, Zaslansky R, Schwenkglenks M, Komann M, Allvin R, Backstrom R, Brill S, Buchholz I, Engel C, Fletcher D, Fodor L, Funk P, Gerbershagen HJ, Gordon DB, Konrad C, Kopf A, Leykin Y, Pogatzki-Zahn E, Puig M, Rawal N, Taylor RS, Ullrich K, Volk T, Yahiaoui-Doktor M, Meissner W. Patients' perception of postoperative pain management: validation of the International Pain Outcomes (IPO) questionnaire. J Pain. 2013 Nov;14(11):1361-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.05.016. Epub 2013 Sep 7.

    PubMed 24021577
  • Wang AH, Juan AH, Ko KD, Tsai PF, Zare H, Dell'Orso S, Sartorelli V. The Elongation Factor Spt6 Maintains ESC Pluripotency by Controlling Super-Enhancers and Counteracting Polycomb Proteins. Mol Cell. 2017 Oct 19;68(2):398-413.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

    PubMed 29033324
  • Mazzeffi M, Khelemsky Y. Poststernotomy pain: a clinical review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Dec;25(6):1163-78. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Sep 29. No abstract available.

    PubMed 21955825

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in