Plantar Fasciitis of Both FeetGood FeetNCT07103070
A Test of Efficacy and Foot Position Alteration in Patients Wearing Good Feet Arch Supports for the Treatment of Pain
An observational study of Plantar Fasciitis of Both Feet and Metatarsalgia, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is a single armed prospective case series designed to evaluate the efficacy of treating common structural-related foot ailments (i.e. plantar fasciitis, metatarsalgia, and/or hallux valgus) with a high quality non-custom made arch support. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Plantar Fasciitis of Both Feet, Metatarsalgia, Morton Neuroma
- What is being tested?
- Arch supports
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 43 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 13 Jun 2022to 31 Mar 2024
- How long will I take part?
- 12 Weeks
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Subjects will be recruited from the clinicians in the Division of Podiatry under the Department of Orthopaedics. Additionally, the sponsor, Good Feet Worldwide has a trade store the MGH service area, and will allow us to promote the study at their location with an advertisement poster. Potential subjects from the trade store will be referred to our clinics for screening and, when appropriate, recruited for the study.
Who may be able to join
- Men or women ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 years of age
- Able and willing to comply with study procedures, and a signed and dated
- Diagnosed with symptomatic hallux valgus and/or plantar fasciitis and/or metatarsalgia
- Has had foot pain for at least 30 days
- Willing and able to utilize insole when walking for 90 days
- BMI ≤ 35
- Able to walk up to 0.5 miles without difficulty in a 24-hour period
Who cannot join
- Inability or unwillingness to comply with study procedures
- Gross asymmetry in feet, where shoe size differs by 2 or more full sizes between right and left foot
- Subject has had a CT performed within the last 30 days, for any body part.
- Prior partial or total amputation of a foot
- BMI > 35.
- Unilateral or bilateral foot deformity that would hinder the fitting of an over-the-counter arch support, such as active Charcot foot or Charcot with boney prominence
Show all 11Show fewer
- Ulcers or open sores on either foot
- Currently wearing custom shoes or insoles.
- Currently ambulating with a cane, crutches, walker.
- Currently using any type of foot or ankle brace, and/or having used a brace in the last 30 days.
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
About this study
This study is a single armed prospective case series designed to evaluate the efficacy of treating common structural-related foot ailments (i.e. plantar fasciitis, metatarsalgia, and/or hallux valgus) with a high quality non-custom made arch support. It is believed that these conditions are the result of inadequate or poorly fitted arch supports resulting in a lack of structural correction in the foot while weight bearing. Over-the-counter insoles are believed to counteract the shortcomings in foot structure that result in these painful conditions. In this study, it is proposed that changes in foot morphology can be measured quantitatively using weight bearing CT Scan (Computerized Tomography) and X-rays of the subject with and without the arch supports. Subjects will also answer questions from a validated series of questionnaires pertaining to their foot condition and generalized health and activity level.
The study is a minimal risk study, with all subjects receiving the arch supports being investigated. There is no placebo offered. Initial evaluation of all subjects will include all imaging and measurements. Collection of subjective responses will occur after 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks of treatment.
Read the detailed description
- Background and Significance Foot orthoses are arch supports that can be worn in the shoes, and are designed to relieve pain by providing support to various areas of the foot to eliminate or reduce excessive mechanical forces. Most commonly, these devices are used as part of the treatment protocol for a variety of common foot ailments including painful plantar fasciitis and pronation. A variety of musculoskeletal pains have been shown to be reduced, and stability in ambulation can be improved by adding arch support to the shoes. Most importantly, previous studies have demonstrated that the structure of the foot can be altered, and with that the function of the foot, when orthoses are used. Previous studies have demonstrated multiple biomechanical and clinical benefits of using foot orthoses and arch supports. These devices have been shown to alter foot positioning and forefoot pressure during walking, reducing heel and forefoot pressures, decreasing impact forces, and improving comfort. Cadaveric studies confirm that orthoses enhance ankle and subtalar joint stability, correct abnormal rotations, improve arch alignment, and increase arch height under simulated load. Clinical studies involving military personnel found that wearing arch supports significantly reduced stress fracture incidence and improved comfort. Additionally, arch supports were associated with decreased lower back pain after prolonged use. Research also indicated that orthotic devices reduce tibial internal rotation, influencing the mechanical function of proximal structures like the ankle and leg. Furthermore, orthoses positively impacted foot deformities, pain (foot, knee, hip, and back), and balance, as demonstrated by radiographic and center-of-pressure analyses, indicating overall improvements in stability and symptomatic relief. The goal of the current study is to investigate the clinical and biomechanical effects of arch-support insoles in common foot pathologies including plantar fasciitis, and metatarsalgia.
