Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)NEUTROFLOWNCT07246759
Neutrophil Biomarker Test for Predicting Clinical Benefit From Immunotherapy Based on Flow Cytometry Analysis
An observational study of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Melanoma (Skin Cancer), run by OncoHost Ltd. at 3 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The NeutroFlow study is a multi-center clinical trial designed to develop a computational model that converts flow cytometry results into a prediction of clinical benefit. The study analyzes Ly6Ehi neutrophils in biological samples from patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors to evaluate their likelihood of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), Melanoma (Skin Cancer), Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)
- What is being tested?
- Blood sample collection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 600 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2025to 30 May 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: At least 600 treatment-naïve patients due to be treated with a first line regimen that includes PD- 1/PD-L1 inhibitors with the following diagnoses are planned to be enrolled in the study over a period of 3 years or as needed: 1. Stage IV or Stage III-unresectable NSCLC 2. Stage IV or Stage IIIb-d malignant melanoma 3. Stage IV HNSCC 4. Stage IV RCC 5. Stage IV TNBC
Who may be able to join
- Patients newly diagnosed with advanced-stage/metastatic NSCLC, melanoma, HNSCC, RCC, or TNBC, who are due to receive first-line treatment with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor, either as monotherapy or in combination with other agents, according to current standard-of-care regimens, including (but not limited to) the following approved options: NSCLC. Monotherapy: Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Cemiplimab. Combination: Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy; Nivolumab + Ipilimumab; Cemiplimab + chemotherapy; Atezolizumab + chemotherapy + Bevacizumab.
- Melanoma. Monotherapy: Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab. Combination: Nivolumab + Ipilimumab; Nivolumab + Relatlimab.
- HNSCC. Monotherapy: Pembrolizumab, Cemiplimab. Combination: Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy.
- RCC. Combination only: Nivolumab + Ipilimumab; Nivolumab + Cabozantinib; Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib or Axitinib; Avelumab + Axitinib.
- TNBC. Combination only: Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy.
- Male or female aged at least 18 years
Show all 9Show fewer
- ECOG PS: 0/1-2
- Normal hematologic, renal and liver function:
- Absolute neutrophil count > 1500/mm³ Platelets > 100,000/mm³ Hemoglobin > 9 g/dL Creatinine concentration ≤ 1.4 mg/dL, or creatinine clearance > 40 mL/min, Total bilirubin < 1.5 mg/dL ALT + AST levels ≤ 3 times above the upper normal limit
Who cannot join
- Any concurrent and/or other active malignancy that has required systemic treatment within 2 years of the first dose of treatment.
- For NSCLC: presence of activating EGFR, ALK, ROS1, RET, NTRK alterations linked to an approved first-line targeted drug.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 3 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Shani Raveh Shoval VP of Clinical Affairs, PhD contact
3 sites in 3 countries
Germany1 site
Heidelberg University Hospital
Heidelberg, 69120
Petros Christopoulos, petros.christopoulos@gmail.com
Petros Christopoulos
Italy1 site
Intituto Europeo di Oncologia SRL
Milan, 20121
Francesco Bertolini, francesco.bertolini@ieo.it
Bertolini Francesco
Spain1 site
Virgen Macarena University Hospital - Servicio Andaluz de Salud
Seville, 41071
Alberto Moreno, +34 955057406, alberto.moreno.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es
Francisco J., innovacion.hvm.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es
About this study
Official title: NEUTROFLOW: Development and Validation of a Pan-cancer Neutrophil Biomarker Test for Predicting Clinical Benefit From Immunotherapy Based on Flow Cytometry Analysis of Blood Samples
The NeutroFlow study is a multi-center clinical trial designed to develop a computational model that converts flow cytometry results into a prediction of clinical benefit. The study analyzes Ly6Ehi neutrophils in biological samples from patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors to evaluate their likelihood of benefiting from treatment. Blood samples are collected prior to treatment and used to support the ongoing development of the algorithm.
Read the detailed description
The recent introduction of cancer immunotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionised the treatment landscape for a broad range of cancer types. However, response to ICIs varies widely between patients, with the majority experiencing resistance to therapy. Moreover, the increasing use of these costly drugs coupled with management of ICI-related toxicities creates a substantial economic burden. Current biomarker tests for determining eligibility for ICIs have limited predictive performance, and many require invasive tumour biopsies. Thus, novel (and preferentially non-invasive) biomarkers for predicting ICI clinical benefit are desperately needed for better guiding clinical decisions. NeutroFlow directly addresses this unmet need. The neutroFlow study is based on a comprehensive academic research describing a flow cytometry assay for measuring a novel predictive biomarker in the blood - Ly6Ehi neutrophil - that accurately predicts therapeutic benefit from ICIs, outperforming the approved PD-L1 biomarker.
