Type 1 Diabetes MellitusPhase 2KETO-TRACKNCT07225465
Evaluating Safe Ketone Thresholds To Minimise Ketosis in People With Type 1 Diabetes Using Dapagliflozin
A Phase 2 study testing FORXIGA in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne at 4 sites in Australia.
Trial summary
Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a type of medicine that help the kidneys get rid of extra sugar in the blood through urine. In people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), these medications help lower blood sugar levels, help people lose weight and improve heart and kidney health. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 24 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- FORXIGA
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 115 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesAustralia
- Study dates
- Feb 2026to Feb 2028
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 24 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged between 24 and 85 years of age inclusive (66% 24Y to 65Y; and 33% >65Y to 85Y)
- Diagnosed with T1D (made on clinical criteria) for at least 1 year
- Insulin regimen either on MDI or insulin pump with at least 40% in one mode
- Minimum total daily insulin dose 0.4 Units per kg / day (can be on insulin pump or MDI);
- HbA1c <10% (86mmol/ mol)
- Minimum daily carbohydrate intake of 100g
- Willing to adhere to the study protocol
- Ability to perform high-intensity exercise (specific to the exercise sub-study)
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy or planned pregnancy
- eGFR <30ml/min/1.73m2
- History of DKA in the last 12 months
- Use of low carbohydrate diet (<100g/day)
- Diabetic gastroparesis
- Tape allergy
Show all 10Show fewer
- Heavy alcohol use (15 standard drinks per week or binge drinking)
- Use of SGLT inhibitor in the last month
- Medications increasing the risk of DKA e.g. steroids, anorectic agents (eg phentermine, naltrexone HCl/bupropion HCl, and GLP 1 agonists).
- Major medical or psychiatric illness that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with protocol adherence or impact participant safety.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Australia4 sites
St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065
Dr Yee Wen Kong, +61 3 9231 2757, DTRG-t1research@unimelb.edu.au
Austin Health
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084
Prof Elif Ekinci, +61 3 9496 2160, elif.ekinci@unimelb.edu.au
Adele Manzoney, +61 3 9496 2160
Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute
Melbourne, Victoria, 3004
Prof David O'Neal, +61 3 9231 2757, dno@unimelb.edu.au
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, Victoria, 3050
Prof Spiros Fourlanos, +61 3 9342 7365, diabetesendo@mh.org.au
About this study
Official title: The Evaluation of Two Response Thresholds to Continuous Ketone Monitoring Information Minimising Ketosis in People With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Dapagliflozin
Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a type of medicine that help the kidneys get rid of extra sugar in the blood through urine. In people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), these medications help lower blood sugar levels, help people lose weight and improve heart and kidney health.
SGLT2 inhibitors are mainly used in T2D, however some studies show they might also help people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). The same health benefits observed in people with T2D the investigators anticipate may help those with T1D. Currently, there is a safety concern that people with T1D using these medicines can raise the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). DKA occurs when the body doesn't have enough insulin (a hormone made in the pancreas that helps your body use sugar (glucose) for energy), it starts to break down fats as a source of energy. This breakdown of fats produces ketones. Very high levels of ketones in the blood can make the blood acidic (toxic) and lead to DKA. If not treated in time, this can make the person living with T1D very ill and can be life-threatening. Because of this risk, health agencies like the FDA in the U.S., and the TGA in Australia have not approved use of SGLT2 inhibitors for people with T1D.
Read more
Still, some experts believe SGLT2 inhibitors may safely be used alongside insulin in T1D if DKA risk is carefully managed. This might be possible with early detection and treatment of rising ketone levels. One approach is using continuous ketone monitors, which track ketone levels in real time and can alert users early. People would also need proper education on what to do if ketone levels start rising.
To date, there's no official agreement on the exact ketone level that should trigger action. Some suggest action when ketone levels reach 1.0 or 1.5 mmol/L. A lower limit like 1.0 mmol/L may be safer, but it could also lead to too many alarms and extra stress, or unnecessary eating to bring ketones down.
Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess if initiating responses to elevated ketone levels at a threshold of 1.0 mmol/L, compared to a threshold of 1.5 mmol/L, will reduce the risk of DKA in people with T1D using Dapagliflozin.
The investigators will recruit 115 adults with T1D and provide Dapagliflozin (SGLT2 inhibitor) and continuous glucose and ketone monitoring (DGK) devices. Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1 will wear a DGK with alarms set at ketone level of 1.0 mmol/L and receive education about taking action when ketone levels are ≥1.0 mmol/L. Group 2 will wear a DGK with alarms set at ketone level of 1.5 mmol/L and receive education about taking action when ketone levels are ≥1.5 mmol/L. Participants will be assessed for time spent with critically high ketone levels, incidence of DKA, glucose and person reported outcomes.
Findings from this study will provide real life data and clinical evidence to help guide safe use of SGLT2 inhibitors in people with T1D by informing protocols for monitoring and managing associated DKA risks.
Read the detailed description
Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) is responsible for approximately 90% of glucose re-absorption in the renal proximal tubules, so SGLT2 inhibition results in significant excretion of glucose in the urine. SGLT2 inhibition may play a key role in the prevention and management of the cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome as this class of agent has been shown to benefit glucose levels (reducing HbA1c, and glycaemic variability without increasing severe or total hypoglycaemia), reduce heart failure, improve weight control, reduce cardiovascular mortality, and provide reno-protection in people with diabetes thereby addressing some of the fundamental issues contributing to the syndrome. While most data pertain to agents which inhibit SGLT2 in people with T2D, SGLT2 inhibition also has the potential to substantially benefit glucose control, weight management, and reduce complication development including that of the CKM syndrome in people with T1D. Dapagliflozin is a SGLT2 inhibitor. Data available in adults with T1D indicate that Dapagliflozin improves glucose control without increasing hypoglycaemia and reduces glycaemic variability. In addition, there are improvements in body weight and blood pressure. There is also substantial evidence in people with T2D that Dapagliflozin lowers mortality from cardiovascular causes and hospitalisations for heart failure. In terms of reno-protective effects, Dapagliflozin was demonstrated to slow down decline in renal function, reduce rates of renal failure and death from renal causes in T2D.These cardiorenal benefits may extend to people with T1D.
While SGLT2 inhibitors as adjunctive therapy to insulin may benefit people with T1D, in general their use has been associated with a significantly increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) which may occur in the absence of hyperglycaemia. DKA represents a life-threatening acute emergency of T1D, which occurs when insulin deficiency leads to lipolysis and accumulation of ketones, resulting in metabolic acidosis. It requires prompt identification and action, and delays in management are associated with an increase in mortality. For example, the pooled analysis of DEPICT-1 and DEPICT-2 participants showed that over 52 weeks of treatment, the incidence of adjudicated DKA was numerically higher with Dapagliflozin 5 mg/day or 10 mg/day than with placebo (4.0% and 3.5% vs. 1.1%). Therefore, SGLT2 inhibitors in general have failed to receive approval in the USA (FDA) and Australia (TGA) for use to control glucose levels in people with T1D due to an unacceptable increase in DKA. It is possible that SGLT2 inhibitor therapy may be viable in people with T1D if an intervention is able to shift the risk-benefit balance in favour of benefit e.g. if the risk of DKA could be recognized and addressed in a timely manner. The early recognition of impending DKA is of critical importance. However, symptoms of ketosis which include nausea, vomiting, fatigue, loss of appetite, malaise, weakness, and tachypnoea appear late and those associated with dehydration may be absent in the setting of normoglycaemia. Therefore, timely ketone measurement represents a cornerstone of management allowing therapeutic measures to be initiated.
