AzTrials
AzTrials

Shoulder-hand SyndromeNCT07245472

The Treatment of Shoulder-hand Syndrome in Hemiplegia Patients

A study testing Dry Needling and Kinesio Taping in people with Shoulder-hand Syndrome, run by Handan Central Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this clinical study is to investigate effects of Kinesio taping (KT) combined with dry needling (DN) on myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in post-stroke hemiplegic shoulder-hand syndrome (SHS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Shoulder-hand Syndrome
What is being tested?
Dry Needling and Kinesio Taping
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
84 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Nov 2023to 1 Oct 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Within the recovery period from stroke with stable vital signs
  • Diagnosis of Stage I shoulder-hand syndrome (SHS)
  • SHS onset within 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Aged between 40 and 80 years
  • Willingness to participate in the trial and provision of signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • SHS caused by brain trauma or other non-stroke etiologies
  • History of shoulder or neck pain due to cervical spondylosis or scapulohumeral periarthritis
  • Diagnosis of malignant tumors
  • Presence of psychotic disorders or other severe systemic diseases
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Skin allergies or leukemia contraindicating acupuncture treatment
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Known skin allergy to Kinesio tape
  • Concurrent participation in other traditional Chinese medicine or interventional therapies during the trial period
  • Joint pain or dyskinesia resulting from peripheral neuropathy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Handan Central Hospital

    Handan, Hebei, 057150

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Clinical Effect of Kinesio Taping Combined With Dry Needling to Myofascial Trigger Point on Shoulder-hand Syndrome in Hemiplegia Patients

The purpose of this clinical study is to investigate effects of Kinesio taping (KT) combined with dry needling (DN) on myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in post-stroke hemiplegic shoulder-hand syndrome (SHS).

Methods: A prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted on 84 SHS patients, who were randomized into three groups: DN (Group A), KT (Group B), and DN+KT (Group C), all receiving standard rehabilitation. VAS, ADL, FMA-UE, PROM, and 8-figure dimensional difference were assessed pre- and post-28-day treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 27.0, with paired t-test for intragroup comparisons and independent sample t-test for intergroup comparisons, and statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

Read the detailed description

A total of 87 patients with stage I shoulder-hand syndrome (SHS) were enrolled between November 2023 and October 2024. Diagnostic criteria followed the Chinese guidelines for acute ischemic stroke (2023) and stroke rehabilitation therapy (2011). Key diagnostic features included unilateral shoulder and hand pain, local skin flushing, increased skin temperature, limited finger flexion, and exclusion of other causes such as trauma or infection. Three participants withdrew, leaving 84 who completed the study.

Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups (DN, KT, DN+KT) in a 1:1: ratio via a computer-generated random number table (SPSS 27.0). The sequence was concealed using sequentially numbered, sealed opaque envelopes. Group assignment was revealed only to the treating therapist at the time of intervention. Participants and outcome assessors remained blinded throughout the study.

All groups received standard rehabilitation including passive and active range-of-motion exercises, strengthening, and functional training. No analgesics or anti-inflammatory drugs were permitted.

Treatment Group A (n = 28) received DN and sham Kinesio taping: Received dry needling targeting active myofascial trigger points in shoulder muscles, performed by an experienced physician. Sham KT was applied without tension using the same tape as in the KT group.

Group B (n = 28) was treated with KT and sham DN: Received therapeutic Kinesio taping applied in multiple strips with specific tension techniques. Sham DN was performed using a needle without eliciting a local twitch response.

Group C (n = 28) was treated with KT combined with DN: Received both active DN and KT interventions.

Being tested
Dry Needling, Sham Kinesio taping, Kinesio Taping, Sham Dry Needling
Keywords
Shoulder-hand syndrome, Dry Needling, Kinesio Taping, Myofascial Trigger Points
Medical subject headings
Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dry NeedlingDevice

    The deltoid, subscapularis, supraspinatus,and infraspinatus muscles were examined through physical examination to determine the active myofascial trigger points (MTrPs). After disinfection with alcohol, a sterile needle with a diameter of 0.3mm*50mm (China, Suzhou Medical Supplies Factory Co., Ltd.Hua Tuo) was used to puncture the most painful points until a local twitch response (LTR) was obtained. After removing the needle,we pressed it with a cotton swab to prevent local hematoma. The prone position was adopted for the infraspinatus, deltoid and subscapular muscles, and sitting position was adopted for DN treatment of the supraspinatus.

  • Sham Kinesio tapingDevice

    For the treatment with the sham Kinesio taping, Researchers used the sports white tape of the same specification as the Kinesio taping , and blocked the vision of the participants to apply the same dose as that in Kinesio taping to the same area where the Kinesio taping was applied, so that it could be applied to the skin of the same area where the Kinesio taping was applied without pulling force.