The objective of the NeutroFlow study is to develop a clinical decision-support tool that includes an antibody panel for detecting Ly6Ehi neutrophils using standard flow cytometry (FC) and a computational model that converts the FC readout into a prediction of clinical benefit.
Patients will provide a single blood sample before starting treatment, and clinical data will be collected from their medical records.
In the first phase of the trial, blood sample data and clinical information will be used to develop the antibody panel and train the prediction algorithm. In the second phase, the algorithm will be validated by comparing its theoretical predictions with the patients' actual objective response rates.
- Conditions
- Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), Melanoma (Skin Cancer), Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), RCC, Renal Cell Cancer, HNSCC
- Being tested
- Blood sample collection
- Keywords
- Immunotherapy, Biomarker, Neutrophils, Flow Cytometry, Immune checkpoint inhibitor
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Melanoma, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Blood sample collectionOther
Blood sample collection prior treatment initiation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with stage IV or stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) | Patients with stage IV or stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment Receives: Other: Blood sample collection | |
| Patients with stage IV or stage IIIb-d malignant melanoma | Patients with stage IV or stage IIIb-d malignant melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment Receives: Other: Blood sample collection | |
| Patients with stage IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) | Patients with stage IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment Receives: Other: Blood sample collection | |
| Patients with stage IV renal cell carcinoma (RCC) | Patients with stage IV renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment Receives: Other: Blood sample collection | |
| Patients with stage IV triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) | Patients with stage IV triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment Receives: Other: Blood sample collection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quantification of Ly6E high (Ly6Ehi) neutrophils in blood using the NeutroFlow flow cytometry assay
Peripheral blood samples will be collected from patients up to 1 month prior to treatment initiation. Ly6Ehi neutrophil populations will be quantified using the NeutroFlow multiparametric flow cytometry assay
Measured: Baseline (up to 1 month before treatment initiation)
Prediction of clinical benefit rate using baseline Ly6Ehi neutrophils levels
The patients clinical benefit (CB) will be defined according to RECIST 1.1 criteria to one of the following categories: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). Baseline Ly6Ehi neutrophil levels will be used as input in a computational predictive model to estimate the likelihood of CB for each patient. The model will be trained and validated with independent patient cohorts, using cross-validation and ROC AUC metrics to assess predictive performance. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value will also be calculated. Predictions will be assessed at multiple timepoints: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-initiation of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. Subgroup analyses will include age, sex, cancer type, disease stage, and treatment line.
Measured: Baseline (blood draw) to 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post treatment initiation
Secondary outcomes (4)
Clinical benefit rate across individual cancer types
The clinical benefit rate described in Outcome 2 will be evaluated separately for each cancer indication (e.g., NSCLC, melanoma, HNSCC, RCC, TNBC) at several time points (6, 12, 18 and 24 months post treatment initiation). At least 50 patients per indication will be included to ensure adequate statistical power. ROC AUC values and predictive model performance will be computed for each subgroup. Additional exploratory analyses will examine potential modifiers, including tumor burden, prior therapies, and immune-related biomarkers, to evaluate heterogeneity of response
Measured: Baseline to 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post treatment initiation (per indication)
Clinical benefit rate by PD-(L)1 treatment regimen
The clinical benefit rate will be assessed across various anti-PD-(L)1 regimens, including monotherapy and combination protocols. Treatments are classified according to indication and line of therapy:
NSCLC: Monotherapy: Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Cemiplimab. Combination: Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy; Nivolumab + Ipilimumab; Cemiplimab + chemotherapy; Atezolizumab + chemotherapy + Bevacizumab.
Melanoma: Monotherapy: Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab. Combination: Nivolumab + Ipilimumab; Nivolumab + Relatlimab.
HNSCC: Monotherapy: Pembrolizumab, Cemiplimab. Combination: Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy.
RCC: Combination only: Nivolumab + Ipilimumab; Nivolumab + Cabozantinib; Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib or Axitinib; Avelumab + Axitinib.
TNBC: Combination only: Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy.
