Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)PanFitNCT07255001
Using Strength Tests to Better Understand How Pancreatic Cancer Affects Muscle Mass and Quality of Life
A study testing Hand grip strength assessments using a dynamometer in people with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and Hand Grip Strength, run by British Columbia Cancer Agency at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to measure hand grip strength in adults with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The main questions it aims to answer are: Is it feasible to measure hand grip strength as part of a clinic visit? Are changes in hand grip strength related to changes in body composition? Is hand… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC), Hand Grip Strength
- What is being tested?
- Hand grip strength assessments using a dynamometer
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 13 Aug 2026to 31 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 years or older.
- Histological and/or radiological diagnosis of resectable, non-resectable, or metastatic PDAC. For resectable PDAC, adjuvant setting only.
- ECOG performance status 0-2.
- Life expectancy greater than 6 months as judged by the investigator.
- Planned for treatment, either as part of routine care or in combination with an investigational agent within another study.
- Ability to hold a dynamometer with one hand.
Who cannot join
- Individuals with CT imaging performed outside of Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Individuals who are unfit to undergo CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
- Individuals who are currently participating in a structured moderate intensity resistance training program.
- Individuals who are otherwise judged by the investigator to be unfit to proceed with this protocol.
- Unable to comply with study assessments and follow-up.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
BC Cancer
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
Daniel J Renouf, MD, MPH, 800-663-3333, drenouf@bccancer.bc.ca
About this study
Official title: Monitoring Physical Function Changes for Patients Living With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Potential for Better Understanding of Treatment Trajectory and Survival
The goal of this clinical trial is to measure hand grip strength in adults with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is it feasible to measure hand grip strength as part of a clinic visit?
- Are changes in hand grip strength related to changes in body composition?
- Is hand grip strength related to a person's well-being?
- Is hand grip strength related to how a tumour responds to treatment?
Participants will squeeze a device with their hand to measure their hand grip strength and complete questionnaires about their well-being when they are seen in clinic for their regular medical care for PDAC.
- Being tested
- Hand grip strength assessments using a dynamometer
- Keywords
- Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), Hand grip strength (HGS), Quality of Life (QOL), Body composition, Cachexia, Sarcopenia, Physical function, Skeletal muscle, Adipose tissue
- Medical subject headings
- Cachexia, Sarcopenia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hand grip strength assessments using a dynamometerDevice
Squeeze a dynamometer with one hand to measure hand grip strength.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study Arm | Experimental | The study arm all participants are enrolled into. Participants will complete hand grip strength assessments and questionnaires. Receives: Device: Hand grip strength assessments using a dynamometer |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Frequency of Participants with Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Measurements at 6 Months From Treatment Start Date
The percentage of participants with hand grip strength (HGS) test results at 6 months from treatment start date. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the 6-month follow-up assessment.
Secondary outcomes (202)
Frequency of Participants with Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Measurements at Study Baseline
The percentage of participants with hand grip strength (HGS) test results at study baseline. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: At the time of the baseline assessment for the study.
Frequency of Participants with Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Measurements at 3 Months From Treatment Start Date
The percentage of participants with hand grip strength (HGS) test results at 3 months from treatment start date. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the 3-month follow-up assessment.
Frequency of Participants with Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Measurements at 9 Months From Treatment Start Date
The percentage of participants with hand grip strength (HGS) test results at 9 months from treatment start date. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the 9-month follow-up assessment.
Frequency of Participants with Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Measurements at 12 Months From Treatment Start Date
The percentage of participants with hand grip strength (HGS) test results at 12 months from treatment start date. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the 12-month follow-up assessment.
Proportion of Participants with Sarcopenia Using CT Image Alone (Sarcopenia CT)
The percentage of participants at each timepoint that meet the criteria for sarcopenia using the established definitions determined by CT image alone, namely the sex- and BMI-specific cut-off points developed by Caan et al. (2017).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Proportion of Participants with Sarcopenia Using Physical Function Alone (Sarcopenia P)
The percentage of participants at each timepoint that meet the criteria for sarcopenia using the definition of the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC) (Bhasin et al. 2020).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Proportion of Participants with Sarcopenia Using a Combination of CT Image and Physical Function (Sarcopenia COMB)
The percentage of participants at each timepoint that meet the criteria for sarcopenia using the definition by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older Adults (EWGSOP2) (Cruz-Jentoft et al. 2019), which is supported by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (Chen et al. 2019), and the Australian and New Zealand Society for Sarcopenia and Frailty Research (Zanker et al. 2023a, Zanker et al. 2023b).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in hand grip strength (HGS) for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in hand grip strength (HGS) for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in hand grip strength (HGS) for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in hand grip strength (HGS) for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in hand grip strength (HGS) for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in hand grip strength (HGS) for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
The change in hand grip strength (HGS) for each unit of increase in progression-free survival (PFS). Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer. Progression-free survival is the length of time from the first dose of treatment until the date of clinical progression.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the date of clinical progression, withdrawal, date of death, or end of study, whichever comes first, assessed up to 26 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Overall Survival (OS)
The change in hand grip strength (HGS) for each unit of increase in overall survival (OS). Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer. Overall survival is the length of time from the initiation of treatment that participants survive.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the date of death or end of study, whichever comes first, assessed up to 26 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Objective Response Rate (ORR)
The change in hand grip strength (HGS) for each unit of increase in objective response rate (ORR). Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer. Objective response rate is the proportion of participants who have a complete or partial response to treatment.
