AzTrials
AzTrials

Gram-negative BacteremiaCMIBActRéaNCT07202377

Impact of Real-time MIC (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration) Reporting (<6 Hours) on β-lactam Prescription in Cases of Gram-negative Bacilli Bacteremia in ICU Patients in Real-life Settings

A study testing SPECIFIC REVEAL® Rapid AST system and antibiotic susceptibility testing on agar medium in people with Gram-negative Bacteremia and Intensive Care Patients, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Evaluate the impact of rapid, real-time (4 to 6 h) MIC reporting compared with the standard method (=diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing) (18 to 24 h) on β-lactam prescribing in terms of the choice of molecule by the resuscitating clinician in the event of real-life Gram-negative Bacilli GNB bacteremia in the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
SPECIFIC REVEAL® Rapid AST system and antibiotic susceptibility testing on agar medium
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Oct 2025to Nov 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients aged over 18 years
  • Patients with a positive blood culture for Gram-negative bacilli (Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii) with results reported on weekdays before 11:00 ante meridiem (AM)
  • Patients clinically suspected of infection
  • Treated with empirical antibiotic therapy including a β-lactam, among the standard list of antibiotics to be tested recommended by CASFM-EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) for Enterobacterales/Pseudomonas and included in the Reveal Rapid AST System panel
  • Hospitalized in intensive care unit (ICU) for at least the next 24 hours
  • Written informed consent obtained from the patient or a relative for study participation (emergency consent)
  • Affiliated with the French social security system

Who cannot join

  • Patients receiving withdrawal or limitation of care
  • Patients with an expected survival prognosis of less than 72 hours
  • Patients with bloodstream infections caused by Gram-negative bacilli other than Acinetobacter baumannii, Citrobacter freundii, Citrobacter koseri, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella aerogenes, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa
  • Patients treated with antibiotic therapy not including a β-lactam
  • Polymicrobial bloodstream infections
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Patients under legal protection (guardianship or conservatorship)
  • Participation in another interventional research study

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Françoise Jauréguy contact

01 48 95 56 69

francoise.jaureguy@aphp.fr

About this study

Evaluate the impact of rapid, real-time (4 to 6 h) MIC reporting compared with the standard method (=diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing) (18 to 24 h) on β-lactam prescribing in terms of the choice of molecule by the resuscitating clinician in the event of real-life Gram-negative Bacilli GNB bacteremia in the ICU.

Read the detailed description

In the microbiology laboratory, antibiotic susceptibility is traditionally determined using the disk diffusion method on agar medium, directly from a positive blood culture bottle, which requires 18 to 24 hours of incubation. Over the past decade, the turnaround time for antibiotic susceptibility testing has been shortened (down to 7 hours) thanks to rapid diagnostic tools. However, to date, there is no rapid (within 4 to 6 hours) and accurate method for determining the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) that would allow for optimized antibiotic treatment beyond the basic susceptibility to a tested drug. This level of precision would be particularly useful in critically ill septic patients, especially in cases of bacteremia caused by Gram-negative bacilli (GNB).

Recent intensive care guidelines have suggested that for β-lactam antibiotics, the therapeutic target in these patients should be a plasma antibiotic concentration between 4 to 8 times the MIC of the administered antibiotic, depending on the bacterium and the drug. MIC thus represents a key determinant for optimizing antibiotic therapy by increasing the likelihood of achieving the pharmacodynamic efficacy targets of β-lactams.

The use of a new instrument, the SPECIFIC REVEAL® Rapid AST system (bioMérieux), which provides not only a full antibiogram but also MIC values for 23 different antibiotics as early as 4 hours after a positive GNB blood culture (Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii), could represent a potential benefit for ICU patients by enabling rapid optimization of antibiotic therapy. This technique was validated by comparison with two reference methods: a precise MIC determination method (broth microdilution, Sensititre, ThermoFisher) and an approximate method (Vitek2, bioMérieux). A 96% correlation was observed across the 23 antibiotics tested. Furthermore, a recent study conducted outside the ICU suggested a clinical impact, with earlier re-evaluation of antibiotic choices in 58% of cases.