A continuous ketone sensor (CKS) would address many of the shortcomings associated with current standard-of-care blood ketone testing using a handheld meter. Ketones can be quantified in interstitial fluid using a similar approach to that taken with widely commercially used continuous glucose monitor (CGM), using an enzymatic reaction. While feasibility of CKS devices has previously been demonstrated, the optimum thresholds for alerts, balancing the burden of alarms vs. timely intervention, have yet to be determined. Preliminary at home CKS data provided by Abbott indicate free-living people with T1D who are not using SGLTi spend <1% of the time with ketone levels >1.0mmol/L. Ketone levels in free-living with T1D using SGLT2 inhibitors remains unknown. To provide insights into appropriate ketone thresholds for alerts a literature search was undertaken in May 2024.
Studies included were published between January 2000 and April 2024 involving those aged ≥16 years of age which described capillary β-OHB levels in relation to suspected DKA and which reported sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, or positive predictive value. Eight of the 11 studies provided capillary β-OHB levels that excluded DKA; these ranged from 0.7 to ≥3.0 mmol/L 13-23 and the most recommended cut-off level was 1.0 mmol/L (n=3) followed by 1.5 mmol/L (n=2). The β-OHB cut-offs for the diagnosis of DKA ranged from 1.8 mmol/L to 3.5 mmol/L, with 3.0 mmol/L being most proposed by five of the studies. The investigators therefore concluded that capillary β-OHB cut off values of <1.0 mmol/L and <1.5 mmol/L exclude DKA. The investigators also conclude that a capillary β-OHB level ≥3.0 mmol/L exhibited high sensitivity and specificity in detecting DKA with levels between 1.5 mmol/L and 3.0 mmol/L representing a transition range with increasing risk.
The investigators propose that to pre-empt DKA in people with T1D using SGLTi that responses to CKS data could be initiated at levels of either 1.0mmol/L or 1.5mmol/L with alerts aligned accordingly. The lower alert may provide an additional safety margin though could come at the cost of a greater number of alarms and carbohydrates eaten that may not have necessarily been required. The investigators also suggest that there may be high DKA-risk subgroups (female sex, lower baseline body mass index (BMI), β-hydroxybutyrate levels pre-treatment, use of an insulin pump, and lower insulin requirements at baseline with dose reductions required post SGLT inhibitor commencement to avoid hypoglycaemia) who may benefit from the lower alarm thresholds facilitating earlier intervention. Finally, the risk for DKA may vary according to illness, fasting and high intensity exercise requiring alerts to be adjusted according to circumstances. However, data are required to inform protocols.
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- FORXIGA
- Keywords
- Ketosis, Dapagliflozin, Type 1 Diabetes, Dual Glucose and Ketone Monitor, SGLT2 inhibitor
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Ketosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FORXIGADrug
All participants will take FORXIGA (Dapagliflozin) orally at a dose of 10mg/day for 12 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dual glucose and ketone (DGK) sensor threshold 1.0mmol/L | Active comparator | The DGK will be set with threshold alarms activated at 1.0mmol/L for participant response to ketosis Receives: Drug: FORXIGA |
| Dual glucose and ketone (DGK) sensor threshold 1.5mmol/L | Active comparator | The DGK will be set with threshold alarms activated at 1.5mmol/L for participant response to ketosis Receives: Drug: FORXIGA |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent time spent with interstitial ketones ≥3.0mmol/L (Main Study)
Percent of time spent with interstitial ketone levels ≥3.0mmol/L on dual glucose / ketone monitoring device during 12-weeks of taking Dapagliflozin
Measured: Commencement to end of study (12 weeks)
Percent of time spent with interstitial ketones ≥3.0mmol/L during exercise (Exercise Study)
Percent of time spent with interstitial ketones ≥3.0mmol/L on dual glucose / ketone monitoring device from start of exercise to 12 hours post-commencement of exercise
Measured: Weeks 4 to12
Secondary outcomes (19)
Percent of time with ketone levels in different ranges
Percent time with interstitial ketone levels of:
- >0.6 mmol/L
- >1.0 mmol/L
- >1.5mmol/L
Measured: Commencement to end of study (12 weeks)
Mean interstitial ketone levels
Average if ketone levels measured by dual glucose / ketone monitor device over 12 weeks
Measured: Commencement to end of study (12 weeks)
Incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA)
Number of DKA events
Measured: Commencement to end of study (12 weeks)
Change in HbA1c
Difference in HbA1c (mmol/mol) between baseline and study end
Measured: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
CGM metrics
Standardised consensus CGM metrics (% times in prespecified ranges, mean glucose, and CV) over 12 weeks
Measured: Commencement to end of study (12 weeks)
Change in weight
Change in weight (kg) from baseline to study end
