AzTrials
AzTrials

Burnout, Healthcare WorkersNCT07247708

Mizzou Nurse Workload and Well-Being Study

An observational study of Burnout, Healthcare Workers and Nursing Workload, run by University of Missouri-Columbia at 1 site in United States.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This observational study will evaluate the feasibility of linking nursing workload to burnout and physiological well-being among acute care nurses. Researchers will collect data from three sources: hospital workforce management software, wearable health devices (Oura Rings), and validated surveys. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Burnout, Healthcare Workers, Nursing Workload
What is being tested?
Multimethod data collection
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
26 Aug 2025to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Registered nurses (RNs) working in intensive care and medical-surgical units at MU Health Care

Who may be able to join

  • RN participants must be at least 18 years of age.
  • Must be a credentialed registered nurse (RN) working fulltime (≥0.75 FTE) in the MUHC University Hospital on the surgical or cardiac ICUs, surgical specialties, or the cardiovascular unit.
  • Must own a smart phone capable of supporting latest version of the Oura app with internet connectivity (Apple iOS15 and higher; Android 8.0 and higher with Google Play services) and Bluetooth 4.0.
  • Ability to wear an Oura ring daily, 7 days/ week (at least 22 hours/day), and adhere to study procedures.
  • Able to complete informed consenting procedures.

Who cannot join

  • Known allergy or sensitivity to components of Oura ring.
  • RNs working part-time or per diem
  • Travel nurses
  • Known allergies to the Oura ring
  • Ring finger sizes incompatible with Oura Ring Gen 3 sizes

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site
  • University of Missouri

    Columbia, Missouri, 65211

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Exploring the Correlation Between Workload, Stress Level, and Health Status of Nurses Through Wearable Technology and Shift Data: A Feasibility Study

This observational study will evaluate the feasibility of linking nursing workload to burnout and physiological well-being among acute care nurses. Researchers will collect data from three sources: hospital workforce management software, wearable health devices (Oura Rings), and validated surveys. Fifty nurses from intensive care and medical-surgical units at a level one trauma center will participate. The study will also include interviews to better understand workplace stressors. Findings will help identify patterns that contribute to burnout and guide the development of future interventions to support nurse well-being and improve workforce retention.

Being tested
Multimethod data collection
Keywords
burnout, nursing workload, acute care nursing, physiological stress, job satisfaction, biometric measurement, organizational factors in health care, well-being
Medical subject headings
Burnout, Psychological

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Multimethod data collectionOther

    Also called Mizzou Nurse Workload and Well-Being Study

    Participants will contribute data through three integrated sources: workload metrics (workforce management software to assess patient acuity and shift characteristics); biometric monitoring (physiological data collected via the Oura Ring); and self-report surveys and semi-structured interviews.

Study groups in NCT07247708
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intensive Care Unitsurgical ICU and cardiac ICU RNs
Receives: Other: Multimethod data collection
Medical-Surgical Unitsurgical and cardiovascular units
Receives: Other: Multimethod data collection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Acceptability

    Acceptability is evaluated based on the number of people who were approached to participate in the study compared to the number of people who agreed to participate. Reported as a percentage rate.

    Measured: Enrollment

  2. Data completion rate

    Reported as percentage rate of complete data obtained at baseline, 5 weeks, and 10 weeks

    Measured: Enrollment through 10 weeks

  3. Retention rate

    Reported as a percentage rate reflecting the number of participants participating at study completion compared to the number of participants participating at study commencement.

    Measured: Enrollment through 10 weeks

  4. Heart rate

    Reported as a numerical value reflecting beats per minute.

    Measured: Enrollment through 10 weeks

  5. Heart rate variability

    Reported as a numerical value in (milliseconds)

    Measured: Enrollment through 10 weeks

  6. Sleep duration

    Reported as the total sleep time (hours and minutes)

    Measured: Enrollment through 10 weeks

  7. Sleep score

    Reported as a numerical value (index value) ranging from 0-100

    Measured: Enrollment through 10 weeks

  8. Resilience score

    Reported as a numerical score (composite index value) ranging from 0-100

    Measured: Enrollment through 10 weeks

  9. Patient Acuity score

    The Oracle Health Workload Management Clairvia system operationalizes patient acuity in terms of the intensity of care provided by nursing staff and allows for the direct care time required per patient to be quantified. This allows capture of RNs' workload across the working shift, creating an individualized utilization value that can reported as a numerical value (score).

    Measured: From enrollment through the end of 10 weeks

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. The Perceived Stress Scale

    The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) (r = .93) is a 10-item survey measuring general perceived stress over the past 1 month. Scores range 0 to 40; ≥ 14 suggests at least moderate perceived stress.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 5, Week 10

  2. The Professional Quality of Life Scale

    The Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL) is a 30-item measure of burnout, well-being, and occupational stress from the past 30 days. ProQOL subscales include compassion satisfaction (Cronbach's α = 0.88), burnout (Cronbach's α = 0.75), and secondary traumatic stress (Cronbach's α = 0.81). Scores are interpreted as ≤ 22 (low), 23-41 (moderate), and ≥42 (high) levels of the construct being measured.

    Measured: Baseline

  3. The PROMIS-29 Profile v2.0

    The PROMIS®-29 Profile v.2.0 assesses 7 domains of mental and physical health, including anxiety, depression, fatigue, physical function, social role, sleep disturbance, pain. Raw scores are converted to T-scores with higher T-scores representing more of the construct being measured.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 5, Week 10

  4. Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)

    The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) is a 4-item, validated implementation outcome survey tool designed to assess how practical and achievable an intervention is within a given setting. Responses range from completely disagree to completely agree.

    Measured: Week 5, Week 10

  5. Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

    The AIM is a 4-item tool that evaluates the extent to which participants perceive an intervention as agreeable, satisfactory, or appealing. Responses range from completely disagree to completely agree.

    Measured: Week 5, Week 10

  6. Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)

    The IAM is a 4-item tool that assesses the perceived fit or suitability of an intervention for a specific setting. Responses range from completely disagree to completely agree.

    Measured: Week 5, Week 10

  7. Qualitative Insights on Burnout and Organizational Stressors

    Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews exploring nurses' perceptions of stress, workload, and well-being.

    Measured: Baseline

  8. Hours worked per week

    Numerical value reflecting the total number of hours a nurse worked each week.

    Measured: Baseline through week 10

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Nov 2025
  2. Study start26 Aug 2025
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07247708
Sponsor's protocol ID
2101866
Other IDs
URC-025-19
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
29 Sep 2025
Last updated
4 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: This is a pilot feasibility study involving sensitive biometric and survey data from a small sample of nurses. Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared publicly due to privacy considerations and the exploratory nature of the study.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Burnout, Healthcare Workers and Nursing Workload, run by University of Missouri-Columbia at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Acceptability (time frame: Enrollment). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in