Measured: From the date of the baseline assessment scan until the date of clinical progression, withdrawal, date of death, or end of study, whichever comes first, assessed up to 26 months.
Difference in Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Between Treatment Regimens
The difference in the amount of hand grip strength (HGS) between participants receiving different treatment regimens. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Tumour Stage
The change in hand grip strength (HGS) for each unit of increase in tumour stage as defined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer. Tumour stage describes the extent of cancer growth and spread.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Tumour Grade
The change in hand grip strength (HGS) for each unit of increase in tumour grade as defined by a four-tier grading system. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer. Tumour grade describes the appearance of cancer cells and their expected growth rate.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Difference in Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Between Sites of Metastasis
The difference in the amount of hand grip strength (HGS) between participants with different sites of metastasis. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Global Health Status (QoL, per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The global health status measure (QL2) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Physical Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in physical functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The physical functioning scale (PF2) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Role Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in role functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The role functioning scale (RF2) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Role functioning measures a person's ability to participate in daily life. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Emotional Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in emotional functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The emotional functioning scale (EF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Cognitive Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in cognitive functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The cognitive functioning scale (CF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Social Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in social functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The social functioning scale (SF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Fatigue (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in fatigue, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The symptom scale for fatigue (FA) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Nausea and Vomiting (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in nausea and vomiting, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The symptom scale for nausea and vomiting (NV) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Pain (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in pain, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The symptom scale for pain (PA) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Dyspnoea (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in dyspnoea, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The symptom item of dyspnoea (DY) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Insomnia (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in insomnia, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The symptom item of insomnia (SL) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Appetite Loss (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in appetite loss, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The symptom item of appetite loss (AP) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Constipation (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in constipation, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The symptom item of constipation (CO) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Diarrhoea (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in diarrhoea, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The symptom item of diarrhoea (DI) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Financial Difficulties (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in financial difficulties, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The symptom item of financial difficulties (FI) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Food Aversion (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in food aversion, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The symptom scale for food aversion (AV) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Eating and Weight Loss Worry (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in eating and weight loss worry, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The symptom scale for eating and weight loss worry (EW) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Eating Difficulties (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in eating difficulties, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The symptom scale for eating difficulties (EAT) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Loss of Control (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in loss of control, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The symptom scale for loss of control (LC) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Physical Decline (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in physical decline, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The symptom scale for physical decline (PHY) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Dry Mouth (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in dry mouth, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The single item measure of dry mouth (DM) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Indigestion/Heartburn (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in indigestion/heartburn, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The single item measure of indigestion/heartburn (IND) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Forcing Self to Eat (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in forcing self to eat, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The single item measure of forcing self to eat (FOR) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Inadequate Information (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in a participant's perception of receiving inadequate information about their weight loss from their care team, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). The single item measure of receiving inadequate information about weight loss (INF) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Index Value (per EuroQol EQ-5D-5L) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the Index Value from the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). In Canada, the Index Value ranges from -0.148 to 0.949 with larger and more positive numbers indicating better health. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Health Status (EQ-VAS per EuroQol EQ-5D-5L) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) from the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, for each unit of increase in hand grip strength (HGS). EQ-VAS ranges from 0 to 100 with larger scores indicating better health. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Global Health Status (QoL, per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The global health status measure (QL2) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Physical Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in physical functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The physical functioning scale (PF2) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Role Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in role functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The role functioning scale (RF2) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Role functioning measures a person's ability to participate in daily life. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Emotional Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in emotional functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The emotional functioning scale (EF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Cognitive Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in cognitive functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The cognitive functioning scale (CF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Social Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in social functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The social functioning scale (SF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Fatigue (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in fatigue, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The symptom scale for fatigue (FA) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Nausea and Vomiting (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in nausea and vomiting, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The symptom scale for nausea and vomiting (NV) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Pain (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in pain, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The symptom scale for pain (PA) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Dyspnoea (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in dyspnoea, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The symptom item of dyspnoea (DY) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Insomnia (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in insomnia, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The symptom item of insomnia (SL) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Appetite Loss (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in appetite loss, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The symptom item of appetite loss (AP) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Constipation (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in constipation, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The symptom item of constipation (CO) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Diarrhoea (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in diarrhoea, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The symptom item of diarrhoea (DI) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Financial Difficulties (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in financial difficulties, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The symptom item of financial difficulties (FI) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Food Aversion (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in food aversion, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The symptom scale for food aversion (AV) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Eating and Weight Loss Worry (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in eating and weight loss worry, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The symptom scale for eating and weight loss worry (EW) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Eating Difficulties (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in eating difficulties, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The symptom scale for eating difficulties (EAT) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Loss of Control (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in loss of control, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The symptom scale for loss of control (LC) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Physical Decline (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in physical decline, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The symptom scale for physical decline (PHY) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Dry Mouth (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in dry mouth, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The single item measure of dry mouth (DM) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Indigestion/Heartburn (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in indigestion/heartburn, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The single item measure of indigestion/heartburn (IND) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Forcing Self to Eat (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in forcing self to eat, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The single item measure of forcing self to eat (FOR) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Inadequate Information (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in a participant's perception of receiving inadequate information about their weight loss from their care team, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). The single item measure of receiving inadequate information about weight loss (INF) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Index Value (per EuroQol EQ-5D-5L) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the Index Value from the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). In Canada, the Index Value ranges from -0.148 to 0.949 with larger and more positive numbers indicating better health. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Health Status (EQ-VAS per EuroQol EQ-5D-5L) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) from the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle index (SMI). EQ-VAS ranges from 0 to 100 with larger scores indicating better health. Skeletal muscle index estimates overall muscle mass by dividing skeletal muscle area (SMA) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by height squared. SMI is measured in cm^2/m^2 and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Global Health Status (QoL, per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The global health status measure (QL2) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Physical Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in physical functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The physical functioning scale (PF2) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Role Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in role functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The role functioning scale (RF2) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Role functioning measures a person's ability to participate in daily life. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Emotional Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in emotional functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The emotional functioning scale (EF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Cognitive Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in cognitive functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The cognitive functioning scale (CF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Social Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in social functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The social functioning scale (SF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Fatigue (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in fatigue, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The symptom scale for fatigue (FA) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Nausea and Vomiting (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in nausea and vomiting, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The symptom scale for nausea and vomiting (NV) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Pain (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in pain, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The symptom scale for pain (PA) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Dyspnoea (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in dyspnoea, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The symptom item of dyspnoea (DY) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Insomnia (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in insomnia, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The symptom item of insomnia (SL) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Appetite Loss (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in appetite loss, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The symptom item of appetite loss (AP) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Constipation (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in constipation, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The symptom item of constipation (CO) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Diarrhoea (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in diarrhoea, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The symptom item of diarrhoea (DI) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Financial Difficulties (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in financial difficulties, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The symptom item of financial difficulties (FI) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Food Aversion (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in food aversion, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The symptom scale for food aversion (AV) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Eating and Weight Loss Worry (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in eating and weight loss worry, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The symptom scale for eating and weight loss worry (EW) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Eating Difficulties (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in eating difficulties, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The symptom scale for eating difficulties (EAT) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Loss of Control (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in loss of control, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The symptom scale for loss of control (LC) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Physical Decline (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in physical decline, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The symptom scale for physical decline (PHY) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Dry Mouth (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in dry mouth, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The single item measure of dry mouth (DM) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Indigestion/Heartburn (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in indigestion/heartburn, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The single item measure of indigestion/heartburn (IND) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Forcing Self to Eat (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in forcing self to eat, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The single item measure of forcing self to eat (FOR) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Inadequate Information (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in a participant's perception of receiving inadequate information about their weight loss from their care team, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). The single item measure of receiving inadequate information about weight loss (INF) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Index Value (per EuroQol EQ-5D-5L) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the Index Value from the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). In Canada, the Index Value ranges from -0.148 to 0.949 with larger and more positive numbers indicating better health. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Health Status (EQ-VAS per EuroQol EQ-5D-5L) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) from the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle density (SMD). EQ-VAS ranges from 0 to 100 with larger scores indicating better health. Skeletal muscle density measures muscle composition, which includes the amount of fat and non-fat tissue within the muscle. SMD is measured in Hausefield Units (HU) and is calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Global Health Status (QoL, per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The global health status measure (QL2) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Physical Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in physical functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The physical functioning scale (PF2) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Role Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in role functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The role functioning scale (RF2) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Role functioning measures a person's ability to participate in daily life. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Emotional Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in emotional functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The emotional functioning scale (EF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Cognitive Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in cognitive functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The cognitive functioning scale (CF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Social Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in social functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The social functioning scale (SF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Fatigue (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in fatigue, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The symptom scale for fatigue (FA) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Nausea and Vomiting (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in nausea and vomiting, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The symptom scale for nausea and vomiting (NV) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Pain (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in pain, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The symptom scale for pain (PA) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Dyspnoea (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in dyspnoea, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The symptom item of dyspnoea (DY) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Insomnia (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in insomnia, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The symptom item of insomnia (SL) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Appetite Loss (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in appetite loss, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The symptom item of appetite loss (AP) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Constipation (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in constipation, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The symptom item of constipation (CO) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Diarrhoea (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in diarrhoea, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The symptom item of diarrhoea (DI) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Financial Difficulties (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in financial difficulties, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The symptom item of financial difficulties (FI) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Food Aversion (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in food aversion, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The symptom scale for food aversion (AV) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Eating and Weight Loss Worry (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in eating and weight loss worry, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The symptom scale for eating and weight loss worry (EW) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Eating Difficulties (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in eating difficulties, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The symptom scale for eating difficulties (EAT) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Loss of Control (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in loss of control, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The symptom scale for loss of control (LC) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Physical Decline (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in physical decline, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The symptom scale for physical decline (PHY) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Dry Mouth (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in dry mouth, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The single item measure of dry mouth (DM) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Indigestion/Heartburn (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in indigestion/heartburn, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The single item measure of indigestion/heartburn (IND) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Forcing Self to Eat (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in forcing self to eat, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The single item measure of forcing self to eat (FOR) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Inadequate Information (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in a participant's perception of receiving inadequate information about their weight loss from their care team, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). The single item measure of receiving inadequate information about weight loss (INF) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Index Value (per EuroQol EQ-5D-5L) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the Index Value from the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). In Canada, the Index Value ranges from -0.148 to 0.949 with larger and more positive numbers indicating better health. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Health Status (EQ-VAS per EuroQol EQ-5D-5L) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) from the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, for each unit of increase in skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). EQ-VAS ranges from 0 to 100 with larger scores indicating better health. Skeletal muscle gauge is a measure of both skeletal muscle quantity and quality. SMG is calculated as the product of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) and so is indirectly calculated from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMG is measured in Hausefield Units (HU)*cm^2/m^2.
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Global Health Status (QoL, per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The global health status measure (QL2) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Physical Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in physical functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The physical functioning scale (PF2) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Role Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in role functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The role functioning scale (RF2) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Role functioning measures a person's ability to participate in daily life. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Emotional Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in emotional functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The emotional functioning scale (EF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Cognitive Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in cognitive functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The cognitive functioning scale (CF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Social Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in social functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The social functioning scale (SF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Fatigue (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in fatigue, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The symptom scale for fatigue (FA) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Nausea and Vomiting (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in nausea and vomiting, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The symptom scale for nausea and vomiting (NV) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Pain (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in pain, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The symptom scale for pain (PA) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Dyspnoea (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in dyspnoea, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The symptom item of dyspnoea (DY) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Insomnia (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in insomnia, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The symptom item of insomnia (SL) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Appetite Loss (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in appetite loss, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The symptom item of appetite loss (AP) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Constipation (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in constipation, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The symptom item of constipation (CO) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Diarrhoea (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in diarrhoea, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The symptom item of diarrhoea (DI) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Financial Difficulties (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in financial difficulties, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The symptom item of financial difficulties (FI) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Food Aversion (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in food aversion, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The symptom scale for food aversion (AV) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Eating and Weight Loss Worry (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in eating and weight loss worry, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The symptom scale for eating and weight loss worry (EW) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Eating Difficulties (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in eating difficulties, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The symptom scale for eating difficulties (EAT) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Loss of Control (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in loss of control, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The symptom scale for loss of control (LC) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Physical Decline (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in physical decline, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The symptom scale for physical decline (PHY) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Dry Mouth (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in dry mouth, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The single item measure of dry mouth (DM) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Indigestion/Heartburn (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in indigestion/heartburn, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The single item measure of indigestion/heartburn (IND) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Forcing Self to Eat (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in forcing self to eat, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The single item measure of forcing self to eat (FOR) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Inadequate Information (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in a participant's perception of receiving inadequate information about their weight loss from their care team, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The single item measure of receiving inadequate information about weight loss (INF) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Index Value (per EuroQol EQ-5D-5L) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the Index Value from the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). In Canada, the Index Value ranges from -0.148 to 0.949 with larger and more positive numbers indicating better health. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Health Status (EQ-VAS per EuroQol EQ-5D-5L) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) from the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, for each unit of increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). EQ-VAS ranges from 0 to 100 with larger scores indicating better health. Visceral adipose tissue is fat that is stored deep within the abdominal cavity and surrounds abdominal organs. VAT assesses the volume of fat in the body. VAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Global Health Status (QoL, per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The global health status measure (QL2) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Physical Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in physical functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The physical functioning scale (PF2) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Role Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in role functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The role functioning scale (RF2) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Role functioning measures a person's ability to participate in daily life. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Emotional Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in emotional functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The emotional functioning scale (EF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Cognitive Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in cognitive functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The cognitive functioning scale (CF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Social Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in social functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The social functioning scale (SF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Fatigue (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in fatigue, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The symptom scale for fatigue (FA) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Nausea and Vomiting (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in nausea and vomiting, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The symptom scale for nausea and vomiting (NV) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Pain (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in pain, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The symptom scale for pain (PA) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Dyspnoea (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in dyspnoea, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The symptom item of dyspnoea (DY) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Insomnia (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in insomnia, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The symptom item of insomnia (SL) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Appetite Loss (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in appetite loss, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The symptom item of appetite loss (AP) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Constipation (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in constipation, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The symptom item of constipation (CO) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Diarrhoea (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in diarrhoea, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The symptom item of diarrhoea (DI) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Financial Difficulties (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in financial difficulties, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The symptom item of financial difficulties (FI) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Food Aversion (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in food aversion, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The symptom scale for food aversion (AV) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Eating and Weight Loss Worry (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in eating and weight loss worry, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The symptom scale for eating and weight loss worry (EW) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Eating Difficulties (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in eating difficulties, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The symptom scale for eating difficulties (EAT) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Loss of Control (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in loss of control, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The symptom scale for loss of control (LC) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Physical Decline (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in physical decline, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The symptom scale for physical decline (PHY) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Dry Mouth (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in dry mouth, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The single item measure of dry mouth (DM) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Indigestion/Heartburn (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in indigestion/heartburn, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The single item measure of indigestion/heartburn (IND) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Forcing Self to Eat (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in forcing self to eat, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The single item measure of forcing self to eat (FOR) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Inadequate Information (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in a participant's perception of receiving inadequate information about their weight loss from their care team, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The single item measure of receiving inadequate information about weight loss (INF) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Index Value (per EuroQol EQ-5D-5L) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the Index Value from the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). In Canada, the Index Value ranges from -0.148 to 0.949 with larger and more positive numbers indicating better health. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Health Status (EQ-VAS per EuroQol EQ-5D-5L) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) from the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, for each unit of increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). EQ-VAS ranges from 0 to 100 with larger scores indicating better health. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is the layer of fat located directly beneath the skin, between the dermis and muscles. SAT assesses fat distribution in the body. SAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Global Health Status (QoL, per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The global health status measure (QL2) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Physical Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in physical functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The physical functioning scale (PF2) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Role Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in role functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The role functioning scale (RF2) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Role functioning measures a person's ability to participate in daily life. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Emotional Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in emotional functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The emotional functioning scale (EF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Cognitive Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in cognitive functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The cognitive functioning scale (CF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Social Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in social functioning, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The social functioning scale (SF) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher/healthy level of functioning. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Fatigue (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in fatigue, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The symptom scale for fatigue (FA) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Nausea and Vomiting (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in nausea and vomiting, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The symptom scale for nausea and vomiting (NV) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Pain (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in pain, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The symptom scale for pain (PA) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Dyspnoea (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in dyspnoea, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The symptom item of dyspnoea (DY) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Insomnia (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in insomnia, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The symptom item of insomnia (SL) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Appetite Loss (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in appetite loss, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The symptom item of appetite loss (AP) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Constipation (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in constipation, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The symptom item of constipation (CO) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Diarrhoea (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in diarrhoea, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The symptom item of diarrhoea (DI) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Financial Difficulties (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in financial difficulties, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The symptom item of financial difficulties (FI) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Food Aversion (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in food aversion, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The symptom scale for food aversion (AV) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Eating and Weight Loss Worry (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in eating and weight loss worry, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The symptom scale for eating and weight loss worry (EW) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Eating Difficulties (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in eating difficulties, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The symptom scale for eating difficulties (EAT) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Loss of Control (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in loss of control, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The symptom scale for loss of control (LC) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Physical Decline (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in physical decline, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The symptom scale for physical decline (PHY) ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Dry Mouth (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in dry mouth, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The single item measure of dry mouth (DM) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Indigestion/Heartburn (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in indigestion/heartburn, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The single item measure of indigestion/heartburn (IND) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Forcing Self to Eat (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in forcing self to eat, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The single item measure of forcing self to eat (FOR) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Inadequate Information (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in a participant's perception of receiving inadequate information about their weight loss from their care team, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-CAX24 questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The single item measure of receiving inadequate information about weight loss (INF) ranges in score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a high level of symptomatology or problems. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Index Value (per EuroQol EQ-5D-5L) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the Index Value from the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). In Canada, the Index Value ranges from -0.148 to 0.949 with larger and more positive numbers indicating better health. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Health Status (EQ-VAS per EuroQol EQ-5D-5L) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
The change in quality of life, as measured by the visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) from the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, for each unit of increase in intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). EQ-VAS ranges from 0 to 100 with larger scores indicating better health. Intermuscular adipose tissue is fat that is located between muscle groups and underneath the deep fascia surrounding them. IMAT assesses the accumulation of fat in the body. IMAT is measured in cm^2 from CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
Measured: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Nov 2025
- Study start13 Aug 2026
- Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (35)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- British Columbia Cancer Agency
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07255001
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H25-00754
- Acronym
- PanFit
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 2 Sep 2025
- Last updated
- 15 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Only aggregate data will be shared with other researchers.
