AmyloidosisPhase 2NCT07285044
The Cancer Connected Access and Remote Expertise Beyond Walls Program to Provide In-Home Cancer Treatment and Improve Treatment Satisfaction in Cancer Patients Living in the Florida Panhandle and Surrounding Areas
A Phase 2 study testing Cancer Therapeutic Procedure and Questionnaire Administration in people with Amyloidosis and Basal Cell Carcinoma, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This phase II trial studies whether providing cancer treatment in the home is preferred over the traditional clinic setting and if it improves treatment satisfaction in cancer patients living in the Florida Panhandle and surrounding areas. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Amyloidosis, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Biliary Tract Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Cancer Therapeutic Procedure and Questionnaire Administration
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 27 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 18 Dec 2025to 15 May 2027
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient has had adequate tolerability of their clinical standard of care treatment, in the opinion of their treating physician, and no clinically significant drug-related reactions occurred prior to consent
- Participant must be receiving a standard-of-care treatment regimen listed in this protocol that is being used in accordance with standard medical practice. Specifically, it must be either a) Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for the participant's disease indication, or b) recommended in nationally recognized professional guidelines (e.g. National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN], American Society of Clinical Oncology [ASCO], American Society of Hematology [ASH], etc.) as standard of care for the disease indication. Off-label use is permitted only if supported by such guidelines
- A social stability screener, used per standard of care, indicates patient is appropriate to participate in the CCBW program
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0, 1, 2 or 3 at the discretion of the treating physician
- Female or male patients age >= 18 years at the time of consent
- Willing and able to comply with the study protocol in the investigator's judgement
Show all 67Show fewer
- Patients with histologically confirmed malignancy who are currently receiving treatment with one of the eligible treatment regimens. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are eligible based on imaging diagnosis alone: histologic confirmation is not required.
- Note: patients diagnosed with any of the following disease types may receive any of the eligible regimens listed. Additionally, patients receiving hormonal or immunotherapy, such as nivolumab or pembrolizumab, may receive these infusions in home supplemental to any of the regimens identified. Co-administration with hormonal agents such as anti-androgens, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, oral gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRh) antagonists, estrogens, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), or aromatase inhibitors are allowed, however combinations of oral regimens only are not permitted. Patients may receive any combination of any listed medications or regimens
- Eligible disease cancer types:
- Amyloidosis
- Basal cell carcinoma
- Biliary
- Bladder
- Breast
- Cervical
- Colorectal
- Endometrial
- Fallopian tube
- Gastroesophageal
- Glioblastoma
- Head and neck
- Hepatocellular
- Hodgkin lymphoma
- Lung
- Mantle cell lymphoma
- Merkle cell carcinoma
- Multiple myeloma
- Melanoma
- Myelodysplastic syndrome
- Ovarian
- Pancreatic
- Peritoneal
- Prostate
- Renal cell carcinoma
- Squamous cell carcinoma
- Urothelial carcinoma
- Eligible regimens
- Atezolizumab +/- bevacizumab
- Avelumab
- Bevacizumab
- Bortezomib
- Cemiplimab
- Daratumumab +/- bortezomib
- Darbepoetin alpha
- Degarelix
- Denosumab (Xgeva)
- Durvalumab
- Fluorouracil +/- bevacizumab
- Fulvestrant
- Goserelin
- Ipilimumab +/- Nivolumab
- Lanreotide
- Leuprolide
- Nivolumab
- Nivolumab + relatlimab
- Octreotide
- Pembrolizumab
- Pertuzumab +/- trastuzumab
- Trastuzumab +/- pertuzumab
- Zoledronic acid (Zometa)
- Willingness to follow birth control requirements for females and males of reproductive potential
- Resides within the Florida Panhandle and surrounding area serviced by the at-home healthcare supplier utilized for the study and a paramedic network
- Patient's residence has an existing Wi-Fi connection or can be connected using using a mobile Wi-Fi device provided as part of the program so as to enable a reliable connection with the remote CCBW Command Center at Mayo Clinic
- Patients who, according to documentation from their treating provider, plan to continue the eligible treatment regimen they are currently prescribed for >= 12 weeks from the time of registration
- Provide written informed consent
- Ability to complete questionnaire(s) by themselves or with assistance
- Willing to return to enrolling institution for follow-up (during the Active Monitoring Phase of the study)
Who cannot join
- Co-morbid systemic illnesses or other severe concurrent disease which, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study or interfere significantly with the proper assessment of safety and toxicity of the prescribed regimens
- Receiving any investigational agent which would be considered as a treatment for the primary neoplasm.
