AzTrials
AzTrials

Wrist FracturePhase 4NCT07268547

Wrist Reduction Intervention: Supracondylar Technique for Radial Nerve Block vs. Hematoma Block (WRIST Block Study)

A Phase 4 study testing Supracondylar radial nerve block, Hematoma block and Combination of blocks in people with Wrist Fracture, run by Sarasota Memorial Health Care System at 1 site in United States.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare different types of local anesthesia-a supracondylar radial nerve block, a hematoma block, or a combination of the two-for reducing pain in people with a broken wrist (distal radius fracture). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Wrist Fracture
What is being tested?
Supracondylar radial nerve block, Hematoma block and Combination of blocks
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
105 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
9 Dec 2025to 1 Dec 2027
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Patients admitted to the ECC with a distal radius fracture requiring closed reduction
  • Patient must be willing and able to provide informed consent to the study

Who cannot join

  • Under 18 years of age
  • Pregnant
  • Prisoner
  • Allergy to lidocaine
  • Patients unable to provide informed consent and/or perform study-related activities
  • Patients undergoing procedural sedation
  • Patients may be excluded at the discretion of the investigator based on their clinical judgment, if the participant no longer meets criteria, and/or if the health or safety of the patient may be impacted by taking part in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site
  • Sarasota Memorial Health Care System

    Sarasota, Florida, 34239

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to compare different types of local anesthesia-a supracondylar radial nerve block, a hematoma block, or a combination of the two-for reducing pain in people with a broken wrist (distal radius fracture). This is being done to find out which method provides better pain relief after the injury and during treatment in the emergency room.

Read the detailed description

This study is testing different ways to provide pain relief before reducing a broken wrist. Participants will receive one of three techniques: (1) a nerve block where a doctor injects lidocaine near the radial nerve under ultrasound guidance; (2) a hematoma block where a doctor injects lidocaine into the area where the bone broke; or (3) both the nerve block and the hematoma block. Patients will be asked how much pain they feel before the numbing, after the numbing, and after the wrist is reduced.

Conditions
Wrist Fracture
Being tested
Supracondylar radial nerve block, Hematoma block, Combination of blocks
Keywords
wrist fracture, fracture, nerve block
Medical subject headings
Wrist Fractures, Fractures, Bone

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Supracondylar radial nerve blockProcedure or surgery

    Supracondylar radial nerve blocks given at the radial nerve not as the same location of the fracture site, prior to fracture reduction.

  • Hematoma blockProcedure or surgery

    Injection of analgesia into the hematoma that forms surrounding the wrist fracture.

  • Combination of blocksProcedure or surgery

    Supracondylar radial nerve block given first, followed by hematoma block, before fracture reduction.

Study groups in NCT07268547
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Supracondylar radial nerve blocksExperimentalLidocaine injection given near the radial never under ultrasound guidance
Receives: Procedure: Supracondylar radial nerve block
Hematoma blocksExperimentalInjecting analgesia into the hematoma that forms surrounding the wrist fracture
Receives: Procedure: Hematoma block
Combination of supracondylar radial nerve block and hematoma blockExperimentalSupracondylar radial nerve block given first followed by hematoma block
Receives: Procedure: Combination of blocks

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain levels comparison

    Comparing pain levels among patients who are undergoing a wrist fracture reduction. Measured on a scale of 0-10, 0= no pain to 10= worst pain.

    Pain will be measured at (1) baseline, (2) after administering the assigned pain block (s), and after the (3) fracture reduction.

    Measured: Pain will be measured at (1) baseline, (2) after administering the assigned pain block(s), and after the (3) fracture reduction.

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Amount of opioid medication needed to control pain.

    The amount of opioid prescribed, if any, will be collected and recorded for comparison during patient's time in emergency room.

    Measured: Opioid medication prescribing will be assessed at baseline, time of admission to the emergency room, until the patient is discharged and they are no longer active in the study.

  2. Number of patients requiring conscious sedation.

    The need for conscious sedation among patients undergoing wrist fracture reduction in emergency care center will be recorded and monitored for comparison between groups.

    Measured: Patients will be monitored for need of conscious sedation from baseline, time of enrollment in the study, until discharge from the emergency room, when they are no longer active in the study.

