Hypo-responderPhase 4NCT07121751
Optimal Stimulation of Hypo-responders Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization (IVF)
A Phase 4 study testing use of combination of recombinant FSH and recombinant LH, higher dose recFSH and unchanged dose in people with Hypo-responder and Infertility (IVF Patients), run by Dunamenti REK Istenhegyi IVF Center at 4 sites in Hungary.
Trial summary
Stimulation is a key step of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Typically, injectable gonadotropins are used for stimulation, and their dose is individually determined to avoid hypo- as well as hyper-response. Despite the individualization some patients respond with a lower-than-expected number of oocytes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypo-responder, Infertility (IVF Patients), OVARIAN STIMULATION
- What is being tested?
- use of combination of recombinant FSH and recombinant LH, higher dose recFSH and unchanged dose
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesHungary
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2025to 1 Mar 2027
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- indication for IVF-ICSI
- age 18-40 years
- <9 oocytes in a previous IVF cycle and having an AMH ≥1.2 ng/ml and/or AFC ≥5 (POSEIDON 1,2)
- The use of ≤225 IU FSH (either rFSH alone or the combination of rFSH+hMG) in the previous cycle
- regular 24-35 day cycles
- Intact uterine cavity
- motile sperm from ejaculate or testicular biopsy
Who cannot join
- not meeting the inclusion criteria
- the use of rFSH:rLH (2:1 ratio) in the previous cycle
- the use of clomiphene citrate or aromatase inhibitor in the previous cycle
- >225 IU gonadotropin in the previous cycle
- >3 failed previous treatments
- patient with recurrent miscarriages
Show all 11Show fewer
- presence of a hydrosalpinx
- positive HIV or hepatitis screening test
- planned preimplantation genetic testing of the embryos
- planned elective cryopreservation
- lack of consent
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Hungary4 sites
Dunamenti REK Istenhegyi IVF Center
Budapest, 1125
Peter Kovacs, MD, +3612022802, peterkovacs1970@hotmail.com
Dunamenti REK Gyor IVF Center
Győr, 9026
Peter Boga, MD, +3696511210, bogahun@netscape.net
University of Szeged, Reproductive Medicine Institute
Szeged, 6723
Janos Zadori, MD, +3662423623, jzadori@gmail.com
Dunamenti REK Tapolca IVF Center
Tapolca, 8300
Attila Torok, MD, +3687510365, attila@torok.info
About this study
Official title: Optimal Stimulation of Hypo-responders Undergoing IVF: a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Stimulation is a key step of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Typically, injectable gonadotropins are used for stimulation, and their dose is individually determined to avoid hypo- as well as hyper-response. Despite the individualization some patients respond with a lower-than-expected number of oocytes. If the low response is unexpected based on the baseline parameters or if an unusually high dose of gonadotropins is needed to achieve a proper response we talk about "hypo-response". In such cases if the first treatment fails and a repeat attempt is planned typically even more gonadotropins, the combination of luteinizing hormone (LH) with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) or the use of the more potent recombinant preparations are considered. The benefits of these approaches however have not been studied properly in hypo-responders. The studies have used various criteria to identify hypo-responders, have used various gonadotropin doses and have evaluated different outcome parameters. Live birth was only studied in one trial.
It is also known that in a different cycle the same patient is likely to have a slightly different response to the same type and dose of drugs. Therefore, the question arises whether a hypo-responder in one treatment is expected to have hypo-response again if the treatment is similarly carried out in a different cycle. Do we need to change/ increase the gonadotropin dose if based on age and ovarian reserve otherwise we would expect a normal response? Furthermore, if we consider a change should we increase the dose of FSH or should we combine it with LH?
Read more
Therefore the aim of this randomized controlled trial is compare an unchanged medication regimen to increased dose of FSH vs the combination of FSH and LH in hypo-responder patients identified based on POSEIDON (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number) criteria (Gr 1 and 2: retrieval of 9 or fewer oocytes in patients with an anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level ≥ 1.2 ng/ml or antral follicle count (AFC) ≥ 5 and age <35 years [Group (Gr) 1] or ≥35 years [Gr2]). Hypo-responder patients will be randomized to:
- Same gonadotropin dose as in previous treatment (recombinant(r) FSH) ['control group']
- The same dose as in the previous cycle but in the form of FSH + LH combination (rFSH:rLH 2:1 ratio) ['additional LH group']
- A dose increase of 75 international unit (IU) compared to the dose in the previous treatment. ['higher dose FSH group'] The primary outcome parameter to study is live clinical pregnancy. In addition, baseline demographic, stimulation and further clinical outcomes (pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate) will be compared.
Read the detailed description
The key step of an IVF treatment is controlled ovarian stimulation. The aim of stimulation is to recruit an optimal number of oocytes. The outcome of the fresh cycle improves if the collected oocyte number increases up to 10-15 oocytes. Cumulative success however keeps on rising even over 20 oocytes.
In most of the IVF cycles injectable gonadotropins are used to induce multi-follicular development. The type and dose of the gonadotropins are individually determined based on age, ovarian reserve markers, weight and previous response to treatment. Based on these parameters patients are grouped as expected low-, normal- or high-responders.