In cases where treatment changes occur during follow-up, two scenarios will be considered:
- the patient exits the analysis at the time of treatment change; or
- the new treatment marks a new baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post treatment initiation
Correlation between Ly6Ehi neutrophil levels and PD-L1 status (TPS/CPS)
Evaluation of the association between baseline Ly6Ehi neutrophil levels and PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue, measured as Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) and/or Combined Positive Score (CPS), depending on standard of care and assay availability. PD-L1 will be assessed by IHC using validated assays per standard of care. Subgroup analyses will explore correlations within different cancer types and treatment regimens. These analyses will provide insight into whether Ly6Ehi neutrophils complement or enhance PD-L1-based patient stratification.
Measured: Baseline (PD-L1 and neutrophils assessed prior to treatment)
Correlation between Ly6Ehi neutrophil levels and other clinical response-associated parameters
Exploratory analyses will assess correlations between baseline Ly6Ehi neutrophil levels and other parameters associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response, including Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB), Microsatellite Instability (MSI), Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), and ECOG performance status. Multivariate models and correlation analyses will evaluate whether Ly6Ehi neutrophils provide independent predictive value. Subgroup analyses will include cancer type, treatment regimen, and prior therapy exposure. This outcome will help determine the broader immunological and clinical context of Ly6Ehi neutrophil levels
Measured: Baseline (clinical parameters collected prior to treatment)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Nov 2025
- Study start15 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 May 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- OncoHost Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- European Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07246759
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NEUTROFLOW
- Acronym
- NEUTROFLOW
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 16 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 24 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: The clinical information and results generated as part of the study may be shared with other researchers and doctors, national and international regulatory agencies as well as in scientific repositories, always ensuring the necessary conditions of quality, security and confidentiality.
Publications
Alturki NA. Review of the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Context of Cancer Treatment. J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 27;12(13):4301. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134301.
PubMed 37445336Man J, Millican J, Mulvey A, Gebski V, Hui R. Response Rate and Survival at Key Timepoints With PD-1 Blockade vs Chemotherapy in PD-L1 Subgroups: Meta-Analysis of Metastatic NSCLC Trials. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Jan 27;5(3):pkab012. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab012. eCollection 2021 Jun.
PubMed 34084999Martins F, Sofiya L, Sykiotis GP, Lamine F, Maillard M, Fraga M, Shabafrouz K, Ribi C, Cairoli A, Guex-Crosier Y, Kuntzer T, Michielin O, Peters S, Coukos G, Spertini F, Thompson JA, Obeid M. Adverse effects of immune-checkpoint inhibitors: epidemiology, management and surveillance. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep;16(9):563-580. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0218-0.
PubMed 31092901Hurwitz JT, Vaffis S, Grizzle AJ, Nielsen S, Dodson A, Parry S. Cost-Effectiveness of PD-L1 Testing in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Using In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Versus Laboratory-Developed Test (LDT). Oncol Ther. 2022 Dec;10(2):391-409. doi: 10.1007/s40487-022-00197-1. Epub 2022 May 13.
PubMed 35556235Lei Y, Li X, Huang Q, Zheng X, Liu M. Progress and Challenges of Predictive Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Blockade. Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 11;11:617335. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.617335. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 33777757Arora S, Velichinskii R, Lesh RW, Ali U, Kubiak M, Bansal P, Borghaei H, Edelman MJ, Boumber Y. Existing and Emerging Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Immunotherapy in Solid Tumors. Adv Ther. 2019 Oct;36(10):2638-2678. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01051-z. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
PubMed 31410780McKean WB, Moser JC, Rimm D, Hu-Lieskovan S. Biomarkers in Precision Cancer Immunotherapy: Promise and Challenges. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2020 May;40:e275-e291. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_280571.
PubMed 32453632Benguigui M, Cooper TJ, Kalkar P, Schif-Zuck S, Halaban R, Bacchiocchi A, Kamer I, Deo A, Manobla B, Menachem R, Haj-Shomaly J, Vorontsova A, Raviv Z, Buxbaum C, Christopoulos P, Bar J, Lotem M, Sznol M, Ariel A, Shen-Orr SS, Shaked Y. Interferon-stimulated neutrophils as a predictor of immunotherapy response. Cancer Cell. 2024 Feb 12;42(2):253-265.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.12.005. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
PubMed 38181798
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- NEUTROFLOW: Development and Validation of a Pan-cancer Neutrophil Biomarker Test for Predicting Clinical Benefit From Immunotherapy Based on Flow Cytometry Analysis of Blood Samples
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07246759
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NEUTROFLOW / NEUTROFLOW
- Conditions
- Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), Melanoma (Skin Cancer), Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), RCC, Renal Cell Cancer, HNSCC
- Keywords
- Immunotherapy, Biomarker, Neutrophils, Flow Cytometry, Immune checkpoint inhibitor
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- OncoHost Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- European Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
- Study start
- 15 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The NeutroFlow study is a multi-center clinical trial designed to develop a computational model that converts flow cytometry results into a prediction of clinical benefit. The study analyzes Ly6Ehi neutrophils in biological samples from patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors to evaluate their likelihood of benefiting from treatment. Blood samples are collected prior to treatment and used to support the ongoing development of the algorithm.
