AzTrials
AzTrials

Mitral RegurgitationPROSPECT-MITNCT07151495

Additive Prognostic Value of PALS Compared to Bernard's Staging in Patients Undergoing MV Surgery

An observational study of Mitral Regurgitation, run by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Mitral valve prolapse is the most common cause of mitral regurgitation requiring surgery in developed countries. While cardiac surgery is recommended for symptomatic patients, in accordance with the ESC guidelines on valvular heart disease, indications for intervention in asymptomatic patients are mainly based on… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Mitral Regurgitation
What is being tested?
Speckle tracking and 2D echocardiography
How many people
300 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
15 Sep 2025to 15 Jan 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with severe primary mitral regurgitation treated with cardiac surgery

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with severe primary mitral regurgitation treated with cardiac surgery
  • Age > 18 years
  • Signed informed consent form/Substitute declaration in place of the signed informed consent form in the case of deceased patients

Who cannot join

  • Known coronary artery disease
  • Infective endocarditis
  • Functional mitral regurgitation
  • Presence of additional left-sided valvular heart disease greater than mild
  • History of prior cardiac surgery
  • History of rheumatic valvular disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Absence of a signed informed consent form/Absence of the signed substitute declaration in the case of deceased patients

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

About this study

Official title: The Additive Prognostic Value of Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Compared to Bernard's Staging in Patients Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery

Mitral valve prolapse is the most common cause of mitral regurgitation requiring surgery in developed countries. While cardiac surgery is recommended for symptomatic patients, in accordance with the ESC guidelines on valvular heart disease, indications for intervention in asymptomatic patients are mainly based on two-dimensional echocardiographic criteria: the presence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction or dilatation (end-systolic diameter ≥ 40 mm and/or ejection fraction ≤ 60%); or, in patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function, the occurrence of atrial fibrillation secondary to valvular disease or pulmonary hypertension (systolic pulmonary artery pressure > 50 mmHg); finally, significant left atrial dilatation (indexed left atrial volume ≥ 60 ml/m² or diameter ≥ 55 mm) also represents an indication. Mitral valve repair is preferred over valve replacement with a prosthesis, as it is associated with lower intraoperative mortality, better long-term survival, and fewer valve-related complications. However, the cut-off values derived from conventional echocardiography and used as indicators for surgical intervention may reflect an already severe and irreversible structural and functional cardiac alteration. Moreover, they do not consider more advanced imaging techniques such as speckle tracking echocardiography, which is now widely used in clinical practice and allows for a quantitative assessment of myocardial function through the analysis of myocardial fiber shortening in the cardiac walls. Several studies have shown that preoperative peak left atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) has prognostic value in predicting postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for primary mitral regurgitation, as well as in predicting left atrial reverse remodeling; this prognostic relevance has also been observed in asymptomatic patients and in cases of less than severe mitral regurgitation. Furthermore, Bernard et al. demonstrated the prognostic value of a staging system for extra-valvular cardiac damage, assessed using two-dimensional echocardiographic data, in asymptomatic patients with moderate or severe mitral regurgitation.

Being tested
Speckle tracking and 2D echocardiography
Medical subject headings
Mitral Valve Insufficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Speckle tracking and 2D echocardiographyDiagnostic test

    The study will involve only the collection of data obtained from routine clinical procedures and a telephone follow-up. Preoperative echocardiographic data and pre-operative left atrial speckle tracking data will be retrieved

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. All cause or cardiovascular mortality

    To determine the additive prognostic value for the primary outcome (all cause or cardiovascular mortality) of left atrial speckle-tracking echocardiography (PALS) over Bernard's staging

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Composite endpoint: all cause or cardiovascular mortality, new onset of atrial fibrillation, hospitalization for cardiovascular cause (heart failure, acute coronary syndrome)

    To determine the prognostic value for the composite endpoint of Bernard'staging and of PALS in our cohort of patients

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Sep 2025
  2. Study start15 Sep 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Jan 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07151495
Sponsor's protocol ID
7837
Acronym
PROSPECT-MIT
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
12 Aug 2025
Last updated
3 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Mitral Regurgitation, run by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Annalisa Pasquini, MD, PhD (+390630155701, annalisa.pasquini@policlinicogemelli.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

All cause or cardiovascular mortality (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Sep 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in