Despite a seemingly adequate stimulation regimen some patients respond with fewer than the expected number of follicles/ oocytes. Such patients are called hypo-responders. According to the POSEIDON classification these patients belong to POSEIDON groups 1 and 2 (Gr 1 and 2: retrieval of 9 or fewer oocytes in patients with an anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level ≥ 1.2 ng/ml or antral follicle count (AFC) ≥ 5 and age <35 years [Gr1] or ≥35 years [Gr2]). Other definitions to identify hypo-responders are: 1) use of >2500 IU gonadotropins during stimulation, 2) lack of follicle growth during stimulation, 3) lack of estradiol rise during stimulation. In these cases, we expect a proper response, but it either does not happen, or we need to administer high doses of gonadotropins to achieve the desired result. The exact cause of this phenomenon is not known but receptor polymorphism is one mechanism that could interfere with appropriate signal transduction. Another hypothesis is that these patients are less sensitive to LH and despite adequate serum LH levels they suffer from a reduced LH effect.
If a hypo-responder patient needs to undergo a second treatment, usually either the gonadotropin dose is increased from the onset of the stimulation, or the FSH preparation is combined with LH, or the more potent recombinant preparations are favored. LH could play a dual role; it increases androgen synthesis in the theca cells which in turn increases the FSH sensitivity and aromatase activity of the granulosa cells. In addition, mid-size follicles express LH receptors and therefore LH can directly support their development.
According to one meta-analysis, if treatment outcome is compared with rFSH vs rFSH+rLH in the general, non-selected population then with rFSH more oocytes can be collected while the rFSH+rLH combination results in more pregnancies. Another meta-analysis focusing on poor responders found more oocytes and higher clinical pregnancy rates after rFSH+rLH treatment but no difference in the live birth rates.
However, only a few properly designed studies have compared the various treatment strategies among hypo-responders. Lisi et al. have supplemented with rLH from day 7 onwards the second stimulation of those patients who required >2500 IU gonadotropin in their first attempt. Clinical pregnancy rate was higher in the rLH supplemented cycles. Based on these findings the authors designed a quasi-randomized trial during which every 3rd patient was given rLH supplementation from day 7 onwards. Among those who eventually needed >2500 IU gonadotropin those who were supplemented with rLH had higher implantation rates. There were however only 8 such cases. Ferraretti et al., have studied patients who had stagnation of follicle growth and estradiol production between days 7-10 of their treatment. The participants either received a higher FSH dose or received the combination or rFSH+rLH or the combination of rFSH + human menopausal gonadotropins (hMG). With rFSH alone the number of oocytes, the estradiol level and the clinical pregnancy rate were lower, but the live birth rate did not differ among the three groups. De Placido et al., in a study with a similar design to Ferraretti et al. found more oocytes in the increased rFSH dose arm but clinical outcome remained comparable in the three arms. In a study by Ruolvo et al., among women who needed >3000 IU gonadotropins previously the combination of rFSH with rLH resulted in more pregnancies. Finally, Yilmaz et al. reported improved implantation and pregnancy rates in hypo-responders with the combination of rFSH+rLH. Conforti et al., in a meta-analysis of trials in hypo-responders found that with rFSH+rLH an additional 2 oocytes can be collected and the live birth rate increases.
It is also known from daily practice that the same patient can respond differently to the same medication type and dose in a different cycle. Folliculogenesis is a long process lasting 3-6 months and most of this process is independent of gonadotropins. Those follicles that enter the final 2-3 weeks of this process become responsive to FSH and LH. The size of these groups of follicles varies from cycle to cycle. Therefore, the question arises whether a hypo-responder in one treatment is expected to have a similar hypo-response if the treatment is carried out without alterations. Do the providers need to change/ increase the gonadotropin dose if otherwise based on age and ovarian reserve one would expect a normal response? Furthermore, if adjustments are considered should the dose of FSH be increased or should a mixture with LH be used? In order to try to answer these question the investigators plan to perform a randomized controlled trial.
The aim of this randomized controlled trial is compare unchanged medication protocol to increased dose of FSH vs the combination of FSH and LH in hypo-responder patients identified based on POSEIDON criteria.
Inclusion criteria:
- indication for IVF- intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)
- age 18-40 years
- <9 oocytes in a previous IVF cycle and having an AMH ≥1.2 ng/ml and/or AFC ≥5 (POSEIDON 1,2)
- The use of ≤225 IU FSH (either rFSH alone or the combination of rFSH+human Menopausal Gonadotropin (hMG)) in the previous cycle
- regular 24-35 day cycles
- Intact uterine cavity
- motile sperm from ejaculate or testicular biopsy Exclusion criteria
- not meeting the inclusion criteria
- the use of rFSH:rLH (2:1 ratio) in the previous cycle
- the use of clomiphene citrate or aromatase inhibitor in the previous cycle
- >225 IU gonadotropin in the previous cycle
- >3 failed previous treatments
- patient with recurrent miscarriages
- presence of a hydrosalpinx
- positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis screening test
- planned preimplantation genetic testing of the embryos
- planned elective cryopreservation
- lack of consent Randomization: An online randomization list will be accessible from all participating centers by the local primary investigator using a personal link (www.randomizer.org). The other participating providers will receive the assignment from the local principle investigator (PI) once the patient has signed the consent form.
Sample size: Considering the pilot nature of the study the investigators plan to enroll 50 patients per treatment arm, 150 in total. If one treatment proves to be superior to the others, then the results could serve as the basis for a larger properly powered study.
Study sites: 4 IVF centers will participate: Dunamenti REK Istenhegyi IVF Center, Dunamenti REK Gyor IVF Center, Dunamenti REK Tapolca IVF Center, Reproductive Medicine Institute University of Szeged.
