Supraglottic Airway DeviceGLAM-IINCT07196696
An in Vivo CT Imaging Study of GMA-Tulip, I-gel, and LMA Supreme (GLAM-II)
A study testing GMA-Tulip, I-gel and LMA-Supreme insertion in people with Supraglottic Airway Device, run by Zhejiang Cancer Hospital at 2 sites in China.
Trial summary
Laryngeal masks are core devices for supraglottic airway management, and the accuracy of their anatomical position directly impacts ventilation safety and the incidence of complications. Despite their wide clinical application, gaps remain in understanding their in vivo anatomical characteristics. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Supraglottic Airway Device
- What is being tested?
- GMA-Tulip, I-gel and LMA-Supreme insertion
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 9 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 12 Oct 2025to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged 18-75 years, scheduled for CT interventional therapy;
- Aged 18-75 years, scheduled for CT interventional therapy;
- Body Mass Index (BMI) <30 kg/m²;
- Good communication and cooperation, with voluntary signing of the informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- Presence of head/neck or airway anatomical abnormalities (e.g., laryngeal cartilage malformation, Grade III tonsillar hypertrophy, tongue hypertrophy, cervical spine malformation) that may affect laryngeal mask insertion or CT imaging evaluation;
- Current participation in other clinical studies.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Jiangling Wang, Dr contact
China2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022
Xiaochun Jin, Dr., +86 571 88122564, ec@zjcc.org.cn
Pingbp Xu, Ph. D
- Recruiting
Jiangling Wang
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022
Jiangling Wang, Ph. D, wangjl@zjcc.org.cn
Pingbo Xu, Ph. D, xupb@zjcc.org.cn
About this study
Official title: An in Vivo CT Imaging Study After Insertion of the LMA Supreme, I-gel, and GMA-Tulip Airway Devices Under General Anesthesia (GLAM-II)
Laryngeal masks are core devices for supraglottic airway management, and the accuracy of their anatomical position directly impacts ventilation safety and the incidence of complications. Despite their wide clinical application, gaps remain in understanding their in vivo anatomical characteristics. This study aims to evaluate the in vivo anatomical features (e.g., insertion depth, anatomical alignment, tissue compression) of three laryngeal masks (LMA Supreme, I-gel, GMA-Tulip) using CT scanning in anesthetized patients undergoing CT interventional therapy, providing anatomical evidence for optimized laryngeal mask selection and complication prevention.
Read the detailed description
After approval by the Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Approval Number: IRB-2025-001 (IIT)), this study will be registered on ClinicalTrials.gov prior to participant enrollment. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The study is planned to be conducted from September 2025 to December 2025.
Eligible participants are 18-75 years old, ASA physical status I-II, BMI <30 kg/m², scheduled for CT interventional therapy, and without contraindications (e.g., head/neck airway anomalies, participation in other clinical studies).
Pre-procedure Preparation: Patients fast and abstain from fluids as per standard protocols, with no premedication. Upon admission to the operating room, standard monitoring (ECG, HR, BP, SpO₂) is initiated, and an intravenous access is established. Pre-anesthesia baseline HR and BP are recorded.
Anesthesia Induction: Pre-oxygenation with 8 L/min oxygen via face mask for 3 minutes. Anesthesia is induced with propofol (3.5 μg/ml) and remifentanil (4 ng/ml). After loss of eyelash reflex, rocuronium (0.9 mg/kg) is administered, and laryngeal mask insertion is performed 2 minutes post-rocuronium injection.
Laryngeal Mask Insertion: Participants are randomly assigned (via computer-generated sequence) to one of three groups: LMA Supreme Group (L Group), I-gel Group (I Group), or GMA-Tulip Group (G Group). Each patient receives one laryngeal mask insertion by an anesthesiologist with ≥5 years of experience, following standardized insertion protocols for each device:
LMA Supreme: Lubricate the posterior surface; place the head in neutral or sniffing position; advance the mask along the midline of the oral cavity until resistance is felt.
I-gel: Lubricate the posterior surface; advance along the hard palate until definite resistance is felt.
GMA-Tulip: Lubricate the posterior surface; place the head in sniffing position; avoid tongue entrapment; advance until passing the base of the tongue (no need to seek strong resistance); gently shake to ensure tight fit.