Measured: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Change in BMI
Change in BMI (kg/m2) from baseline to study end
Measured: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Change in treatment satisfaction using Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire - Short form
Change in questionnaire scores from baseline to study end. Questionnaire contains 20 items. Items are scored on a scale from 0 to 3-4. Higher scores mean better outcome
Measured: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Change in Gold score
Change in questionnaire scores from baseline to study end. Questionnaire contains 1 item. Item is scored on a scale from 1 to 7. Higher scores mean worse outcome
Measured: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Change in questionnaire scores from baseline to study end. Questionnaire contains 19 items. Items are scored on a scale from 0 to 3. Higher scores mean worse outcome
Measured: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Change in PROMIS Fatigue - Short form
Change in questionnaire scores from baseline to study end. Questionnaire contains 4 items. Items are scored on a scale from 1 to 5. Higher scores mean worse outcome
Measured: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Change in EQ-5D-5L
Change in questionnaire scores from baseline to study end. Questionnaire contains 6 items. Items are scored on a scale from 1 to 5. Higher scores mean worse outcome
Measured: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Change in Problem Areas in Diabetes - Short form
Change in questionnaire scores from baseline to study end. Questionnaire contains 5 items. Items are scored on a scale from 0 to 4. Higher scores mean worse outcome
Measured: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Change in WHO-5 Well-being index
Change in questionnaire scores from baseline to study end. Questionnaire contains 5 items. Items are scored on a scale from 0 to 5. Higher scores mean better outcome
Measured: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Change in Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey - Short Form
Change in questionnaire scores from baseline to study end. Questionnaire contains 11items. Items are scored on a scale from 0 to 4. Higher scores mean worse outcome
Measured: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Treatment satisfaction with ketone sensor using Study specific questions regarding treatment satisfaction
Questionnaire contains 10 items. Items are scored on a scale from 1 to 5. Higher scores mean better outcome
Measured: Week 12 from study commencement (study end)
Ketone sensor usability with System Usability Scale
Questionnaire contains 10 items. Items are scored on a scale from 1-5. Higher scores mean better outcome
Measured: Week 12 from study commencement (study end)
Treatment satisfaction and ketone sensor usability with User Experience Questionnaire
Change in questionnaire scores from baseline to study end. Questionnaire contains 26 items. Items are scored on a scale from 1 to 7. Higher scores mean better outcome
Measured: Week 12 from study commencement (study end)
Lived experience of a using DGK system during Dapagliflozin treatment
Thematic analysis of interviews exploring lived experience of a using DGK system during Dapagliflozin treatment
Measured: Week 12 from study commencement (study end)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Nov 2025
- Study startFeb 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionFeb 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Type 1 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 115 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), University of Melbourne, Melbourne Health, Austin Health
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, David O'Neal, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07225465
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 235/25
- Other IDs
- 1U01DK143330-01
- Acronym
- KETO-TRACK
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 2 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 6 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Evaluation of Two Response Thresholds to Continuous Ketone Monitoring Information Minimising Ketosis in People With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Dapagliflozin
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07225465
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KETO-TRACK / 235/25
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- Ketosis, Dapagliflozin, Type 1 Diabetes, Dual Glucose and Ketone Monitor, SGLT2 inhibitor
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 115 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- St Vincent's Hospital MelbourneUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), University of Melbourne, Melbourne Health, Austin Health
- Study start
- Feb 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a type of medicine that help the kidneys get rid of extra sugar in the blood through urine. In people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), these medications help lower blood sugar levels, help people lose weight and improve heart and kidney health.
