Fatigue SymptomNCT07135791
Monitoring Fatigue In Daily Life In Adults With Cerebral Palsy or Acquired Brain Injury
An observational study of Fatigue Symptom and Fatigue Intensity, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study is to learn about levels and patterns of fatigue in adults with cerebral palsy (CP) and acquired brain injury (ABI) in daily life. The main question it aims to answer is: How do adults with CP and ABI experience fatigue in daily life? Researchers will compare data from CP and ABI… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Fatigue Symptom, Fatigue Intensity, Cerebral Palsy (CP)
- What is being tested?
- Real-time monitoring
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 26 Mar 2025to 31 Oct 2026
- Phase
- Observational
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All participants will be residing in Denmark. Participants with CP will be recruited nationally via two sites located in the eastern and western part of Denmark, respectively: Glostrup and Kolding. They are not required to have any affiliation with clinical settings or organizations. Healthy volunteers will be recruited via a single site in the eastern part of Denmark (Glostrup). Participants with ABI will be recruited via two specialized rehabilitation centers in the eastern and western part of Denmark: 1. Vejlefjord Rehabilitation, providing both inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation programs for children and adults with functional impairments following brain injury. 2. Center for Rehabilitation of Brain Injury, providing outpatient rehabilitation services for individuals with acquired brain injury.
Who may be able to join
- Score of minimum 4 on the 7-item Fatigue Severity Scale (CP and ABI only)
- Speak, read, and write Danish
- Living in a private residence (i.e., not in institutional care or facilities providing 24-hour assistance)
- Able to walk independently or with assistive devices over short distances
- Able to operate a smartphone independently
- Additional inclusion criteria for CP specifically:
Show all 13Show fewer
- Self-reported diagnosis of CP
- Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level ≤ II
- Communication Function Classification System level ≤ II
- Additional inclusion criteria for ABI specifically:
- Self-reported diagnosis of ABI, including stroke, traumatic brain injury, brain infections, toxins, anoxia, or encephalopathy (transient ischemic attack, concussion or post-concussion syndrome, intracranial tumors, or progressive brain diseases are not included)
- Between three months and two years post-injury
- modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤ 3
Who cannot join
- History of other neurological disorders or chronic fatigue syndrome requiring treatment
- Current substance or alcohol abuse
- Night shift work or travel across time zones (1 to 3 zones within the last week or 4 to 6 zones within the last two weeks or at least 7 zones within the last 4 weeks)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Neurorehabilitation Research and Knowledge Centre, Rigshospitalet
Glostrup Municipality, 2600
Frederik Dornonville de la Cour, Ph.D, +4538634292, fdor0002@regionh.dk
Sun-Hee S Christensen, MSc, +4538624292, sun-hee.skovgaard.christensen.01@regionh.dk
About this study
Official title: Real-Time Monitoring of Fatigue In Daily Life Among Adults With Cerebral Palsy or Acquired Brain Injury: An Observational Study
The goal of this observational study is to learn about levels and patterns of fatigue in adults with cerebral palsy (CP) and acquired brain injury (ABI) in daily life.
The main question it aims to answer is: How do adults with CP and ABI experience fatigue in daily life?
Read more
Researchers will compare data from CP and ABI with healthy volunteers to see if they experience fatigue differently.
Participants will:
- Monitor their symptoms, mood, and behavior in real-time by completing a brief survey on their mobile phone 10 times a day for seven consecutive days.
- Attend a briefing session the day prior to the seven-day period of real-time monitoring.
- Wear an accelerometer for the seven-day period.
- Complete a daily sleep diary for the seven-day period.
- Receive feedback on their real-time monitoring data, sleep and activity data.
Read the detailed description
Fatigue is a major problem for adults with cerebral palsy (CP) or acquired brain injury (ABI), and contributes to disability, loss of productivity, and poor quality of life.
Qualitative research indicates that fatigue symptoms are dynamic and context-dependent, and the severity of symptoms can fluctuate throughout the day and from day to day.
People living with fatigue may tire more easily, in response to physical or mental exertion, than people without fatigue. Symptoms of fatigue may worsen dramatically and unexpectedly from one moment to the next. It can be very difficult for people to figure out, why they are suddenly overwhelmed by fatigue and to anticipate when symptoms will worsen again.
To help people manage their fatigue, assessment and treatment approaches need to encompass the daily fluctuations and their interaction over time with activities of daily living.
Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is a well-established method for capturing everyday experiences, including thoughts and behaviors, in their immediate context. As they go about their everyday lives, respondents are prompted multiple times a day, on a mobile device, to answer a brief set of questions about their momentary, "here and now", experience, e.g., "how happy are you right now?". On traditional self-report instruments, such as questionnaires, rating scales, and diaries, respondents are required to recall information or report on their beliefs and attitudes, which introduce risks of bias to the assessment attributable to memory limitations, personal beliefs, and self-perception. By sampling everyday experiences in real-time, EMA reduces these biases and errors.
The longitudinal nature of EMA even allows for assessment of dynamic processes and interactions that occur over short periods of time. Such fine-grained data are crucial for understanding how and why symptoms change during the day and to identify circumstances that may worsen or mitigate fatigue. This may lead to better treatment and symptom management.
A few studies in CP and ABI have demonstrated the feasibility and prospect of using EMA to capture the dynamics of fatigue. However, evidence is scarce regarding factors of everyday life that exacerbate or mitigate fatigue, although this information is essential for effective management strategies. Qualitative research indicates that several potential triggers of fatigue may be similar across CP and ABI.
Primary Objective:
- To identify patterns of fatigue and antecedents of symptom exacerbation in daily life of adults with CP and ABI. Secondary Objectives:
- To compare the dynamics of fatigue across CP, ABI, and neurotypical controls.
- To identify factors in daily life that correlate with exacerbating fatigue symptoms.
- To explore how physical activity, rest, and sleep influence fatigue patterns.
Design: We will use an intensive longitudinal observational study design. Participants will be asked to monitor in real-time for seven consecutive days. Notifications will pop up on their smartphone 10 times a day, and participants will be prompted to answer a brief survey about "how they are doing", "what they are doing", "where they are", and "who they are with", when they received the notification.
Participants will wear an accelerometer on their least affected thigh, and they will be asked to complete a sleep diary every morning in the seven-day period. The day prior to real-time monitoring, participants will meet with a research assistant to be instructed in the EMA protocol.
One week after real-time monitoring, participants will be invited to a feedback session, where the results of real-time monitoring of fatigue, activity, and sleep will be presented and discussed.
We will compare three groups of participants: Adults with CP, adults with ABI, and healthy volunteers without neurological conditions.
Participants with CP will be recruited via a public online announcement on the Elsass Foundation's website.
Participants with ABI will be recruited via two specialised brain injury rehabilitation centers (Vejlefjord Rehabilitering and Center for Rehabilitation of Brain Injury).
Healthy volunteers for the control group were initially planned to be recruited via the social network of the participants with CP or ABI. From August 2025, recruitment will be advertised publicly through social media platforms of the Neurorehabilitation Research and Knowledge Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet (including newsletter, LinkedIn, and announcement on the webpage). The call for healthy volunteers will also be promoted through advocacy organizations for individuals with cerebral palsy or acquired brain injury, e.g., via social media platforms or their websites.
- Conditions
- Fatigue Symptom, Fatigue Intensity, Cerebral Palsy (CP), Acquired Brain Injury Including Stroke, Fatigue, Mental, Fatigue
- Being tested
- Real-time monitoring
- Keywords
- Cerebral palsy, Acquired brain injury, ecological momentary assessment, experience sampling method, real-time monitoring, Fatigue, Real-time fatigue
- Medical subject headings
- Fatigue, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Fatigue, Brain Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Real-time monitoringDiagnostic test
Also called Ecological Momentary Assessment, Ambulatory assessment
Complete a brief 20-item survey 10 times a day for seven consecutive days, while wearing an accelerometer and completing daily sleep diaries.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cerebral palsy | Adults with cerebral palsy Receives: Diagnostic Test: Real-time monitoring | |
| Acquired brain injury | Adults with acquired brain injury Receives: Diagnostic Test: Real-time monitoring | |
| Healthy volunteers | Adults without neurological conditions Receives: Diagnostic Test: Real-time monitoring |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ecological Momentary Assessment: "Fatigue item"
A single item variable: "How tired do you feel right now?" Rated on an 11-point slider scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (severe fatigue).
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Secondary outcomes (21)
SENS motion® activity sensor
SENS motion® wearable activity sensor is an accelerometer that will be attached to the thigh using a patch. The accelerometer will be used to measure physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep. If the participants have any physical impairments, the patch will be worn on the least affected thigh.
