AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative CarePinEAPPLENCT07191938

Posthectomy in Pediatric Elective Surgery : a Comparison of Perioperative Analgesia Using Echo-guided Penile Block and Pudendal Block With neurostimuLation Technique

A study testing Ultrasound guided penile block and Neurostimulation guided pudendal block in people with Postoperative Care and Analgesia Assessment, run by University Hospital, Caen at 1 site in France.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Context : Posthectomy is a surgical procedure that concerns around 30% of the male population, mainly in pediatrics. As this procedure is mainly performed on an outpatient basis, the implementation of an enhanced rehabilitation protocol after surgery in pediatrics helps to reduce the incidence of postoperative pain… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 weeks to 18 years, men only
What is being tested?
Ultrasound guided penile block and Neurostimulation guided pudendal block
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
240 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Sep 2025to Dec 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 weeks to 18 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • All children aged over 3 months or 60 weeks post-conceptional age scheduled for outpatient posthectomy surgery

Who cannot join

  • Recent airway infection.
  • Contraindication to locoregional anesthesia: infection and/or loss of substance at the puncture site, congenital or acquired coagulopathy, product allergy.
  • Contraindication to outpatient treatment: age < 12 weeks for healthy children or 60 weeks corrected age for premature babies, unbalanced pre-existing pathology (respiratory), ability to understand and comply with instructions (pre-operative fasting, taking painkillers at home and resumption of feeding), inability to ensure the presence of 2 adults including 1 parent on the return journey by car for children < 10 years old, easy access to care close to home.
  • Emergency surgery.
  • Coupled surgery (posthectomy + other surgery).
  • Parents' refusal to participate in the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Marine A Rolland, MD contact

+33699014734

rolland-m@chu-caen.fr

Jean Luc Hanouz, MD, PhD contact

+33231063106

hanouz-jl@chu-caen.fr

France1 site
  • CHU de Caen

    Caen, Normandy, 14000

    Marine A Rolland, MD, +33699014734, rolland-m@chu-caen.fr

    Marine A Rolland, MD

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Echo-guided Penile Block and Pudendal Block Under Neurostimulation for Perioperative Analgesia of Posthectomy in Pediatric Surgery: a Prospective, Randomized Study at Caen University Hospital

Context : Posthectomy is a surgical procedure that concerns around 30% of the male population, mainly in pediatrics. As this procedure is mainly performed on an outpatient basis, the implementation of an enhanced rehabilitation protocol after surgery in pediatrics helps to reduce the incidence of postoperative pain, notably by providing multimodal analgesia, including locoregional anesthesia. Current recommendations from pediatric locoregional anesthesia societies favor penile block and the use of ultrasound in pediatric anesthesia to reduce anesthetic set-up time and the volume of local anesthetic, but also to increase the duration of sensory block and the success rate. However, several studies have shown the inferiority of penile block in anatomical landmarks compared with pudendal block under neurostimulation. As a result, pediatric anesthesiologists at Caen University Hospital prefer to use pudendal blocks under neurostimulation for posthectomy surgery. To date, no study has compared penile block under ultrasound with pudendal block under neurostimulation for postoperative analgesia after posthectomy surgery. On the other hand, a study of postoperative analgesia in hypospadias surgery showed a clear superiority of penile block under ultrasound over pudendal block in terms of both immediate postoperative pain and duration of postoperative analgesia. It therefore seems pertinent to compare these two techniques in posthectomy surgery.

Objective: We propose a prospective, open-label, non-inferiority study with the primary objective of comparing the efficacy of echo-guided penile block versus pudendal block in neurostimulation for posthectomy surgery.

Read more

Methods: This randomized, single-center study will include 240 patients divided into two groups. The experimental group will receive optimized medical and surgical management, with a penile block under ultrasound, while the control group will receive a pudendal block under neurostimulation. The planned duration of the study is 3 years.

Hypothesis tested: We hypothesize that ultrasound-guided penile block is non-inferior to neurostimulated pudendal block for postoperative analgesia in scheduled posthectomy surgery. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the time taken to perform the block, the volume of local anesthetic used, the need for sufentanil reinjection intraoperatively, the quantitative evaluation of analgesia using the EVENDOL score, the consumption of nalbuphine in the post anesthesia care unit, the occurrence of postoperative vomiting, and the length of stay in the post anesthesia care unit. The rate of complications related to the performance of locoregional anesthesia is also observed.

