Bone AugmentationNeoDent01NCT07179497
Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of the Neobone®: A Prospective Observational Study in Dental Area
An observational study of Bone Augmentation, run by Bioceramed at 1 site in Portugal.
Trial summary
This study aims to collect real-world clinical data to gather information on the performance and safety of the Neobone® when used according to its intended purpose and current clinical applications. The results of the clinical study will serve as clinical evidence for the device's clinical evaluation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bone Augmentation
- How many people
- 66 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePortugal
- Study dates
- 6 Oct 2025to Oct 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The clinical study population consists of adult patients (aged > 18 years old) who undergo reconstructive dental surgery using the Neobone® medical device.
Who may be able to join
- Adult males or females (age > 18 years old);
- Patients who are able to sign an informed consent form (for data collection);
- Patients undergoing reconstructive dental surgery and indicated for the use of Neobone®;
Who cannot join
- Patients who are unable to understand consent and the objectives of the study;
- Signs of local or systemic acute/ active or chronic infections;
- Metabolic affections;
- Severe degenerative diseases, conditions in which general bone grafting is not advisable;
- Implementation sites that allow product migration;
- Conditions which require structural support in the skeletal system;
Show all 9Show fewer
- Conditions where the implantation site is unstable and not rigidly fixated;
- Sensibility to the implantable materials;
- Known hypersensitivity to the implant material.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Portugal1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Egas Moniz School of Health and Science Caparica
Lisbon
João Botelho, 212 946 840 ext. +351, egasmoniz@egasmoniz.edu.pt
About this study
This study aims to collect real-world clinical data to gather information on the performance and safety of the Neobone® when used according to its intended purpose and current clinical applications. The results of the clinical study will serve as clinical evidence for the device's clinical evaluation.
Read the detailed description
Neobone® is a synthetic and resorbable implantable synthetic calcium phosphate ceramic bone substitute, composed of hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate. The structures composed of these calcium phosphate ceramic structures are rapidly osseointegrated due to its chemical composition, which is similar to the mineral phase of the human bone, and due to the interconnected porosity allowing a total vascularization of the implant. Since beta-tricalcium phosphate is more soluble than hydroxyapatite, this biphasic composition enhances the ceramic resorption, allowing a resorption rate compatible with the physiology of bone cells. Neobone® is a single use, gamma radiation sterilized medical device.
Neobone® is a single use, gamma sterilized, implantable biodegradable medical device intended to be used in filling bony voids or gaps within the skeletal system that do not contribute to the structural stability of the bone, and in reconstructive dental and maxillofacial surgeries. These defects may arise from surgical procedures or result from osseous damage due to traumatic injury to the bone.
Neobone® is intended to be used in operating rooms by trained orthopaedic surgeons, as well as in dental offices or operating rooms by dentists and maxillofacial surgeons who have medical and technical knowledge in bone grafting. Neobone® is a class III medical device and is intended for long-term use and will be placed in contact with cancellous tissue and adjacent tissues through surgically invasive techniques.
This observational post-market study will collect data relating to standard practice procedures, therefore there are no additional risks or direct benefits associated with participating in this registry for the patient.
Participation in the study may provide a better understanding of treatment with Neobone® and potentially influence future clinical decisions, contributing to the continuous improvement of healthcare.
This study based on observations of clinical practice aims to collect clinical data to keep up to date the information on the performance and safety of the medical device when used in accordance with its intended use and current clinical applications. The results of the clinical study shall be used as clinical evidence for clinical evaluation of the medical.
The post-market study is meant to identify and analyse emerging risks, ensure the continued acceptability of the benefit/risk ratio and also identify possible systematic misuse or unauthorized use of the medical device. This protocol does not include any planned new uses, new populations, new materials or design changes.
The results from the prospective observational post-market study will provide clinical evidence on the device's performance and safety in the post-market phase.. This complements the data collected during the pre-market phases, thus protecting patient safety. Active surveillance of the safety of medical devices, achieved through the continuous monitoring of vast sources of clinical data, is a priority in the field of medical devices, a requirement of MDR - Medical Device Regulation No. 2017/745. This approach is crucial to achieving the objectives set, guaranteeing the safety and efficacy of the devices in circulation.
The clinical study population consists of adult patients (aged > 18 years old) who undergo reconstructive dental surgery using the Neobone® medical device. Patients will be followed as per local standard medical practices of the centre for 2 years. Clinical data will be collected at 6 points in time: Visit 1 (before surgery - baseline and enrolment), Visit 2 (moment after surgery), Visit 3 (7 ± 1 days), Visit 4 (6 months ±3 weeks), Visit 5 (12 months ±30 days) and Visit 6 (23 months ±30 days).
- Conditions
- Bone Augmentation
- Keywords
- prospective observational clinical study, bone substitute, bone defects, hydroxyapatite and beta tricalcium phosphate, Neobone®, real-world clinical data, safety, performance, medical device, reconstructive dental surgeries
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical and radiographic performance endpoint:
- Bone gain (augmentation volume in mm³) at 6 months, assessed by computed tomography (CBCT);
Measured: 6 months
Safety Endpoint
The assessment of adverse events (AE) and device deficiencies (DD) during the patient follow-up period relation to the medical device. This endpoint will be evaluated at each follow-up visit.