Outcome parameters:
- primary outcome: live clinical pregnancy at week 10-12 of gestation
- secondary outcomes: pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy (intrauterine gestational sac), live birth rate (birth a live newborn after week 24 of gestation), miscarriage rate, birth weight, week of delivery
Definitions:
- Biochemical pregnancy: hCG>10 IU/l
- Clinical pregnancy: intrauterine gestational sac
- Ongoing pregnancy: embryo with heartbeat at week 10-12
- Early miscarriage: pregnancy loss prior to week 12
- Late miscarriage: pregnancy loss week 12-24
- Live birth: delivery after 24 weeks gestation
- Preterm delivery: delivery prior to week 37 gestation
- Very preterm delivery: delivery before week 32 gestation
- Low birth weight: < 2500 g
- Very low birth weight: < 1500 g
Treatment arms:
- Same gonadotropin dose as in previous treatment (recombinant(r) FSH) ['control group']
- The same dose as in the previous cycle but in the form of FSH + LH combination (rFSH:rLH 2:1 ratio) ['additional LH group']
- A dose increase of 75 IU compared to the dose in the previous treatment. ['higher dose FSH group']
Treatment plan:
- The patient meeting the inclusion or exclusion criteria is seen for an ultrasound during the cycle preceding the IVF treatment and is randomized according to the online list after consent has been given.
- Stimulation is started on day 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle and is continued for 5 days. On day 6 the patient is seen for transvaginal ultrasound to assess the size and number of follicles and undergoes blood test for estradiol and LH. If the provider decides to increase the dose of the medication, then it can be increased by max. 75 IU every 2 days to a maximum of 300 IU/day.
- Once the largest follicles reach 12-14 mm in diameter 0.25 mg cetrorelix (Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist) is started.
- At the time of the last follicle scan serum estradiol, progesterone and LH levels are measured again.
- Once the largest follicle reaches >17 mm in diameter the trigger injection (recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (rHCG) or the combination of rHCG + GnRH agonist) is administered or if the provider considers the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) to be high pure GnRH agonist trigger (with elective cryopreservation) can be administered.
- 35-36 hours after the trigger transvaginal oocyte retrieval is performed. Fertilization by IVF or ICSI depending on the semen parameters and patient history.
- Vaginal progesterone supplementation from the day after the retrieval.
- 3-5 days after the retrieval 1-2 embryos/blastocysts are transferred transcervically. Surplus good morphology embryos are cryopreserved using vitrification.
- 12-14 days after the transfer serum beta HCG test to confirm pregnancy.
- If the test is positive in another 3+/-0.5 weeks ultrasound to confirm intrauterine implantation.
- Second ultrasound to confirm live ongoing pregnancy around week 10.
- Luteal support up to week 8-9 of gestation.
- Follow up until delivery to collect perinatal outcome parameters.
- If the first transfer fails but frozen embryos are available frozen embryo transfer (FET) can be planned.
Parameters to be collected:
- age
- number of previous embryo transfers
- indication for IVF
- body mass index
- smoking history
- day 6 estradiol + LH levels
- estradiol, LH, progesterone at last scan
- endometrial thickness at last scan
- number of oocytes
- number of mature oocytes
- method of fertilization
- number of fertilized oocytes
- number of embryos
- number of embryos transferred
- number of embryos cryopreserved
- embryo quality (Gardner score in case of blastocysts)
- result of the initial hCG
- clinical pregnancy
- live clinical pregnancy
- miscarriage
- live birth
- week of delivery
- birth weight
- adverse events: 1) elevated progesterone prior to retrieval (>1.5 ng/ml), 2) elective cryopreservation for OHSS, 3) OHSS, 4) other (complications during retrieval)
Statistical methods:
Statistical analysis: Baseline demographic, IVF treatment related, and clinical outcomes will be compared in the three different stimulation protocol groups. Continuous variables will be shown as mean +/- standard deviation (SD), while categorical variable as number and percent. ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U test will be used for the analysis.
- Being tested
- use of combination of recombinant FSH and recombinant LH, higher dose recFSH, unchanged dose
- Keywords
- ovarian stimulation, in vitro fertilization, hypo-responder, gonadotropin, luteinizing hormone
- Medical subject headings
- Infertility
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
use of combination of recombinant FSH and recombinant LHDrug
in this arm the patients will use the combination of recFSH:recLH in the same dose as in her prior cycle
higher dose recFSHDrug
in this arm the patient will use an additional 75 IU/day recFSH compared to her previous drug dose
unchanged doseDrug
in this groups the patient will receive the same recFSH dose as in her prior cycle
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | Other | In this arm the hypo-responder patient will undergo stimulation using the same gonadotropin dose as in her previous treatment.
Treatment steps:
1. Stimulation using the same recombinant FSH dose as in her prevoius cycle is started on day 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle and is continued for 5 days. On day 6 the patient is seen for US and bloodwork. If indicated the dose can be increased by max. 75 IU every 2 days to a maximum of 300 IU/day.
2. GnRH antagonist is started at follicle size 12-14 m.
3. Trigger is administered once the largest follicle gets >17 mm. Retrieval is scheduled 36 hrs later. IVF or ICSI fertilization. Luteal support from day past retrieval.
4. Transfer of 1-2 embryos on day 3 or 5.
5. Pregnancy test 12 days after ET. Receives: Drug: unchanged dose |
| Additional LH group (Pergoveris, Merck) | Active comparator | In this arm the hypo-responder patient will undergo stimulation using the same gonadotropin dose as in her previous treatment but in the form of rec FSH and recLH 2:1 ratio (e.g.: if 150 IU rec FSH was used then 150 IU recFSH and recLH (2:1 ratio).
Treatment steps:
1. Stimulation using the same dose as in her previuos cycle but in the form of recombinant FSH and recombinant LH 2:1 ratio is started on day 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle and is continued for 5 days. On day 6 the patient is seen for US and bloodwork. If indicated the dose can be increased by max. 75 IU every 2 days to a maximum of 300 IU/day.