Detailed description
The recent introduction of cancer immunotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionised the treatment landscape for a broad range of cancer types. However, response to ICIs varies widely between patients, with the majority experiencing resistance to therapy. Moreover, the increasing use of these costly drugs coupled with management of ICI-related toxicities creates a substantial economic burden. Current biomarker tests for determining eligibility for ICIs have limited predictive performance, and many require invasive tumour biopsies. Thus, novel (and preferentially non-invasive) biomarkers for predicting ICI clinical benefit are desperately needed for better guiding clinical decisions. NeutroFlow directly addresses this unmet need. The neutroFlow study is based on a comprehensive academic research describing a flow cytometry assay for measuring a novel predictive biomarker in the blood - Ly6Ehi neutrophil - that accurately predicts therapeutic benefit from ICIs, outperforming the approved PD-L1 biomarker.
The objective of the NeutroFlow study is to develop a clinical decision-support tool that includes an antibody panel for detecting Ly6Ehi neutrophils using standard flow cytometry (FC) and a computational model that converts the FC readout into a prediction of clinical benefit.
Patients will provide a single blood sample before starting treatment, and clinical data will be collected from their medical records.
In the first phase of the trial, blood sample data and clinical information will be used to develop the antibody panel and train the prediction algorithm. In the second phase, the algorithm will be validated by comparing its theoretical predictions with the patients' actual objective response rates.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with stage IV or stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) | – | Other: Blood sample collectionPatients with stage IV or stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment |
| Patients with stage IV or stage IIIb-d malignant melanoma | – | Other: Blood sample collectionPatients with stage IV or stage IIIb-d malignant melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment |
| Patients with stage IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) | – | Other: Blood sample collectionPatients with stage IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment |
| Patients with stage IV renal cell carcinoma (RCC) | – | Other: Blood sample collectionPatients with stage IV renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment |
| Patients with stage IV triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) | – | Other: Blood sample collectionPatients with stage IV triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- At least 600 treatment-naïve patients due to be treated with a first line regimen that includes PD- 1/PD-L1 inhibitors with the following diagnoses are planned to be enrolled in the study over a period of 3 years or as needed: 1. Stage IV or Stage III-unresectable NSCLC 2. Stage IV or Stage IIIb-d malignant melanoma 3. Stage IV HNSCC 4. Stage IV RCC 5. Stage IV TNBC
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients newly diagnosed with advanced-stage/metastatic NSCLC, melanoma, HNSCC, RCC, or TNBC, who are due to receive first-line treatment with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor, either as monotherapy or in combination with other agents, according to current standard-of-care regimens, including (but not limited to) the following approved options: NSCLC. Monotherapy: Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Cemiplimab. Combination: Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy; Nivolumab + Ipilimumab; Cemiplimab + chemotherapy; Atezolizumab + chemotherapy + Bevacizumab.
- Melanoma. Monotherapy: Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab. Combination: Nivolumab + Ipilimumab; Nivolumab + Relatlimab.
- HNSCC. Monotherapy: Pembrolizumab, Cemiplimab. Combination: Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy.
- RCC. Combination only: Nivolumab + Ipilimumab; Nivolumab + Cabozantinib; Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib or Axitinib; Avelumab + Axitinib.
- TNBC. Combination only: Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Any concurrent and/or other active malignancy that has required systemic treatment within 2 years of the first dose of treatment.
- For NSCLC: presence of activating EGFR, ALK, ROS1, RET, NTRK alterations linked to an approved first-line targeted drug.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Blood sample collectionBlood sample collection prior treatment initiation | Other | Patients with stage IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), Patients with stage IV or stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), Patients with stage IV or stage IIIb-d malignant melanoma, Patients with stage IV renal cell carcinoma (RCC), Patients with stage IV triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) |
Primary outcome
Quantification of Ly6E high (Ly6Ehi) neutrophils in blood using the NeutroFlow flow cytometry assay
Time frame: Baseline (up to 1 month before treatment initiation)
Peripheral blood samples will be collected from patients up to 1 month prior to treatment initiation. Ly6Ehi neutrophil populations will be quantified using the NeutroFlow multiparametric flow cytometry assay
Prediction of clinical benefit rate using baseline Ly6Ehi neutrophils levels
Time frame: Baseline (blood draw) to 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post treatment initiation
The patients clinical benefit (CB) will be defined according to RECIST 1.1 criteria to one of the following categories: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). Baseline Ly6Ehi neutrophil levels will be used as input in a computational predictive model to estimate the likelihood of CB for each patient. The model will be trained and validated with independent patient cohorts, using cross-validation and ROC AUC metrics to assess predictive performance. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value will also be calculated. Predictions will be assessed at multiple timepoints: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-initiation of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. Subgroup analyses will include age, sex, cancer type, disease stage, and treatment line.