Measured: Visit 2 (moment after surgery), Visit 3 (7 ± 1 days), Visit 4 (6 months ±3 weeks), Visit 5 (12 months ±30 days) and Visit 6 (23 months ±30 days).
Clinical and radiographic performance endpoint:
- Bone regeneration at the surgical site, clinically viable for implant placement at 6 months (Yes/No), defined as sufficient bone volume and quality, based on clinical evaluation and CBCT, allowing safe implant placement;
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Technical success rate
Technical success rate and surgeon's satisfaction with the medical device, assessed through a post-surgical questionnaire evaluating usability and overall performance.
Measured: moment after surgery
Quality of life assessment
Quality of life will be assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire, administered at baseline, immediately post-surgery, and within the first 7 days postoperatively and during follow-up visits at 6, 12, and 23 months.
Measured: Visit 1 (before surgery - baseline and enrolment), Visit 2 (moment after surgery), Visit 3 (7 ± 1 days), Visit 4 (6 months ±3 weeks), Visit 5 (12 months ±30 days) and Visit 6 (23 months ±30 days).
Radiographic bone density assessment
Radiographic bone density (Hounsfield units) at 6 months, assessed by CBCT in the regenerated area. The grayscale values (or relative density measurements) will be used to estimate the degree of bone mineralization in the treated site. Elevated radiographic bone density values indicate good mineralization and quality of the regenerated bone. These data serve as complementary indicators of the quality of the bone tissue obtained with the use of the synthetic bone substitute.
Measured: 6 months
Pain level assessment
Pain level will be reported using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-10), assessed at baseline, immediately post-surgery, within the first 7 days post-operatively, and during follow-up visits at 6, 12, and 23 months.
Measured: Visit 1 (before surgery - baseline and enrolment), Visit 2 (moment after surgery), Visit 3 (7 ± 1 days), Visit 4 (6 months ±3 weeks), Visit 5 (12 months ±30 days) and Visit 6 (23 months ±30 days).
Bone volume variation (in %) assessment
Bone volume variation (in %) assessed using scans taken at baseline and at 6 months. Volumetric analysis will be performed by superimposing two CBCT images, with the system automatically calculating the percentage difference. This allows quantification of bone gain or maintenance over time. Positive values indicate bone gain, zero indicates maintenance of bone volume, and negative values indicate bone loss. A greater positive volume variation indicates more effective bone regeneration, reflecting a successful outcome at the treated site.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Sep 2025
- Study start6 Oct 2025
- Primary completionOct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Bone AugmentationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bioceramed
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Egas Moniz - Cooperativa de Ensino Superior, CRL
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- João Botelho, Principal investigator, Egas Moniz School of Health and Science Caparica
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07179497
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NeoDent01
- Acronym
- NeoDent01
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Sep 2025
- Last updated
- 18 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of the Neobone®: A Prospective Observational Study in Dental Area
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07179497
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NeoDent01 / NeoDent01
- Conditions
- Bone Augmentation
- Keywords
- prospective observational clinical study, bone substitute, bone defects, hydroxyapatite and beta tricalcium phosphate, Neobone®, real-world clinical data, safety, performance
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- BioceramedIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Egas Moniz - Cooperativa de Ensino Superior, CRL
- Study start
- 6 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to collect real-world clinical data to gather information on the performance and safety of the Neobone® when used according to its intended purpose and current clinical applications. The results of the clinical study will serve as clinical evidence for the device's clinical evaluation.
Detailed description
Neobone® is a synthetic and resorbable implantable synthetic calcium phosphate ceramic bone substitute, composed of hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate. The structures composed of these calcium phosphate ceramic structures are rapidly osseointegrated due to its chemical composition, which is similar to the mineral phase of the human bone, and due to the interconnected porosity allowing a total vascularization of the implant. Since beta-tricalcium phosphate is more soluble than hydroxyapatite, this biphasic composition enhances the ceramic resorption, allowing a resorption rate compatible with the physiology of bone cells. Neobone® is a single use, gamma radiation sterilized medical device.
Neobone® is a single use, gamma sterilized, implantable biodegradable medical device intended to be used in filling bony voids or gaps within the skeletal system that do not contribute to the structural stability of the bone, and in reconstructive dental and maxillofacial surgeries. These defects may arise from surgical procedures or result from osseous damage due to traumatic injury to the bone.
Neobone® is intended to be used in operating rooms by trained orthopaedic surgeons, as well as in dental offices or operating rooms by dentists and maxillofacial surgeons who have medical and technical knowledge in bone grafting. Neobone® is a class III medical device and is intended for long-term use and will be placed in contact with cancellous tissue and adjacent tissues through surgically invasive techniques.
This observational post-market study will collect data relating to standard practice procedures, therefore there are no additional risks or direct benefits associated with participating in this registry for the patient.