2. GnRH antagonist is started at follicle size 12-14 m.
3. Trigger is administered once the largest follicle gets >17 mm. Retrieval is scheduled 36 hrs later. IVF or ICSI fertilization. Luteal support from day past retrieval.
4. Transfer of 1-2 embryos on day 3 or 5.
5. Pregnancy test 12 days after ET. Receives: Drug: use of combination of recombinant FSH and recombinant LH |
| higher dose FSH group (follitropin alpha (Gonal-F, Ovaleap) or follitropin delta (Rekovelle) | Active comparator | In this arm the hypo-responder patient will undergo stimulation using recombinant FSH but with a dose increase of 75 IU/day compared to the gonadotropin dose used in her previous treatment (e.g.: if 150 IU/d rec FSH was used then 225 IU/d will be used).
Treatment steps:
1. Stimulation using an additional 75 IU recombinant FSH per day compared to her previous treatment is started on day 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle and is continued for 5 days. On day 6 the patient is seen for US and bloodwork. If indicated the dose can be increased by max. 75 IU every 2 days to a maximum of 300 IU/day.
2. GnRH antagonist is started at follicle size 12-14 m.
3. Trigger is administered once the largest follicle gets >17 mm. Retrieval is scheduled 36 hrs later. IVF or ICSI fertilization. Luteal support from day past retrieval.
4. Transfer of 1-2 embryos on day 3 or 5.
5. Pregnancy test 12 days after ET. Receives: Drug: higher dose recFSH |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
live clinical pregnancy
intrauterine gestational sac with an embryo with heartbeat at week 10-12
Measured: up to 3 months after the embryo transfer; starting with the first patient who has a positive pregnancy test after transfer and up to 3 months after the completion of the study (last transfer with positive result)
Secondary outcomes (1)
live birth
Live birth: delivery after 24 weeks gestation
Measured: from up to 9 month after the embryo transfer; starting with the first patient who has a positive pregnancy test after the embryo transfer and up to 8 months after the completion of the study (last transfer with positive result)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Aug 2025
- Study start1 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Mar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hypo-responderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dunamenti REK Istenhegyi IVF Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dunamenti REK Gyor Clinic, Dunamenti REK Pannon Clinic, Szeged University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Peter Kovacs MD, Dunamenti REK Istenhegyi IVF Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07121751
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NNGYK/22108-7/2025
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 25 Jul 2025
- Last updated
- 13 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Patient data will be shared upon reasonable request.
Publications
Yazici Yilmaz F, Gorkemli H, Colakoglu MC, Aktan M, Gezginc K. The evaluation of recombinant LH supplementation in patients with suboptimal response to recombinant FSH undergoing IVF treatment with GnRH agonist down-regulation. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015 Feb;31(2):141-4. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.965675. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
PubMed 25237892Ruvolo G, Bosco L, Pane A, Morici G, Cittadini E, Roccheri MC. Lower apoptosis rate in human cumulus cells after administration of recombinant luteinizing hormone to women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization procedures. Fertil Steril. 2007 Mar;87(3):542-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.059. Epub 2006 Nov 27.
PubMed 17126339De Placido G, Alviggi C, Perino A, Strina I, Lisi F, Fasolino A, De Palo R, Ranieri A, Colacurci N, Mollo A; Italian Collaborative Group on Recombinant Human Luteinizing Hormone. Recombinant human LH supplementation versus recombinant human FSH (rFSH) step-up protocol during controlled ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women with initial inadequate ovarian response to rFSH. A multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2005 Feb;20(2):390-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh625. Epub 2004 Dec 2.
PubMed 15576390Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L, Magli MC, D'angelo A, Farfalli V, Montanaro N. Exogenous luteinizing hormone in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted reproduction techniques. Fertil Steril. 2004 Dec;82(6):1521-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.041.
PubMed 15589853Lisi F, Rinaldi L, Fishel S, Lisi R, Pepe GP, Picconeri MG, Campbell A. Use of recombinant LH in a group of unselected IVF patients. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002 Sep-Oct;5(2):104-8. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61610-0.
PubMed 12419032Lisi F, Rinaldi L, Fishel S, Lisi R, Pepe G, Picconeri MG, Campbell A, Rowe P. Use of recombinant FSH and recombinant LH in multiple follicular stimulation for IVF: a preliminary study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2001;3(3):190-194. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62034-2.
PubMed 12513853Lehert P, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Schertz J, Saunders H, Arriagada P, Copt S, Tarlatzis B. Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) plus recombinant luteinizing hormone versus r-hFSH alone for ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Feb 20;12:17. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-17.
PubMed 24555766Santi D, Casarini L, Alviggi C, Simoni M. Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the "Personalized" Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017 Jun 1;8:114. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00114. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28620352Gougeon A. Regulation of ovarian follicular development in primates: facts and hypotheses. Endocr Rev. 1996 Apr;17(2):121-55. doi: 10.1210/edrv-17-2-121. No abstract available.
PubMed 8706629Conforti A, Esteves SC, Di Rella F, Strina I, De Rosa P, Fiorenza A, Zullo F, De Placido G, Alviggi C. The role of recombinant LH in women with hypo-response to controlled ovarian stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2019 Feb 6;17(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12958-019-0460-4.
PubMed 30728019Poseidon Group (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number); Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K, Conforti A, De Placido G, Esteves SC, Fischer R, Galliano D, Polyzos NP, Sunkara SK, Ubaldi FM, Humaidan P. A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertil Steril. 2016 Jun;105(6):1452-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 26. No abstract available.