- Note: oral concomitant medications for oncologic indications will be maintained per standard of care treatment and not considered part of the trial. Any nononcologic medication, regardless of route of administration will be maintained per standard of care treatment and also not considered part of the trial; therefore, patients receiving oral anti-cancer or other medications per standard of care treatment in addition to any of the medications listed are considered eligible for this trial
- Individuals who require continuous (24/7) assistance with daily living and are unable to independently manage the technology required for study participation, unless a caregiver is available and willing to provide consistent support throughout the study
- Current inpatient hospitalization (excluding admission to the Advanced Care at Home program)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Mayo Clinic in Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224-9980
Clinical Trials Referral Office, 855-776-0015, mayocliniccancerstudies@mayo.edu
Roxana S. Dronca, MD
About this study
Official title: Cancer CARE (Connected Access and Remote Expertise) Beyond Walls - Pilot, Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Evaluate Administration of Cancer-Directed Therapy in the Patient's Homes Versus in Clinic in the Florida Panhandle and Surrounding Areas
This phase II trial studies whether providing cancer treatment in the home is preferred over the traditional clinic setting and if it improves treatment satisfaction in cancer patients living in the Florida Panhandle and surrounding areas. Typically, drug-related cancer care is provided at a medical center which causes patients to have to spend considerable time away from their family, friends, and familiar surroundings. This may add to the physical, emotional, social, and financial burden for patients and their families during this difficult time in their lives. The Cancer Connected Access and Remote Expertise (CARE) Beyond Walls (CCBW) program uses a specialized care team trained to provide cancer treatment in the patient's home setting. It is designed to support remote connection between the home health team and providers and Mayo clinic. This may be preferred over the traditional clinic setting which may improve treatment satisfaction in cancer patients living in the Florida Panhandle and surrounding areas.
- Conditions
- Amyloidosis, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Biliary Tract Carcinoma, Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Cancer Therapeutic Procedure, Questionnaire Administration
- Medical subject headings
- Amyloidosis, Carcinoma, Basal Cell, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Colorectal Neoplasms, Endometrial Neoplasms, Fallopian Tube Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cancer Therapeutic ProcedureDrug
Also called anticancer therapy, Cancer Therapy, Cancer Treatment, Malignant Neoplasm Therapy
Receive in-home standard of care cancer-treatment
Cancer Therapeutic ProcedureDrug
Also called anticancer therapy, Cancer Therapy, Cancer Treatment, Malignant Neoplasm Therapy
Receive in-clinic standard of care cancer-treatment
Questionnaire AdministrationOther
Ancillary studies
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Health services research (CCBW in-home cancer treatment) | Experimental | Patients receive in-home standard of care cancer-treatment through CCBW according to standard clinical practice for up to 12 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Following 12 weeks of in-home treatment, patients choose to return to clinic setting or continue to receive in-home treatment for an additional 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Cancer Therapeutic Procedure; Other: Questionnaire Administration |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient preferences regarding location of cancer treatment delivery
As assessed by a single item asking patients to rate their preferred location for cancer treatment delivery on a 1 to 7 scale: 1 = strongly prefer in clinic, 2 = moderately prefer in clinic, 3 = slightly prefer in clinic, 4 = no preference, 5 = slightly prefer at home, 6 = moderately prefer at home, 7 = strongly prefer at home. Patients who receive any care in the mobile unit will be instructed to consider "at home" to mean receipt of care inside their home or near their home in the mobile unit.
Measured: At 12 weeks
Adverse Events Related to Location of Treatment
Safety of at-home administration of cancer treatment will be assessed by incidence of grade 3+ adverse events at least possibly related to the location of cancer treatment delivery that occur up to 30 days after the administration of the last dose of study drug/agent or therapy. The maximum grade for each type of adverse event will be summarized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
Measured: Up to 9 months
Incidence of avoidable acute care visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations
Safety of at-home administration of cancer treatment will be assessed by the frequency and proportion of patients who experience an avoidable (in the opinion of the treating physician) acute care visit, emergency room visit, or hospitalization while receiving at-home cancer treatment.
