AzTrials
AzTrials

Bone LesionsNCT07248033

Role of SPECT/CT of Bone Scan in Charactarization of Bone Lesions

An observational study of Bone Lesions, run by MennaTalla Saber Sabet Mohamed.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This observational study aims to assess the diagnostic value of SPECT/CT of 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy in differentiating begnin from malignant bone lesions. The main question it aims to answer is: ●Can SPECT/CT-derived quantitative parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean) accurately differentiate between begnin and malignant… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Bone Lesions
What is being tested?
SPECT/CT
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
120 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Nov 2025to Dec 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population will consist of patients referred to the Nuclear Medicine Unit at Assiut University, for bone imaging using 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT due to clinical suspicion of bone lesions.

Who may be able to join

  • Any age referred for 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT
  • Clinical suspicion of either metastatic or degenerative etiology

Who cannot join

  • Case with double malignancies
  • Pregnant patients
  • Severely ill patients

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

MennaTalla Saber Sabet contact

01151322001

Sebastian.kuroshitsuji1@gmail.com

Walaa Oteify, Lecturer contact

01029304463

walaa@med.aun.edu.eg

About this study

Official title: Evaluating the Role of Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography Derived Quantitative Parameters of Bone Scintigraphy in Characterization of Bone Lesions.

This observational study aims to assess the diagnostic value of SPECT/CT of 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy in differentiating begnin from malignant bone lesions. The main question it aims to answer is:

●Can SPECT/CT-derived quantitative parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean) accurately differentiate between begnin and malignant bone lesions in clinical settings? Final diagnostic impression: confirmed by biopsy (if available), or through multidisciplinary radiologic-clinical correlation

Read the detailed description

Bone lesions represent a common diagnostic challenge in oncology and general radiology, as they may be of malignant, benign, or degenerative origin. Accurate differentiation is essential for guiding appropriate management, avoiding unnecessary biopsies or surgeries, and improving patient outcomes.

Among imaging modalities, 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) bone scintigraphy has long been a cornerstone in skeletal evaluation due to its high sensitivity in detecting bone turnover. However, hybrid SPECT/CT imaging, which combines functional and anatomical data, has revolutionized bone imaging by enhancing lesion localization, characterization, and diagnostic specificity.

Recent advances in quantitative SPECT/CT allow the extraction of semi-quantitative parameters, such as the Standardized Uptake Value (SUV), previously limited to PET imaging. These SUV-based parameters have shown promising diagnostic value in distinguishing benign from malignant skeletal lesions.

For instance, SUVmax thresholds derived from 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT have been proposed in several studies, with malignant lesions often demonstrating higher uptake than benign ones due to increased osteoblastic activity.

In resource-limited settings such as Egypt, access to PET/CT remains constrained due to cost and availability, especially outside major urban centers. Consequently, leveraging the diagnostic utility of quantitative SPECT/CT could bridge the gap in skeletal lesion assessment and aid in earlier detection and treatment planning.

Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of SPECT/CT-derived SUV in differentiating benign and malignant bone lesions at a tertiary center in Upper Egypt. It will analyze the correlation between SUV metrics, lesion morphology, and final diagnosis, contributing to the growing body of evidence supporting quantitative SPECT/CT in musculoskeletal oncology.

Conditions
Bone Lesions
Being tested
SPECT/CT

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SPECT/CTDevice

    It is a medical imaging test that combines a Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) scan with a Computed Tomography (CT) scan to provide both detailed physiological (function) and anatomical (structure) information about the body. A radioactive tracer is injected and detected by the SPECT camera to show organ function, while the CT scan captures precise images of the body's structures, allowing for precise localization of the tracer and identification of abnormalities in a single, comprehensive study.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To measure SUVmax and SUVmean of bone lesions using quantitative SPECT/CT.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. To compare these values between malignant and degenerative lesions confirmed by clinical, histological, or radiological follow-up.

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. To establish a diagnostic SUV cut-off value that aids in distinguishing between lesion types.

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Nov 2025
  2. Study startNov 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionNov 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07248033
Sponsor's protocol ID
SPECT/CT in bone scan
Status last verified
Oct 2025
First submitted
18 Nov 2025
Last updated
25 Nov 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Bone Lesions, run by MennaTalla Saber Sabet Mohamed.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact MennaTalla Saber Sabet (01151322001, Sebastian.kuroshitsuji1@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To measure SUVmax and SUVmean of bone lesions using quantitative SPECT/CT. (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Nov 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in