PubMed 26921622Ovarian Stimulation TEGGO, Bosch E, Broer S, Griesinger G, Grynberg M, Humaidan P, Kolibianakis E, Kunicki M, La Marca A, Lainas G, Le Clef N, Massin N, Mastenbroek S, Polyzos N, Sunkara SK, Timeva T, Toyli M, Urbancsek J, Vermeulen N, Broekmans F. ESHRE guideline: ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSIdagger. Hum Reprod Open. 2020 May 1;2020(2):hoaa009. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa009. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32395637Polyzos NP, Drakopoulos P, Parra J, Pellicer A, Santos-Ribeiro S, Tournaye H, Bosch E, Garcia-Velasco J. Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including approximately 15,000 women. Fertil Steril. 2018 Sep;110(4):661-670.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.039.
PubMed 30196963Fanton M, Cho JH, Baker VL, Loewke K. A higher number of oocytes retrieved is associated with an increase in fertilized oocytes, blastocysts, and cumulative live birth rates. Fertil Steril. 2023 May;119(5):762-769. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.01.001. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
PubMed 36634732
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimal Stimulation of Hypo-responders Undergoing IVF: a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07121751
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NNGYK/22108-7/2025
- Keywords
- ovarian stimulation, in vitro fertilization, hypo-responder, gonadotropin, luteinizing hormone
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Dunamenti REK Istenhegyi IVF CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dunamenti REK Gyor Clinic, Dunamenti REK Pannon Clinic, Szeged University
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Stimulation is a key step of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Typically, injectable gonadotropins are used for stimulation, and their dose is individually determined to avoid hypo- as well as hyper-response. Despite the individualization some patients respond with a lower-than-expected number of oocytes. If the low response is unexpected based on the baseline parameters or if an unusually high dose of gonadotropins is needed to achieve a proper response we talk about "hypo-response". In such cases if the first treatment fails and a repeat attempt is planned typically even more gonadotropins, the combination of luteinizing hormone (LH) with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) or the use of the more potent recombinant preparations are considered. The benefits of these approaches however have not been studied properly in hypo-responders. The studies have used various criteria to identify hypo-responders, have used various gonadotropin doses and have evaluated different outcome parameters. Live birth was only studied in one trial.
It is also known that in a different cycle the same patient is likely to have a slightly different response to the same type and dose of drugs. Therefore, the question arises whether a hypo-responder in one treatment is expected to have hypo-response again if the treatment is similarly carried out in a different cycle. Do we need to change/ increase the gonadotropin dose if based on age and ovarian reserve otherwise we would expect a normal response? Furthermore, if we consider a change should we increase the dose of FSH or should we combine it with LH?
Therefore the aim of this randomized controlled trial is compare an unchanged medication regimen to increased dose of FSH vs the combination of FSH and LH in hypo-responder patients identified based on POSEIDON (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number) criteria (Gr 1 and 2: retrieval of 9 or fewer oocytes in patients with an anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level ≥ 1.2 ng/ml or antral follicle count (AFC) ≥ 5 and age <35 years [Group (Gr) 1] or ≥35 years [Gr2]). Hypo-responder patients will be randomized to:
- Same gonadotropin dose as in previous treatment (recombinant(r) FSH) ['control group']
- The same dose as in the previous cycle but in the form of FSH + LH combination (rFSH:rLH 2:1 ratio) ['additional LH group']
- A dose increase of 75 international unit (IU) compared to the dose in the previous treatment. ['higher dose FSH group'] The primary outcome parameter to study is live clinical pregnancy. In addition, baseline demographic, stimulation and further clinical outcomes (pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate) will be compared.
Detailed description
The key step of an IVF treatment is controlled ovarian stimulation. The aim of stimulation is to recruit an optimal number of oocytes. The outcome of the fresh cycle improves if the collected oocyte number increases up to 10-15 oocytes. Cumulative success however keeps on rising even over 20 oocytes.
In most of the IVF cycles injectable gonadotropins are used to induce multi-follicular development. The type and dose of the gonadotropins are individually determined based on age, ovarian reserve markers, weight and previous response to treatment. Based on these parameters patients are grouped as expected low-, normal- or high-responders.
Despite a seemingly adequate stimulation regimen some patients respond with fewer than the expected number of follicles/ oocytes. Such patients are called hypo-responders. According to the POSEIDON classification these patients belong to POSEIDON groups 1 and 2 (Gr 1 and 2: retrieval of 9 or fewer oocytes in patients with an anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level ≥ 1.2 ng/ml or antral follicle count (AFC) ≥ 5 and age <35 years [Gr1] or ≥35 years [Gr2]). Other definitions to identify hypo-responders are: 1) use of >2500 IU gonadotropins during stimulation, 2) lack of follicle growth during stimulation, 3) lack of estradiol rise during stimulation. In these cases, we expect a proper response, but it either does not happen, or we need to administer high doses of gonadotropins to achieve the desired result. The exact cause of this phenomenon is not known but receptor polymorphism is one mechanism that could interfere with appropriate signal transduction. Another hypothesis is that these patients are less sensitive to LH and despite adequate serum LH levels they suffer from a reduced LH effect.
If a hypo-responder patient needs to undergo a second treatment, usually either the gonadotropin dose is increased from the onset of the stimulation, or the FSH preparation is combined with LH, or the more potent recombinant preparations are favored. LH could play a dual role; it increases androgen synthesis in the theca cells which in turn increases the FSH sensitivity and aromatase activity of the granulosa cells. In addition, mid-size follicles express LH receptors and therefore LH can directly support their development.
According to one meta-analysis, if treatment outcome is compared with rFSH vs rFSH+rLH in the general, non-selected population then with rFSH more oocytes can be collected while the rFSH+rLH combination results in more pregnancies. Another meta-analysis focusing on poor responders found more oocytes and higher clinical pregnancy rates after rFSH+rLH treatment but no difference in the live birth rates.