Being tested
Ultrasound guided penile block, Neurostimulation guided pudendal block
Keywords
Neurostimulation guided pudendal block, US guided penile block, Security, Efficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultrasound guided penile blockProcedure or surgery

    The penile block is performed supine. After skin disinfection, the Buck's fascia is sonographically located, and the local anesthetic is injected close to the dorsal nerve of the penis in the plane after a negative aspiration test (16). The recommended dose is 0.1 ml/kg per side of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml (8). Injection is performed bilaterally. A subcutaneous injection of 1ml ropivacaine 2mg/ml (i.e. 2mg) is made at the base of the penis to ensure blockage of the perineal fibers.

  • Neurostimulation guided pudendal blockProcedure or surgery

    The pudendal block is performed in the supine position, with the legs flexed. After skin disinfection and palpation of the ischial tuberosity, the neurostimulator needle, set at 0.5 mA, is inserted 1 cm medial to the tuberosity. Contraction of the anal sphincter enables the proximity of the pudendal nerve, originating from the S2, S3 and S4 roots, to be identified. Once contraction has been obtained, local anaesthetic is injected using ropivacaine 2 mg/ml at a dose of 0.2 ml/kg per side, in the absence of blood reflux.

Study groups in NCT07191938
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ultrasound guided penile blockExperimentalThe penile block is performed supine. After skin disinfection, the Buck's fascia is sonographically located, and the local anesthetic is injected close to the dorsal nerve of the penis in the plane after a negative aspiration test. The recommended dose is 0.1 ml/kg per side of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml. Injection is performed bilaterally. A subcutaneous injection of 1ml ropivacaine 2mg/ml is made at the base of the penis to ensure blockage of the perineal fibers.
Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound guided penile block
Neurostimulation guided pudendal blockActive comparatorThe pudendal block is performed in the supine position, with the legs flexed. After skin disinfection and palpation of the ischial tuberosity, the neurostimulator needle, set at 0.5 mA, is inserted 1 cm medial to the tuberosity. Contraction of the anal sphincter enables the proximity of the pudendal nerve, originating from the S2, S3 and S4 nerve roots, to be identified. Once contraction has been obtained, local anaesthetic is injected using ropivacaine 2 mg/ml at a dose of 0.2 ml/kg per side, in the absence of blood reflux.
Receives: Procedure: Neurostimulation guided pudendal block

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Failure of effective postoperative analgesia

    It is defined by intense postoperative pain: an EVENDOL score ≥ 4 or the use of nalbuphine (0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg discontinuous) in the post anesthesia care unit "EVENDOL" is a French scale, which is an acronym of "EValuation ENfant DOuleur" or "Child pain assessment". This scale goes from 0 to 15, 0 is the absence of pain and 15 is the maximum pain. 4/15 is the threshold from which treatment is indicated.

    Measured: Perioperative period : From anesthetic induction to discharge from the post- anesthesia care unit (12 hours maximum)

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Locoregional anesthesia completion time

    In seconds, defined as the time between the end of skin disinfection and removal of the locoregional anesthesia needle.

    Measured: Peroperative period : From the end of skin disinfection to the removal of the locoregional anesthesia needle, assessed up to 30 minutes

  2. Volume of local anesthetic injected

    Volume of local anesthetic injected (in mL/kg/side)

    Measured: Peroperative period : From skin disinfection to removal of the ALR needle, assessed up to 30 minutes

  3. Intraoperative block failure rate

    Block failure is defined by the need to reinject sufentanil intraoperatively when systolic blood pressure or heart rate increases by more than 20% compared with the pre-incision heart rate, necessitating the consumption of intraoperative morphine.

    Measured: Peroperative period : From the beginning to the end of the surgery, assessed up to 2 hours

  4. Quantitative assessment of postoperative pain

    Quantitative assessment of postoperative pain using the EVENDOL score on arrival in the ICU, H+20 minutes, H+40 minutes and discharge from the post anesthesia care unit.

    As a reminder, EVENDOL" is a French scale, which is an acronym of "EValuation ENfant DOuleur" or "Child pain assessment". This scale goes from 0 to 15, 0 is the absence of pain and 15 is the maximum pain. 4/15 is the threshold from which treatment is indicated.