  • Kinesio TapingDevice

    Patients received eight therapeutic kinesiology taping (KT) sessions. Each application remained for two days, with a two-day interval after every two treatments. Standard 5-cm white KT was used.A 10-cm X-shaped tape was first applied with its center anchored at 50-75% tension over the coracoid process under downward pressure; the tails were laid without tension.A second I-shaped tape was applied with the strengthening technique along the supraspinatus muscle from origin to insertion, with the shoulder extended, adducted, and internally rotated, and the neck contralaterally flexed. The ends (2.5-5 cm) were fixed without tension.The third and fourth I-shaped tapes targeted the anterior and posterior deltoid. With the patient seated, anchors were placed on the lateral clavicle and scapula. The tape was stretched over the deltoid with the shoulder horizontally extended and externally rotated into abduction.

  • Sham Dry NeedlingDevice

    For sham DN treatment, Researchers used a 0.3mm*50 mm sterile needle (China, Suzhou Medical Supplies Factory Co., Ltd., Hua Tuo) and blocked the participants eyesight with the DN group of the same dose used in the local MTrP of the same area. The effectiveness of the blinding strategy was verified through experiments based on the criterion of causing a tingling sensation without causing LTR.

Study groups in NCT07245472
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A (n = 28) received DN and sham Kinesio tapingExperimentalAn experienced physician performed the DN treatment. Active myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) were identified via physical examination in the deltoid, subscapularis, supraspinatus, and infraspinatus muscles. After disinfecting with alcohol, the most painful points were punctured using a sterile 0.3mm × 50mm needle (Hua Tuo, Suzhou Medical Supplies Factory Co., Ltd., China) until a local twitch response (LTR) was elicited. Upon needle removal, the investigators applied pressure with a cotton swab to prevent hematoma. The supraspinatus was needled with the participant seated, while the other muscles were treated in the prone position. For sham taping, the same type of white sports tape as used in Group B was applied-without tension-to the same anatomical area, with the participant's vision blocked.
Receives: Device: Dry Needling; Device: Sham Kinesio taping
Group B (n = 28) was treated with KT and sham DNExperimentalParticipants underwent eight KT applications, each retained for two days, with a two-day interval after every two applications. Standard 5-cm white KT tape was used. The protocol included: an X-shaped strip anchored at the coracoid process with 50-75% tension; an I-shaped strip applied along the supraspinatus muscle with the shoulder extended, adducted, and internally rotated, plus contralateral cervical bending; and two additional I-shaped strips reinforcing the anterior and posterior deltoid using a strengthening technique, with anchors at the outer third of the clavicle and scapula. All tapes ended without tension. The same physician performed all taping. For sham DN, a sterile 0.3×50 mm needle was used at the same MTrP locations as in the DN group, with participants' vision blocked. The sham procedure aimed to produce a tingling sensation without eliciting a local twitch response to maintain blinding.
Receives: Device: Kinesio Taping; Device: Sham Dry Needling
Group C (n = 28) was treated with KT combined with DN.ExperimentalParticipants received both active DN and KT interventions
Receives: Device: Dry Needling; Device: Kinesio Taping

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain Intensity

    Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The scale consists of a 10-cm horizontal line with endpoints labeled "0" (no pain) and "10" (worst pain possible). Patients marked their perceived pain level on the line, with scores rounded to the nearest 0.25. Higher scores indicate more severe pain.

    Measured: Baseline, 14 days, and 28 days post-treatment.

  2. Upper Limb Motor Function

    The simplified Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) was used to evaluate upper limb motor function. The total score is 66 points, with higher scores indicating better upper limb motor function.

    Measured: Baseline, 14 days, and 28 days post-treatment.

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Degree of Finger Edema

    Finger swelling was evaluated by measuring the difference in the "8-figure" circumference between the affected and healthy hands. The measurement started from the ulnar styloid process, parallel to the wrist crease, passed around the dorsum of the hand across the fifth and second metacarpophalangeal joints, diagonally crossed the back of the hand, and returned to the starting point.

    Measured: Baseline, 14 days, and 28 days post-treatment.

  2. Passive Range of Motion of the Shoulder Joint

    Passive range of motion of the shoulder joint was measured using a standard goniometer. Assessment indicators included passive flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, horizontal abduction, horizontal adduction, horizontal medial rotation, and horizontal lateral rotation .

    Measured: Baseline, 14 days, and 28 days post-treatment.

  3. Activities of Daily Living

    The Activities of Daily Living scale was used for assessment. This scale includes 10 aspects: eating, personal hygiene, bathing, toileting, dressing, anal control, bladder control, bed-chair transfer, level walking, and stair climbing, with a total score of 100 points . A score >60 indicates that the patient can independently perform activities of daily living, with higher scores indicating better living ability.

    Measured: Baseline, 14 days, and 28 days post-treatment.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Nov 2025
  2. Study start1 Nov 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2024
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
84 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07245472
Sponsor's protocol ID
HandanCentral
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
12 Sep 2025
Last updated
24 Nov 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dry Needling and Kinesio Taping in people with Shoulder-hand Syndrome, run by Handan Central Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain Intensity (time frame: Baseline, 14 days, and 28 days post-treatment.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Nov 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in