Healthy Older AdultsNCT07275138
Acute Cardiovascular and Neuromuscular Responses to Walking With Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) in Older Adults
A study testing Walking in people with Healthy Older Adults, run by Universidade da Coruña at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to explore how walking combined with different levels of partial blood flow restriction (BFR) affects cardiovascular, neuromuscular, and movement (kinematic) variables in older adults. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy Older Adults
- What is being tested?
- Walking
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 8 Dec 2025to Jan 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged between 60 and 90 years.
Who cannot join
- Being institutionalized.
- Peripheral vascular disease, defined by an ankle-brachial index (ABI) outside the normal range (0.9-1.4).
- Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (>180/110 mmHg).
- Any contraindication to exercise, based on self-reported medical history and PAR-Q+.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
2 sites in 2 countries
Portugal1 site
Faculty of Sport of University of Porto
Porto, Porto District, 4200-450
Lucimere Bohn, Researcher, 351 917 028 600, lucimerebohn@fade.up.pt
Spain1 site
Faculty of Education of University of La Laguna
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 38204
Eduardo Carballeira, PhD, 0034-634-476-577, ecarball@ull.edu.es
About this study
Official title: Acute Cardiovascular and Neuromuscular Responses to Walking With Blood Flow Restriction in Older Adults: a Study Protocol for a Randomized Crossover Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to explore how walking combined with different levels of partial blood flow restriction (BFR) affects cardiovascular, neuromuscular, and movement (kinematic) variables in older adults.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
Does walking with BFR increase internal effort, as shown by cardiovascular changes, and is this effect proportional to the level of restriction?
Does walking with BFR temporarily reduce neuromuscular control, and is this reduction greater at higher restriction levels?
Does walking with BFR change gait movement patterns?
This study uses a crossover design, meaning that each participant will complete all four conditions and serve as their own control.
Participants will:
Take part in walking sessions under four conditions with different levels of restriction: BFR40%, BFR80%, SHAM (0% BFR), and CON (without BFR).
Have their cardiovascular responses, muscle performance, and gait movement patterns measured.
Report their perceptions of the sessions, including Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE), satisfaction, and possible side effects.
Read the detailed description
This innovative research project aims to explore the effect of the novel BFR technique, combined with walking, as a non-pharmacological strategy to prevent or reverse sarcopenia and thereby improve the quality of life in sedentary older adults. BFR involves the use of a specialized pneumatic cuff to restrict venous blood flow to a muscle while partially inhibiting arterial flow, and it can be applied either at rest or in combination with exercise.
The application of BFR combined with exercise has shown promise as a tool to induce favorable physiological effects at lower training doses, that is, at lower intensities (e.g., lower intensities or slower walking or running speeds), compared to active control groups. However, despite the promising benefits reported in some studies, comprehensive investigation of the cardiovascular and neuromuscular responses during BFR combined with walking remains a largely unexplored area, both in healthy participants and special populations. This knowledge gap is particularly relevant when considering the substantial benefits that older adults and individuals with mobility limitations could gain from BFR combined with walking, especially given their potential difficulty in adhering to the minimum exercise dosage requirements recommended by the World Health Organization
- Conditions
- Healthy Older Adults
- Being tested
- Walking
- Keywords
- Blood Flow Restriction (BFR), walking exercise, older adults, Gait Kinematic, Cardiovascular Response, Neuromuscular Performance, Crossover Study, Physical Function, safety, Endurance training, Low-impact exercise, Aerobic exercise, Physical activity, functionality, Elderly, Senior, Age 60+, Community-dwelling, Non-institutionalized, Partial Blood Flow Restriction
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
WalkingBehavioural
Also called Physical activity, Aerobic exercise, Cardio exercise, Endurance exercise
Participants will perform two continuous 10-minute walking bouts, separated by a 3-minute seated recovery period to allow reperfusion following BFR or pause, along a rectangular 40-meter walking circuit (15×5 m). Walking cadence will be standardized at 112 steps per minute.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BFR40% | Experimental | BFR set at 40% of the participant's arterial occlusion pressure (AOP). Receives: Behavioral: Walking |
| BFR80% | Experimental | BFR set at 80% of the participant's AOP. Receives: Behavioral: Walking |
| BFR0% | Sham comparator | BFR set at 0% of the participant's AOP. Receives: Behavioral: Walking |
| CON | Active comparator | No BFR cuffs. Receives: Behavioral: Walking |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Blood pressure
Systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure will be obtained by a photoplethysmography sensor. Units: mmHg
Measured: 25 minutes
Heart rate
The average and maximum values will be obtained using a chest-worn heart rate sensor. Unit: beats per minute (bpm)
Measured: 60 minutes
RR-Interval Time-Domain Metrics
Standard time-domain HRV metrics-including mean RR intervals (meanRR), the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN), and the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD)-will be derived from inter-beat interval data exported from a chest-worn heart rate sensor (epochs of 5 min).