- Specific Aims and Objectives The objective of this study is to measure the structural changes that occur in the foot when wearing arch supports, and how these changes correlate with overall relief of common structural-related foot ailments; plantar fasciitis, metatarsalgia, and/or hallux valgus Specific Aim #1: Measure any changes that occur in the position and alignment of the foot bones relative to one another using weight bearing radiographs and weight bearing CT scans, with and without over-the-counter arch supports under the sole of the feet. Hypothesis: Arch supports (orthoses) will alter the positioning and alignment of the bones of the foot when standing. Any changes will be measurable in three dimensions, using both weight bearing CT scans and standard anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs. Specific Aim #2: Demonstrate if there is a correlation between symptomatic relief of painful foot conditions including plantar fasciitis and metatarsalgia pain using validated clinical scores and quality of life measures. Hypothesis: Painful foot conditions will improve when subjects wear over-the-counter arch supports on a regular basis, as demonstrated by validated subjective scoring.
- General Description of Study Design
This study is a single armed prospective case series designed to evaluate the efficacy of treating common structural-related foot ailments (i.e. plantar fasciitis, metatarsalgia, and/or hallux valgus) with a high quality non-custom made arch support. It is believed that these conditions are the result of inadequate or poorly fitted arch supports resulting in a lack of structural correction in the foot while weight bearing. Over-the-counter insoles are believed to counteract the shortcomings in foot structure that result in these painful conditions. In this study, it is proposed that changes in foot morphology can be measured quantitatively using weight bearing CT Scan (Computerized Tomography) and X-rays of the subject with and without the arch supports. Subjects will also answer questions from a validated series of questionnaires pertaining to their foot condition and generalized health and activity level.
The study is a minimal risk study, with all subjects receiving the arch supports being investigated. There is no placebo offered. Initial evaluation of all subjects will include all imaging and measurements. Collection of subjective responses will occur after 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks of treatment.
Subject Recruitment:
Subjects will be recruited from the clinicians in the Division of Podiatry under the Department of Orthopaedics. Additionally, the sponsor, Good Feet Worldwide has a trade store the MGH service area, and will allow us to promote the study at their location with an advertisement poster. Potential subjects from the trade store will be referred to our clinics for screening and, when appropriate, recruited for the study.
Potential subjects will contact the principal investigator, Dr. Adam Landsman for preliminary screening and if they are able to satisfy the basic criteria, will be invited for formal screening. If qualified, they will be enrolled to begin the study. In order to avoid any undue pressure, all potential subjects who are patients of one of the Investigators will be given the option to do any or all of the following:
- Offer patients the opportunity to take home the Consent Form, and call back if they wish to participate
- Offer to connect the patient with other health care providers to discuss participation.
All study subjects will be screened and evaluated at the Foot and Ankle Clinic at MGH Waltham. Screenings and enrollments will take place on Tuesdays and Wednesdays, during dedicated research time.
The conditions being examined here are common among all races and genders, and enrollment is open to all. There have been limitations placed on subject age, as this age group is most likely to experience the conditions being studied.
- Conditions
- Plantar Fasciitis of Both Feet, Metatarsalgia, Morton Neuroma, Hallux Valgus Deformity, Low Back Pain, Knee Pain
- Being tested
- Arch supports
- Keywords
- arch supports, heel pain, metatarsalgia, plantar fasciitis
- Medical subject headings
- Metatarsalgia, Morton Neuroma, Low Back Pain, Fasciitis, Plantar
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Arch supportsDevice
Set of 3 arch supports supplied by Good Feet
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Inclusion 1. Men or women ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 years of age 2. The subject is able and willing to comply w | Subjects with foot pain who are able to wear arch supports. Receives: Device: Arch supports |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Pain Intensity Score
Change in symptoms and relief of pain will be quantified based on subjective completion of validated questionnaires. Scoring is based on a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity. Raw scores are converted to T-scores, standardized to a mean of 50 (average for the general population) and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores reflect more severe pain intensity.
Measured: 12 weeks
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Pain Interference Score
PROMIS Pain Interference measures the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities. Respondents rate how much pain has interfered with their daily life over the past 7 days. Scoring uses a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater interference. Raw scores are converted to T-scores (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher T-scores represent more significant pain interference.
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change in foot morphology- Weightbearing X-ray
Foot alignment will be assessed using linear and angular measurements on anteroposterior and lateral views of plain radiographs. Images will be taken at baseline with and without insoles
Measured: Baseline
Change in foot morphology- Weightbearing CT scans
Foot alignment will be assessed using 3D, linear, and angular measurements on CT scans. Images will be taken at baseline with and without insoles
Measured: Baseline
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Global Health
PROMIS Global Health is a brief patient-reported outcome measure that assesses general physical, mental, and social health. It includes items covering overall health, quality of life, physical health, mental health, social roles, and symptom burden. Scoring is based on responses to a set of items (typically 4 or 10), each using a 5-point scale. Raw scores are converted to T-scores (mean = 50, SD = 10), with higher T-scores indicating better global health status.
