AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetic Retinal DiseaseARNCT07270133

Longitudinal Natural History Study of Retinal Function in Eyes of Patients With Diabetes

An observational study of Diabetic Retinal Disease, run by Jaeb Center for Health Research at 8 sites in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A considerable hurdle to the development of novel, more effective therapies for diabetic retinal disease is the limited number of primary endpoints available for use in regulatory trials. Current endpoints necessitate long trial durations and a greater number of participants to show efficacy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Diabetic Retinal Disease
What is being tested?
Visual Acuity, Reading Speed and Visual Field testing
How many people
450 participants
Where
8 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Jun 2026to Dec 2032
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Individuals must meet all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria to be eligible to participate in the study. The potential study participant must have at least one eye meeting the inclusion criteria, but participants may have both eyes eligible for the study

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Diagnosed with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes or non-diabetic control patients
  • Best corrected visual acuity 20/32 or better (Snellen) (≥74 ETDRS letters)
  • Meets criteria for one of the defined observational groups below
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Ocular or systemic condition, aside from diabetes mellitus (DM), that is likely to affect the assessment of DRSS, DME, or the functioning of the neural retina
  • Previous treatment of any kind for diabetic retinopathy or DME
  • Any condition that may preclude adequate imaging of the macula (e.g. dense cataract or other media opacity, ptosis)
  • History of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment or macular hole
  • History of vitrectomy
  • Intraocular surgery (including cataract surgery) within 4 months prior to enrollment or anticipated within the next 6 months
  • Requiring treatment for DR/DME in the next 6 months

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

8 sites in 1 country

United States8 sites, 8 recruiting
  • Southeast Retina Center, P.C.

    Augusta, Georgia, 30909

    Dennis M Marcus, MD, 709-650-0061, amitchell@southeastretina.com

    Recruiting
  • Retina Consultants of Texas

    Beaumont, Texas, 77707

    William Pearce, MD, 9008335921, alaida.jimenez@retinaconsultantstexas.com

    Recruiting
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02118

    Steven D Ness, MD, 617-414-4020, sreevardhan.alluri@bmc.org

    Recruiting
  • Henry Ford Health System

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

    Paul A Edwards, MD, 313-874-9167, mthoma22@hfhs.org

    Recruiting
  • Retina Associates of Southern California

    Huntington Beach, California, 92647

    Hani Salehi-Had, MD, 657-227-9496, i.gomez@retinasocal.com

    Recruiting
  • Retina-Vitreous Consultants, Inc.

    Monroeville, Pennsylvania, 15146

    Shripaad Y Shukla, MD, 412-683-5300, merlottil@retinapittsburgh.com

    Recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

    Andrew J. Barkmeier, MD, 507-538-8119, Taylor.Laura2@mayo.edu

    Recruiting
  • Pittsburgh Clinical Trial Consortium

    Sewickley, Pennsylvania, 15143

    Leanne T. Labriola, DO, MBA, 412-301-5326, franco@pghtrials.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

A considerable hurdle to the development of novel, more effective therapies for diabetic retinal disease is the limited number of primary endpoints available for use in regulatory trials. Current endpoints necessitate long trial durations and a greater number of participants to show efficacy. Thus, a better understanding of the structural and functional changes in the retina occurring in people with diabetes is essential for developing primary endpoints and validating surrogate and clinical endpoints.

Being tested
Visual Acuity, Reading Speed, Visual Field testing, Contrast sensitivity, Electroretinography (ERG) and pupillography in light- and dark-adapted states

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Visual AcuityDiagnostic test

    Also called Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity ETDRS

    Visual Acuity measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent of <20/800). Higher scores indicate better visual acuity, and lower scores indicate worse visual acuity

  • Reading SpeedDiagnostic test

    Also called MNREAD (Minnesota Low-Vision Reading)

    The MNREAD (Minnesota Low-Vision Reading) test is a standardized test that measures reading performance in people with normal or impaired vision.

  • Visual Field testingDiagnostic test

    Also called objectiveFIELD analyzer

    The objectiveFIELD Analyzer is a perimetry tool that measures visual fields using electroencephalography-based brain responses to flickering light. Higher sensitivity = better function, Lower sensitivity (more negative deviations from normal) = worse function; Global indices (MD, PSD-like values) indicate overall field loss and pattern of damage.