4 secondary outcomes
Clinical benefit rate across individual cancer types
Time frame: Baseline to 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post treatment initiation (per indication)
Clinical benefit rate by PD-(L)1 treatment regimen
Time frame: Baseline to 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post treatment initiation
Correlation between Ly6Ehi neutrophil levels and PD-L1 status (TPS/CPS)
Time frame: Baseline (PD-L1 and neutrophils assessed prior to treatment)
Correlation between Ly6Ehi neutrophil levels and other clinical response-associated parameters
Time frame: Baseline (clinical parameters collected prior to treatment)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Nov 2025.
- Background: PubMed 37445336Alturki NA. Review of the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Context of Cancer Treatment. J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 27;12(13):4301. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134301.
- Background: PubMed 34084999Man J, Millican J, Mulvey A, Gebski V, Hui R. Response Rate and Survival at Key Timepoints With PD-1 Blockade vs Chemotherapy in PD-L1 Subgroups: Meta-Analysis of Metastatic NSCLC Trials. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Jan 27;5(3):pkab012. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab012. eCollection 2021 Jun.
- Background: PubMed 31092901Martins F, Sofiya L, Sykiotis GP, Lamine F, Maillard M, Fraga M, Shabafrouz K, Ribi C, Cairoli A, Guex-Crosier Y, Kuntzer T, Michielin O, Peters S, Coukos G, Spertini F, Thompson JA, Obeid M. Adverse effects of immune-checkpoint inhibitors: epidemiology, management and surveillance. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep;16(9):563-580. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0218-0.
- Background: PubMed 35556235Hurwitz JT, Vaffis S, Grizzle AJ, Nielsen S, Dodson A, Parry S. Cost-Effectiveness of PD-L1 Testing in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Using In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Versus Laboratory-Developed Test (LDT). Oncol Ther. 2022 Dec;10(2):391-409. doi: 10.1007/s40487-022-00197-1. Epub 2022 May 13.
- Background: PubMed 33777757Lei Y, Li X, Huang Q, Zheng X, Liu M. Progress and Challenges of Predictive Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Blockade. Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 11;11:617335. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.617335. eCollection 2021.
- Background: PubMed 31410780Arora S, Velichinskii R, Lesh RW, Ali U, Kubiak M, Bansal P, Borghaei H, Edelman MJ, Boumber Y. Existing and Emerging Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Immunotherapy in Solid Tumors. Adv Ther. 2019 Oct;36(10):2638-2678. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01051-z. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
- Background: PubMed 32453632McKean WB, Moser JC, Rimm D, Hu-Lieskovan S. Biomarkers in Precision Cancer Immunotherapy: Promise and Challenges. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2020 May;40:e275-e291. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_280571.
- Background: PubMed 38181798Benguigui M, Cooper TJ, Kalkar P, Schif-Zuck S, Halaban R, Bacchiocchi A, Kamer I, Deo A, Manobla B, Menachem R, Haj-Shomaly J, Vorontsova A, Raviv Z, Buxbaum C, Christopoulos P, Bar J, Lotem M, Sznol M, Ariel A, Shen-Orr SS, Shaked Y. Interferon-stimulated neutrophils as a predictor of immunotherapy response. Cancer Cell. 2024 Feb 12;42(2):253-265.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.12.005. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. The clinical information and results generated as part of the study may be shared with other researchers and doctors, national and international regulatory agencies as well as in scientific repositories, always ensuring the necessary conditions of quality, security and confidentiality.
Related trials for Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Shani Raveh Shoval VP of Clinical Affairs, PhD contact
3 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Melanoma (Skin Cancer), run by OncoHost Ltd. at 3 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Germany, Italy, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Michal Harel VP of Translational Medicine, PhD (97248537558, Michal@oncohost.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quantification of Ly6E high (Ly6Ehi) neutrophils in blood using the NeutroFlow flow cytometry assay (time frame: Baseline (up to 1 month before treatment initiation)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07246759, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Nov 2025.