Laryngeal mask size is selected based on body weight:
L Group: 3# (30-50 kg), 4# (50-70 kg), 5# (70-100 kg); I Group: 3# (30-60 kg), 4# (50-90 kg), 5# (>90 kg); G Group: 2.5# (<60 kg), 3# (60-85 kg), 4# (>80 kg);
Anesthesia Maintenance: Propofol (3.5 μg/ml) and remifentanil (2 ng/ml) are infused to maintain BIS 40-60. Additional rocuronium (0.15 mg/kg) or sufentanil (5 μg) is administered as needed. Hemodynamics are maintained within ±20% of baseline using medications (atropine, ephedrine, esmolol, dopamine, norepinephrine, nitroglycerin) if required. At the end of the procedure, propofol and remifentanil are discontinued, and rocuronium is antagonized with sugammadex sodium (200 mg). The laryngeal mask is removed when the patient regains consciousness and can follow commands. Participants recover in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) for ≥1 hour before discharge.
Alignment Verification: Mechanical ventilation is initiated with parameters: VT 6-8 ml/kg, I:E 1:2, RR 12-14 breaths/min, maintaining PETCO₂ 35-45 mmHg. Air tightness is confirmed via leak test (25 cmH₂O pressure) and auscultation. Fiberoptic laryngoscopy is used to grade anatomical alignment (Grade I: Only one aryepiglottic fold and partial laryngeal inlet visible, SpO₂ >98%; Grade II: Bilateral aryepiglottic folds and partial laryngeal inlet visible, SpO₂ >98%; Grade III: Bilateral aryepiglottic folds, laryngeal inlet, and partial glottis visible; Grade IV: Entire glottis visible).
Outcome Assessment: CT scanning is performed to measure insertion depth, anatomical alignment, and tissue compression. Post-procedure follow-up is conducted at 24 hours to assess complications (mucosal injury, hoarseness, sore throat via VAS 0-10, regurgitation).
- Conditions
- Supraglottic Airway Device
- Being tested
- GMA-Tulip, I-gel, LMA-Supreme insertion
- Keywords
- GMA-Tulip, I-gel, LMA-Supreme, Supraglottic airway device
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GMA-TulipDevice
Also called GMA-Tulip insertion
Under general anesthesia, GMA-Tulip laryngeal mask is inserted following standardized protocols. CT scanning and fiberoptic laryngoscopy are performed to assess insertion depth, anatomical alignment, and tissue compression.
I-gelDevice
Also called I-gel insertion
Under general anesthesia, I-gel laryngeal mask is inserted following standardized protocols. CT scanning and fiberoptic laryngoscopy are performed to assess insertion depth, anatomical alignment, and tissue compression.
LMA-Supreme insertionDevice
Also called LMA-Supreme
Under general anesthesia, LMA Supreme laryngeal mask is inserted following standardized protocols. CT scanning and fiberoptic laryngoscopy are performed to assess insertion depth, anatomical alignment, and tissue compression.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| GMA-Tulip | Experimental | Insert GMA-Tulip in this group and observe the outcomes Receives: Device: GMA-Tulip |
| I-gel | Active comparator | Insert I-gel in this group and observe the outcomes Receives: Device: I-gel |
| LMA-Supreme | Sham comparator | Insert LMA-Supreme in this group and observe the outcomes Receives: Device: LMA-Supreme insertion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Insertion depth of the three laryngeal masks
Measurement of the distance from the laryngeal mask tip to the glottis and the upper edge of the 5th cervical vertebra (C5), and the relationship between the mask tip and the cricoid cartilage plate (via CT imaging)
Measured: During CT scanning immediately after laryngeal mask insertion (within 30 minutes of insertion)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Anatomical alignment of the three laryngeal masks
Assessment of laryngeal inlet coverage (glottis, epiglottis, aryepiglottic folds, arytenoid cartilage, interarytenoid notch) via fiberoptic laryngoscopy (graded as Grade I-IV) and CT imaging.
Measured: During fiberoptic examination and CT scanning immediately after laryngeal mask insertion
Degree of local tissue compression
Quantification of epiglottis/tongue compression, displacement distance of the hyoid bone and cricoid cartilage plate, inter-common carotid artery distance, tracheal inner diameter change, and the area of the mask body at the upper edge, lower edge, and middle of the cricoid cartilage plate (via CT imaging)
Measured: During CT scanning immediately after laryngeal mask insertion.
