AzTrials
AzTrials

Hearing LossNCT07146607

Evaluating an Audiology Text-Message Protocol to Support Hearing Aid Use in NHS Adult Audiology Patients

A study testing Audiology text-message protocol in people with Hearing Loss, run by WSAUD A/S at 3 sites in United Kingdom.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Over 18 million adults in the United Kingdom have significant hearing loss, linked to isolation, depression and comorbidities. Hearing aids are the main management option yet are frequently unused (~23%) or used irregularly (<40%), wasting NHS resources and reducing quality-of-life gains. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hearing Loss
What is being tested?
Audiology text-message protocol
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
30 Sep 2025to Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged ≥18 years (no upper age limit)
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Registered on a pre-existing Florence text-messaging protocol.
  • Unable to read/understand English
  • WP2: Nested Process Evaluation (minimum n=10 patients, n=2 clinicians) Inclusion criteria (patients)
  • Aged ≥18 years (no upper age limit)
  • Prescribed their first NHS acoustic hearing aid(s) for the primary concern of hearing loss
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Registered on a pre-existing Florence text-messaging protocol.
  • Unable to read/understand English
  • Not meeting criteria for inclusion

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United Kingdom3 sites, 3 recruiting
  • QMC Ropewalk House

    Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG1 5DU

    Enrolling by invitation
  • Sunderland Royal Hospital, Kayll Road, Sunderland, SR4 7TP

    Sunderland, SR4 7TP

    Recruiting
  • Audiology Department Suite 2 Thomas Linacre Centre Parsons Walk Wigan WN1 1RU

    Wigan, WN1 1RU

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Audiology Text-Messaging Intervention (Florence) to Improve Hearing Aid Use in NHS Adult Audiology Patients: A Feasibility Study With Proof-of-Concept and Embedded Process Evaluation

Over 18 million adults in the United Kingdom have significant hearing loss, linked to isolation, depression and comorbidities. Hearing aids are the main management option yet are frequently unused (~23%) or used irregularly (<40%), wasting NHS resources and reducing quality-of-life gains. Digital behaviour-change interventions can improve self-management between appointments. Florence, an NHS-endorsed text-messaging system, has been used in the management of other long-term conditions, but has not yet been applied within audiology. This study will test a standardised audiology text-message protocol, delivered via Florence, to support new NHS hearing aid users, aiming to improve adherence, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. Outcomes assess trial feasibility (primary objective), proof-of concept for efficacy (secondary objective), and process evaluation (tertiary objective).

Read the detailed description

Over 18 million adults in the UK have significant hearing loss, with prevalence and severity increasing with age. Hearing loss is a leading global cause of disability, associated with social isolation, depression, dementia, and reduced quality of life, and is more common among people with other long-term conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease. Hearing aids are the standard clinical management, yet up to 23% of new users abandon them and <40% use them irregularly, resulting in wasted NHS resources and prolonging hearing difficulties.

Adjusting to hearing aids is a novel health behaviour, and behaviour-change interventions informed by health psychology can empower patients to manage their care, benefiting both patients and healthcare systems. Digital interventions, such as mobile text-messaging, are cost-effective ways to provide information and support between appointments and improve self-management.

Florence, an NHS-endorsed text-messaging system, has improved self-management in long-term conditions including hypertension, diabetes, and cancer, improving patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness. It has not yet been applied in audiology. This feasibility study will examine a standardised audiology text-message protocol, delivered via Florence, for new NHS hearing aid users, addressing trial feasibility, proof-of-concept, and process evaluation objectives. Effective use could improve hearing aid adherence, quality of life, and save the NHS millions annually.

Conditions
Hearing Loss
Being tested
Audiology text-message protocol
Keywords
hearing loss, hearing aid, health behaviour
Medical subject headings
Hearing Loss

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Audiology text-message protocolBehavioural

    Florence is an interactive text messaging service, endorsed by NHS England, designed to improve clinical outcomes for patients. An audiology text-message protocol, delivered via Florence, will prepare, inform and support new NHS hearing aid users as they are prescribed, receive, and start to use their hearing aid(s).

Study groups in NCT07146607
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hearing aids plus text-message protocolExperimentalAudiology text-message protocol: The experimental group will receive a minimum of 65 text-messages directly to their mobile telephone for the duration of the 14-week text-message protocol (2 weeks for Stage 1 protocol, 12 weeks for Stage 2 protocol) in addition to receiving the standard audiology treatment as usual (see Control: Standard audiological care (hearing aid provision - treatment as usual)).
Receives: Behavioral: Audiology text-message protocol
Standard audiological care (treatment as usual)No interventionParticipants allocated to the control group will receive treatment as usual. Treatment as usual is defined as standard treatment available to NHS audiology patients. This may include an audiological assessment, prescription of one/two hearing aids, and an optional face-to-face follow-up appointment.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Self-reported hearing aid use

    A bespoke single item question recording the self-reported average hours of daily hearing aid use over the past seven days. The question "On a typical day over the last seven days, how many hours did you use your hearing aid?" will be collected via participants' preferred contact method.

