AzTrials
AzTrials

Neuromuscular AgentsPhase 3PLATINUM USNCT07122193

A Study of NT 201 in Adults With Moderate to Severe Platysma Prominence in the United States

A Phase 3 study testing NT 201 in people with Neuromuscular Agents and Peripheral Nervous System Agents, run by Merz North America, Inc. at 28 sites in 2 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of NT 201 compared with placebo in participants with moderate to severe platysma prominence. The study will be conducted in two periods: Main Period (MP) and Open label Extension Period (OLEX). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
NT 201
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
300 participants
Where
28 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
27 Aug 2025to Sep 2027
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Presence of four (medial and lateral, left and right) platysmal bands assessed at screening and baseline.
  • A score of Grade 3 ('moderate') or Grade 4 ('severe') on the MAPS-D at maximum contraction by the investigator and participant.

Who cannot join

  • Hypersensitivity or a history of allergic reaction to botulinum toxin of any serotype or any of their formulation ingredients.
  • Any medical condition that may put the participant at increased risk with exposure to botulinum toxin of any serotype, or any disorders that might interfere with neuromuscular function.
  • Any serious disease or disorder that could interfere with the safe completion of treatment or with study outcome assessments, or compromise participant safety.
  • Botulinum toxin treatment in the face (below the lower orbital rim), jawline, or neck within the last seven months.
  • History of lower face surgery, neck or chest surgery, and aesthetic procedures in the past 12 months, and/or orthodontic procedures in the past 6 months.
  • Planned surgery or aesthetic procedures to the lower face, neck, or chest during the study period.
  • Anticipated need for treatment with botulinum toxin of any serotype for any indication during the study (other than study products).

Trial locations and contacts

28 sites in 2 countries.

28 sites in 2 countries

United States27 sites
  • Merz Investigative Site

    Alpharetta, Georgia, 30005

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Ardmore, Pennsylvania, 19003

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Arlington, Virginia, 22209

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Aventura, Florida, 33180

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33431

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Bradenton, Florida, 34209

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27517

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Coral Gables, Florida, 33143

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Coral Gables, Florida, 33146

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75225

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Encino, California, 91436

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Greenwood Village, Colorado, 80111

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Hunt Valley, Maryland, 21030

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Los Angeles, California, 90069

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Mount Kisco, New York, 10549

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Naperville, Illinois, 60563

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37215

  • Merz Investigative Site

    New York, New York, 10021

  • Merz Investigative Site

    New York, New York, 10028

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Redondo Beach, California, 90277

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Santa Monica, California, 90404

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85260

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Vista, California, 92803

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037

  • Merz Investigative Site

    West Palm Beach, Florida, 33404

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Westport, Connecticut, 06880

  • Merz Investigative Site

    Wilmington, North Carolina, 28405

Other trials in United States

Puerto Rico1 site
  • Merz Investigative Site

    San Juan, 00917

Other trials in Puerto Rico

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of NT 201 Compared With Placebo in Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Platysma Prominence in the United States

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of NT 201 compared with placebo in participants with moderate to severe platysma prominence. The study will be conducted in two periods: Main Period (MP) and Open label Extension Period (OLEX).

Being tested
NT 201, NT 201 Placebo
Keywords
Platysma prominence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NT 201Drug

    Also called IncobotulinumtoxinA, Xeomin/Bocouture, Xeomin Cosmetic, Xeomeen

    Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin A (150 kiloDalton [kD], free of complexing proteins), powder for solution for injection.

  • NT 201 PlaceboDrug

    NT 201 matching-placebo

Study groups in NCT07122193
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Main Period: NT 201ExperimentalParticipants will receive NT 201 IM injection, once on Day 1 of the MP.
Receives: Drug: NT 201
Main Period: NT 201 Matching PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive NT 201 matching placebo IM injection, once on Day 1 of the MP.
Receives: Drug: NT 201 Placebo
OLEX Period: NT 201ExperimentalParticipants will receive a reinjection of NT 201 IM injection, once on Day 1 of OLEX Cycle 1 and Cycle 2.
Receives: Drug: NT 201

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Composite Achievement of Grade 1 or Grade 2 And at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Both the Investigator's Assessment and Participant's Self-Assessment Using the Merz Aesthetics Platysma Scale - Dynamic (MAPS-D) At Week 2 of MP

    MAPS-D is a validated five-point scale that will be used to grade the platysma prominence. Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe). A lower score indicates improvement.