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Aug 2025
- Study start13 Jun 2022
- Primary completion31 Dec 2023
- Study completion31 Mar 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Plantar Fasciitis of Both FeetStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Massachusetts General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 12 Weeks
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Adam S. Landsman, DPM, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Investigators
- Adam S Landsman, DPM, PhD, Principal investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07103070
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022P000291
- Acronym
- Good Feet
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Jul 2025
- Last updated
- 8 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: HIPPA compliance
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Test of Efficacy and Foot Position Alteration in Patients Wearing Good Feet Arch Supports for the Treatment of Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07103070
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Good Feet / 2022P000291
- Conditions
- Plantar Fasciitis of Both Feet, Metatarsalgia, Morton Neuroma, Hallux Valgus Deformity, Low Back Pain, Knee Pain
- Keywords
- arch supports, heel pain, metatarsalgia, plantar fasciitis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a single armed prospective case series designed to evaluate the efficacy of treating common structural-related foot ailments (i.e. plantar fasciitis, metatarsalgia, and/or hallux valgus) with a high quality non-custom made arch support. It is believed that these conditions are the result of inadequate or poorly fitted arch supports resulting in a lack of structural correction in the foot while weight bearing. Over-the-counter insoles are believed to counteract the shortcomings in foot structure that result in these painful conditions. In this study, it is proposed that changes in foot morphology can be measured quantitatively using weight bearing CT Scan (Computerized Tomography) and X-rays of the subject with and without the arch supports. Subjects will also answer questions from a validated series of questionnaires pertaining to their foot condition and generalized health and activity level.
The study is a minimal risk study, with all subjects receiving the arch supports being investigated. There is no placebo offered. Initial evaluation of all subjects will include all imaging and measurements. Collection of subjective responses will occur after 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks of treatment.
Detailed description
- Background and Significance Foot orthoses are arch supports that can be worn in the shoes, and are designed to relieve pain by providing support to various areas of the foot to eliminate or reduce excessive mechanical forces. Most commonly, these devices are used as part of the treatment protocol for a variety of common foot ailments including painful plantar fasciitis and pronation. A variety of musculoskeletal pains have been shown to be reduced, and stability in ambulation can be improved by adding arch support to the shoes. Most importantly, previous studies have demonstrated that the structure of the foot can be altered, and with that the function of the foot, when orthoses are used. Previous studies have demonstrated multiple biomechanical and clinical benefits of using foot orthoses and arch supports. These devices have been shown to alter foot positioning and forefoot pressure during walking, reducing heel and forefoot pressures, decreasing impact forces, and improving comfort. Cadaveric studies confirm that orthoses enhance ankle and subtalar joint stability, correct abnormal rotations, improve arch alignment, and increase arch height under simulated load. Clinical studies involving military personnel found that wearing arch supports significantly reduced stress fracture incidence and improved comfort. Additionally, arch supports were associated with decreased lower back pain after prolonged use. Research also indicated that orthotic devices reduce tibial internal rotation, influencing the mechanical function of proximal structures like the ankle and leg. Furthermore, orthoses positively impacted foot deformities, pain (foot, knee, hip, and back), and balance, as demonstrated by radiographic and center-of-pressure analyses, indicating overall improvements in stability and symptomatic relief. The goal of the current study is to investigate the clinical and biomechanical effects of arch-support insoles in common foot pathologies including plantar fasciitis, and metatarsalgia.
- Specific Aims and Objectives The objective of this study is to measure the structural changes that occur in the foot when wearing arch supports, and how these changes correlate with overall relief of common structural-related foot ailments; plantar fasciitis, metatarsalgia, and/or hallux valgus Specific Aim #1: Measure any changes that occur in the position and alignment of the foot bones relative to one another using weight bearing radiographs and weight bearing CT scans, with and without over-the-counter arch supports under the sole of the feet. Hypothesis: Arch supports (orthoses) will alter the positioning and alignment of the bones of the foot when standing. Any changes will be measurable in three dimensions, using both weight bearing CT scans and standard anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs. Specific Aim #2: Demonstrate if there is a correlation between symptomatic relief of painful foot conditions including plantar fasciitis and metatarsalgia pain using validated clinical scores and quality of life measures. Hypothesis: Painful foot conditions will improve when subjects wear over-the-counter arch supports on a regular basis, as demonstrated by validated subjective scoring.