    Measured: From enrollment to week 16 and 28

  2. Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile (GHABP): (Gatehouse 1999)

    The GHABP is a 24-item scale consisting of six subscales. The subscales address hearing aid initial disability, hearing aid handicap, reported hearing aid use, reported hearing aid benefit, hearing aid satisfaction and hearing aid derived benefit. Each domain is measured on a five-point scale, and the mean score across four predefined situations is converted into a percentage. Participants will only be asked to complete Part A (preintervention) of the GHABP questionnaire at the baseline assessment (pre-hearing aid fitting). Part B (residual) will be completed at the 16 and 28 week follow up (post-hearing aid fitting).

    Measured: Week 1 (Part A) Week 16, 28 (Part B)

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly/Adults (HHIE/A): (Ventry and Weinstein 1982)

    The HHIE is a 25-item questionnaire designed to assess the effects of hearing loss on the emotional (n = 13), social and situational adjustment (n = 12) of older people, scored using a three-point scale (4 = yes; 2 = sometimes; 0 = no). A higher score indicates a more severe level of handicap.

    Measured: Week 1, Week 16, 28

  2. Auditory Lifestyle and Demand questionnaire (ALDQ): (Gatehouse 1999)

    The ALDQ (Gatehouse, 1999) is a questionnaire assessing auditory lifestyle. It describes a range of listening environments that are experienced by the PHL and the extent to which auditory requirements play a role in daily functioning. It is a 24-item questionnaire with two subscales: lifestyle and demand. Lifestyle scores are computed by totalling the 24 item responses in the subscale (maximum points 48). The demand subscale is calculated by multiplying the Lifestyle subscale with its corresponding importance weighting. The 24 products are then totalled to create a Demand score for the subject (maximum 96 points). Both the 'lifestyle' and 'demand' subscales are converted to percentage scores.

    Measured: Week 1, Week 16, 28

  3. International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) (Cox and Alexander 2002)

    The IOI-HA consists of seven questions each probing a separate area related to hearing aid use including usage benefit, satisfaction, quality of life, impact on others and residual difficulties. Responses to the items are assigned a value of 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating a more favourable outcome.

    Measured: Week 16, 28

  4. Hearing Related Lifestyle (HEARLI-Q) (Lelic, Wolters et al. 2022)

    The HEARLI-Q is a questionnaire consisting of 23 listening situations that participants rate on frequency of occurrence, importance to hear well, difficulty to hear and hearing aid satisfaction. Scores are calculated as follows:

    • Richness of Hearing-Related Lifestyle = (sum of all occurrence scores/92) × 100 in order to arrive at a score between 0 and 100.
    • Hearing Demand = (sum of [occurrence × importance]/368) × 100 in order to arrive at a score between 0 and 100.
    • Hearing Difficulty = average of the difficulty scores
    • Hearing Aid Satisfaction = average of the satisfaction scores excluding the response "I don't wear hearing aids in this situation." The situations in which participants do not wear hearing aids are reported alongside the overall hearing aids satisfaction score.

    Measured: Week 16, 28 Week 1, Week 16, 28

  5. Hearing related adaptive strategies (AStra) (Fischer 2024)

    The AStra questionnaire is an 18-item questionnaire assessing the type of strategies patients use in their everyday life to cope with hearing difficulties. Each item is rated on a seven-point scale ranging from never to always. Items are scores on three scales: i) selection; ii) optimization, iii) compensation. To score scale selection items 5 and 6 are inverted and the mean of items 1-6 is calculated. For scale optimisation the mean of items 7-12 is calculated and for scale compensation the mean of items 13-18 is calculated.

    Measured: Week 1, Week 16, 28

  6. Big Five Inventory (BFI) (John 1991)

    The BFI is a 44-item inventory that measures an individual on the Big Five Factors (dimensions) of personality. It comprised of five dimensions: i) extraversion versus introversion, ii) agreeableness versus antagonism, iii) conscientiousness versus lack of direction, iv) neuroticism versus emotional stability, v) openness versus closedness to experience. Each item is rated on a five-point scale ranging from 1 (disagree strongly) to 5 (agree strongly). The following items should be reverse scores: Extraversion: items 6R, 21R, 31R; Agreeableness: items 2R, 12R, 27R, 37R; Conscientiousness: items 8R, 18R, 23R, 43R; Neuroticism: items 9R, 24R, 34R; Openness: items 35R, 41R. After reverse scoring, find the total score for E(Extroversion), A (Agreeableness), C (Conscientiousness), N (Neuroticism), and O (Openness).

    Measured: Week 1

  7. Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) (Hawthorne, Sansoni et al. 2014)

    A seven-item scale that assesses patient satisfaction with their treatment. It assesses the core domains of patient satisfaction which include treatment satisfaction, explanation of treatment results, clinician care, participation in medical decision making, respect by the clinician, time with the clinician, and satisfaction with hospital/clinic care. Responses scales are on a 5-point scale. To score, reverse the scores for items 1, 3, 5 and 7; then sum all scores. The score range is from 0 (extremely dissatisfied) to 28 (extremely satisfied).