    Measured: At Week 2 of MP

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Achievement of Grade 1 (None to Minimal) or Grade 2 (Mild) And at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Investigator's Assessment Using MAPS-D at Week 2 of MP

    MAPS-D is a validated five-point scale that will be used to grade the platysma prominence. Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe). A lower score indicates improvement.

    Measured: At Week 2 of MP

  2. Achievement of Grade 1 (None to Minimal) or Grade 2 (Mild) And at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Participant's Self-Assessment Using MAPS-D at Week 2 of MP

    MAPS-D is a validated five-point scale that will be used to grade the platysma prominence. Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe). A lower score indicates improvement.

    Measured: At Week 2 of MP

  3. Achievement of at Least a +1 (Somewhat Satisfied) Score Using the Participant's Satisfaction Questionnaire at Week 2 of MP

    Participants satisfaction questionnaire responses will be rated on a scale ranging from +3 (very satisfied) to -3 (very dissatisfied). A higher score indicates satisfaction.

    Measured: At Week 2 of MP

  4. Achievement of Grade 1 (None to Minimal) or Grade 2 (Mild) And at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Both the Investigator's Assessment and Participant's Self-Assessment Using MAPS-D at Week 1 and Week 4 up to Week 17 of MP

    MAPS-D is a validated five-point scale that will be used to grade the platysma prominence. Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe). A lower score indicates improvement.

    Measured: At Week 1 and Week 4 up to Week 17 of MP

  5. Achievement of Grade 1 (None to Minimal) or Grade 2 (Mild) And at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Investigator's Assessment Using MAPS-D at Week 1 and Week 4 up to Week 17 of MP

    MAPS-D is a validated five-point scale that will be used to grade the platysma prominence. Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe). A lower score indicates improvement.

    Measured: At Week 1 and Week 4 up to Week 17 of MP

  6. Achievement of Grade 1 (None to Minimal) or Grade 2 (Mild) And at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Self-Assessment Using MAPS-D at Week 1 and Week 4 up to Week 17 of MP

    MAPS-D is a validated five-point scale that will be used to grade the platysma prominence. Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe). A lower score indicates improvement.

    Measured: At Week 1 and Week 4 up to Week 17 of MP

  7. Achievement of at Least a +1 (Improved) Score on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)-Platysmal Bands Based on the Investigator's Assessment at Week 2 of MP

    GAIS is a balanced seven-point Likert scale (range -3 [very much worse] to +3 [very much improved]) commonly used in aesthetic medicine to rate post-treatment improvement in appearance. A higher score indicates improvement.

    Measured: At Week 2 of MP

  8. Achievement of at Least a +1 (Improved) Score on the GAIS-Platysmal Bands Based on the Participant's Self-Assessment at Week 2 of MP

    GAIS is a balanced seven-point Likert scale (range -3 [very much worse] to +3 [very much improved]) commonly used in aesthetic medicine to rate post-treatment improvement in appearance. A higher score indicates improvement.

    Measured: At Week 2 of MP

  9. Achievement of at Least a +1 (Improved) Score Using the GAIS-Lower Face Contour According to the Investigator's Assessment at Week 2 of MP

    GAIS is a balanced seven-point Likert scale (range -3 [very much worse] to +3 [very much improved]) commonly used in aesthetic medicine to rate post-treatment improvement in appearance. A higher score indicates improvement.

    Measured: At Week 2 of MP

  10. Achievement of at Least a +1 (Improved) Score Using the GAIS-Lower Face Contour According to the Participant's Self-Assessment at Week 2 of MP

    GAIS is a balanced seven-point Likert scale (range -3 [very much worse] to +3 [very much improved]) commonly used in aesthetic medicine to rate post-treatment improvement in appearance. A higher score indicates improvement.

    Measured: At Week 2 of MP

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Aug 2025
  2. Study start27 Aug 2025
  3. Primary completion5 Jun 2026
  4. Study completionSep 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
300 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07122193
Sponsor's protocol ID
NT-PPR-US001
Acronym
PLATINUM US
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
7 Aug 2025
Last updated
10 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing NT 201 in people with Neuromuscular Agents and Peripheral Nervous System Agents, run by Merz North America, Inc. at 28 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 28 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Composite Achievement of Grade 1 or Grade 2 And at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Both the Investigator's Assessment and Participant's Self-Assessment Using the Merz Aesthetics Platysma Scale - Dynamic (MAPS-D) At Week 2 of MP (time frame: At Week 2 of MP). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in