Publications
Armstrong V, Stretch C, Fitzgerald L, Gopaul A, McKinnon G, Koziak J, Kopciuk K, Brockton N, Bathe O. Characterizing cancer-associated myosteatosis: anatomic distribution and cancer-specific variability of low radiodensity muscle. JCSM Rapid Communications. 2021; 4(2):197-206. doi: 10.1002/rco2.46
Song M, Zhang Q, Tang M, Zhang X, Ruan G, Zhang X, Zhang K, Ge Y, Yang M, Li Q, Li X, Liu X, Li W, Cong M, Wang K, Song C, Shi H. Associations of low hand grip strength with 1 year mortality of cancer cachexia: a multicentre observational study. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021 Dec;12(6):1489-1500. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12778. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
PubMed 34545711Cheville A. Rehabilitation of patients with advanced cancer. Cancer. 2001 Aug 15;92(4 Suppl):1039-48. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010815)92:4+3.0.co;2-l.
PubMed 11519031Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
PubMed 8433390Wheelwright S, Darlington AS, Hopkinson JB, Fitzsimmons D, White A, Johnson CD. A systematic review of health-related quality of life instruments in patients with cancer cachexia. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Sep;21(9):2625-36. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1881-9. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
PubMed 23797577Cella D, Stone AA. Health-related quality of life measurement in oncology: advances and opportunities. Am Psychol. 2015 Feb-Mar;70(2):175-85. doi: 10.1037/a0037821.
PubMed 25730723Hagens ERC, Feenstra ML, van Egmond MA, van Laarhoven HWM, Hulshof MCCM, Boshier PR, Low DE, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS. Influence of body composition and muscle strength on outcomes after multimodal oesophageal cancer treatment. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Jun;11(3):756-767. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12540. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
PubMed 32096923Caan BJ, Meyerhardt JA, Kroenke CH, Alexeeff S, Xiao J, Weltzien E, Feliciano EC, Castillo AL, Quesenberry CP, Kwan ML, Prado CM. Explaining the Obesity Paradox: The Association between Body Composition and Colorectal Cancer Survival (C-SCANS Study). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Jul;26(7):1008-1015. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0200. Epub 2017 May 15.
PubMed 28506965Malietzis G, Aziz O, Bagnall NM, Johns N, Fearon KC, Jenkins JT. The role of body composition evaluation by computerized tomography in determining colorectal cancer treatment outcomes: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;41(2):186-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.10.056. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
PubMed 25468746Correa-de-Araujo R, Addison O, Miljkovic I, Goodpaster BH, Bergman BC, Clark RV, Elena JW, Esser KA, Ferrucci L, Harris-Love MO, Kritchevsky SB, Lorbergs A, Shepherd JA, Shulman GI, Rosen CJ. Myosteatosis in the Context of Skeletal Muscle Function Deficit: An Interdisciplinary Workshop at the National Institute on Aging. Front Physiol. 2020 Aug 7;11:963. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00963. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32903666Aleixo GFP, Shachar SS, Nyrop KA, Muss HB, Malpica L, Williams GR. Myosteatosis and prognosis in cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020 Jan;145:102839. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.102839. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
PubMed 31877534Mourtzakis M, Prado CM, Lieffers JR, Reiman T, McCargar LJ, Baracos VE. A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008 Oct;33(5):997-1006. doi: 10.1139/H08-075.
