AzTrials
AzTrials

Aortic StenosisNCT07205068

Improved Outcomes With Pre-Procedure Shockwave IVL of Common Femoral Artery Access Site Prior to Large Bore Access and Pre-Closure

A study testing Shockwave M5 IVL Catheter and Modified Seldinger Technique in people with Aortic Stenosis, run by University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary purpose of this study is to observe reduced access site complications in patients with heavily calcified common femoral arteries requiring Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Aortic Stenosis
What is being tested?
Shockwave M5 IVL Catheter and Modified Seldinger Technique
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
4 Oct 2025to 4 Oct 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • >18 years of age
  • Patient with a diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR
  • Participants must be able to read and understand study procedures
  • Willing to participate and sign an ICF
  • Patients with > 90-degree arc of calcium at the large bore access site per CT documentation

Who cannot join

  • Unable to understand study procedures
  • Unwilling to give consent
  • Patients with cognitive impairments that can affect their ability to give consent
  • Unfavorable calcium distribution of femoral artery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University of Tennessee Medical Center

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920

    Savannah Allen, MPH Study Coordinator, +1865-305-9522, skallen1@utmck.edu

    Raj Baljepally, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

The primary purpose of this study is to observe reduced access site complications in patients with heavily calcified common femoral arteries requiring Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective randomized/control trial pilot study to compare clinical outcomes of common femoral artery access in patients undergoing TAVR at the University of Tennessee Medical. Specifically, This study compares patients utilizing the Shockwave model (M5) Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) prior to standard arterial access using the modified Seldinger technique to those utilizing the standard femoral artery access via the modified Seldinger approach without the utilization of intravascular lithotripsy in heavily calcified femoral arteries.

The secondary purposes of this study are to:

  1. Determine the clinical outcomes between groups
  2. Distinguish extravasation post closure at the end of the procedure
  3. Compare the need for open vascular surgery between groups
  4. Examine PTA or Stents to the CFA to help hemostasis or local vascular complications between groups
  5. Number of Perclose devices used between groups
  6. Compare Bleeding/Hematoma between groups
  7. Examine the difference in hospital length of stay between groups
  8. Examine renal function post procedure
  9. Difference in pain or numbness in the distal extremity between groups
  10. Mortality related to complications from vascular closure site between groups
  11. Conversion to general anesthesia due to additional procedures required to address the CFA access site complications between groups
Conditions
Aortic Stenosis
Being tested
Shockwave M5 IVL Catheter, Modified Seldinger Technique
Keywords
Aortic Stenosis, Transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Medical subject headings
Aortic Valve Stenosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Shockwave M5 IVL CatheterDevice

    The Shockwave M5 IVL Catheter is a balloon catheter designed to modify calcified arterial plaque using intravascular lithotripsy prior to vascular access

  • Modified Seldinger TechniqueProcedure or surgery

    Standard of care for femoral access in patients with calcified femoral arteries

  • Modified Seldinger TechniqueProcedure or surgery

    Standard femoral artery access using the modified Seldinger technique without any prior vessel preparation or plaque modification.

Study groups in NCT07205068
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Shockwave model (M5) Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL)ExperimentalPatients will be treated with the Shockwave M5 Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) device prior to femoral artery access using the modified Seldinger technique
Receives: Device: Shockwave M5 IVL Catheter; Procedure: Modified Seldinger Technique
Standard femoral accessActive comparatorPatients will receive standard femoral artery access via the modified Seldinger approach without utilizing intravascular lithotripsy in heavily calcified femoral arteries
Receives: Procedure: Modified Seldinger Technique

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Evaluate for contrast extravasation post closure of femoral artery at the end of the procedure

    Measured: Immediately post-procedure

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Determine need for Vascular surgery consultation

    Measured: During hospital stay (Day 0-3)

  2. If vascular complication, was PTA, stenting, or open surgery used

    Measured: During hospital stay (Day 0-3)

  3. Number of perclose devices used to close the femoral artery access site

    Measured: During procedure (Day 0)

  4. Determine presence of other vascular complications I.e. bleeding, hematoma, emboli etc

    Measured: Within 3 days post-procedure

  5. Change in Hemoglobin

    As part of evaluating clinical deterioration, this outcome measures the drop in hemoglobin (g/dL)

    Measured: Day 0 to Day 3 post-procedure

  6. Change in Serum Creatinine

    As part of evaluating clinical deterioration, this outcome assesses the increase in serum creatinine (mg/dL)

    Measured: Day 0 to Day 3 post procedure

  7. Incidence of Hypotension or Shock

    As part of evaluating clinical deterioration, this outcome captures the number of participants who develop hypotension (SBP < 90 mmHg) or clinical shock.

    Measured: Day 0 to Day 3 post-procedure

  8. Incidence of Infections or Sepsis

    As part of evaluating clinical deterioration, this outcome records the number of participants diagnosed with infection or sepsis

    Measured: Day 0 to Day 3 post-procedure

  9. Determine if there is a difference between hospital length of stay

    Hospital length of stay will be measured in days from the date of admission to the date of discharge. The total duration will be compared between the intervention and control groups.

    Measured: From date of admission to date of discharge, assessed up to 60 days

  10. Assess for difference in pain/numbness in distal extremities post-procedure (Yes/No)

    Measured: Within 3 days post-procedure

  11. Assess for differences in mortality related to complications between the groups

    Presence of new or worsening pain or numbness in the distal extremities will be assessed by patient-reported symptoms during routine clinical evaluation and physical examination. If present, symptoms will be documented in medical records

    Measured: Up to 3 months post-procedure

  12. Failure of treatment

    Failure to achieve the intended procedural outcomes or additional interventions due to complications

    Measured: Day 0 to discharge (or up to 3 days post-procedure)

  13. Number of related AE(s)

    Measured: Up to 3 months post-procedure

  14. Number of related SAE(S)

    Measured: Up to 3 months post-procedure

  15. Side effects reported by subjects or observed by study team

    Measured: Within 3 days post-procedure, or up to 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Oct 2025
  2. Study start4 Oct 2025
  3. Primary completion4 Oct 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion4 Oct 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07205068
Sponsor's protocol ID
5319
Other IDs
Institutional Review Board
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
21 Aug 2025
Last updated
17 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Shockwave M5 IVL Catheter and Modified Seldinger Technique in people with Aortic Stenosis, run by University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Evaluate for contrast extravasation post closure of femoral artery at the end of the procedure (time frame: Immediately post-procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in