Post-extubation complications
Evaluation of mucosal injury (visible bleeding during mask removal), hoarseness (patient-reported), sore throat (VAS 0-10, 0 = no pain, 10 = severe pain), and regurgitation (presence of gastric fluid in the oropharynx) at 24 hours post-extubation.
Measured: 24 hours after laryngeal mask extubation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Sep 2025
- Study start12 Oct 2025
- Primary completion30 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Supraglottic Airway DeviceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Zhejiang Cancer HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Wang Jiangling, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
- Investigators
- Jiangling Wang, Dr, Principal investigator, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07196696
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB-2025-1160(IIT)
- Acronym
- GLAM-II
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 21 Sep 2025
- Last updated
- 25 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An in Vivo CT Imaging Study After Insertion of the LMA Supreme, I-gel, and GMA-Tulip Airway Devices Under General Anesthesia (GLAM-II)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07196696
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GLAM-II / IRB-2025-1160(IIT)
- Conditions
- Supraglottic Airway Device
- Keywords
- GMA-Tulip, I-gel, LMA-Supreme, Supraglottic airway device
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Zhejiang Cancer HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Laryngeal masks are core devices for supraglottic airway management, and the accuracy of their anatomical position directly impacts ventilation safety and the incidence of complications. Despite their wide clinical application, gaps remain in understanding their in vivo anatomical characteristics. This study aims to evaluate the in vivo anatomical features (e.g., insertion depth, anatomical alignment, tissue compression) of three laryngeal masks (LMA Supreme, I-gel, GMA-Tulip) using CT scanning in anesthetized patients undergoing CT interventional therapy, providing anatomical evidence for optimized laryngeal mask selection and complication prevention.
Detailed description
After approval by the Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Approval Number: IRB-2025-001 (IIT)), this study will be registered on ClinicalTrials.gov prior to participant enrollment. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The study is planned to be conducted from September 2025 to December 2025.
Eligible participants are 18-75 years old, ASA physical status I-II, BMI <30 kg/m², scheduled for CT interventional therapy, and without contraindications (e.g., head/neck airway anomalies, participation in other clinical studies).
Pre-procedure Preparation: Patients fast and abstain from fluids as per standard protocols, with no premedication. Upon admission to the operating room, standard monitoring (ECG, HR, BP, SpO₂) is initiated, and an intravenous access is established. Pre-anesthesia baseline HR and BP are recorded.
Anesthesia Induction: Pre-oxygenation with 8 L/min oxygen via face mask for 3 minutes. Anesthesia is induced with propofol (3.5 μg/ml) and remifentanil (4 ng/ml). After loss of eyelash reflex, rocuronium (0.9 mg/kg) is administered, and laryngeal mask insertion is performed 2 minutes post-rocuronium injection.
Laryngeal Mask Insertion: Participants are randomly assigned (via computer-generated sequence) to one of three groups: LMA Supreme Group (L Group), I-gel Group (I Group), or GMA-Tulip Group (G Group). Each patient receives one laryngeal mask insertion by an anesthesiologist with ≥5 years of experience, following standardized insertion protocols for each device:
LMA Supreme: Lubricate the posterior surface; place the head in neutral or sniffing position; advance the mask along the midline of the oral cavity until resistance is felt.
I-gel: Lubricate the posterior surface; advance along the hard palate until definite resistance is felt.
GMA-Tulip: Lubricate the posterior surface; place the head in sniffing position; avoid tongue entrapment; advance until passing the base of the tongue (no need to seek strong resistance); gently shake to ensure tight fit.
Laryngeal mask size is selected based on body weight:
L Group: 3# (30-50 kg), 4# (50-70 kg), 5# (70-100 kg); I Group: 3# (30-60 kg), 4# (50-90 kg), 5# (>90 kg); G Group: 2.5# (<60 kg), 3# (60-85 kg), 4# (>80 kg);
Anesthesia Maintenance: Propofol (3.5 μg/ml) and remifentanil (2 ng/ml) are infused to maintain BIS 40-60. Additional rocuronium (0.15 mg/kg) or sufentanil (5 μg) is administered as needed. Hemodynamics are maintained within ±20% of baseline using medications (atropine, ephedrine, esmolol, dopamine, norepinephrine, nitroglycerin) if required. At the end of the procedure, propofol and remifentanil are discontinued, and rocuronium is antagonized with sugammadex sodium (200 mg). The laryngeal mask is removed when the patient regains consciousness and can follow commands. Participants recover in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) for ≥1 hour before discharge.