Units: milliseconds (ms).
Measured: 60 minutes
RR-Interval Nonlinear Metric
Short-term fractal scaling (DFA α1) will be calculated from inter-beat interval data exported from a chest-worn heart rate sensor (epochs of 5 min).
Units: dimensionless.
Measured: 60 minutes
Maximum isometric strength
Maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) force during a knee-extension task will be recorded using a force-gauge device.
Unit: Newtons (N)
Measured: 10 minutes
Force steadiness
Force steadiness will be evaluated from the RMSSD of the coefficient of variation (CV) during a 30-s submaximal isometric knee-extension contraction at 30% MVIC, using a force-gauge device with data-analysis software.
Unit: Percentage (%)
Measured: 10 minutes
Secondary outcomes (7)
Arterial stiffness
It will be assessed by finger-toe pulse wave velocity (PWV) method. Units: m/s
Measured: 25 minutes
Temporal Gait Parameters
Mean temporal gait parameters-including stride time, step time, and stance time-will be derived from IMU-based measurements.
Units: milliseconds (ms).
Measured: 20 minutes
Temporal Gait Variability
Stride-to-stride temporal variability (stride time, step time, stance time) will be computed from walking recordings collected using a wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU) equipped with a triaxial accelerometer and gyroscope. Variability will be expressed as the coefficient of variation (CV) for each temporal metric.
Units: Percentage (%)
Measured: 20 minutes
Postural Stability
Postural stability in mediolateral (ML) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions will be assessed during quiet standing under four conditions (eyes open/closed × firm/foam surface). A wearable IMU will record triaxial centre-of-mass acceleration. Stability metrics will be computed as -ln[m/s²], where higher values reflect lower acceleration and therefore better postural control.
Units: -ln[m/s²]
Measured: 10 minutes
Internal subjective load
Perceived exertion during walking will be quantified every 5 minutes using the OMNI-RES scale.
Units: Points (0-10).
Measured: 20 minutes
Adverse effects
Severity of adverse sensations (e.g., tingling, burning, numbness, fatigue, discomfort, petechiae) potentially associated with BFR will be recorded.
Units: Points (0-5).
Measured: 20 minutes
Affective Responses
Affective valence during the exercise bout will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Feeling Scale.
Units: Points (-5 to +5).
Measured: 20 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Dec 2025
- Study start8 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionJan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Healthy Older AdultsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Each participant will perform a walking experimental session under different levels of BFR applied to the lower limbs. The order of BFR conditions will be randomized for each participant. A minimum washout period of 72 hours will be observed between sessions.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade da Coruña
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Work and Welfare - Xunta de Galicia, Universidade do Porto, University of La Laguna
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07275138
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CEFADE40_2024
- Other IDs
- ED481B-2024/079
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 17 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 10 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Acute Cardiovascular and Neuromuscular Responses to Walking With Blood Flow Restriction in Older Adults: a Study Protocol for a Randomized Crossover Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07275138
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CEFADE40_2024
- Conditions
- Healthy Older Adults
- Keywords
- Blood Flow Restriction (BFR), walking exercise, older adults, Gait Kinematic, Cardiovascular Response, Neuromuscular Performance, Crossover Study, Physical Function
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade da CoruñaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Work and Welfare - Xunta de Galicia, Universidade do Porto, University of La Laguna
- Study start
- 8 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to explore how walking combined with different levels of partial blood flow restriction (BFR) affects cardiovascular, neuromuscular, and movement (kinematic) variables in older adults.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does walking with BFR increase internal effort, as shown by cardiovascular changes, and is this effect proportional to the level of restriction?
Does walking with BFR temporarily reduce neuromuscular control, and is this reduction greater at higher restriction levels?
Does walking with BFR change gait movement patterns?
This study uses a crossover design, meaning that each participant will complete all four conditions and serve as their own control.
Participants will:
Take part in walking sessions under four conditions with different levels of restriction: BFR40%, BFR80%, SHAM (0% BFR), and CON (without BFR).
Have their cardiovascular responses, muscle performance, and gait movement patterns measured.
Report their perceptions of the sessions, including Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE), satisfaction, and possible side effects.