  • Contrast sensitivityDiagnostic test

    Also called AST Manifold qCSF

    A clinical device that utilizes the quick Contrast Sensitivity Function (qCSF) methodology to assess visual function. The qCSF method is a Bayesian adaptive algorithm designed to efficiently estimate a patient's contrast sensitivity across a wide range of spatial frequencies. Higher curve / higher AULCSF = better contrast sensitivity (normal vision). Lower curve / lower Area Under the Log Contrast Sensitivity Function = reduced contrast sensitivity (seen in early AMD, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, etc.).

  • Electroretinography (ERG) and pupillography in light- and dark-adapted statesDiagnostic test

    Also called RETeval device

    The RETeval® is a portable, handheld electroretinography (ERG) and visual evoked potential (VEP) device. It enables clinicians to assess the retinal and optic nerve.

  • Ultrawide field-color photographDiagnostic test

    Also called UWF-Photo

    Ultrawide field color photography is a high-resolution, wide-angle retinal imaging technique that captures both central and peripheral retina in natural color. Grading is typically based on the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale or DRSS, which is a standardized grading scale from 10 (no DR) to 85 (severe PDR)

  • Ultrawide field-Fluorescein angiogramDiagnostic test

    Also called UWF-FA

    a high-resolution, wide-angle retinal vascular imaging technique that allows clinicians to see both central and peripheral retina blood flow, detect ischemia, leakage, and neovascularization, and guide diagnosis and treatment

  • Optical coherence tomographyDiagnostic test

    Also called OCT

    non-invasive retinal imaging tool that produces detailed cross-sectional images. Disease-specific grading systems (like macular thickness for DME or RNFL thickness for glaucoma) are used to quantify severity and monitor progression

  • Optical coherence tomography- AngiographyOther

    Also called OCT-A

    non-invasive, dye-free imaging method that maps retinal and choroidal vasculature, allowing both qualitative and quantitative assessment of microvascular health. Quantitative metrics like vessel density, perfusion, FAZ size, and non-perfusion area serve as functional "scales" for disease severity and progression.

Study groups in NCT07270133
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Non-diabetic controlsAged-matched people without a diagnosis of diabetes. At least one eye must be eligible without retinal pathology.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Visual Acuity; Diagnostic Test: Reading Speed; Diagnostic Test: Visual Field testing; Diagnostic Test: Contrast sensitivity; Diagnostic Test: Electroretinography (ERG) and pupillography in light- and dark-adapted states; Diagnostic Test: Ultrawide field-color photograph; Diagnostic Test: Ultrawide field-Fluorescein angiogram; Diagnostic Test: Optical coherence tomography; Other: Optical coherence tomography- Angiography
Subclinical (No diabetic retinopathy on the diabetic retinopathy severity scale)Eyes of patients with a diagnosis of diabetes, Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale = 10, and no diabetic macular edema. Lower limit on duration of disease for Type 1 is 5 years, for Type 2 is 1 year
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Visual Acuity; Diagnostic Test: Reading Speed; Diagnostic Test: Visual Field testing; Diagnostic Test: Contrast sensitivity; Diagnostic Test: Electroretinography (ERG) and pupillography in light- and dark-adapted states; Diagnostic Test: Ultrawide field-color photograph; Diagnostic Test: Ultrawide field-Fluorescein angiogram; Diagnostic Test: Optical coherence tomography; Other: Optical coherence tomography- Angiography
Minimal to Mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathyEyes of patients with a diagnosis of diabetes, Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale = 20-35, and no center-involved diabetic macular edema
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Visual Acuity; Diagnostic Test: Reading Speed; Diagnostic Test: Visual Field testing; Diagnostic Test: Contrast sensitivity; Diagnostic Test: Electroretinography (ERG) and pupillography in light- and dark-adapted states; Diagnostic Test: Ultrawide field-color photograph; Diagnostic Test: Ultrawide field-Fluorescein angiogram; Diagnostic Test: Optical coherence tomography; Other: Optical coherence tomography- Angiography
Moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathyEyes of patients with a diagnosis of diabetes, Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale = 43-47, and no center-involved diabetic macular edema
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Visual Acuity; Diagnostic Test: Reading Speed; Diagnostic Test: Visual Field testing; Diagnostic Test: Contrast sensitivity; Diagnostic Test: Electroretinography (ERG) and pupillography in light- and dark-adapted states; Diagnostic Test: Ultrawide field-color photograph; Diagnostic Test: Ultrawide field-Fluorescein angiogram; Diagnostic Test: Optical coherence tomography; Other: Optical coherence tomography- Angiography
Severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathyEyes of patients with a diagnosis of diabetes, Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale = 53, and no center-involved diabetic macular edema
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Visual Acuity; Diagnostic Test: Reading Speed; Diagnostic Test: Visual Field testing; Diagnostic Test: Contrast sensitivity; Diagnostic Test: Electroretinography (ERG) and pupillography in light- and dark-adapted states; Diagnostic Test: Ultrawide field-color photograph; Diagnostic Test: Ultrawide field-Fluorescein angiogram; Diagnostic Test: Optical coherence tomography; Other: Optical coherence tomography- Angiography
Proliferative diabetic retinopathyEyes of patients with a diagnosis of diabetes, Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale > 60, and no center-involved diabetic macular edema
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Visual Acuity; Diagnostic Test: Reading Speed; Diagnostic Test: Visual Field testing; Diagnostic Test: Contrast sensitivity; Diagnostic Test: Electroretinography (ERG) and pupillography in light- and dark-adapted states; Diagnostic Test: Ultrawide field-color photograph; Diagnostic Test: Ultrawide field-Fluorescein angiogram; Diagnostic Test: Optical coherence tomography; Other: Optical coherence tomography- Angiography