Alignment Verification: Mechanical ventilation is initiated with parameters: VT 6-8 ml/kg, I:E 1:2, RR 12-14 breaths/min, maintaining PETCO₂ 35-45 mmHg. Air tightness is confirmed via leak test (25 cmH₂O pressure) and auscultation. Fiberoptic laryngoscopy is used to grade anatomical alignment (Grade I: Only one aryepiglottic fold and partial laryngeal inlet visible, SpO₂ >98%; Grade II: Bilateral aryepiglottic folds and partial laryngeal inlet visible, SpO₂ >98%; Grade III: Bilateral aryepiglottic folds, laryngeal inlet, and partial glottis visible; Grade IV: Entire glottis visible).
Outcome Assessment: CT scanning is performed to measure insertion depth, anatomical alignment, and tissue compression. Post-procedure follow-up is conducted at 24 hours to assess complications (mucosal injury, hoarseness, sore throat via VAS 0-10, regurgitation).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| GMA-Tulip | Experimental | Device: GMA-TulipInsert GMA-Tulip in this group and observe the outcomes |
| I-gel | Active comparator | Device: I-gelInsert I-gel in this group and observe the outcomes |
| LMA-Supreme | Sham comparator | Device: LMA-Supreme insertionInsert LMA-Supreme in this group and observe the outcomes |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Aged 18-75 years, scheduled for CT interventional therapy;
- Aged 18-75 years, scheduled for CT interventional therapy;
- Body Mass Index (BMI) <30 kg/m²;
- Good communication and cooperation, with voluntary signing of the informed consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Presence of head/neck or airway anatomical abnormalities (e.g., laryngeal cartilage malformation, Grade III tonsillar hypertrophy, tongue hypertrophy, cervical spine malformation) that may affect laryngeal mask insertion or CT imaging evaluation;
- Current participation in other clinical studies.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GMA-TulipAlso: GMA-Tulip insertionUnder general anesthesia, GMA-Tulip laryngeal mask is inserted following standardized protocols. CT scanning and fiberoptic laryngoscopy are performed to assess insertion depth, anatomical alignment, and tissue compression. | Device | GMA-Tulip |
| I-gelAlso: I-gel insertionUnder general anesthesia, I-gel laryngeal mask is inserted following standardized protocols. CT scanning and fiberoptic laryngoscopy are performed to assess insertion depth, anatomical alignment, and tissue compression. | Device | I-gel |
| LMA-Supreme insertionAlso: LMA-SupremeUnder general anesthesia, LMA Supreme laryngeal mask is inserted following standardized protocols. CT scanning and fiberoptic laryngoscopy are performed to assess insertion depth, anatomical alignment, and tissue compression. | Device | LMA-Supreme |
Primary outcome
Insertion depth of the three laryngeal masks
Time frame: During CT scanning immediately after laryngeal mask insertion (within 30 minutes of insertion)
Measurement of the distance from the laryngeal mask tip to the glottis and the upper edge of the 5th cervical vertebra (C5), and the relationship between the mask tip and the cricoid cartilage plate (via CT imaging)
3 secondary outcomes
Anatomical alignment of the three laryngeal masks
Time frame: During fiberoptic examination and CT scanning immediately after laryngeal mask insertion
Degree of local tissue compression
Time frame: During CT scanning immediately after laryngeal mask insertion.
Post-extubation complications
Time frame: 24 hours after laryngeal mask extubation
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Nov 2025.
Related trials for Supraglottic Airway Device
Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled SaCo-VLM Trial
General Anaesthesia Using Supraglotic Airway
Not yet recruiting
Tizanidine Premedication Versus Placebo for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion and Recovery in Adults Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery
Airway Management
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Second- and Third-Generation Laryngeal Mask Airway in Pediatric Patients
Airway Management, Anesthesia, General
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Neuromuscular Blocking Agent Use on Video Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion
Airway Management, Supraglottic Airway Device Insertion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jiangling Wang, Dr contact
Jiangling Wang, Dr principal investigator
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing GMA-Tulip, I-gel and LMA-Supreme insertion in people with Supraglottic Airway Device, run by Zhejiang Cancer Hospital at 2 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Xiaochun Jin, M.D (+86 571-88122564, ec@zjcc.org.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Insertion depth of the three laryngeal masks (time frame: During CT scanning immediately after laryngeal mask insertion (within 30 minutes of insertion)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Nov 2025.