Measured: Up to 24 weeks
Secondary outcomes (6)
Change in Patient-reported Function - EORTC-QLQ-F17
Assessed using the 15 function-related questions from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-F17. The F17 is an abbreviated version of the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire (30 questions), which is used to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. The F17 is composed solely of items related to function. It also includes two questions related to health status and quality of life (QOL). Fifteen function questions are answered on a scale of 1-4 (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4= very much), and two health/QOL questions are answered on a scale of 1-7 where 1= very poor and 7=excellent. Higher summary scores indicate greater overall function and better health related quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, week 12, and week 24
Change in Patient-reported Global Health/Quality of Life - EORTC-QLQ-F17
Assessed by two questions from the EORTC-QLQ-F17 related to Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QL) scale. These questions are answered on a scale of 1-7 where 1= very poor and 7=excellent. Higher summary scores indicate better health related quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, week 12, and week 24
Patient-reported Symptoms - PRO-CTCAE
As measured by the Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). PRO-CTCAE scores will be summarized using composite scores. The PRO-CTCAE was developed to assess patient self-reported symptoms in cancer clinical trials. The PRO-CTCAE consists of 27 questions related to symptoms and side effects experienced over the past 7 days. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale (e.g., none/mild/moderate/severe/very severe or never/rarely/occasionally/frequently/almost constantly). The final question is an opportunity to list any other symptoms not included in the assessment. Higher scores indicate experience of worse or more frequent/severe symptoms and side effects.
Measured: At baseline, week 12, and week 24
Patient-reported Symptoms - FACT GP5
As measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General 5 (FACT GP 5), a single question evaluating how much participants were bothered by treatment side effects over the past 7 days. The question is answered on a scale of 0-4, where 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2-somewhat, 3-quite a bit, and 4=very much.
Measured: Baseline, week 12, and week 24
Patient-reported Satisfaction - Patient Satisfaction & Feedback
As measured by the Patient Satisfaction and Feedback Questionnaire developed for this study. Patient responses will be summarized descriptively. The frequency and proportion of patients who express comfort receiving their cancer treatment at home (i.e., response of "quite a bit" or "very much") will be reported.
Measured: 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Patient-reported Satisfaction - Was It Worth It
As measured by the 6-item Was It Worth It Questionnaire, which asks patients whether they thought that receiving cancer care at home was worthwhile, whether they would do it again, and whether they would recommend it to others. The patient is also asked whether care at home changed their quality of life and whether the experience was as expected. The patient will also have an opportunity to provide a free-text response about anything they recommend be changed to improve their experience. Responses will be summarized descriptively.
Measured: 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Dec 2025
- Study start18 Dec 2025
- Primary completion15 May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion15 May 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for AmyloidosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mayo ClinicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Roxana S. Dronca, MD, Principal investigator, Mayo Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07285044
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MC250902
- Other IDs
- 25-003171
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 30 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cancer CARE (Connected Access and Remote Expertise) Beyond Walls - Pilot, Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Evaluate Administration of Cancer-Directed Therapy in the Patient's Homes Versus in Clinic in the Florida Panhandle and Surrounding Areas
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07285044
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MC250902
- Conditions
- Amyloidosis, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Biliary Tract Carcinoma, Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 May 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This phase II trial studies whether providing cancer treatment in the home is preferred over the traditional clinic setting and if it improves treatment satisfaction in cancer patients living in the Florida Panhandle and surrounding areas. Typically, drug-related cancer care is provided at a medical center which causes patients to have to spend considerable time away from their family, friends, and familiar surroundings. This may add to the physical, emotional, social, and financial burden for patients and their families during this difficult time in their lives. The Cancer Connected Access and Remote Expertise (CARE) Beyond Walls (CCBW) program uses a specialized care team trained to provide cancer treatment in the patient's home setting. It is designed to support remote connection between the home health team and providers and Mayo clinic. This may be preferred over the traditional clinic setting which may improve treatment satisfaction in cancer patients living in the Florida Panhandle and surrounding areas.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Health services research (CCBW in-home cancer treatment) | Experimental | Drug: Cancer Therapeutic Procedure, Other: Questionnaire AdministrationPatients receive in-home standard of care cancer-treatment through CCBW according to standard clinical practice for up to 12 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Following 12 weeks of in-home treatment, patients choose to return to clinic setting or continue to receive in-home treatment for an additional 12 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (67 listed)
- Patient has had adequate tolerability of their clinical standard of care treatment, in the opinion of their treating physician, and no clinically significant drug-related reactions occurred prior to consent
- Participant must be receiving a standard-of-care treatment regimen listed in this protocol that is being used in accordance with standard medical practice. Specifically, it must be either a) Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for the participant's disease indication, or b) recommended in nationally recognized professional guidelines (e.g. National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN], American Society of Clinical Oncology [ASCO], American Society of Hematology [ASH], etc.) as standard of care for the disease indication. Off-label use is permitted only if supported by such guidelines
- A social stability screener, used per standard of care, indicates patient is appropriate to participate in the CCBW program
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0, 1, 2 or 3 at the discretion of the treating physician
- Female or male patients age >= 18 years at the time of consent
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Co-morbid systemic illnesses or other severe concurrent disease which, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study or interfere significantly with the proper assessment of safety and toxicity of the prescribed regimens
- Receiving any investigational agent which would be considered as a treatment for the primary neoplasm.