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Does the performance of the objectiveFIELD Analyzer at baseline worsen as the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Score increases

    The objectiveFIELD Analyzer is a perimetry tool that measures visual fields using electroencephalography-based brain responses to flickering light. Higher sensitivity = better function, Lower sensitivity (more negative deviations from normal) = worse function; Global indices (MD, PSD-like values) indicate overall field loss and pattern of damage.

    Measured: 4 Years

  2. Does the performance of the Contrast sensitivity (AST Manifold qCSF) at baseline worsen as the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Score increases

    A clinical device that utilizes the quick Contrast Sensitivity Function (qCSF) methodology to assess visual function. The qCSF method is a Bayesian adaptive algorithm designed to efficiently estimate a patient's contrast sensitivity across a wide range of spatial frequencies. Higher curve / higher AULCSF = better contrast sensitivity (normal vision). Lower curve / lower Area Under the Log Contrast Sensitivity Function = reduced contrast sensitivity (seen in early AMD, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, etc.).

    Measured: 4 Years

  3. Does the performance of the Electroretinography (ERG) at baseline worsen as the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Score increases

    The RETeval® is a portable, handheld electroretinography (ERG) and visual evoked potential (VEP) device. It enables clinicians to assess the retinal and optic nerve.

    Measured: 4 Years

  4. Does the performance of the Ultrawide field-color photograph at baseline worsen as the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Score increases

    Ultrawide field color photography is a high-resolution, wide-angle retinal imaging technique that captures both central and peripheral retina in natural color. Grading is typically based on the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale or DRSS, which is a standardized grading scale from 10 (no DR) to 85 (severe PDR)

    Measured: 4 Years

  5. Does the performance of the Ultrawide field-Fluorescein angiogram at baseline worsen as the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Score increases

    A high-resolution, wide-angle retinal vascular imaging technique that allows clinicians to see both central and peripheral retina blood flow, detect ischemia, leakage, and neovascularization, and guide diagnosis and treatment

    Measured: 4 Years

  6. Does the performance of the Optical coherence tomography at baseline worsen as the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Score increases

    A non-invasive retinal imaging tool that produces detailed cross-sectional images. Disease-specific grading systems (like macular thickness for DME or RNFL thickness for glaucoma) are used to quantify severity and monitor progression

    Measured: 4 Years

  7. Does the performance of the Optical Coherence Tomography- Angiography at baseline worsen as the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Score increases

    A non-invasive, dye-free imaging method that maps retinal and choroidal vasculature, allowing both qualitative and quantitative assessment of microvascular health. Quantitative metrics like vessel density, perfusion, FAZ size, and non-perfusion area serve as functional "scales" for disease severity and progression.

    Measured: 4 Years

  8. Does the performance of Visual Acuity at baseline worsen as the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Score increases

    Visual Acuity measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent of <20/800). Higher scores indicate better visual acuity, and lower scores indicate worse visual acuity

    Measured: 4 Years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Dec 2025
  2. Study start1 Jun 2026
  3. Primary completionDec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2032 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
450 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07270133
Sponsor's protocol ID
Protocol AR
Other IDs
UG1EY014231
Acronym
AR
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
7 Oct 2025
Last updated
23 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Diabetic Retinal Disease, run by Jaeb Center for Health Research at 8 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Does the performance of the objectiveFIELD Analyzer at baseline worsen as the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Score increases (time frame: 4 Years). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in