    Measured: Week 1, 28

  8. Measure of Audiologic Rehabilitation Self-Efficacy for Hearing Aids (MARS-HA): (West and Smith 2007)

    The MARS-HA is a 24 item self-assessment of a patient's ability to do certain activities with a hearing aid as well as the patient's abilities to hear in certain situations. The MARS-HA measures four factors: 1) Basic Handling, 2) Advanced Handling, 3) Adjustment, and 4) Aided Listening. The MARS-HA subscale and total scale scores are calculated by taking the average of the item responses. An average less than or equal to 80% indicates a low or moderate self-efficacy.

    Measured: Week 1, Week 16, 28

  9. Short Form Patient Activation Measure (PAM) (Hibbard, Mahoney et al. 2005)

    A 13-item validated questionnaire assesses the knowledge, skills, and confidence of patients to self-manage their health. Participants indicated how much each statement applies to them on a four-point scale: 0 (disagree strongly) to 3 (agree strongly). Scores are summed and converted into an activation score between 0-100 (0 = no activation, 100 = high activation).

    Measured: Week 1, 3, 16, 28

  10. Empowerment Audiology Questionnaire (EmpAQ-15) (Bennett, Larsson et al. 2024)

    the EmpAQ -15 is a 15 item questionnaire to measure empowerment in adults with hearing loss. Participants respond to items using a 4 point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Each item is scored on a scale from 1 to 4 (e.g. strongly disagree = 1). Not applicable is scored as missing. Calculate the mean score by summing the response scores divided by the number of items answered. Subtract 1 and multiply by 33.33. The final score is presented as a scale with a range between 0-100% with a high % indicating a higher level of empowerment.

    Measured: Week 1, 3, 16, 28

  11. Expected Consequences of Hearing aid Ownership (ECHO): (Cox and Alexander 2000)

    The ECHO is a 15-item questionnaire for measuring expectations about hearing aids. There are four subscales: positive effect, service and cost, negative features and personal image. The response to each item is scored from 1-7. For all subscales, a higher score is indicative of a more favourable inclination toward the hearing aid. In the 'negative features' subscale, a higher score can be interpreted as reflecting a lack of knowledge or concern about potentially problematic issues. An average score is calculated for each subscale. The Global Score is the mean of the scores for all the items.

    Measured: Week 1, 3, 16, 28

  12. Stigma Consciousness Questionnaire for Hearing Loss (SCQ-HL): (Vincent, Gagné et al. 2017)

    The SCQ-HL is a 10-item self-report questionnaire that measures the extent to which respondents expect to be stereotyped because of their disability, social role or sexual orientation. Each statement is rated on a seven-point scale ranging from 0 (completely disagree) to 6 (completely agree). The scale includes a midpoint of 3, denoting 'neither agree nor disagree'. A high total score indicates that a respondent's level of stigma consciousness is high.

    Measured: Week 1, 16, 28

  13. Patient Global Impression Scale - Improvement (PGI-I) (Guy, 1976)

    The PGI-I is a one-item questionnaire that asks an individual patient to rate at endpoint the perceived change in his/her daily listening and communication in response to an intervention. It is rated on a seven-point scale ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). A low score indicates that respondent's daily listening and communication is very much better than before wearing hearing aids.

    Measured: Week 16, 28

  14. Health Utilities Index (HUI-III) (Feeny, Furlong et al. 2002)

    The HUI-III measures health-related quality of life. It comprises of eight attributes (Vision, Hearing, Speech, Ambulation, Dexterity, Emotion, Cognition and Pain) within each attribute there are five or six levels of ability/disability.

    Measured: Week 1, 16, 28

  15. EQ-5D-3L (Oppe, Devlin et al. 2014)

    The EQ -5D-3L comprise of five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). The patient indicates their health status by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each dimension ranging from no problems to extreme problems. Each health state can be assigned a summary index score ranging from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating high health utility.

    Measured: Week 1, 16, 28

  16. Data logging from the text-message intervention

    Data such as text-message receipt data, how many reminder messages were sent and the number of participants who opted-out of the text-messages will be recorded directly from the Florence telehealth system. Other information such as the type of goals/plans set within the text-message intervention and patient keyword text inputs will be recorded.

    Measured: Week 28

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Aug 2025
  2. Study start30 Sep 2025
  3. Primary completionNov 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants are assigned to one of two or more groups in parallel for the duration of the study
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
70 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07146607
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRAS 345347
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
21 Aug 2025
Last updated
9 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Audiology text-message protocol in people with Hearing Loss, run by WSAUD A/S at 3 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Emma E Broome, PhD (+44 (0) 115 8232606, emma.broome1@nottingham.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Self-reported hearing aid use (time frame: From enrollment to week 16 and 28). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in