- General Description of Study Design
This study is a single armed prospective case series designed to evaluate the efficacy of treating common structural-related foot ailments (i.e. plantar fasciitis, metatarsalgia, and/or hallux valgus) with a high quality non-custom made arch support. It is believed that these conditions are the result of inadequate or poorly fitted arch supports resulting in a lack of structural correction in the foot while weight bearing. Over-the-counter insoles are believed to counteract the shortcomings in foot structure that result in these painful conditions. In this study, it is proposed that changes in foot morphology can be measured quantitatively using weight bearing CT Scan (Computerized Tomography) and X-rays of the subject with and without the arch supports. Subjects will also answer questions from a validated series of questionnaires pertaining to their foot condition and generalized health and activity level.
The study is a minimal risk study, with all subjects receiving the arch supports being investigated. There is no placebo offered. Initial evaluation of all subjects will include all imaging and measurements. Collection of subjective responses will occur after 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks of treatment.
Subject Recruitment:
Subjects will be recruited from the clinicians in the Division of Podiatry under the Department of Orthopaedics. Additionally, the sponsor, Good Feet Worldwide has a trade store the MGH service area, and will allow us to promote the study at their location with an advertisement poster. Potential subjects from the trade store will be referred to our clinics for screening and, when appropriate, recruited for the study.
Potential subjects will contact the principal investigator, Dr. Adam Landsman for preliminary screening and if they are able to satisfy the basic criteria, will be invited for formal screening. If qualified, they will be enrolled to begin the study. In order to avoid any undue pressure, all potential subjects who are patients of one of the Investigators will be given the option to do any or all of the following:
- Offer patients the opportunity to take home the Consent Form, and call back if they wish to participate
- Offer to connect the patient with other health care providers to discuss participation.
All study subjects will be screened and evaluated at the Foot and Ankle Clinic at MGH Waltham. Screenings and enrollments will take place on Tuesdays and Wednesdays, during dedicated research time.
The conditions being examined here are common among all races and genders, and enrollment is open to all. There have been limitations placed on subject age, as this age group is most likely to experience the conditions being studied.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 12 Weeks
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Inclusion 1. Men or women ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 years of age 2. The subject is able and willing to comply w | – | Device: Arch supportsSubjects with foot pain who are able to wear arch supports. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Subjects will be recruited from the clinicians in the Division of Podiatry under the Department of Orthopaedics. Additionally, the sponsor, Good Feet Worldwide has a trade store the MGH service area, and will allow us to promote the study at their location with an advertisement poster. Potential subjects from the trade store will be referred to our clinics for screening and, when appropriate, recruited for the study.
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Men or women ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 years of age
- Able and willing to comply with study procedures, and a signed and dated
- Diagnosed with symptomatic hallux valgus and/or plantar fasciitis and/or metatarsalgia
- Has had foot pain for at least 30 days
- Willing and able to utilize insole when walking for 90 days
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Inability or unwillingness to comply with study procedures
- Gross asymmetry in feet, where shoe size differs by 2 or more full sizes between right and left foot
- Subject has had a CT performed within the last 30 days, for any body part.
- Prior partial or total amputation of a foot
- BMI > 35.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Arch supportsSet of 3 arch supports supplied by Good Feet | Device | Inclusion 1. Men or women ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 years of age 2. The subject is able and willing to comply w |
Primary outcome
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Pain Intensity Score
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change in symptoms and relief of pain will be quantified based on subjective completion of validated questionnaires. Scoring is based on a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity. Raw scores are converted to T-scores, standardized to a mean of 50 (average for the general population) and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores reflect more severe pain intensity.
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Pain Interference Score
Time frame: 12 weeks
PROMIS Pain Interference measures the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities. Respondents rate how much pain has interfered with their daily life over the past 7 days. Scoring uses a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater interference. Raw scores are converted to T-scores (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher T-scores represent more significant pain interference.
3 secondary outcomes
Change in foot morphology- Weightbearing X-ray
Time frame: Baseline
Change in foot morphology- Weightbearing CT scans
Time frame: Baseline
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Global Health
Time frame: 12 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Aug 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. HIPPA compliance
Related trials for Plantar Fasciitis of Both Feet
Recruiting
Video-Based Versus Physician-Led Exercise Training for Plantar Fasciitis
Plantar Fasciitis of Both Feet, Plantar Fascitis
Not yet recruiting
Baxter's Nerve Pulsed Radiofrequency Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection or Both Together as a Treatment Modality of Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis
Plantar Fasciitis, Heel Pain
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Spinal Posture, Balance, and Core Muscle Endurance in Individuals With Plantar Fasciitis
Plantar Fasciitis of Both Feet
Enrolling by invitation
Effects Of Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization as Compared With Manual Longitudinal Friction Massage in Individuals With Plantar Fasciitis.
Plantar Fasciitis of Both Feet
Recruiting
Platelet Rich Plasma for Musculoskeletal Conditions
Osteoarthritis (OA), Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Adam S Landsman, DPM, PhD principal investigator
Massachusetts General Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Plantar Fasciitis of Both Feet and Metatarsalgia, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Pain Intensity Score (time frame: 12 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Aug 2025.