AzTrials
AzTrials

Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder PainNCT07232511

Exercise-induced Hypoalgesia Effects of Blood Flow Restriction in People With Rotator Cuff-related Shoulder Pain

A study testing Resistance exercise with low AOP, Resistance exercise with moderate BFR and Resistance exercise with high BFR in people with Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain, run by University of Valencia at 1 site in Spain.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to compare the effects of blood flow restricted (BFR) exercise and to examine the differences between various BFR protocols on acute pain reduction in individuals with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain, as well as the exercise tolerance at each intensity and occlusion setting. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain
What is being tested?
Resistance exercise with low AOP, Resistance exercise with moderate BFR and Resistance exercise with high BFR
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
5 Mar 2026to Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 18 and 65
  • Shoulder symptoms lasting at least 3 months
  • Pain in the proximal anterolateral aspect of the shoulder, aggravated by abduction
  • At least two of the following tests positive: Jobe test, resisted external rotation test, Hawkins-Kennedy test, Neer test, painful arc between 60 and 120 degrees of shoulder abduction

Who cannot join

  • History of shoulder trauma or surgery
  • Pain of such intensity that it is impossible to perform the proposed exercises
  • Active arm elevation less than 90 degrees
  • Clinical signs of a complete tear (positive delayed external and internal rotation sign and positive arm drop test)
  • Suspected frozen shoulder (50% reduction or more than 30° loss in passive shoulder external rotation)
  • Primary diagnosis of shoulder instability or acromioclavicular pathology
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Shoulder pain due to primary involvement in the cervical or thoracic region
  • Corticosteroid injections in the last 6 weeks
  • Presence of diseases such as inflammatory arthritis, neurological diseases, fibromyalgia, malignant tumors, or polymyalgia rheumatica
  • Presence of more than one risk factor for thromboembolism
  • Participation in upper limb exercise programs in the last month

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Adrian Escriche-Escuder, PhD contact

+34 963 98 38 55

adrian.escriche@uv.es

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia

    Valencia, Valencia, 46010

    Adrian Escriche-Escuder, 963983853, dep.fisioterapia@uv.es

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Differences in Exercise-induced Hypoalgesia After a Session With Different Blood Flow Restriction Protocols in People With Rotator Cuff-related Shoulder Pain

This study aims to compare the effects of blood flow restricted (BFR) exercise and to examine the differences between various BFR protocols on acute pain reduction in individuals with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain, as well as the exercise tolerance at each intensity and occlusion setting. There are four exercise modalities corresponding to different combinations of intensity (%RM) and percentage of occlusion (%AOP): 1) 30% RM and 30% AOP; 2) 30% RM and 50% AOP; 3) 30% RM and 70% AOP; 4) 30% RM and BFR placebo (cuff without pressure).

All participants will complete one session of each of the four exercise modalities, analyzing the variables studied in each for subsequent analysis and comparison.

Being tested
Resistance exercise with low AOP, Resistance exercise with moderate BFR, Resistance exercise with high BFR, Resistance exercise with sham BFR
Keywords
blood flow restriction, exercise, rotator cuff-related shoulder pain
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Resistance exercise with low AOPDevice

    Three exercises: external rotation at 0°, internal rotation at 0° and elevation in the scapular plane. 4 sets (30, 15, 15, reps to fatigue) with a intensity of 30% RM and a 30% of arterial occlusion pressure. 30" rest between sets, 2' rest between exercises.

  • Resistance exercise with moderate BFRDevice

    Three exercises: external rotation at 0°, internal rotation at 0° and elevation in the scapular plane. 4 sets (30, 15, 15, reps to fatigue) with a intensity of 30% RM and a 50% of arterial occlusion pressure. 30" rest between sets, 2' rest between exercises.

  • Resistance exercise with high BFRDevice

    Three exercises: external rotation at 0°, internal rotation at 0° and elevation in the scapular plane. 4 sets (30, 15, 15, reps to fatigue) with a intensity of 30% RM and a 70% of arterial occlusion pressure. 30" rest between sets, 2' rest between exercises.

  • Resistance exercise with sham BFRDevice

    Three exercises: external rotation at 0°, internal rotation at 0° and elevation in the scapular plane. 4 sets (30, 15, 15, reps to fatigue) with a intensity of 30% RM and a sham blood flow restriction application (cuff applied without pressure). 30" rest between sets, 2' rest between exercises.

Study groups in NCT07232511
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Resistance exercise with low blood occlusionExperimentalA single session of exercise, 30% repetition maximum, and 30% blood occlusion
Receives: Device: Resistance exercise with low AOP
Resistance exercise with moderate blood occlusionExperimentalA single session of exercise, 30% repetition maximum, and 50% blood occlusion
Receives: Device: Resistance exercise with moderate BFR
Resistance exercise with high blood occlusionExperimentalA single session of exercise, 30% repetition maximum, and 70% blood occlusion
Receives: Device: Resistance exercise with high BFR
Resistance exercise with sham blood flow restrictionSham comparatorA single session of exercise, 30% repetition maximum, and without blood restriction (cuff applied without pressure)
Receives: Device: Resistance exercise with sham BFR

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain intensity at rest (Visual Analogue Scale, 0-10)

    Pain intensity perceived on a Visual Analogue Scale, at rest, being 0 no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable.

    Measured: Periprocedural

  2. Pain intensity during movement (Visual Analogue Scale, 0-10)

    Pain intensity perceived on a Visual Analogue Scale during movement (flexion and abduction movement without load), being 0 no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable

    Measured: Periprocedural

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Pressure pain threshold

    Pressure pain threshold measured in the middle deltoid (peripheral sensitivity) and tibialis anterior (central sensitivity), using an algometer

    Measured: Periprocedural

  2. Exercise tolerance with each setting

    Exercise tolerance with each setting according to the following 5-point scale: well tolerated, tolerated, neutral, poorly tolerated, not tolerated.

    Measured: Periprocedural

  3. Occurrence of adverse effects

    Occurrence of adverse effects (e.g., pain, delayed onset muscle soreness, sudden weakness of the trained limb, redness or swelling of the trained limb, etc.) by self-report.

    Measured: Immediately after the intervention, 1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours

  4. Surface electromyography

    Surface electromyography for the study of muscle recruitment (middle deltoid, infraspinatus, teres minor and trapezius muscles)

    Measured: Periprocedural

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Nov 2025
  2. Study start5 Mar 2026
  3. Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07232511
Sponsor's protocol ID
2025-FIS-3945738
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
26 Sep 2025
Last updated
4 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: The data that support the findings of this study will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in