  3. Adverse Events Monitoring

    Adverse events associated with any of the blocks that are administered to patients undergoing a wrist fracture reduction in the emergency care center will be identified, monitored, and recorded for reporting.

    Measured: From baseline, time the patient is admitted and enrolled into the study, until the patient is discharged and no longer active in the study.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Dec 2025
  2. Study start9 Dec 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The purpose of this study is to compare different types of local anesthesia-a supracondylar radial nerve block, a hematoma block, or a combination of the two-for lowering pain in people with a broken wrist (distal radius fracture). We want to find out which method provides better pain relief after the injury and during treatment in the emergency room. Each of these methods is a different standard procedure for pain control prior to wrist fracture reduction.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
105 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07268547
Sponsor's protocol ID
25-MEDI-58
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
18 Nov 2025
Last updated
26 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Tseng PT, Leu TH, Chen YW, Chen YP. Hematoma block or procedural sedation and analgesia, which is the most effective method of anesthesia in reduction of displaced distal radius fracture? J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Mar 27;13(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0772-7.

    PubMed 29580286
  • Siebelt M, Hartholt KA, van Winden DFM, Boot F, Papathanasiou D, Verdouw BC, de Vries MR, Mathijssen NM, Kraan GA. Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks as Analgesia for Nonoperative Management of Distal Radius Fractures-Two Consecutive Randomized Controlled Trials. J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Apr;33(4):e124-e130. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001388.

    PubMed 30893220
  • Oakley B, Busby C, Kulkarni S, Arnold SJ, Kulkarni SS, Ollivere BJ. Manipulation of distal radius fractures: a comparison of Bier's block vs haematoma block. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 May;105(5):434-440. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0116. Epub 2022 Oct 14.

    PubMed 36239973
  • Maia GAS, Cunha JC, Feijo CQ, Leal DM, Moreira JJ, Herrero CFPDS. Radial Nerve Supracondylar Block Versus Fracture Hematoma Block. Comparison of Their Efficacy in Cases of Fractures of the Distal Third of the Radius. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2023 Aug 30;58(4):e557-e562. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1768623. eCollection 2023 Aug.

    PubMed 37663190
  • Handoll HH, Madhok R, Dodds C. Anaesthesia for treating distal radial fracture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(3):CD003320. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003320.

    PubMed 12137688
  • Haley CB, Beauchesne AR, Fox JC, Nelson AM. Block Time: A Multispecialty Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound-guided Upper Extremity Nerve Blocks. West J Emerg Med. 2023 Jun 30;24(4):774-785. doi: 10.5811/westjem.56058.

    PubMed 37527380
  • Gottlieb M, Cosby K. Ultrasound-guided hematoma block for distal radial and ulnar fractures. J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;48(3):310-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.09.063. Epub 2014 Dec 9.

    PubMed 25497895
  • Martinez-Arboleda JJ, Moreno M, Diaz-Solorzano JP, Mejia-Grueso A. Ultrasound-guided supracondylar radial nerve block for closed reduction of a distal radius fracture in the emergency department: Case report. Trauma Case Rep. 2024 Sep 25;54:101116. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2024.101116. eCollection 2024 Dec.

    PubMed 39399762
  • Che Daud AZ, Mohd Nayan NA, Ahmad A, Alrashdi M, Kadar M, Mohd Poot EF. Distal radius fracture rehabilitation: A bibliometric and scoping review. J Hand Ther. 2026 Jan-Mar;39(1):120-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2025.05.016. Epub 2025 Jul 4.

    PubMed 40615307
  • Abbasi S, Garjani N, Mahshidfar B, Farsi D, Mofidi M, Hafezimoghadam P, Rezai M, Javan A. Comparative Study of Radial and Median Nerve Blocks with Hematoma Block under Ultrasound Guide in Distal Radius Fracture Reduction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2023 Oct 23;37:113. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.37.113. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 38145179

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Supracondylar radial nerve block, Hematoma block and Combination of blocks in people with Wrist Fracture, run by Sarasota Memorial Health Care System at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain levels comparison (time frame: Pain will be measured at (1) baseline, (2) after administering the assigned pain block(s), and after the (3) fracture reduction.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07268547, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in