Measured: 7 consecutive days
Consensus Sleep Diary (CSD)
The Consensus Sleep Diary (CSD) is a self-report 9-item instrument designed to track sleep patterns on a daily basis for typically 1-2 weeks. The questions ask about: (1) the time of getting into bed; (2) the time at which the individual attempted to fall asleep; (3) sleep onset latency; (4) number of awakenings; (5) duration of awakenings; (6) time of final awakening; (7) final rise time; (8) perceived sleep quality, rated on a 5-level scale from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good); and (9) an additional space for open-ended comments from the respondent.
We added two items from the expanded CSD for Morning about napping or dozing during the day: (10) number of naps/dozings; and (11) duration of naps/dozings.
Participants are instructed to complete the CSD within one hour of getting out of bed in the morning.
Measured: 1 time a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Momentary Assessment "Energy item"
A single item variable: "How much energy do you have right now?" Rated on an 11-point slider scale ranging from 0 (pictogram of an empty battery) to 10 (pictogram of a full battery).
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Momentary Assessment: "Fatigue domain item"
A single item variable: "How does your fatigue feel right now?" Response categories are: "Primarily physical", "Primarily mental", "Both", "Neither", and "Not relevant"
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Monetary Assessment: "Alert item"
A single item variable: "How alert do you feel right now?". Rated on an 11-point slider scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much).
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Momentary Assessment "Exhaustion item"
A single item variable: "How exhausted do you feel right now?" Rated on an 11-point slider scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much).
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Momentary Assessment "Pain item"
A single item variable: "How much pain do you have right now?" Rated on an 11-point slider scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Momentary Assessment "Sleepy item"
A single item variable: "How sleepy do you feel right now?" Rated on an 11-point slider scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much)
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Momentary Assessment: "Concentration item"
A single item variable: "How well are you able to concentrate right now?" Rated on an 11-point slider scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much).
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Momentary Assessment: "Effort item"
A single item variable: "How much of an effort is it to do anything right now?" Rated on an 11-point slider scale ranging from 0 (none at all) to 10 (very much).
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Momentary Assessment: "Happiness item"
A single item variable: "How happy do you feel right now?" Rated on an 11-point slider scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much).
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Momentary Assessment: "Sadness item"
A single item variable: "How sad do you feel right now?" Rated on an 11-point slider scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much).
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Momentary Assessment: "Anxious item"
A single item variable: "How anxious do you feel right now?" Rated on an 11-point slider scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much).
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Momentary Assessment: "Irritability item"
A single item variable: "How irritable do you feel right now?" Rated on an 11-point slider scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much).
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Momentary Assessment: "Activity item"
A single item variable: "What were you doing when you received the notification?" Multiple choice response.
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Momentary Assessment: "Physical demand item"
A single item variable: "How physically demanding is the task you were doing?" Rated on an 11-point slider scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much).
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Momentary Assessment: "Mental demand item"
A single item variable: "How mentally demanding is the task you were doing?" Rated on an 11-point slider scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much).
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Momentary Assessment: "Motivation item"
A single item variable: "How motivated were you for the task you were doing?" Rated on an 11-point slider scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much).
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Momentary Assessment: "Location item"
A single item variable: "Where were you when you received the notification?" Multiple choice response.
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Momentary Assessment: "Sensory load item"
A single item variable: "How many sensory impressions were present around you when you received the notification?" Rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale: 0 (Very low degree), 1 (Low degree), 2 (Some degree), 3 (High degree), and 4 (Very high degree).
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Ecological Momentary Assessment: "Company item"
A single item variable: "Who were with you when you received the notification?" Multiple choice response.
Measured: 10 times a day over 7 consecutive days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Aug 2025
- Study start26 Mar 2025
- Primary completion31 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Oct 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Fatigue SymptomStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Center for Rehabilitation of Brain Injury (Center for Hjerneskade), Vejlefjord Rehabilitation, Elsass Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Frederik Dornonville de la Cour, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Investigators
- Anne Norup, Ph.D., Study director, Neurorehabilitation Research and Knowledge Centre, Rigshospitalet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07135791
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- p-2023-14839
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 29 Jul 2025
- Last updated
- 22 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided