CancerNCT07128277
Clinical Study of Trap (FAPI) 3 PET Imaging in Noninvasive Diagnosis of Malignant Tumors
An observational study of Cancer, run by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a functional imaging technology for diagnosing and monitoring tumors. In clinical applications for malignant tumors, PET includes staging, response assessment, and prognosis prediction, providing attractive semi-quantitative biomarkers for both clinical and research platforms. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 13 Aug 2025to 1 Nov 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The subjects we selected are adults who are not restricted by gender. For details, please refer to the "EligibilityCriteria" colymn.
Who may be able to join
- Age between 18 and 65 years old, gender is not limited
- Patients with malignant tumors confirmed by biopsy or surgical pathology
- Suspected lymph node or distant metastasis found by imaging
- Written informed consent signed by the subject or his/her legal guardian
Who cannot join
- Patients receiving anti-tumor therapy prior to PET/CT or PET/MR scans
- Patients with severe medical conditions unable to tolerate PET/CT or PET/MR scans
- Eligible participants with contraindications for PET/CT or PET/MR scans
- Participants with radiation exposure exceeding 50 mSv in the past year
- Participants who underwent major surgery within the last three months or received experimental drugs/instruments (with unclear efficacy/safety) within one month
- Participants with clinical conditions that the study sponsor considers potentially hazardous or harmful to this investigational agent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Daping Hospital of Army Medical University
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400010
About this study
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a functional imaging technology for diagnosing and monitoring tumors. In clinical applications for malignant tumors, PET includes staging, response assessment, and prognosis prediction, providing attractive semi-quantitative biomarkers for both clinical and research platforms. Understanding the fundamentals of imaging science and evaluating the strengths and limitations of imaging modalities is crucial for optimizing research assessments. With the widespread use of functional techniques and the development of novel PET biomarkers, PET-based research evaluations will be further enhanced. The field of oncology has undergone a revolution through molecular imaging, which evaluates tumor biology, while traditional radiological imaging focuses on morphological anatomy . Molecular imaging employs non-invasive visualization at cellular or subcellular levels to observe physiological or pathological processes, whereas PET/CT serves as a hybrid imaging tool that provides complementary information on both function and structure . [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), first developed in the late 1970s as a tracer for brain region metabolism, remains the most widely used PET tracer with diverse applications in both oncology and non-oncology fields . Despite its undeniable clinical utility, FDG uptake serves as an alternative indicator for glucose transport/metabolism rather than being specific to malignant tumors. Continuous exploration of cellular targets has led to the discovery of fibroblast activation protein (FAP). Cancer-associated fibroblasts are present in many tumors, particularly those with strong fibrotic-promoting responses such as breast cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, and lung cancer. Consequently, FAP expression has been observed in over 90% of epithelial tumors. To date, FAP expression has been associated with poor tumor prognosis in colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and ovarian cancer . Although more research is needed, this advantage makes cancer-associated fibroblasts an ideal target for anti-tumor therapy. In practical applications, low FAP expression in fibroblasts or healthy tissues facilitates imaging of subtle pathological changes. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), a key component of the tumor microenvironment, account for over half the mass in various tumor types. Previous studies indicate that CAFs play significant roles in tumor growth, immune suppression, and cancer invasion . Therefore, CAFs may become emerging targets for tumor diagnosis and treatment. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is overexpressed in CAFs of multiple epithelial cancers but shows weak expression in healthy tissues, making it a promising target in cancer research. Recent years have seen expanded molecular imaging studies targeting FAP in tumor diagnosis . The excellent tumor-targeting efficacy of FAP has been confirmed through multiple clinical trials . The results clearly establish FAPI as a highly promising tumor-targeting ligand with significant potential applications in translational oncology. However, its therapeutic efficacy remains under investigation. An ideal radiopharmaceutical for cancer treatment should demonstrate excellent targeting specificity and relatively long tumor retention time. Previous studies have shown that radiolabeled FAPI variants (FAPI-04 and FAPI-46) accumulate rapidly and satisfactorily in tumors while showing low physiological uptake in normal tissues. However, previous FAP-related tracers exhibited relatively short tumor retention times . Our aim is to design a FAPI trimer, Trap-(FAPI)3, to optimize pharmacokinetics and evaluate whether this novel drug demonstrates superior advantages over its monomeric analogs in tumor imaging diagnosis and staging.
Read the detailed description
4.1 Research Site and Population This study enrolled patients with confirmed malignant tumors at the Army Specialized Medical Center between April 2025 and April 2027, as verified by biopsy or surgical pathology. 4.2 Sample Size Determination Using PASS software, the investigators calculated the required sample size by selecting the "Test for a single-sample Sensitivity and Specificity" under Diagnostic Tests (ROC). Based on prior literature and pilot studies, the sensitivity (Sensitivity) of 18F RCCB6 imaging for predicting treatment efficacy was estimated at 85%, with a specificity (Specificity) of 75%. With confidence levels α=0.05, β=0.2, and p=0.25, the null hypotheses for both sensitivity and specificity were set at 50%. Data analysis yielded a required sample size of 32.4.3 Survey Content 4.3.1 Clinical Data Collection All patients' disease progression, laboratory tests (tumor markers), pathological findings, and relevant immunohistochemical data were recorded. Image analysis and observation metrics: Trap- (FAPI) 3 PET/CT or PET/MR images were independently reviewed and processed by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. The following indicators were recorded and evaluated: 1) Visual image analysis: including lesion location, size, morphology, and uptake extent; 2) Semi-quantitative analysis: measuring standard uptake value (SUV) of lesions and the ratio between lesion SUV and liver/blood pool SUV. 4.3.3 Pathological Analysis After collecting pathological specimens from primary lesions and metastatic lymph nodes post-surgery, formalin fixation and paraffin embedding were performed before sectioning into 4μm-thick slices for FAP staining. 4.4 Data Management and Statistical Analysis The Department of Nuclear Medicine at the Army Specialized Medical Center was responsible for data management and analysis. A spreadsheet system was established to centrally manage all enrolled patients 'basic information, laboratory tests, PET/CT/MR imaging results, postoperative pathology, and immunohistochemistry. Original PET/CT/MR images of all enrolled patients were archived. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS20.0 software. Qualitative data were presented as frequency using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Quantitative data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality tests, with normally distributed data expressed as (x±s). Independent samples t-tests were employed for normal distribution verification; non-normal distribution data were represented by median (upper/lower quartiles) using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Pearson correlation analysis evaluated the correlation between lesion FAP expression levels and PET imaging. Receiver-operated characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess diagnostic performance, calculating area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and thresholds for each variable. The diagnostic efficacy of PET/MRI and PET/CT was compared by Medcalc software. P <0.05 was statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with malignant tumors | a) Age between 18 and 65 years, gender not limited; b) Patients with malignant tumors confirmed by biopsy or surgical pathology; c) Imaging findings of suspicious lymph nodes or distant metastases; d) Written informed consent from the subject or his/her legal guardian. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Diagnostic efficacy
The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-Trap-FAPI PET were calculated and compared to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy.
Measured: Completed within half year after end of the study
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Aug 2025
- Study start13 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Xiao Chen, Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07128277
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025179
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Aug 2025
- Last updated
- 22 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Tan Y, Li J, Zhao T, Zhou M, Liu K, Xiang S, Tang Y, Jakobsson V, Xu P, Chen X, Zhang J. Clinical translation of a novel FAPI dimer [68Ga]Ga-LNC1013. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024 Jul;51(9):2761-2773. doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-06703-z. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
PubMed 38561515
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Study of Trap (FAPI) 3 PET Imaging in Noninvasive Diagnosis of Malignant Tumors
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07128277
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2025179
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a functional imaging technology for diagnosing and monitoring tumors. In clinical applications for malignant tumors, PET includes staging, response assessment, and prognosis prediction, providing attractive semi-quantitative biomarkers for both clinical and research platforms. Understanding the fundamentals of imaging science and evaluating the strengths and limitations of imaging modalities is crucial for optimizing research assessments. With the widespread use of functional techniques and the development of novel PET biomarkers, PET-based research evaluations will be further enhanced. The field of oncology has undergone a revolution through molecular imaging, which evaluates tumor biology, while traditional radiological imaging focuses on morphological anatomy . Molecular imaging employs non-invasive visualization at cellular or subcellular levels to observe physiological or pathological processes, whereas PET/CT serves as a hybrid imaging tool that provides complementary information on both function and structure . [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), first developed in the late 1970s as a tracer for brain region metabolism, remains the most widely used PET tracer with diverse applications in both oncology and non-oncology fields . Despite its undeniable clinical utility, FDG uptake serves as an alternative indicator for glucose transport/metabolism rather than being specific to malignant tumors. Continuous exploration of cellular targets has led to the discovery of fibroblast activation protein (FAP). Cancer-associated fibroblasts are present in many tumors, particularly those with strong fibrotic-promoting responses such as breast cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, and lung cancer. Consequently, FAP expression has been observed in over 90% of epithelial tumors. To date, FAP expression has been associated with poor tumor prognosis in colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and ovarian cancer . Although more research is needed, this advantage makes cancer-associated fibroblasts an ideal target for anti-tumor therapy. In practical applications, low FAP expression in fibroblasts or healthy tissues facilitates imaging of subtle pathological changes. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), a key component of the tumor microenvironment, account for over half the mass in various tumor types. Previous studies indicate that CAFs play significant roles in tumor growth, immune suppression, and cancer invasion . Therefore, CAFs may become emerging targets for tumor diagnosis and treatment. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is overexpressed in CAFs of multiple epithelial cancers but shows weak expression in healthy tissues, making it a promising target in cancer research. Recent years have seen expanded molecular imaging studies targeting FAP in tumor diagnosis . The excellent tumor-targeting efficacy of FAP has been confirmed through multiple clinical trials . The results clearly establish FAPI as a highly promising tumor-targeting ligand with significant potential applications in translational oncology. However, its therapeutic efficacy remains under investigation. An ideal radiopharmaceutical for cancer treatment should demonstrate excellent targeting specificity and relatively long tumor retention time. Previous studies have shown that radiolabeled FAPI variants (FAPI-04 and FAPI-46) accumulate rapidly and satisfactorily in tumors while showing low physiological uptake in normal tissues. However, previous FAP-related tracers exhibited relatively short tumor retention times . Our aim is to design a FAPI trimer, Trap-(FAPI)3, to optimize pharmacokinetics and evaluate whether this novel drug demonstrates superior advantages over its monomeric analogs in tumor imaging diagnosis and staging.
Detailed description
4.1 Research Site and Population This study enrolled patients with confirmed malignant tumors at the Army Specialized Medical Center between April 2025 and April 2027, as verified by biopsy or surgical pathology. 4.2 Sample Size Determination Using PASS software, the investigators calculated the required sample size by selecting the "Test for a single-sample Sensitivity and Specificity" under Diagnostic Tests (ROC). Based on prior literature and pilot studies, the sensitivity (Sensitivity) of 18F RCCB6 imaging for predicting treatment efficacy was estimated at 85%, with a specificity (Specificity) of 75%. With confidence levels α=0.05, β=0.2, and p=0.25, the null hypotheses for both sensitivity and specificity were set at 50%. Data analysis yielded a required sample size of 32.4.3 Survey Content 4.3.1 Clinical Data Collection All patients' disease progression, laboratory tests (tumor markers), pathological findings, and relevant immunohistochemical data were recorded. Image analysis and observation metrics: Trap- (FAPI) 3 PET/CT or PET/MR images were independently reviewed and processed by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. The following indicators were recorded and evaluated: 1) Visual image analysis: including lesion location, size, morphology, and uptake extent; 2) Semi-quantitative analysis: measuring standard uptake value (SUV) of lesions and the ratio between lesion SUV and liver/blood pool SUV. 4.3.3 Pathological Analysis After collecting pathological specimens from primary lesions and metastatic lymph nodes post-surgery, formalin fixation and paraffin embedding were performed before sectioning into 4μm-thick slices for FAP staining. 4.4 Data Management and Statistical Analysis The Department of Nuclear Medicine at the Army Specialized Medical Center was responsible for data management and analysis. A spreadsheet system was established to centrally manage all enrolled patients 'basic information, laboratory tests, PET/CT/MR imaging results, postoperative pathology, and immunohistochemistry. Original PET/CT/MR images of all enrolled patients were archived. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS20.0 software. Qualitative data were presented as frequency using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Quantitative data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality tests, with normally distributed data expressed as (x±s). Independent samples t-tests were employed for normal distribution verification; non-normal distribution data were represented by median (upper/lower quartiles) using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Pearson correlation analysis evaluated the correlation between lesion FAP expression levels and PET imaging. Receiver-operated characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess diagnostic performance, calculating area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and thresholds for each variable. The diagnostic efficacy of PET/MRI and PET/CT was compared by Medcalc software. P <0.05 was statistically significant.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with malignant tumors | – | –a) Age between 18 and 65 years, gender not limited; b) Patients with malignant tumors confirmed by biopsy or surgical pathology; c) Imaging findings of suspicious lymph nodes or distant metastases; d) Written informed consent from the subject or his/her legal guardian. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The subjects we selected are adults who are not restricted by gender. For details, please refer to the "EligibilityCriteria" colymn.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age between 18 and 65 years old, gender is not limited
- Patients with malignant tumors confirmed by biopsy or surgical pathology
- Suspected lymph node or distant metastasis found by imaging
- Written informed consent signed by the subject or his/her legal guardian
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients receiving anti-tumor therapy prior to PET/CT or PET/MR scans
- Patients with severe medical conditions unable to tolerate PET/CT or PET/MR scans
- Eligible participants with contraindications for PET/CT or PET/MR scans
- Participants with radiation exposure exceeding 50 mSv in the past year
- Participants who underwent major surgery within the last three months or received experimental drugs/instruments (with unclear efficacy/safety) within one month
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Diagnostic efficacy
Time frame: Completed within half year after end of the study
The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-Trap-FAPI PET were calculated and compared to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Aug 2025.
- Background: PubMed 38561515Tan Y, Li J, Zhao T, Zhou M, Liu K, Xiang S, Tang Y, Jakobsson V, Xu P, Chen X, Zhang J. Clinical translation of a novel FAPI dimer [68Ga]Ga-LNC1013. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024 Jul;51(9):2761-2773. doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-06703-z. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cancer, run by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Diagnostic efficacy (time frame: Completed within half year after end of the study). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07128277, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Aug 2025.