However, only a few properly designed studies have compared the various treatment strategies among hypo-responders. Lisi et al. have supplemented with rLH from day 7 onwards the second stimulation of those patients who required >2500 IU gonadotropin in their first attempt. Clinical pregnancy rate was higher in the rLH supplemented cycles. Based on these findings the authors designed a quasi-randomized trial during which every 3rd patient was given rLH supplementation from day 7 onwards. Among those who eventually needed >2500 IU gonadotropin those who were supplemented with rLH had higher implantation rates. There were however only 8 such cases. Ferraretti et al., have studied patients who had stagnation of follicle growth and estradiol production between days 7-10 of their treatment. The participants either received a higher FSH dose or received the combination or rFSH+rLH or the combination of rFSH + human menopausal gonadotropins (hMG). With rFSH alone the number of oocytes, the estradiol level and the clinical pregnancy rate were lower, but the live birth rate did not differ among the three groups. De Placido et al., in a study with a similar design to Ferraretti et al. found more oocytes in the increased rFSH dose arm but clinical outcome remained comparable in the three arms. In a study by Ruolvo et al., among women who needed >3000 IU gonadotropins previously the combination of rFSH with rLH resulted in more pregnancies. Finally, Yilmaz et al. reported improved implantation and pregnancy rates in hypo-responders with the combination of rFSH+rLH. Conforti et al., in a meta-analysis of trials in hypo-responders found that with rFSH+rLH an additional 2 oocytes can be collected and the live birth rate increases.
It is also known from daily practice that the same patient can respond differently to the same medication type and dose in a different cycle. Folliculogenesis is a long process lasting 3-6 months and most of this process is independent of gonadotropins. Those follicles that enter the final 2-3 weeks of this process become responsive to FSH and LH. The size of these groups of follicles varies from cycle to cycle. Therefore, the question arises whether a hypo-responder in one treatment is expected to have a similar hypo-response if the treatment is carried out without alterations. Do the providers need to change/ increase the gonadotropin dose if otherwise based on age and ovarian reserve one would expect a normal response? Furthermore, if adjustments are considered should the dose of FSH be increased or should a mixture with LH be used? In order to try to answer these question the investigators plan to perform a randomized controlled trial.
The aim of this randomized controlled trial is compare unchanged medication protocol to increased dose of FSH vs the combination of FSH and LH in hypo-responder patients identified based on POSEIDON criteria.
Inclusion criteria:
- indication for IVF- intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)
- age 18-40 years
- <9 oocytes in a previous IVF cycle and having an AMH ≥1.2 ng/ml and/or AFC ≥5 (POSEIDON 1,2)
- The use of ≤225 IU FSH (either rFSH alone or the combination of rFSH+human Menopausal Gonadotropin (hMG)) in the previous cycle
- regular 24-35 day cycles
- Intact uterine cavity
- motile sperm from ejaculate or testicular biopsy Exclusion criteria
- not meeting the inclusion criteria
- the use of rFSH:rLH (2:1 ratio) in the previous cycle
- the use of clomiphene citrate or aromatase inhibitor in the previous cycle
- >225 IU gonadotropin in the previous cycle
- >3 failed previous treatments
- patient with recurrent miscarriages
- presence of a hydrosalpinx
- positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis screening test
- planned preimplantation genetic testing of the embryos
- planned elective cryopreservation
- lack of consent Randomization: An online randomization list will be accessible from all participating centers by the local primary investigator using a personal link (www.randomizer.org). The other participating providers will receive the assignment from the local principle investigator (PI) once the patient has signed the consent form.
Sample size: Considering the pilot nature of the study the investigators plan to enroll 50 patients per treatment arm, 150 in total. If one treatment proves to be superior to the others, then the results could serve as the basis for a larger properly powered study.
Study sites: 4 IVF centers will participate: Dunamenti REK Istenhegyi IVF Center, Dunamenti REK Gyor IVF Center, Dunamenti REK Tapolca IVF Center, Reproductive Medicine Institute University of Szeged.
Outcome parameters:
- primary outcome: live clinical pregnancy at week 10-12 of gestation
- secondary outcomes: pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy (intrauterine gestational sac), live birth rate (birth a live newborn after week 24 of gestation), miscarriage rate, birth weight, week of delivery
Definitions:
- Biochemical pregnancy: hCG>10 IU/l
- Clinical pregnancy: intrauterine gestational sac
- Ongoing pregnancy: embryo with heartbeat at week 10-12
- Early miscarriage: pregnancy loss prior to week 12
- Late miscarriage: pregnancy loss week 12-24
- Live birth: delivery after 24 weeks gestation
- Preterm delivery: delivery prior to week 37 gestation
- Very preterm delivery: delivery before week 32 gestation
- Low birth weight: < 2500 g
- Very low birth weight: < 1500 g
Treatment arms:
- Same gonadotropin dose as in previous treatment (recombinant(r) FSH) ['control group']
- The same dose as in the previous cycle but in the form of FSH + LH combination (rFSH:rLH 2:1 ratio) ['additional LH group']
- A dose increase of 75 IU compared to the dose in the previous treatment. ['higher dose FSH group']
Treatment plan:
- The patient meeting the inclusion or exclusion criteria is seen for an ultrasound during the cycle preceding the IVF treatment and is randomized according to the online list after consent has been given.
- Stimulation is started on day 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle and is continued for 5 days. On day 6 the patient is seen for transvaginal ultrasound to assess the size and number of follicles and undergoes blood test for estradiol and LH. If the provider decides to increase the dose of the medication, then it can be increased by max. 75 IU every 2 days to a maximum of 300 IU/day.