- Individuals who require continuous (24/7) assistance with daily living and are unable to independently manage the technology required for study participation, unless a caregiver is available and willing to provide consistent support throughout the study
- Current inpatient hospitalization (excluding admission to the Advanced Care at Home program)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cancer Therapeutic ProcedureAlso: anticancer therapy, Cancer Therapy, Cancer Treatment, Malignant Neoplasm TherapyReceive in-home standard of care cancer-treatment | Drug | Health services research (CCBW in-home cancer treatment) |
| Cancer Therapeutic ProcedureAlso: anticancer therapy, Cancer Therapy, Cancer Treatment, Malignant Neoplasm TherapyReceive in-clinic standard of care cancer-treatment | Drug | Health services research (CCBW in-home cancer treatment) |
| Questionnaire AdministrationAncillary studies | Other | Health services research (CCBW in-home cancer treatment) |
Primary outcome
Patient preferences regarding location of cancer treatment delivery
Time frame: At 12 weeks
As assessed by a single item asking patients to rate their preferred location for cancer treatment delivery on a 1 to 7 scale: 1 = strongly prefer in clinic, 2 = moderately prefer in clinic, 3 = slightly prefer in clinic, 4 = no preference, 5 = slightly prefer at home, 6 = moderately prefer at home, 7 = strongly prefer at home. Patients who receive any care in the mobile unit will be instructed to consider "at home" to mean receipt of care inside their home or near their home in the mobile unit.
Adverse Events Related to Location of Treatment
Time frame: Up to 9 months
Safety of at-home administration of cancer treatment will be assessed by incidence of grade 3+ adverse events at least possibly related to the location of cancer treatment delivery that occur up to 30 days after the administration of the last dose of study drug/agent or therapy. The maximum grade for each type of adverse event will be summarized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
Incidence of avoidable acute care visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Safety of at-home administration of cancer treatment will be assessed by the frequency and proportion of patients who experience an avoidable (in the opinion of the treating physician) acute care visit, emergency room visit, or hospitalization while receiving at-home cancer treatment.
6 secondary outcomes
Change in Patient-reported Function - EORTC-QLQ-F17
Time frame: Baseline, week 12, and week 24
Change in Patient-reported Global Health/Quality of Life - EORTC-QLQ-F17
Time frame: Baseline, week 12, and week 24
Patient-reported Symptoms - PRO-CTCAE
Time frame: At baseline, week 12, and week 24
Patient-reported Symptoms - FACT GP5
Time frame: Baseline, week 12, and week 24
Patient-reported Satisfaction - Patient Satisfaction & Feedback
Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Patient-reported Satisfaction - Was It Worth It
Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Sep 2026.
- Mayo Clinic Clinical TrialsLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Amyloidosis
RecruitingObservational study
Amyloid PET Imaging in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
Aging
RecruitingObservational study
Screening for AL Amyloidosis in Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 2
Alzheimer's Tau Platform: Master Protocol
Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease, Alzheimer Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Single-arm, Multi-center Study Evaluating the Acceptance and Feasibility of a Digital Remote Monitoring Tool Configured for Patients With ATTR-CM: ACO-Monitor
Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM)
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
Alzheimer's Tau Platform: Regimen A - AADvac1
Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease, Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Roxana S. Dronca, MD principal investigator
Mayo Clinic
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Cancer Therapeutic Procedure and Questionnaire Administration in people with Amyloidosis and Basal Cell Carcinoma, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 67 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Clinical Trials Referral Office (855-776-0015, mayocliniccancerstudies@mayo.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient preferences regarding location of cancer treatment delivery (time frame: At 12 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2026.