SGLT2 inhibitors are mainly used in T2D, however some studies show they might also help people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). The same health benefits observed in people with T2D the investigators anticipate may help those with T1D. Currently, there is a safety concern that people with T1D using these medicines can raise the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). DKA occurs when the body doesn't have enough insulin (a hormone made in the pancreas that helps your body use sugar (glucose) for energy), it starts to break down fats as a source of energy. This breakdown of fats produces ketones. Very high levels of ketones in the blood can make the blood acidic (toxic) and lead to DKA. If not treated in time, this can make the person living with T1D very ill and can be life-threatening. Because of this risk, health agencies like the FDA in the U.S., and the TGA in Australia have not approved use of SGLT2 inhibitors for people with T1D.
Still, some experts believe SGLT2 inhibitors may safely be used alongside insulin in T1D if DKA risk is carefully managed. This might be possible with early detection and treatment of rising ketone levels. One approach is using continuous ketone monitors, which track ketone levels in real time and can alert users early. People would also need proper education on what to do if ketone levels start rising.
To date, there's no official agreement on the exact ketone level that should trigger action. Some suggest action when ketone levels reach 1.0 or 1.5 mmol/L. A lower limit like 1.0 mmol/L may be safer, but it could also lead to too many alarms and extra stress, or unnecessary eating to bring ketones down.
Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess if initiating responses to elevated ketone levels at a threshold of 1.0 mmol/L, compared to a threshold of 1.5 mmol/L, will reduce the risk of DKA in people with T1D using Dapagliflozin.
The investigators will recruit 115 adults with T1D and provide Dapagliflozin (SGLT2 inhibitor) and continuous glucose and ketone monitoring (DGK) devices. Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1 will wear a DGK with alarms set at ketone level of 1.0 mmol/L and receive education about taking action when ketone levels are ≥1.0 mmol/L. Group 2 will wear a DGK with alarms set at ketone level of 1.5 mmol/L and receive education about taking action when ketone levels are ≥1.5 mmol/L. Participants will be assessed for time spent with critically high ketone levels, incidence of DKA, glucose and person reported outcomes.
Findings from this study will provide real life data and clinical evidence to help guide safe use of SGLT2 inhibitors in people with T1D by informing protocols for monitoring and managing associated DKA risks.
Detailed description
Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) is responsible for approximately 90% of glucose re-absorption in the renal proximal tubules, so SGLT2 inhibition results in significant excretion of glucose in the urine. SGLT2 inhibition may play a key role in the prevention and management of the cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome as this class of agent has been shown to benefit glucose levels (reducing HbA1c, and glycaemic variability without increasing severe or total hypoglycaemia), reduce heart failure, improve weight control, reduce cardiovascular mortality, and provide reno-protection in people with diabetes thereby addressing some of the fundamental issues contributing to the syndrome. While most data pertain to agents which inhibit SGLT2 in people with T2D, SGLT2 inhibition also has the potential to substantially benefit glucose control, weight management, and reduce complication development including that of the CKM syndrome in people with T1D. Dapagliflozin is a SGLT2 inhibitor. Data available in adults with T1D indicate that Dapagliflozin improves glucose control without increasing hypoglycaemia and reduces glycaemic variability. In addition, there are improvements in body weight and blood pressure. There is also substantial evidence in people with T2D that Dapagliflozin lowers mortality from cardiovascular causes and hospitalisations for heart failure. In terms of reno-protective effects, Dapagliflozin was demonstrated to slow down decline in renal function, reduce rates of renal failure and death from renal causes in T2D.These cardiorenal benefits may extend to people with T1D.