- Once the largest follicles reach 12-14 mm in diameter 0.25 mg cetrorelix (Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist) is started.
- At the time of the last follicle scan serum estradiol, progesterone and LH levels are measured again.
- Once the largest follicle reaches >17 mm in diameter the trigger injection (recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (rHCG) or the combination of rHCG + GnRH agonist) is administered or if the provider considers the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) to be high pure GnRH agonist trigger (with elective cryopreservation) can be administered.
- 35-36 hours after the trigger transvaginal oocyte retrieval is performed. Fertilization by IVF or ICSI depending on the semen parameters and patient history.
- Vaginal progesterone supplementation from the day after the retrieval.
- 3-5 days after the retrieval 1-2 embryos/blastocysts are transferred transcervically. Surplus good morphology embryos are cryopreserved using vitrification.
- 12-14 days after the transfer serum beta HCG test to confirm pregnancy.
- If the test is positive in another 3+/-0.5 weeks ultrasound to confirm intrauterine implantation.
- Second ultrasound to confirm live ongoing pregnancy around week 10.
- Luteal support up to week 8-9 of gestation.
- Follow up until delivery to collect perinatal outcome parameters.
- If the first transfer fails but frozen embryos are available frozen embryo transfer (FET) can be planned.
Parameters to be collected:
- age
- number of previous embryo transfers
- indication for IVF
- body mass index
- smoking history
- day 6 estradiol + LH levels
- estradiol, LH, progesterone at last scan
- endometrial thickness at last scan
- number of oocytes
- number of mature oocytes
- method of fertilization
- number of fertilized oocytes
- number of embryos
- number of embryos transferred
- number of embryos cryopreserved
- embryo quality (Gardner score in case of blastocysts)
- result of the initial hCG
- clinical pregnancy
- live clinical pregnancy
- miscarriage
- live birth
- week of delivery
- birth weight
- adverse events: 1) elevated progesterone prior to retrieval (>1.5 ng/ml), 2) elective cryopreservation for OHSS, 3) OHSS, 4) other (complications during retrieval)
Statistical methods:
Statistical analysis: Baseline demographic, IVF treatment related, and clinical outcomes will be compared in the three different stimulation protocol groups. Continuous variables will be shown as mean +/- standard deviation (SD), while categorical variable as number and percent. ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U test will be used for the analysis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | Other | Drug: unchanged doseIn this arm the hypo-responder patient will undergo stimulation using the same gonadotropin dose as in her previous treatment. Treatment steps: 1. Stimulation using the same recombinant FSH dose as in her prevoius cycle is started on day 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle and is continued for 5 days. On day 6 the patient is seen for US and bloodwork. If indicated the dose can be increased by max. 75 IU every 2 days to a maximum of 300 IU/day. 2. GnRH antagonist is started at follicle size 12-14 m. 3. Trigger is administered once the largest follicle gets >17 mm. Retrieval is scheduled 36 hrs later. IVF or ICSI fertilization. Luteal support from day past retrieval. 4. Transfer of 1-2 embryos on day 3 or 5. 5. Pregnancy test 12 days after ET. |
| Additional LH group (Pergoveris, Merck) | Active comparator | Drug: use of combination of recombinant FSH and recombinant LHIn this arm the hypo-responder patient will undergo stimulation using the same gonadotropin dose as in her previous treatment but in the form of rec FSH and recLH 2:1 ratio (e.g.: if 150 IU rec FSH was used then 150 IU recFSH and recLH (2:1 ratio). Treatment steps: 1. Stimulation using the same dose as in her previuos cycle but in the form of recombinant FSH and recombinant LH 2:1 ratio is started on day 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle and is continued for 5 days. On day 6 the patient is seen for US and bloodwork. If indicated the dose can be increased by max. 75 IU every 2 days to a maximum of 300 IU/day. 2. GnRH antagonist is started at follicle size 12-14 m. 3. Trigger is administered once the largest follicle gets >17 mm. Retrieval is scheduled 36 hrs later. IVF or ICSI fertilization. Luteal support from day past retrieval. 4. Transfer of 1-2 embryos on day 3 or 5. 5. Pregnancy test 12 days after ET. |
| higher dose FSH group (follitropin alpha (Gonal-F, Ovaleap) or follitropin delta (Rekovelle) | Active comparator | Drug: higher dose recFSHIn this arm the hypo-responder patient will undergo stimulation using recombinant FSH but with a dose increase of 75 IU/day compared to the gonadotropin dose used in her previous treatment (e.g.: if 150 IU/d rec FSH was used then 225 IU/d will be used). Treatment steps: 1. Stimulation using an additional 75 IU recombinant FSH per day compared to her previous treatment is started on day 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle and is continued for 5 days. On day 6 the patient is seen for US and bloodwork. If indicated the dose can be increased by max. 75 IU every 2 days to a maximum of 300 IU/day. 2. GnRH antagonist is started at follicle size 12-14 m. 3. Trigger is administered once the largest follicle gets >17 mm. Retrieval is scheduled 36 hrs later. IVF or ICSI fertilization. Luteal support from day past retrieval. 4. Transfer of 1-2 embryos on day 3 or 5. 5. Pregnancy test 12 days after ET. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- indication for IVF-ICSI
- age 18-40 years
- <9 oocytes in a previous IVF cycle and having an AMH ≥1.2 ng/ml and/or AFC ≥5 (POSEIDON 1,2)
- The use of ≤225 IU FSH (either rFSH alone or the combination of rFSH+hMG) in the previous cycle
- regular 24-35 day cycles
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- not meeting the inclusion criteria
- the use of rFSH:rLH (2:1 ratio) in the previous cycle
- the use of clomiphene citrate or aromatase inhibitor in the previous cycle
- >225 IU gonadotropin in the previous cycle
- >3 failed previous treatments
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| use of combination of recombinant FSH and recombinant LHin this arm the patients will use the combination of recFSH:recLH in the same dose as in her prior cycle | Drug | Additional LH group (Pergoveris, Merck) |
| higher dose recFSHin this arm the patient will use an additional 75 IU/day recFSH compared to her previous drug dose | Drug | higher dose FSH group (follitropin alpha (Gonal-F, Ovaleap) or follitropin delta (Rekovelle) |
| unchanged dosein this groups the patient will receive the same recFSH dose as in her prior cycle | Drug | Control group |
Primary outcome
live clinical pregnancy
Time frame: up to 3 months after the embryo transfer; starting with the first patient who has a positive pregnancy test after transfer and up to 3 months after the completion of the study (last transfer with positive result)
intrauterine gestational sac with an embryo with heartbeat at week 10-12
1 secondary outcome
live birth
Time frame: from up to 9 month after the embryo transfer; starting with the first patient who has a positive pregnancy test after the embryo transfer and up to 8 months after the completion of the study (last transfer with positive result)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Aug 2025.