PubMed 18923576Alipour S, Kennecke HF, Woods R, Lim HJ, Speers C, Brown CJ, Gill S, Renouf DJ, Cheung WY. Body mass index and body surface area and their associations with outcomes in stage II and III colon cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2013 Jun;44(2):203-10. doi: 10.1007/s12029-012-9472-4.
PubMed 23264206Zanker J, Sim M, Anderson K, Balogun S, Brennan-Olsen SL, Dent E, Duque G, Girgis CM, Grossmann M, Hayes A, Henwood T, Hirani V, Inderjeeth C, Iuliano S, Keogh J, Lewis JR, Lynch GS, Pasco JA, Phu S, Reijnierse EM, Russell N, Vlietstra L, Visvanathan R, Walker T, Waters DL, Yu S, Maier AB, Daly RM, Scott D. Consensus guidelines for sarcopenia prevention, diagnosis and management in Australia and New Zealand. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2023 Feb;14(1):142-156. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13115. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
PubMed 36349684Cao A, Ferrucci LM, Caan BJ, Irwin ML. Effect of Exercise on Sarcopenia among Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 3;14(3):786. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030786.
PubMed 35159052
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Monitoring Physical Function Changes for Patients Living With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Potential for Better Understanding of Treatment Trajectory and Survival
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07255001
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PanFit / H25-00754
- Keywords
- Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), Hand grip strength (HGS), Quality of Life (QOL), Body composition, Cachexia, Sarcopenia, Physical function, Skeletal muscle
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- British Columbia Cancer AgencyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to measure hand grip strength in adults with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is it feasible to measure hand grip strength as part of a clinic visit?
- Are changes in hand grip strength related to changes in body composition?
- Is hand grip strength related to a person's well-being?
- Is hand grip strength related to how a tumour responds to treatment?
Participants will squeeze a device with their hand to measure their hand grip strength and complete questionnaires about their well-being when they are seen in clinic for their regular medical care for PDAC.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study Arm | Experimental | Device: Hand grip strength assessments using a dynamometerThe study arm all participants are enrolled into. Participants will complete hand grip strength assessments and questionnaires. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age 18 years or older.
- Histological and/or radiological diagnosis of resectable, non-resectable, or metastatic PDAC. For resectable PDAC, adjuvant setting only.
- ECOG performance status 0-2.
- Life expectancy greater than 6 months as judged by the investigator.
- Planned for treatment, either as part of routine care or in combination with an investigational agent within another study.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Individuals with CT imaging performed outside of Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Individuals who are unfit to undergo CT imaging of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
- Individuals who are currently participating in a structured moderate intensity resistance training program.
- Individuals who are otherwise judged by the investigator to be unfit to proceed with this protocol.
- Unable to comply with study assessments and follow-up.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hand grip strength assessments using a dynamometerSqueeze a dynamometer with one hand to measure hand grip strength. | Device | Main Study Arm |
Primary outcome
Frequency of Participants with Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Measurements at 6 Months From Treatment Start Date
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the 6-month follow-up assessment.
The percentage of participants with hand grip strength (HGS) test results at 6 months from treatment start date. Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms with a hand-held dynamometer.
202 secondary outcomes
Frequency of Participants with Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Measurements at Study Baseline
Time frame: At the time of the baseline assessment for the study.
Frequency of Participants with Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Measurements at 3 Months From Treatment Start Date
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the 3-month follow-up assessment.
Frequency of Participants with Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Measurements at 9 Months From Treatment Start Date
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the 9-month follow-up assessment.
Frequency of Participants with Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Measurements at 12 Months From Treatment Start Date
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the 12-month follow-up assessment.
Proportion of Participants with Sarcopenia Using CT Image Alone (Sarcopenia CT)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Proportion of Participants with Sarcopenia Using Physical Function Alone (Sarcopenia P)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Proportion of Participants with Sarcopenia Using a Combination of CT Image and Physical Function (Sarcopenia COMB)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Skeletal Muscle Gauge (SMG)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the date of clinical progression, withdrawal, date of death, or end of study, whichever comes first, assessed up to 26 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the date of death or end of study, whichever comes first, assessed up to 26 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: From the date of the baseline assessment scan until the date of clinical progression, withdrawal, date of death, or end of study, whichever comes first, assessed up to 26 months.
Difference in Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Between Treatment Regimens
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Tumour Stage
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Hand Grip Strength (HGS) and Tumour Grade
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Difference in Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Between Sites of Metastasis
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Global Health Status (QoL, per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Physical Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Role Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Emotional Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Cognitive Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Social Functioning (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Fatigue (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Nausea and Vomiting (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Pain (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Dyspnoea (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Insomnia (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Appetite Loss (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Constipation (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Diarrhoea (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Financial Difficulties (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Food Aversion (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Eating and Weight Loss Worry (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Eating Difficulties (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Loss of Control (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Strength and Direction of the Relationship Between Physical Decline (per EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS)
Time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Sep 2026.