Being tested
SPECIFIC REVEAL® Rapid AST system, antibiotic susceptibility testing on agar medium

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SPECIFIC REVEAL® Rapid AST systemDiagnostic test

    The SPECIFIC REVEAL™ system uses biosensors capable of detecting volatile substances released by microorganisms during their growth. The detection of these volatile compounds by ultra-high-performance biosensors enables very early detection of bacterial growth compared with standard technologies based on visual systems (e.g. diffusion antibiogram or MICs determined by microdilution in liquid media) or optical density measurement systems (e.g. Vitek2)

  • antibiotic susceptibility testing on agar mediumDiagnostic test

    Performance of an antibiotic susceptibility test on agar medium, with results expected between H18 and H24

Study groups in NCT07202377
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Performance of an antibiotic susceptibility test on agar mediumActive comparatorPerformance of an antibiotic susceptibility test on agar medium, with results expected between H18 and H24
Receives: Diagnostic Test: antibiotic susceptibility testing on agar medium
Antibiotic susceptibility testing performed using the Reveal techniqueExperimentalAntibiotic susceptibility testing performed using the Reveal technique, with results available between the 4th and 6th hour (H4-H6) after blood culture positivity, allowing for rapid clinical categorization for the 23 antibiotics tested, along with their corresponding MICs.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: SPECIFIC REVEAL® Rapid AST system

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of patients for whom antibiotic therapy was modified in terms of molecule selection within the first 24 hours following the report of a positive blood culture for Gram-negative bacilli, based on medical prescriptions after inclusion

    To evaluate whether the rapid and real-time reporting (4 to 6 hours) of MICs, compared to the standard method (i.e., disk diffusion antibiogram, 18 to 24 hours), has an impact on β-lactam prescription in terms of molecule selection by the ICU clinician in real-life cases of bloodstream infections due to Gram-negative bacilli.

    Measured: 24 hours following the report of a positive blood culture for Gram-negative bacilli

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Proportion of patients with favorable clinical and biological evolution based on the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score between H72 and H96, and on day 7

    To evaluate the impact of rapid MIC reporting compared to the standard method (i.e., disk diffusion, which provides only clinical categorization) on clinical and biological outcomes between H72 and H96, and on day 7

    Measured: hour72 and hour96, and on day 7

  2. Proportion of patients with favorable microbiological evolution, defined by negative blood cultures collected between H72 and H96.

    To evaluate the impact of rapid MIC reporting compared to the standard method (i.e., disk diffusion, which provides only clinical categorization) on microbiological evolution between H72 and H96

    Measured: hour72 and hour96

  3. Plasma concentration/MIC ratio observed at the first β-lactam level measurement between H24 and H48

    To evaluate the impact of rapid MIC reporting compared to the standard method (i.e., disk diffusion, which provides only clinical categorization) on the probability of achieving a residual β-lactam plasma concentration between 4 and 8 times the MIC at the first antibiotic measurement between 24 and 48 hours (H24-H48).

    Measured: hour24 and hour48

  4. Proportion of patients alive at day 30 (D30) and at ICU discharge

    To evaluate the impact of rapid MIC reporting compared to the standard method (i.e., disk diffusion, which provides only clinical categorization) on mortality at day 30 (D30) and at ICU discharge

    Measured: day 30

  5. Incidence of antibiotic-associated adverse events affecting renal, neurological, and hepatic function during the course of treatment

    To evaluate the impact of rapid MIC reporting compared to the standard method (i.e., disk diffusion, which provides only clinical categorization) on the incidence of antibiotic-related adverse effects (renal, neurological, hepatic tolerance) throughout the treatment.

    Measured: day 30

  6. Costs associated with rapid MIC testing, hospital stay, antibiotics, and microbiological tests as well as costs assessed at 30 days.

    To evaluate the medico-economic impact of the rapid MIC reporting strategy through a cost-consequence analysis, which allows for a disaggregated presentation of the consequences of rapid MIC reporting for patients, prescribers, and the microbiology department; costs are estimated from the healthcare provider's perspective

    Measured: day 30

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Oct 2025
  2. Study startOct 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionNov 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07202377
Sponsor's protocol ID
APHP240793
Acronym
CMIBActRéa
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
22 Aug 2025
Last updated
1 Oct 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing SPECIFIC REVEAL® Rapid AST system and antibiotic susceptibility testing on agar medium in people with Gram-negative Bacteremia and Intensive Care Patients, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Françoise Jauréguy (01 48 95 56 69, francoise.jaureguy@aphp.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of patients for whom antibiotic therapy was modified in terms of molecule selection within the first 24 hours following the report of a positive blood culture for Gram-negative bacilli, based on medical prescriptions after inclusion (time frame: 24 hours following the report of a positive blood culture for Gram-negative bacilli). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in