AzTrials
AzTrials

Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA)NCT07246577

The VGR GCA Cohort: Ultrasound, Biopsy and Biomarkers - Novel Methods for Diagnosis, Monitoring and Prognosis in Giant Cell Arteritis.

An observational study of Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA), run by Vastra Gotaland Region at 1 site in Sweden.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common vasculitis in the elderly and is usually treated with long-term corticosteroid therapy. Many patients experience relapses and treatment-related side effects. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA)
How many people
340 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
1 Mar 2026to 1 Dec 2029
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: A new cohort will be recruited. Individuals presenting with suspected GCA at Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg, Sweden, or at Skaraborg Hospital Skövde, Sweden, will be invited to participate in the study. Diagnostic ultrasound examinations and follow-up assessments will be conducted at Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg. After study enrollment, participants diagnosed with GCA will be followed for 12 months, with scheduled visits at 1, 6, and 12 months after initiation of treatment. If clinical relapse of GCA is suspected outside of the scheduled visits, an additional examination will be performed. Participants who are not diagnosed with GCA will be followed up by telephone after 6 months to confirm diagnostic status.

Who may be able to join

  • Individuals referred for evaluation due to suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA).
  • Ability to provide written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Previous diagnosis of GCA.
  • Previous temporal artery biopsy performed as part of prior GCA evaluation.
  • Treatment with high-dose corticosteroids (>7.5 mg/day) for more than two weeks before initiation of the diagnostic work-up.
  • Inability to provide informed consent.
  • Inability to comply with the study protocol.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Johan Skoog, MD, PhD contact

+46313421000

johan.l.skoog@vgregion.se

Eva Klingberg, MD, PhD contact

+46313421000

eva.klingberg@vgregion.se

Sweden1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset

    Gothenburg, 41345

    Johan Skoog, MD, PhD, +46313421000, johan.l.skoog@vgregion.se

    Recruiting

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: The VGR GCA Cohort

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common vasculitis in the elderly and is usually treated with long-term corticosteroid therapy. Many patients experience relapses and treatment-related side effects. Current diagnostic and monitoring methods provide limited prognostic information and cannot reliably distinguish active from inactive disease during relapse. This project addresses the clinical need for improved tools to identify patients at high risk of relapse and to develop more effective methods for disease monitoring.

The aim is to develop new tools that enable more personalized treatment of GCA. By combining vascular ultrasound with novel blood biomarkers, we seek to predict disease course and relapse risk. The specific objectives are:

Read more
  • To identify ultrasound and blood biomarkers that can predict long-term disease control.
  • To determine which ultrasound parameters and blood biomarkers can distinguish active from inactive disease during treatment.
  • To evaluate whether extended vascular ultrasound protocols can improve diagnostic accuracy.

The ultimate goal is to establish safe, practical tools for improved diagnosis and follow-up in patients with GCA.

Read the detailed description

Background Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common form of vasculitis in older adults and is characterized by inflammation of medium- and large-sized arteries. The disease can cause serious complications such as vision loss, aortic aneurysm, and stroke. Treatment is mainly based on long-term glucocorticoid therapy. Despite this, 30-60% of patients experience disease relapse during treatment, and many develop steroid-related side effects. There are substantial knowledge gaps regarding optimal treatment stratification, reliable differentiation between active inflammation and chronic vascular remodeling, and the ideal extent of vascular ultrasound examination for diagnostic accuracy.

Overall Aim and Specific Objectives The overarching aim of this study is to determine which ultrasound parameters and novel blood biomarkers have prognostic, monitoring, and diagnostic value in GCA. The goal is to enable more individualized therapy and to reduce the risk of both over- and undertreatment.

Specific objectives are:

  • To identify ultrasound parameters and biomarkers with prognostic value for long-term treatment response.
  • To identify ultrasound parameters and biomarkers that distinguish active from inactive inflammation during treatment and at diagnosis.
  • To evaluate whether an extended vascular ultrasound protocol improves diagnostic accuracy compared with the current European (EULAR) recommendations, and to assess whether ultrasound-detected neovascularization corresponds to histological neovascularization in temporal artery biopsy specimens.

Current Research Context Diagnostic advances in GCA have recently been driven by imaging techniques, particularly ultrasound. The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) currently recommends ultrasound assessment of the temporal and axillary arteries in suspected GCA. Quantitative parameters such as intima-media thickness (IMT) and scoring systems (e.g., Halo count and the OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score, OGUS) are used to assess vascular wall inflammation. However, these methods primarily evaluate cranial arteries and the axillary arteries. Studies using PET-CT have shown that extracranial vascular involvement is common and associated with a higher relapse risk and longer treatment duration. We have previously developed an extended ultrasound protocol that includes a broader set of extracranial arteries. In a retrospective study, we demonstrated that this extended protocol improves diagnostic accuracy compared to the EULAR-recommended approach.

Distinguishing active inflammation from chronic vascular alterations remains difficult. IMT may remain thickened even after resolution of inflammation. Neovascularization, detectable using modern low-flow ultrasound software, reflects microcirculation and angiogenesis in the vessel wall. Recent studies have demonstrated that neovascularization can be visualized in smaller temporal arteries in patients with active GCA, and that its presence correlates with more extensive disease. Neovascularization thus appears to represent a morphological marker of active inflammation. These previous data together with findings from Takayasu arteritis suggest that ultrasound-detected neovascularization could complement IMT as a sensitive indicator of disease activity. Based on these insights, we aim to integrate both IMT and neovascularization into a composite ultrasound score with potential prognostic and monitoring value.

Currently, disease activity in GCA is primarily assessed using CRP and ESR, which have limited sensitivity and specificity, especially in patients treated with IL-6 inhibitors. Novel biomarkers directly linked to vascular wall inflammation and destruction have been identified in experimental models. Interleukin-9 (IL-9) has been shown to promote inflammation and vascular injury in GCA models, while IL-9 blockade reduces disease severity. Angiopoietin-2 is involved in angiogenesis, and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) contributes to vascular wall degradation. These biomarkers are promising but have not yet been evaluated in clinical GCA cohorts.

A total of 100 individuals with GCA are required for the primary outcome, assuming an alpha level of 0.05, a power of 0.90, and an estimated dropout rate of 25%. Based on an estimated GCA prevalence of 30% among referred patients, approximately 340 ultrasound examinations will be needed to achieve the target sample size.

In summary, diagnostic imaging of GCA has advanced considerably through ultrasound, yet the prognostic and monitoring applications of this technique remain largely unexplored, particularly in combination with novel vascular biomarkers. This study will integrate advanced vascular ultrasound with biomarker analyses to improve diagnostic precision, disease monitoring, and individualized treatment strategies in GCA.

Keywords
Prospective Studies, Validation Study, Giant Cell Arteritis, Ultrasonography, Biomarkers, Temporal Arteries, Biopsy
Medical subject headings
Giant Cell Arteritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07246577
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
GCA groupIndividuals diagnosed with GCA
Control groupIndividuals not diagnosed with GCA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sustained remission

    Defined as achievement of a daily glucocorticoid dose of ≤5 mg after 12 months of standardized treatment according to the treatment protocol recommended by the Swedish Society for Rheumatology.

    Primary Objective:

    To determine which ultrasound parameters and novel biomarkers, individually and as a composite measure (intima-media thickness [IMT] + morphological neovascularization), have prognostic value for remission and relapse in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA).

    Primary Hypotheses:

    1a. The composite measure (IMT + morphological neovascularization) predicts remission at 12 months more accurately than each individual parameter or previously established ultrasound metrics.

    1b. Clinically applicable threshold values exist for the composite measure and for selected biomarkers that distinguish patients achieving remission from those who do not.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Relapse

    Defined as recurrence of symptoms attributable to GCA (after exclusion of alternative causes) and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥30 mm/h and C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥10 mg/L, with improvement of symptoms and/or ESR or CRP following escalation of anti-inflammatory therapy.

    Secondary Objectives (1):

    To identify ultrasound parameters and biomarkers that best differentiate active from inactive vascular inflammation during ongoing GCA treatment in patients with suspected relapse.

    Secondary Hypotheses (1):

    1a. Changes in neovascularization, alone or combined with IMT, correlate more strongly with clinically defined relapse than changes in IMT alone.

    1b. The combination of ultrasound parameters and biomarkers provides higher diagnostic accuracy (AUC) for distinguishing active from inactive disease during treatment follow-up than current standard measures.

    Measured: Up to 12 months

  2. Final Diagnosis of GCA

    Final diagnosis is based on clinical and imaging criteria in accordance with the 2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria for GCA. Diagnosis will be re-evaluated after 6 months.

    Secondary Objectives (2):

    To evaluate whether an extended vascular ultrasound protocol (beyond temporal and axillary arteries) improves diagnostic accuracy compared to current EULAR recommendations, and whether ultrasound-detected neovascularization corresponds to histological neovascularization in temporal artery biopsy specimens.

    Secondary Hypotheses (2):

    2a. The extended ultrasound protocol increases sensitivity for GCA diagnosis without reducing specificity compared with the standard protocol.

    2b. Ultrasound-detected neovascularization corresponds with histological findings of angiogenesis in temporal artery biopsy samples (reference test).

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Nov 2025
  2. Study start1 Mar 2026
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
340 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07246577
Sponsor's protocol ID
2025-02518-01
Other IDs
2025
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
17 Nov 2025
Last updated
15 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in publications arising from this study will be shared, after de-identification. This includes clinical, imaging, and biomarker data directly supporting the primary and secondary outcomes.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA), run by Vastra Gotaland Region at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Johan Skoog, MD, PhD (+46313421000, johan.l.skoog@vgregion.se), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sustained remission (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in