- BackgroundArmstrong V, Stretch C, Fitzgerald L, Gopaul A, McKinnon G, Koziak J, Kopciuk K, Brockton N, Bathe O. Characterizing cancer-associated myosteatosis: anatomic distribution and cancer-specific variability of low radiodensity muscle. JCSM Rapid Communications. 2021; 4(2):197-206. doi: 10.1002/rco2.46
- Background: PubMed 34545711Song M, Zhang Q, Tang M, Zhang X, Ruan G, Zhang X, Zhang K, Ge Y, Yang M, Li Q, Li X, Liu X, Li W, Cong M, Wang K, Song C, Shi H. Associations of low hand grip strength with 1 year mortality of cancer cachexia: a multicentre observational study. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021 Dec;12(6):1489-1500. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12778. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
- Background: PubMed 11519031Cheville A. Rehabilitation of patients with advanced cancer. Cancer. 2001 Aug 15;92(4 Suppl):1039-48. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010815)92:4+3.0.co;2-l.
- Background: PubMed 8433390Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
- Background: PubMed 23797577Wheelwright S, Darlington AS, Hopkinson JB, Fitzsimmons D, White A, Johnson CD. A systematic review of health-related quality of life instruments in patients with cancer cachexia. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Sep;21(9):2625-36. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1881-9. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
- Background: PubMed 25730723Cella D, Stone AA. Health-related quality of life measurement in oncology: advances and opportunities. Am Psychol. 2015 Feb-Mar;70(2):175-85. doi: 10.1037/a0037821.
- Background: PubMed 32096923Hagens ERC, Feenstra ML, van Egmond MA, van Laarhoven HWM, Hulshof MCCM, Boshier PR, Low DE, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS. Influence of body composition and muscle strength on outcomes after multimodal oesophageal cancer treatment. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Jun;11(3):756-767. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12540. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
- Background: PubMed 28506965Caan BJ, Meyerhardt JA, Kroenke CH, Alexeeff S, Xiao J, Weltzien E, Feliciano EC, Castillo AL, Quesenberry CP, Kwan ML, Prado CM. Explaining the Obesity Paradox: The Association between Body Composition and Colorectal Cancer Survival (C-SCANS Study). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Jul;26(7):1008-1015. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0200. Epub 2017 May 15.
- Background: PubMed 25468746Malietzis G, Aziz O, Bagnall NM, Johns N, Fearon KC, Jenkins JT. The role of body composition evaluation by computerized tomography in determining colorectal cancer treatment outcomes: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;41(2):186-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.10.056. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
- Background: PubMed 32903666Correa-de-Araujo R, Addison O, Miljkovic I, Goodpaster BH, Bergman BC, Clark RV, Elena JW, Esser KA, Ferrucci L, Harris-Love MO, Kritchevsky SB, Lorbergs A, Shepherd JA, Shulman GI, Rosen CJ. Myosteatosis in the Context of Skeletal Muscle Function Deficit: An Interdisciplinary Workshop at the National Institute on Aging. Front Physiol. 2020 Aug 7;11:963. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00963. eCollection 2020.
- Background: PubMed 31877534Aleixo GFP, Shachar SS, Nyrop KA, Muss HB, Malpica L, Williams GR. Myosteatosis and prognosis in cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020 Jan;145:102839. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.102839. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
- Background: PubMed 18923576Mourtzakis M, Prado CM, Lieffers JR, Reiman T, McCargar LJ, Baracos VE. A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008 Oct;33(5):997-1006. doi: 10.1139/H08-075.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Only aggregate data will be shared with other researchers.
Related trials for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About Study Medicine ALTA3263 in Adults With Advanced Solid Tumors With KRAS Mutations
Cancer, PDAC - Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2 Study of VS-7375 in Patients With KRAS G12D-Mutated Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC), G12D Mutated KRAS
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of Daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
Pancreatic Cancer, PDAC
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability & Efficacy of TNG462 in Combination in PDAC & NSCLC Patients
PDAC, PDAC - Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hand grip strength assessments using a dynamometer in people with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and Hand Grip Strength, run by British Columbia Cancer Agency at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Daniel J Renouf, MD, MPH (800-663-3333, drenouf@bccancer.bc.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Frequency of Participants with Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Measurements at 6 Months From Treatment Start Date (time frame: From the date anti-cancer therapy is initiated until the 6-month follow-up assessment.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07255001, which also lists 35 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2026.