    Measured: Immediate post operative period : From the arrival to the discharge from the post anesthesia care unit, assessed up to 4 hours

  5. Nalbuphine consumption

    Nalbuphine consumption in the post anesthesia care unit (in mg/kg)

    Measured: Immediate postoperative period : From the arrival to the discharge from the post anesthesia care unit, assessed up to 4 hours

  6. Post operative vomiting

    Post operative vomiting and cosumption of ondansetron

    Measured: Immediate post operative period : From the arrival to the discharge from the post anesthesia care unit, assessed up to 4 hours

  7. Length of stay in post anesthesia care unit

    In minutes

    Measured: Immediate postoperative period : From the arrival to the discharge from the post anesthesia care unit, assessed up to 4 hours

  8. Adverse events related to local anesthesia

    Signs of local anesthetic intoxication (neurological signs such as tinnitus, logorrhea or convulsion; tachycardia, hypotension), bleeding and hematoma at puncture site.

    Measured: Perioperative period : From the completion of local anesthesia to the discharge from post anesthesia care unit, assessed up to 6 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Sep 2025
  2. Study startSep 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionDec 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
240 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07191938
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024-A01470-47
Acronym
PinEAPPLE
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
2 Jul 2025
Last updated
25 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Okoro C, Huang H, Cannon S, Low D, Liston DE, Richards MJ, Lendvay TS. The pudendal nerve block for ambulatory urology: What's old is new again. A quality improvement project. J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Oct;16(5):594.e1-594.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.07.025. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

    PubMed 32819811
  • Boisvert-Moreau F, Turcotte B, Albert N, Singbo N, Moore K, Boivin A. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block with ultrasound-guided penile nerve block for analgesia during pediatric circumcision. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Mar;48(3):127-133. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103785. Epub 2022 Nov 17.

    PubMed 36396298
  • Gnassingbe K, Akakpo-Numado KG, Anoukoum T, Kanassoua K, Kokoroko E, Tekou H. [The circumcision: why and how is it practiced in the newborn and the infant in the Lome teaching hospital?]. Prog Urol. 2009 Sep;19(8):572-5. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2009.02.011. Epub 2009 Apr 3. French.

    PubMed 19699456
  • Aksu C, Akay MA, Sen MC, Gurkan Y. Ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block vs neurostimulator-guided pudendal nerve block in children undergoing hypospadias surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2019 Oct;29(10):1046-1052. doi: 10.1111/pan.13727. Epub 2019 Sep 2.

    PubMed 31433895
  • Pertek JP, Junke E, Coissard A, Vagner JC, Haberer JP. [Penile block in adults]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1992;11(1):82-7. doi: 10.1016/S0750-7658(05)80323-5. French.

    PubMed 1443819
  • Faraoni D, Gilbeau A, Lingier P, Barvais L, Engelman E, Hennart D. Does ultrasound guidance improve the efficacy of dorsal penile nerve block in children? Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Oct;20(10):931-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03405.x.

    PubMed 20849498
  • Tutuncu AC, Kendigelen P, Ashyyeralyeva G, Altintas F, Emre S, Ozcan R, Kaya G. Pudendal Nerve Block Versus Penile Nerve Block in Children Undergoing Circumcision. Urol J. 2018 May 3;15(3):109-115. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4292.

    PubMed 29299888
  • Naja Z, Al-Tannir MA, Faysal W, Daoud N, Ziade F, El-Rajab M. A comparison of pudendal block vs dorsal penile nerve block for circumcision in children: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2011 Sep;66(9):802-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06753.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25.

    PubMed 21790518
  • Beydon L, Ecoffey C, Lienhart A, Puybasset L; Comite ICARE de Societe francaise d'anesthesie et de reanimation (Sfar). [Circumcision in children: an organizational or an ethical challenge?]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2012 May;31(5):442-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2012.01.038. Epub 2012 Mar 30. French.

    PubMed 22464840

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ultrasound guided penile block and Neurostimulation guided pudendal block in people with Postoperative Care and Analgesia Assessment, run by University Hospital, Caen at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Marine A Rolland, MD (+33699014734, rolland-m@chu-caen.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Failure of effective postoperative analgesia (time frame: Perioperative period : From anesthetic induction to discharge from the post- anesthesia care unit (12 hours maximum)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07191938, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in