Detailed description
This innovative research project aims to explore the effect of the novel BFR technique, combined with walking, as a non-pharmacological strategy to prevent or reverse sarcopenia and thereby improve the quality of life in sedentary older adults. BFR involves the use of a specialized pneumatic cuff to restrict venous blood flow to a muscle while partially inhibiting arterial flow, and it can be applied either at rest or in combination with exercise.
The application of BFR combined with exercise has shown promise as a tool to induce favorable physiological effects at lower training doses, that is, at lower intensities (e.g., lower intensities or slower walking or running speeds), compared to active control groups. However, despite the promising benefits reported in some studies, comprehensive investigation of the cardiovascular and neuromuscular responses during BFR combined with walking remains a largely unexplored area, both in healthy participants and special populations. This knowledge gap is particularly relevant when considering the substantial benefits that older adults and individuals with mobility limitations could gain from BFR combined with walking, especially given their potential difficulty in adhering to the minimum exercise dosage requirements recommended by the World Health Organization
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- Each participant will perform a walking experimental session under different levels of BFR applied to the lower limbs. The order of BFR conditions will be randomized for each participant. A minimum washout period of 72 hours will be observed between sessions.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BFR40% | Experimental | Behavioral: WalkingBFR set at 40% of the participant's arterial occlusion pressure (AOP). |
| BFR80% | Experimental | Behavioral: WalkingBFR set at 80% of the participant's AOP. |
| BFR0% | Sham comparator | Behavioral: WalkingBFR set at 0% of the participant's AOP. |
| CON | Active comparator | Behavioral: WalkingNo BFR cuffs. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Aged between 60 and 90 years.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Being institutionalized.
- Peripheral vascular disease, defined by an ankle-brachial index (ABI) outside the normal range (0.9-1.4).
- Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (>180/110 mmHg).
- Any contraindication to exercise, based on self-reported medical history and PAR-Q+.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| WalkingAlso: Physical activity, Aerobic exercise, Cardio exercise, Endurance exerciseParticipants will perform two continuous 10-minute walking bouts, separated by a 3-minute seated recovery period to allow reperfusion following BFR or pause, along a rectangular 40-meter walking circuit (15×5 m). Walking cadence will be standardized at 112 steps per minute. | Behavioural | BFR0%, BFR40%, BFR80%, CON |
Primary outcome
Blood pressure
Time frame: 25 minutes
Systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure will be obtained by a photoplethysmography sensor. Units: mmHg
Heart rate
Time frame: 60 minutes
The average and maximum values will be obtained using a chest-worn heart rate sensor. Unit: beats per minute (bpm)
RR-Interval Time-Domain Metrics
Time frame: 60 minutes
Standard time-domain HRV metrics-including mean RR intervals (meanRR), the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN), and the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD)-will be derived from inter-beat interval data exported from a chest-worn heart rate sensor (epochs of 5 min). Units: milliseconds (ms).
RR-Interval Nonlinear Metric
Time frame: 60 minutes
Short-term fractal scaling (DFA α1) will be calculated from inter-beat interval data exported from a chest-worn heart rate sensor (epochs of 5 min). Units: dimensionless.
Maximum isometric strength
Time frame: 10 minutes
Maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) force during a knee-extension task will be recorded using a force-gauge device. Unit: Newtons (N)
Force steadiness
Time frame: 10 minutes
Force steadiness will be evaluated from the RMSSD of the coefficient of variation (CV) during a 30-s submaximal isometric knee-extension contraction at 30% MVIC, using a force-gauge device with data-analysis software. Unit: Percentage (%)
7 secondary outcomes
Arterial stiffness
Time frame: 25 minutes
Temporal Gait Parameters
Time frame: 20 minutes
Temporal Gait Variability
Time frame: 20 minutes
Postural Stability
Time frame: 10 minutes
Internal subjective load
Time frame: 20 minutes
Adverse effects
Time frame: 20 minutes
Affective Responses
Time frame: 20 minutes
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Dec 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Healthy Older Adults
Recruiting
Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition
Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health
RecruitingPhase 1
Effects of Trigonelline Monohydrate on NAD+ Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability in Healthy Adults
NAD+ Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Trial of Recombinant Herpes Zoster Vaccine (ZFA01 Adjuvant, CHO Cells)
Herpes Zoster
Recruiting
Effects of Breathing Exercises on Cognition in Older Adults
Older Adults (65 Years and Older), Cognition
Not yet recruiting
Stearic Acid and Endothelial Function
Healthy Middle-aged Subjects, Obesity & Overweight
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Walking in people with Healthy Older Adults, run by Universidade da Coruña at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Portugal, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Marta Sevilla-Sanchez, Postdoctoral research (34 637 235 257, marta.sevilla@udc.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Blood pressure (time frame: 25 minutes). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Dec 2025.