While SGLT2 inhibitors as adjunctive therapy to insulin may benefit people with T1D, in general their use has been associated with a significantly increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) which may occur in the absence of hyperglycaemia. DKA represents a life-threatening acute emergency of T1D, which occurs when insulin deficiency leads to lipolysis and accumulation of ketones, resulting in metabolic acidosis. It requires prompt identification and action, and delays in management are associated with an increase in mortality. For example, the pooled analysis of DEPICT-1 and DEPICT-2 participants showed that over 52 weeks of treatment, the incidence of adjudicated DKA was numerically higher with Dapagliflozin 5 mg/day or 10 mg/day than with placebo (4.0% and 3.5% vs. 1.1%). Therefore, SGLT2 inhibitors in general have failed to receive approval in the USA (FDA) and Australia (TGA) for use to control glucose levels in people with T1D due to an unacceptable increase in DKA. It is possible that SGLT2 inhibitor therapy may be viable in people with T1D if an intervention is able to shift the risk-benefit balance in favour of benefit e.g. if the risk of DKA could be recognized and addressed in a timely manner. The early recognition of impending DKA is of critical importance. However, symptoms of ketosis which include nausea, vomiting, fatigue, loss of appetite, malaise, weakness, and tachypnoea appear late and those associated with dehydration may be absent in the setting of normoglycaemia. Therefore, timely ketone measurement represents a cornerstone of management allowing therapeutic measures to be initiated.
A continuous ketone sensor (CKS) would address many of the shortcomings associated with current standard-of-care blood ketone testing using a handheld meter. Ketones can be quantified in interstitial fluid using a similar approach to that taken with widely commercially used continuous glucose monitor (CGM), using an enzymatic reaction. While feasibility of CKS devices has previously been demonstrated, the optimum thresholds for alerts, balancing the burden of alarms vs. timely intervention, have yet to be determined. Preliminary at home CKS data provided by Abbott indicate free-living people with T1D who are not using SGLTi spend <1% of the time with ketone levels >1.0mmol/L. Ketone levels in free-living with T1D using SGLT2 inhibitors remains unknown. To provide insights into appropriate ketone thresholds for alerts a literature search was undertaken in May 2024.
Studies included were published between January 2000 and April 2024 involving those aged ≥16 years of age which described capillary β-OHB levels in relation to suspected DKA and which reported sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, or positive predictive value. Eight of the 11 studies provided capillary β-OHB levels that excluded DKA; these ranged from 0.7 to ≥3.0 mmol/L 13-23 and the most recommended cut-off level was 1.0 mmol/L (n=3) followed by 1.5 mmol/L (n=2). The β-OHB cut-offs for the diagnosis of DKA ranged from 1.8 mmol/L to 3.5 mmol/L, with 3.0 mmol/L being most proposed by five of the studies. The investigators therefore concluded that capillary β-OHB cut off values of <1.0 mmol/L and <1.5 mmol/L exclude DKA. The investigators also conclude that a capillary β-OHB level ≥3.0 mmol/L exhibited high sensitivity and specificity in detecting DKA with levels between 1.5 mmol/L and 3.0 mmol/L representing a transition range with increasing risk.