Participation in the study may provide a better understanding of treatment with Neobone® and potentially influence future clinical decisions, contributing to the continuous improvement of healthcare.
This study based on observations of clinical practice aims to collect clinical data to keep up to date the information on the performance and safety of the medical device when used in accordance with its intended use and current clinical applications. The results of the clinical study shall be used as clinical evidence for clinical evaluation of the medical.
The post-market study is meant to identify and analyse emerging risks, ensure the continued acceptability of the benefit/risk ratio and also identify possible systematic misuse or unauthorized use of the medical device. This protocol does not include any planned new uses, new populations, new materials or design changes.
The results from the prospective observational post-market study will provide clinical evidence on the device's performance and safety in the post-market phase.. This complements the data collected during the pre-market phases, thus protecting patient safety. Active surveillance of the safety of medical devices, achieved through the continuous monitoring of vast sources of clinical data, is a priority in the field of medical devices, a requirement of MDR - Medical Device Regulation No. 2017/745. This approach is crucial to achieving the objectives set, guaranteeing the safety and efficacy of the devices in circulation.
The clinical study population consists of adult patients (aged > 18 years old) who undergo reconstructive dental surgery using the Neobone® medical device. Patients will be followed as per local standard medical practices of the centre for 2 years. Clinical data will be collected at 6 points in time: Visit 1 (before surgery - baseline and enrolment), Visit 2 (moment after surgery), Visit 3 (7 ± 1 days), Visit 4 (6 months ±3 weeks), Visit 5 (12 months ±30 days) and Visit 6 (23 months ±30 days).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The clinical study population consists of adult patients (aged > 18 years old) who undergo reconstructive dental surgery using the Neobone® medical device.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult males or females (age > 18 years old);
- Patients who are able to sign an informed consent form (for data collection);
- Patients undergoing reconstructive dental surgery and indicated for the use of Neobone®;
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients who are unable to understand consent and the objectives of the study;
- Signs of local or systemic acute/ active or chronic infections;
- Metabolic affections;
- Severe degenerative diseases, conditions in which general bone grafting is not advisable;
- Implementation sites that allow product migration;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Clinical and radiographic performance endpoint:
Time frame: 6 months
- Bone gain (augmentation volume in mm³) at 6 months, assessed by computed tomography (CBCT);
Safety Endpoint
Time frame: Visit 2 (moment after surgery), Visit 3 (7 ± 1 days), Visit 4 (6 months ±3 weeks), Visit 5 (12 months ±30 days) and Visit 6 (23 months ±30 days).
The assessment of adverse events (AE) and device deficiencies (DD) during the patient follow-up period relation to the medical device. This endpoint will be evaluated at each follow-up visit.
Clinical and radiographic performance endpoint:
Time frame: 6 months
- Bone regeneration at the surgical site, clinically viable for implant placement at 6 months (Yes/No), defined as sufficient bone volume and quality, based on clinical evaluation and CBCT, allowing safe implant placement;
5 secondary outcomes
Technical success rate
Time frame: moment after surgery
Quality of life assessment
Time frame: Visit 1 (before surgery - baseline and enrolment), Visit 2 (moment after surgery), Visit 3 (7 ± 1 days), Visit 4 (6 months ±3 weeks), Visit 5 (12 months ±30 days) and Visit 6 (23 months ±30 days).
Radiographic bone density assessment
Time frame: 6 months
Pain level assessment
Time frame: Visit 1 (before surgery - baseline and enrolment), Visit 2 (moment after surgery), Visit 3 (7 ± 1 days), Visit 4 (6 months ±3 weeks), Visit 5 (12 months ±30 days) and Visit 6 (23 months ±30 days).
Bone volume variation (in %) assessment
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bone Augmentation
Active, not recruiting
Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction in Post-extraction Sites Using a Magnesium Resorbable Membrane. An Explorative Study
Bone Augmentation, Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
Recruiting
Two Bovine Xenografts in Lateral Window Sinus Augmentation With or Without Bone Marrow Blood
Alveolar Bone Loss, Sinus Floor Augmentation
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Alveolar Ridge Preservation (ARP) Study Using Alloplastic Biomaterial and a Resorbable Synthetic Membrane. A Digital Workflow (CBCT/Scanner) Evaluates Hard and Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes at 4 Months, Validating Support for the Gingival Phenotype and Buccal Bone Plate.
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, Bone Substitutes
Not yet recruiting
Ovate Pontic Versus Essix Provisional After Tooth Extraction and Alveolar Ridge Preservation (Pontic-Essix)
Tooth Loss / Rehabilitation, Tooth Extraction
Recruiting
Dietary Supplements and Middle Aged Women (Collagen & Omega)
Cognition, Inflammation Biomarkers
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
João Botelho principal investigator
Egas Moniz School of Health and Science Caparica
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Bone Augmentation, run by Bioceramed at 1 site in Portugal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Alexandre Barros (253 573 460 ext. +351, info@bioceramed.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical and radiographic performance endpoint: (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.