- Background: PubMed 25237892Yazici Yilmaz F, Gorkemli H, Colakoglu MC, Aktan M, Gezginc K. The evaluation of recombinant LH supplementation in patients with suboptimal response to recombinant FSH undergoing IVF treatment with GnRH agonist down-regulation. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015 Feb;31(2):141-4. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.965675. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
- Background: PubMed 17126339Ruvolo G, Bosco L, Pane A, Morici G, Cittadini E, Roccheri MC. Lower apoptosis rate in human cumulus cells after administration of recombinant luteinizing hormone to women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization procedures. Fertil Steril. 2007 Mar;87(3):542-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.059. Epub 2006 Nov 27.
- Background: PubMed 15576390De Placido G, Alviggi C, Perino A, Strina I, Lisi F, Fasolino A, De Palo R, Ranieri A, Colacurci N, Mollo A; Italian Collaborative Group on Recombinant Human Luteinizing Hormone. Recombinant human LH supplementation versus recombinant human FSH (rFSH) step-up protocol during controlled ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women with initial inadequate ovarian response to rFSH. A multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2005 Feb;20(2):390-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh625. Epub 2004 Dec 2.
- Background: PubMed 15589853Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L, Magli MC, D'angelo A, Farfalli V, Montanaro N. Exogenous luteinizing hormone in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted reproduction techniques. Fertil Steril. 2004 Dec;82(6):1521-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.041.
- Background: PubMed 12419032Lisi F, Rinaldi L, Fishel S, Lisi R, Pepe GP, Picconeri MG, Campbell A. Use of recombinant LH in a group of unselected IVF patients. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002 Sep-Oct;5(2):104-8. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61610-0.
- Background: PubMed 12513853Lisi F, Rinaldi L, Fishel S, Lisi R, Pepe G, Picconeri MG, Campbell A, Rowe P. Use of recombinant FSH and recombinant LH in multiple follicular stimulation for IVF: a preliminary study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2001;3(3):190-194. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62034-2.
- Background: PubMed 24555766Lehert P, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Schertz J, Saunders H, Arriagada P, Copt S, Tarlatzis B. Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) plus recombinant luteinizing hormone versus r-hFSH alone for ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Feb 20;12:17. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-17.
- Background: PubMed 28620352Santi D, Casarini L, Alviggi C, Simoni M. Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the "Personalized" Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017 Jun 1;8:114. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00114. eCollection 2017.
- Background: PubMed 8706629Gougeon A. Regulation of ovarian follicular development in primates: facts and hypotheses. Endocr Rev. 1996 Apr;17(2):121-55. doi: 10.1210/edrv-17-2-121. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30728019Conforti A, Esteves SC, Di Rella F, Strina I, De Rosa P, Fiorenza A, Zullo F, De Placido G, Alviggi C. The role of recombinant LH in women with hypo-response to controlled ovarian stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2019 Feb 6;17(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12958-019-0460-4.
- Background: PubMed 26921622Poseidon Group (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number); Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K, Conforti A, De Placido G, Esteves SC, Fischer R, Galliano D, Polyzos NP, Sunkara SK, Ubaldi FM, Humaidan P. A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertil Steril. 2016 Jun;105(6):1452-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 26. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 32395637Ovarian Stimulation TEGGO, Bosch E, Broer S, Griesinger G, Grynberg M, Humaidan P, Kolibianakis E, Kunicki M, La Marca A, Lainas G, Le Clef N, Massin N, Mastenbroek S, Polyzos N, Sunkara SK, Timeva T, Toyli M, Urbancsek J, Vermeulen N, Broekmans F. ESHRE guideline: ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSIdagger. Hum Reprod Open. 2020 May 1;2020(2):hoaa009. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa009. eCollection 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Patient data will be shared upon reasonable request.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing use of combination of recombinant FSH and recombinant LH, higher dose recFSH and unchanged dose in people with Hypo-responder and Infertility (IVF Patients), run by Dunamenti REK Istenhegyi IVF Center at 4 sites in Hungary.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Hungary. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Peter Kovacs, MD, PhD (+3612022802, peterkovacs1970@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
live clinical pregnancy (time frame: up to 3 months after the embryo transfer; starting with the first patient who has a positive pregnancy test after transfer and up to 3 months after the completion of the study (last transfer with positive result)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07121751, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2025.