The investigators propose that to pre-empt DKA in people with T1D using SGLTi that responses to CKS data could be initiated at levels of either 1.0mmol/L or 1.5mmol/L with alerts aligned accordingly. The lower alert may provide an additional safety margin though could come at the cost of a greater number of alarms and carbohydrates eaten that may not have necessarily been required. The investigators also suggest that there may be high DKA-risk subgroups (female sex, lower baseline body mass index (BMI), β-hydroxybutyrate levels pre-treatment, use of an insulin pump, and lower insulin requirements at baseline with dose reductions required post SGLT inhibitor commencement to avoid hypoglycaemia) who may benefit from the lower alarm thresholds facilitating earlier intervention. Finally, the risk for DKA may vary according to illness, fasting and high intensity exercise requiring alerts to be adjusted according to circumstances. However, data are required to inform protocols.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dual glucose and ketone (DGK) sensor threshold 1.0mmol/L | Active comparator | Drug: FORXIGAThe DGK will be set with threshold alarms activated at 1.0mmol/L for participant response to ketosis |
| Dual glucose and ketone (DGK) sensor threshold 1.5mmol/L | Active comparator | Drug: FORXIGAThe DGK will be set with threshold alarms activated at 1.5mmol/L for participant response to ketosis |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 24 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Aged between 24 and 85 years of age inclusive (66% 24Y to 65Y; and 33% >65Y to 85Y)
- Diagnosed with T1D (made on clinical criteria) for at least 1 year
- Insulin regimen either on MDI or insulin pump with at least 40% in one mode
- Minimum total daily insulin dose 0.4 Units per kg / day (can be on insulin pump or MDI);
- HbA1c <10% (86mmol/ mol)
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Pregnancy or planned pregnancy
- eGFR <30ml/min/1.73m2
- History of DKA in the last 12 months
- Use of low carbohydrate diet (<100g/day)
- Diabetic gastroparesis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FORXIGAAll participants will take FORXIGA (Dapagliflozin) orally at a dose of 10mg/day for 12 weeks | Drug | Dual glucose and ketone (DGK) sensor threshold 1.0mmol/L, Dual glucose and ketone (DGK) sensor threshold 1.5mmol/L |
Primary outcome
Percent time spent with interstitial ketones ≥3.0mmol/L (Main Study)
Time frame: Commencement to end of study (12 weeks)
Percent of time spent with interstitial ketone levels ≥3.0mmol/L on dual glucose / ketone monitoring device during 12-weeks of taking Dapagliflozin
Percent of time spent with interstitial ketones ≥3.0mmol/L during exercise (Exercise Study)
Time frame: Weeks 4 to12
Percent of time spent with interstitial ketones ≥3.0mmol/L on dual glucose / ketone monitoring device from start of exercise to 12 hours post-commencement of exercise
19 secondary outcomes
Percent of time with ketone levels in different ranges
Time frame: Commencement to end of study (12 weeks)
Mean interstitial ketone levels
Time frame: Commencement to end of study (12 weeks)
Incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA)
Time frame: Commencement to end of study (12 weeks)
Change in HbA1c
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
CGM metrics
Time frame: Commencement to end of study (12 weeks)
Change in weight
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Change in BMI
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Change in treatment satisfaction using Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire - Short form
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Change in Gold score
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Change in PROMIS Fatigue - Short form
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Change in EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Change in Problem Areas in Diabetes - Short form
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Change in WHO-5 Well-being index
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Change in Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey - Short Form
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 12 from study commencement
Treatment satisfaction with ketone sensor using Study specific questions regarding treatment satisfaction
Time frame: Week 12 from study commencement (study end)
Ketone sensor usability with System Usability Scale
Time frame: Week 12 from study commencement (study end)
Treatment satisfaction and ketone sensor usability with User Experience Questionnaire
Time frame: Week 12 from study commencement (study end)
Lived experience of a using DGK system during Dapagliflozin treatment
Time frame: Week 12 from study commencement (study end)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Nov 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Islet Cell Transplant for Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Diabetes in African Youth
type1diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Metabolic and Inflammatory Outcomes of the Ketogenic Diet Comparing Saturated and Unsaturated Fat Sources
PreDiabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
RecruitingObservational study
Washed Microbiota Transplantation for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Type 1 Diabetes
Recruiting
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Impact of the Accu-Chek SmartGuide CGM Solution on the Mean Change in Time in Range Compared With Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Participants With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing FORXIGA in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne at 4 sites in Australia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Prof. David O'Neal (+61 3 9231 2757, DTRG-t1research@unimelb.edu.au), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent time spent with interstitial ketones ≥3.0mmol/L (Main Study) (time frame: Commencement to end of study (12 weeks)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.